Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Absolute Adriana
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Med-Hi Resolution - 200-500 K per photo
Gorgeous long-haired blond with natural breasts
100+ sets with 80-100 photos each |
Cons: |
No updates since April 2007
Most sets have the standard sequence of soft-core poses greater variety would have been a plus |
Bottom Line: |
Join for one month, she's worth it unless you insist on artificially augmented boobs. |
|
10-15-08 09:56am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
2
|
Bondage Cafe
(0)
|
|
11-29-12 01:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
3
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
My connection is a 25 Mb/sec fiber optic line. I test it regularly and generally see results in the 23-25 Mb/sec range. I'm using Safari 7.0.5 on a new Mac Pro running OSX 10.9.4. Downloads from other sites generally show speeds in the 2-5 MB/sec range which I find acceptable. On FemJoy the first GB of downloads in a day is in that range and then the rate starts dropping. This is the only site where I've seen this behavior. Some other sites will lock you out for a while if you exceed some limit. This site seems to gradually throttle down the speed. I've seen it go as low as 20 KB/sec. I'm in touch with their tech support, but no resolution yet.
I haven't tried to use FireFox till now. I just downloaded two photo zips with FireFox. FirFox doesn't report the download speed. Activity Monitor seems to be reporting speeds similar to Safari.
|
07-30-14 07:56am
|
Comment
4
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
07-25-14 07:25am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
5
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
The slow response has gone away. The site seems to be working fine now.
|
07-16-14 06:12am
|
Reply
6
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I just got this offer and rejoined. The site is really slow. Right now I'm trying to see the list of photo sets for May 2012 (month chosen at random) and after more than 5 minutes nothing has appeared.
I have a 20 MBS fiber optic internet connection and a new Mac Pro with the latest OSX and Safari. I'm frustrated. I'll post again if I get this resolved.
|
07-13-14 07:09am
|
Reply
7
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
There is a lot of content on the site. For the past two years nearly all the videos have been 1280 X 720. There are about 100 sets of that size. Most of these video sets have 2 or 3 parts. (See to full site review here.) From 2007 thru 2010 most of the sets were 640 X 480. Earlier sets are even smaller.
Overall, I suggest that you join the site for one month and judge for yourself. I think you'll find enough to make at least one month's membership worthwhile. The content if varied. I found some of the sets very attractive and others were, for me, of no interest at all.
|
12-29-12 10:02am
|
Comment
8
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
|
12-10-12 06:25pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
9
|
Jasmine Sinclair
(0)
|
|
07-29-11 06:17am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
10
|
Ken Marcus
(0)
|
|
02-16-15 01:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
Laurie Wallace
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Gorgeous full-figured blond
Variety of poses and genres |
Cons: |
Mostly small images - less than 100 K each
Photo quality of some sets is poor
No information about update frequency |
Bottom Line: |
Don't join. The best quality sets are available on other sites at higher resolution. |
|
10-15-08 10:03am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
12
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
|
01-14-14 04:58am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
13
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Reply
This is to update my previous comment. I was not locked out at 177 downloads. It seems they have occasional server interruptions that I thought was a lock-out. I've found that when I get a "Server Not Found" message, if I try again in a few minutes I'll get through. However, there is a 300 zip per day limit as stated in their terms of service and that is enforced.
|
05-23-13 03:07pm
|
Reply
14
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Horndog's Comment
The problem is still there. I joined yesterday. They say there is a daily limit of 300 zips or 20GB. I downloaded 177 zips (7GB) and found myself locked out. On the plus side many of the models are outstanding.
|
05-21-13 08:21am
|
Reply
15
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ex1am's Comment
At present, they want to charge extra for Playboy Girls after you have joined Playboy Plus. The one-time fee is quite high for a "dead" site.
|
04-22-14 11:01am
|
Reply
16
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I completely agree. When I first discovered this I asked for a refund. When that was denied, I paid the extra $10. That is the last time I've signed on to this site. I no longer visit Twistys for the same reason.
|
01-03-18 06:26am
|
Comment
17
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
|
06-11-16 11:49am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
18
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
It's been another year and I rejoined for the month. It seems they are done transferring material from the Cyber Club site. In the 11 months I was away, they have added about 500 new sets. Most of these sets include both photos and a video. All playmates from the first issue are now present including the actual gatefold image.
My only complaint is that they do not do a good job of identifying the model in a photo graph when a set includes photos of more than one model. About 1/3 of the time the set description had enough information to figure out the mode's name. The rest of the time it takes real work it identify each model.
I'm a regular. I like the models and I like the photography.
|
05-15-15 09:05pm
|
Reply
19
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
I just ended a one-month membership with Playboy Plus. I was able to do this via their on-line chat service. An email confirmation was automatically sent to me.
|
05-23-14 12:26pm
|
Reply
20
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
Well its been another 10 months. There is more content, but it seems they are still moving old material. Some of the multi-model sets now identify the models image by image, but many do not. If you like Playboy as I do, this is a worthwhile site but I wish they'd get it finished and fully organized. Nearly all the videos are now 1080p.
|
05-23-14 12:20pm
|
Reply
21
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
One day later -- It seems I was wrong about the old content. They seem to be still moving older material from CyberClub to Playboy Plus. It the past two days I've noticed about 20 sets added with much older posting dates. I've also been checking some of the videos. In some cases, about a dozen so far, I've noticed that they've posted a 1990's video that was originally a 320 X 240 QuickTime movie as a 1920 X 1080 MP4. However, the new version seems to be the same as the old with no better resolution, but a much larger file. I can understand their wanting to post the old sets, some of them are great, but the higher resolution just wastes disk space and bandwidth.
|
07-08-13 08:02pm
|
Reply
22
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
It's been about a year and I rejoined Playboy Plus. They've finished moving all the material from the CyberClub and there is a lot to see. I still have one major complaint. About 25% of their photo sets consist of solo shots of more than one model. About 25% of these identify the models in each image, but the rest leave you to guess who is who. In the CyberClub nearly all the photos were identified by model. Since most of the unidentified images came from the CyberClub, I guess they just don't care to expend the effort.
|
07-07-13 03:09pm
|
Comment
23
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
|
08-08-12 05:08am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
24
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
I just want to say that I still visit this site 2-3 times a year and the quality was excellent many years ago and continues to improve. They do a fair amount of location shooting in interesting and picturesque places. Videos have improved a lot and they now take requests. The May 2016 review is accurate, but I'd give this site a higher score.
|
07-22-16 06:45am
|
Comment
25
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
|
05-09-14 12:15pm
Replies (1)
|