| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Garden Of Eden
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
LOL! You are quite right about that roseman! Do I hear $12.95? ;)
|
03-11-07 07:50am
|
Reply
477
|
The Boss XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Yes, Maria does have a couple scenes that were added recently, both on the BigTitsCurvyAsses site and another coming soon on MomsACheater. Those are some huge boobs! I like big natural ones somewhere around a D myself, but those are out of control...and I'm guessing right up your alley. ;) And since they are recent the quality will be excellent.
|
03-09-07 03:09pm
|
Reply
478
|
Lady Suspender
(0)
|
Reply of
kazik's Reply
Thanks for the reply kazik and I am very glad you have found a site that meets your needs so well! If you ever find a site focusing on real athletic girls and/or short hair let me know! ;)
I've never heard the term BBC in that context before, but it's always good to learn something new.
Oh, and just so you know, you can edit your review for up to a week I believe if you wanted to add that extra con you mentioned. I agree with roseman that a balanced review with pros and cons helps a site more than one that could seem biased.
Thanks for the review and again for the reply!
|
03-09-07 03:04pm
|
Comment
479
|
Kylie Ireland
(0)
|
|
03-09-07 09:29am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
480
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Review
I just left a reply on another of your reviews asking for more info which I could exactly replicate here. With a score of 84, I'd really like to hear more!
|
03-09-07 09:03am
|
Reply
481
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Review
I'd really like to hear more on this site than what you provided unless you areally found it that boring. If so I'd stay clear, but to me a site with a rating of 84 means it's still pretty good.
|
03-09-07 09:01am
|
Reply
482
|
Lady Suspender
(0)
|
Reply of
kazik's Review
As another user pointed out, to get a point for a review you have to have at least one con, so I suppose you could say that's why you gave a 100 score to a site you admit had at least one issue. However, don't you think that score is a bit too high? You can't see any other site ever being better than this one? There isn't even one thing the site could do to improve? What about better quality videos? More pictures? More models?
My point is that any site can be improved and I for one don't find reviews with a perfect score useful at all. But if that's what you think, that's what you think and I will just have to assume all your porn needs are met in one place. I would love it if I could find one like that!
By the way, what does BBC mean?
|
03-09-07 08:42am
|
Reply
483
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
jbrooks's Reply
I understand where you are coming from and yes they do want at least 1 pro and 1 con. My question always is this: Do you think everyone from every niche would rate this site a 100? That's what I try to take into account, but by no means am I saying everyone should do that! Speaking for myself only, I never look at reviews that got a perfect score because I doubt everyone would be just as pleased.
All that said, the absolute LAST thing I would want is to discourage you from writing further reviews. We need as many opinions as we can get and my reviews are not "more valid" than yours. So, I say welcome and I hope to see more reviews from you in the future!
|
03-06-07 03:01pm
|
Reply
484
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
jbrooks's Review
I hate to say it, but here we go again! I am beginning to understand why someone who adores a particular site would give it a 100 and claim it had no flaws, but how can you give a 100 to a site that you yourself mention has some downsides. You mention more than one "thumbs down" aspect to the site, yet it receives a perfect score. How can this possibly be of use to other users trying to decide whether or not to join one site over another?
|
03-06-07 11:25am
|
Reply
485
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Thanks roseman and you are certainly one of my most trusted reviewers as well! As for Carrie's site, it's too bad more of the beautiful BBWs aren't doing hardcore scenes. My other favorite is Mandy Blake (of MandysPlayhouse.com and HerFirstFatGirl.com) who does some modest g/g, but would love to she her do b/g. But if we always got what we wnated, there wouldn't be much use for this site, right? ;)
|
03-06-07 11:18am
|
Comment
486
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
|
03-04-07 03:49pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
487
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I had to choose doesn't interest me since I haven't done it and all the other choices involved saying yes, but I actually do find it interesting.
|
03-04-07 09:38am
|
Reply
488
|
Vanessa Montagne
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
That is good to know and quite awesome! I think I'll definitely have to give this site a try soon. Thanks again R-man! ;)
|
02-28-07 01:49pm
|
Reply
489
|
Vanessa Montagne
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Great review roseman! And apparently a great girl. :) Too bad she's blonde, but I might be able to make an excepton! LOL! These are the types of sites I'm always on the lookout for and it's nice to know they actually do exist. Thaks man!
|
02-28-07 01:36pm
|
Reply
490
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It's a mix of things. Part of it is definitely the next door neighbor fantasy we all had as young boys and men, but I think the experience factor also counts for a lot of it. I just think women with some experience are sexier because they know what makes them feel sexy and that shows through. Some teens are ok, but most pose in ways that are boring and are trying to look sexy, which NEVER works. I used to find young ones the sexiest, but as I have gotten older the experience makes all the different and MILFs are hot!
|
02-27-07 09:03am
|
Reply
491
|
Elli Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
You are quite welcome. :)
|
02-26-07 05:46pm
|
Reply
492
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really would depend on the deal and how much I wanted to download the content. If it was something unique and I was really into it, absolutely. If it's just an ok site that's really adding restrictions under a so-called "deal of more downloads", not a chance.
|
02-26-07 11:49am
|
Reply
493
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Very true and I agree. As Khan said, interaction really is a bonus and as you said can indicate a webmaster/model really cares. That isn't to say that sites without interaction aren't good, but they are the type that I look for most times. In this case, it's a new site and under contact gives a direct email so I thought I'd give it a whirl. I never thought my simple comment would generate so much buzz, but that's why this site is pretty damn cool.:)
|
02-25-07 08:47am
|
Reply
494
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
No, you didn't sidetrack my comments at all! I just didn't want you to think I was whinning, "Poor little old me!" ;) And I agree knowing other users experiences is one reason why PU is a such great site, while you responding with thoughtful comments is another! I really appreciate it. :)
|
02-24-07 07:41pm
|
Reply
495
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks for the POV Khan and I agree with everything you said. I'm sure the example I mentioned was isolated and I think most webmistresses that didn't have any interaction would just say so when asked rather than calling me a pervert. And in most cases I would be looking for sites that specifically said interaction was part of the deal. In the case of Regan Reese, the main page gives her direct email address and seems to indicate that questions are welcome.
I think my problem is that I don't get as excited about pics or videos unless I have some level of interaction with the individual running the site even if it's very minimal (which it usually is). One girl's website I'm on refers to true interaction on adult sites as "personality porn" but ackowledges that it's pretty rare. That also makes my fetish for short haired girls pretty difficult because by the time I find pics of one they've already changed their hair.
Well, that was long winded. Thanks for the reply Khan! :)
|
02-24-07 07:02pm
|
Reply
496
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
You have no idea how scarce they actually are and I've been looking for years, so I would know! Not that I'm bitter or anything. ;)
|
02-24-07 04:10pm
|
Reply
497
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Thanks roseman! It is a new site, so perhaps I should give her the benefit of the doubt and try again. It is a shame that it's a common issue and I'm sure on some sites it's a matter of volume. However, I get the impression at a lot of sites that it's a matter of being a jerk. ;) BTW, know any nice individual sites where the girl has short hair? Sorry to ask, but I like to make sure I've tapped every resource! LOL
|
02-24-07 02:42pm
|
Comment
498
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
|
02-24-07 02:08pm
Replies (10)
|
Reply
499
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
That's great roseman! I'm a big fan of interaction on a site and wish they had a rating for that at TBP. I've encountered some really rude people in the past. On one site I emailed the person behind the site and for whom it was named asking if there was interaction with the models on the site (may have been about 8-10). I got an angry response saying that the site wasn't a dating service and that I was a pervert. It's nice to know there are webmasters out that that give a crap about members!
|
02-24-07 01:58pm
|
Reply
500
|
DVD Store
(0)
|
Reply of
LauLau's Reply
You have every right to your opinion and I wouldn't ever try to say otherwise. I'm just saying that if there's room to improve to take that into account when you leave a review. The idea is to help other members make good choices about sites and I'm not sure if your review does that. However, if you think it's a 100 then so be it and I'm glad you found a site like that! Personally, I'm still waiting for my 100. :) In any event, thanks for replying to my message!
|
02-23-07 09:16am
|
