Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High quality photography, mostly softcore approach, more erotic than the MetArt style.
-PU discounted price $19.99/month.
Occasionally MetArt will send out emails for discounted prices to one or more of their sites.
-The main attraction of this site (and the Met-Art network) is the quality of the models: these are late teens or early twenties girls who are attractive to extremely attractive. The girls are natural: almost no boob jobs. Young. Fresh. Very few tattoos or piercings.
-Zip files for each photoset. Choice of definition of low, medium, or high.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded.
If downloaded, offered a choice of low, medium or high definition.
If streamed, offered a choice of low, medium or high definition.
-Excellent download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Zip files filename includes: NameOfSite_DatePosted_SetTitle_Model'sName_Photographer'sName_FileDefinition.
So the name of the file includes all the data needed.
Cons:
-Pre-checked offer on join page for subscription to a different site.
This pre-checked offer is slightly different from the normal pre-checked offer.
Instead of using a checked box, you see a drop-down box, that states: "Yes, add 30 days of Met-Art.com for $29.99, rebilling monthly". So change that option to "No thanks, I'm not interested in this special offer".
Because there are cheaper ways to join Met-Art.com, with PU discount, or otherwise.
-I'm not a fan of their software mechanism to view the photosets online. I think it's slow and clunky. Much easier to just download the gallery as a zip file and then browse the photos. Teen Mega World has a much easier and faster system to view the photos online. Suprising, because The Life Erotic is a high-level photo site, and Teen Mega World is a bread-and-butter hardcore site.
-The site often uses low lighting for the photo sets. This is an artistic choice. But sometimes the photos are too dark.
Bottom Line:
The Life Erotic is part of the MetArt network.
As such, expect high quality photo sets.
The photo sets and videos are more erotic than MetArt's softcore approach.
I feel the photo sets and videos at The Life Erotic are basically in the softcore style.
These are very attractive models, and instead of admiring them like you would at MetArt, you
want to do naughty things to the girls (appealing to the baser instincts in the audience).
I've said this is a softcore site. But the site is actually borderline softcore/midcore.
The girls often masturbate. They can stick fingers or a dildo inside their pussy. They can use a vibrator. They can have lesbian sex with another girl. There can be a slight bondage theme. These actions go far beyond what is at MetArt.
Take Julla, for example. The set titled "My Hideaway", posted 2015-06-15. Julla is small (5'3") with short blonde hair. Cute face. Slender body. Small breasts. She's laying back on a couch, legs spread wide, her bra halfway down her
waist. It's a slow strip-tease. But instead of admiring her lovely form, you want to jump on that body and fuck her brains out. Dirty thoughts. But she is to blame. The set is softcore. There is no overt masturbation. But it does have heat.
You don't think that way looking at most MetArt sets. The MetArt girls are lovely, but semi-detached visions. So the dirty thoughts are less often. You just think how lovely and delectable the MetArt girls are.
I'm not saying all the The Life Erotic sets have this level of eroticism, but the overall approach at this site is more erotic than the MetArt photosets. That's for sure.
A short MetArt review:
Even though the models range from attractive to absolutlely stunning, the photosets are softcore, and lack heat.
The videos are mainly a waste of time. The girls may be stunning, they are naked, but the videos are boring.
I'm not saying MetArt is poor. I think it's the best site on the internet for softcore, high grade photography of nude teens. I paid for a lifetime membership to MetArt because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly subscriptions.
But there are other sites that feature high grade photography, that often have more heat or eroticism.
MetArt is a megasite
Galleries: 15,645
Videos: 1,286
Models: 3,189
The Life Erotic is smaller than MetArt, but it's still a large site:
Galleries: 1,739
Videos: 629
Models: 850
I definitely think The Life Erotic is worth at least a one-month membership, if you can find the galleries or videos that appeal to your personal taste. 1,739 galleries is a lot to examine in one month's time, so maybe you might think the site
is worth a longer subscription.
Especially if you come across one of the random offers to join at a very discounted price.
A few years ago, I found an offer to join Erotic Beauty (part of the MetArt network) for $1/month, and I've been a member of that site since that time. $1/month won't even pay for a cup of coffee at McDonald's. I went to a restaurant today,
ordered an iced tea (non-alcoholic), and they charged me $3.00. It pays to look at the prices before you order. Except some restaurants leave off the prices for some items, like non-alcoholic drinks, from the menu.
I'm giving The Life Erotic a score of 90. This is a site with high-grade photography of teen and early-twenties models who are attractive to lovely. It's a large site, with a lot of galleries and videos to browse. The style is more erotic than MetArt, but it's still softcore (or maybe midcore). You find solo female masturbation, with fingers or toys. Also lesbian
sex. But no boy-girl sex that I have found.
Minor note: The Julla photo set that I referred to: She does stick a finger inside her pussy near the end of the photo set. But this is a photo set, not a video. And I think it's more like a tease. Not masturbation. But you could call it borderline masturbation.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large number of very attractive models.
-Professionally shot videos: good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc.
-A number of the videos feature good performances by the models: they actally seem to be enjoying the sex.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec, which is about my maximum download speed.
-Download managers work. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-Choice of streaming or downloading videos.
-Can choose the file definition you want to download. But since the HD Ultra definition file size is over 1 GB, I choose a lower definition, which still looks good and doesn't take as much hard drive space.
-The videos are in English. So you can understand with the models are saying.
-Each video has a matching gallery. Each gallery is a photo shoot of the video shoot, and not a separately photographed shoot where the model is posed for the best shots possible.
-Can stream a full video, or watch selected sections of the video.
Cons:
-I think the cons are basically minor. The site does a good job of featuring massage videos with hot sex.
-Not much plot. Attractive girl gets a sensual massage, she is so turned on by the masseur that he then fucks her.
-They use the same massage room setting for all the videos: some change in plot, setting, etc., would be nice.
-The download file sizes for the 1080p or HD Ultra definition files are large: can be over 1 or 2 GB, which sucks up a lot of hard drive space. But the smaller definition file sizes are completely watchable, especially if you're watching on a 20-something-inch monitor or less.
-There is a model index with thumbnails of each model, but the models are not listed alphabetically, and the index is cumbersome to use. A simpler, alphabetical listing would be helpful.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is attractive young girls getting an erotic massage and then getting fucked.
A large number of really attractive models.
site stats:
over 360 videos
over 360 galleries (1 gallery per matching video)
There are a number of massage-themed sites out there, but FuckedHard18 is one of the better ones: because the models are attractive, and the sex is hot. It doesn't get any simpler than that.
The girls have very little tattoos or piercings. They are young: late teens, early twenties. Almost all white. Slender to slightly medium build.
Site contents are high quality videos of young, attractive girls getting a massage and then having sex.
It's one guy and one girl. Some might complain there isn't more variety: 2 girls, 2 girls and a guy, group sex, sex toys, anal action, whatever.
This is like a "clean" porn site, where you are watching a girl getting hot, and then watching the guy doing her. Simple, but effective.
Giving the site a score of 90, because I really enjoyed the site. As long as you aren't expecting extreme or dirty sex, or more variety, I think you will too. The models are very attractive, the sex can be very hot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low intro price of $9.95 first month, recurring $29.95/monthly.
-Loads of attractive models.
-Wide variety of models. You get some content of your popular porn stars, and loads other girls as
well.
-Fast download speeds. I get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout (I just got timed out. Lost my place. So this site is not as generous as some in site timeout.)
-Professionally shot videos. Good lighting, good colors, good focus, good sound control, etc.
-Lots of niches covered.
-Easy navigation. But there are so many attractive models, you get tired looking through the videos, trying to decide which to view.
-Lots of viewing options. Can stream, or download in different definitions.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Content is basically exclusive.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-The $9.95 for first month is a great bargain for a great network. But renewing at $29.95/month
makes you wonder about renewing.
-There is a pre-checked cross-sell, but it was easy to see and uncheck.
-Initial signup was a little strange. I was rejected 4 times when I tried to use a Master card to sign up. I switched to a Visa card and was accepted the first time.
-For some videos, I get the message: "A plugin is needed to display this content". Most videos will
stream, but a few don't.
-The ultra high quality video files can be large. 1.4 GB for a runtime of 32 minutes.
-The search box returns can be buggy sometimes. You enter "Mia Malkova", who has 2 videos and 2
matching photosets, and the search returns, "Your search - Mia Malkova - did not match any documents." The search box is supposed to search the entire network, not just the site you are currently logged in to.
-The default filename is a random number.
Bottom Line:
The site/network is easy to use, once you get over how many models and videos and photosets there are. It should be a real pleasure going through the high quality contents of attractive women doing dirty sex. But the sheer magnitude of the contents-strangely-almost makes it seem like work.
Sites like X-Art and Diesel Access network, while far smaller, just seem easier to use, because,
psychologically, you know there's less material. And I like or appreciate the models at X-Art and
Diesel Access network more. The videos at those sites seem more intimate, the approach is more
glamcore/heartcore. I don't mean the 21SexTury videos are gonzo. But the models at 21Sextury appear more hardcore pros, while the models at the other two sites I mentioned just seem to give a softer, more real vibe to their performances.
-The best things about this network/site: A large number of lovely models. The videos are crystal
sharp, well focused, good lighting, professionally shot, good colors.
-What is unusual, is that the accompanying photosets are really high quality. The photos are taken by professional photographers who know what they are doing. So you have high quality photos of lovely young models in sexual situations.
Most of the sites focus on a particular niche. At other networks, there might be little attempt to focus the content. But this network makes an effort to supply content specific to the theme of the site.
-Can view the photos online, or download the photoset in a zip file.
-The photoset zip files give two options: normal, and high resolution definitions. (Older photosets
might have just a normal definition zip file).
-Photosets have 100+ photos per set.
-Can stream or download the videos.
-Video runtime averages 30+ minutes per video.
Older videos give you a choice of medium or high definition for download.
Newer videos give you more choices for definition for download:
Low quality H.264
Medium quality wmv
Medium quality H.264
High quality wmv
Ultra high quality wmv
Ultra high quality H.264
-You can download the entire video, or can select partial scenes from the video for download.
-With so many sites (you get access to 39 sites), and so many models, and so many videos and photosets to examine, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. Just bite the bullet, and keep looking, and you will almost certainly find models and videos and photosets that will appeal.
The introductory price of $9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month thereafter) makes this a real bargain. I don't know why I haven't tried this site before.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Epoch is the billing company.
-Get a confirming email on signup.
-Currently a discounted price of $17.87/month.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I average 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Videos have date they were posted to the site.
-Nice selection of attractive teen models.
Cons:
-Most of the cons are basically minor.
-Thumbnails of other sites that are being advertised are present on the members pages.
-Need to un-check the pre-checked offer at signup.
-Large watermark bottom right side of videos.
-Most of the videos at the Rub A Teen site were previously posted at Tricky Masseur(TeenMegaWorld network). But Rub A Teen offers those videos in a higher definition.
The Team Skeet network focuses on teen hardcore videos. The video quality is high grade. The videos are mainly professionally shot. Good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc.
You get a choice of several definitions for both streaming and downloading.
For streaming, you can choose low, medium or high definition.
For download, you can choose 1080p, 720p, or lower definitions. They also offer a file for iPods.
You also get photosets of many of the videos. The photos are good quality. Below what you will find at major photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. But better than screen caps.
Minor nitpick: The site Innocent High features models that are supposed to be in high school. But because of the models' ages, it would be better to name them College Pros. None of the models I saw showed any innocence or hesitation about fucking and sucking their brains out.
The network has over 1,000 videos. The average runtime is between 20-30 minutes. Many of the models are real teens. Some models appear to be in their early twenties. There are a large number of very attractive young girls. So for a reduced price of $17.87/month with the PU/TBP discount, you gain access to a large number of hardcore teen videos that are professionally shot.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High end, glamor style photos of teen and early twenty models.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Access to live cams.
-Good download speeds. I usually max out my download speed of 1.3MB/sec.
-Easy site navigation. There are a lot of photosets, but it's fairly easy to look through the site to see what you like.
-Each photoset comes in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-Download managers work. I use DownThemAll, which works here.
-If you are a member, you can get a discount to other sites in the network through their upgrade option.
-Content is exclusive.
-No watermark on their photos.
-You get a large number of photographers contributing to this site. I think they are
all basically high-end glamor style shoots, with not a large variation in styles, but you get to see how different photographers use this approach.
-The models are clean. Almost no tatoos. Very little piercing.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor. If you like high-end teen softcore glamor photosets, you will probably like this site.
-No videos. Photosets only.
-A few models have more than one name. So if you want to set all their sets, you need a bit of luck to find them.
-The site advertises itself as using amateur models. I think that's misleading. You get a large number of models who have appeared at different porn sites. I think a better description would be that these are attractive young girls that you would like to see more of.
-You get a model bio for each girl, but the bio is very short, with few details.
-Site advertises "Over 10,000 Breathtaking Beauties". I doubt that. MetArt, which has
been around about 6 more years than Erotic Beauty, advertises 2,730 models, and MetArt
updates about 4-6 photosets per day, compared to 1 per day for Erotic Beauty. So Erotic Beauty might have 1,000 models at the site, or less.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 0
Number of models: hundreds+
The dimensions of the recently posted photosets:
low definition: 680 x 1024 pixels
medium definition: 1361 x 2048 pixels
high definition: 2000 x 3008 pixels or 2832 x 4256 pixels
You have to join each site separately. You can't join one, and automatically get access to another site in the network. But as cjd2004 pointed out, there is an option to join all the sites in the network at once at signup.
Erotic Beauty used to be called Metmodels. I assume they changed the name to further distinguish itself from MetArt, so people won't automatically compare the two sites to see which site offers the better value.
Erotic Beauty is actually like a smaller sister of MetArt: MetArt offers up to 6 new updates per day. Recently they have been offering around 4 updates per day. Almost all the updates are photosets, but they usually offer 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Erotic Beauty offers 1 new photoset per day. No videos at the site.
MetArt has a huge collection of models and photosets (and videos, but the videos basically have little value, because they are almost all boring, in spite of featuring lovely young models in the nude).
Erotic Beauty has a large collection of models and photosets, but much smaller than what MetArt has.
If you haven't been a member of either MetArt or Erotic Beauty, the better value is obviously MetArt, because of the greater amount of content at MetArt. But if you've already seen MetArt, and haven't seen Erotic Beauty, and if you like the MetArt content, then Erotic Beauty is definitely worth a visit, because you will find similar content in the photosets at Erotic Beauty.
Almost all the models are in their teens or early twenties. Most are Causcasian. You have a pick of attractive to lovely or gorgeous girls to look at. This is a high-end teen glamor softcore photo site. It doesn't get much better than this. MetArt, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy are some of the best in the field.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Recently, 1 video update per week for the last month. Before that, no video updates for 2 months.
-Videos are dated.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Can use download manager.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Good download speeds. I posted an earlier comment that I was getting poor download speeds through this site. But the problem cleared up. Not sure what the cause was. But I am now getting about 1.36 MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum download speed.
Cons:
-Picture sets are not dated.
-Only one size for downloaded pics: no choice of high, medium, low quality photos.
-The high quality video option is really a low-to medium quality video.
-Frame height x frame width is 720 x 1280.
-A video with a runtime of 10 minutes in WMV format takes 221 MB.
-The models in the vids are not identified by name.
Bottom Line:
This is a site with the theme: ex-girl friend. But the site doesn't really accomplish that theme. Instead, it's a mish-mash of low to medium quality vids and pics that have no unifying theme or purpose.
Currently
Videos: 101
Photosets: 109
Number of photos per photoset: from 39 to 76.
Bottom line: the site itself has little value. Almost all the videos and photosets are low-to-medium quality.
What gives the site value is the network access to the Royal Cash/Teen Mega World network. The network has a huge number of attractive Eastern
European teens, shown in hardcore videos. I think the network value would be increased if this ExGF Box site was eliminated. Because the site itself
is basically a waste of time.
I am giving the site a score of 90. That is based on the site including access to about 30 sites in the Royal Cash network. The value of the site contents by itself would be low 60s, in my opinion.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lovely young teen models.
-The videos have crystal sharp definition, good lighting, good sound control (no random, loud, extraneous background noises). Some of the older
videos have some extraneous background noises and the photography is not always sharp. But the newer videos are well shot photography.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login to the site - with the DieselAccess network.
Cons:
-The cons are minor. rearadmiral and tangub have reported problems with the site (such as poor downloading speeds occasionally), but I have not.
-They should have some posting if the Live Diesel model is late for a public show, or if the show has been cancelled. A simple notice stating
the model has been delayed, and when she might appear online. Or if the show has been cancelled, simply stating that.
-A few videos or photosets might be from years ago, but you couldn't tell it from the posting date. For example, the model Odessa is familiar from years ago. She is also known as Priscilla, Anna, Lily, Yana, Chrissy, Lusy, and Melissa. And she has appeared on more than 25 pay sites.
Anyway, in a video on 18OnlyGirls (a network site to YoungLegalPorn), Odessa states her name as Anna, not Odessa. And she says her age is 18.
She has been doing porn since 2002. The video is dated/posted as 2009-10-07. So the age she states is wrong, or the videos is from years ago.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
But the posted date is a minor problem.
-Some photosets have only one option for downloading, others have 3 options for downloading: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px.
-In the updates section, I wish they would clearly identify each set as "video" or "photo set". Instead, you have to click on the set to find whether it's a video or photos.
-The search (or listing for a model) is specific to each site only. The model Samantha, for example, shows as one set on YoungLegalPorn. You have to transfer to 18onlygirls to see that she also has a set at that site. It would be easier if a single search returns all the sets for a particular model at that network, with each site being listed with the sets for that model. Instead, you have to visit each individual site and do a search to see if the model appears at that site.
-The rearadmiral reported that he had a problem gaining access to all sites in this network even though he paid for all network sites. But that was straighten after a few email. I did not have that problem.
-Also, rearadmiral reported that he connection to the network was very slow at times. My download speed maxes out about 630 KB/s, and I did not have any problems with my download speed. But admiral has a faster connection than my own. And he was using the connection longer than I was. But rearadmiral saw sustained download speeds of less than 20 KB/sec. The Webmaster replied to rearadmiral's comments on PU, and said there was a technical problem and the problem seems to be fixed.
The Webmaster should be giving credit for responding to PU comments so fast, and with an open attitude of trying to fix those complaints.
-Bottom Line (summary):
-Web site features teen girls. Doing masturbation (1 or 2 or more girls). Doing lesbian sex (2 or more girls). Doing sex with a boy (1 or 2 girls, 1 boy). The girls are OK to very attractive.
-videos:
high quality:
width x height: 1280x720
total bitrate: 11013 kbps
802 MB/13 min 46 sec runtime
The newer videos have a high definition option, 720p, along with 480p and 360p.
The older videos from several years ago only have a standard definition option 480p.
photosets:
4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px on some photosets. But the file size for the 4000 px photoset can be 148-250 MB.
-There are live chat sessions with Diesel models that are free with a paid membership, named "Diesel Girls Live".
There are also, separately, chat sessions with other models. The chat sessions with other models can be free. There can also be a charge for the other model chat sessions, in one of two modes: a non-public mode which is open to all members who pay the fee; a separate private chat which would be a one-on-one session with yourself and the chat model.
I think the site is worth a 90. But if you have the problems that rearadmiral or tangub are having, the site is worth far less. The sites has some great looking models. The recent videos are crystal sharp. The photography is ok, showing improvement over time, but not up to standards of MetArt or MPL Studios.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy log-in.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Can download or stream videos.
-Multiple download options.
-Fairly simple navigation. The owners are working to make the entire network contents easier to view and enjoy, by redesigning the sites, adding hot links, model thumbnails for an index, simplifying the search.
-Download manager allowed-I used DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I consistently got 620-630 KB/s, which is my maximum download speed.
-Content is dated.
-Zip file for each photoset.
Cons:
-Most cons are minor.
-The system for viewing individual photos should be replaced with a simpler system where you simply click on a thumbnail of the photo you want
to view, and an enlarged photo should appear.
-The default filename for a download is a generic name, such as 305.sethigh.wmv or 141.sethigh.wmv. The default filename should be a more useful description, such as including the name of the female model, or the date the video was posted.
-There is some sharing or migration of content.
The video of Marissa at nubilegirlshd posted 2010-02-24 is the same video at beauty-angels posted 2010-12-14. Both sites are part of the Teen Mega World network. The video is the same, but the filename it is saved as is different. So you don't realize it's the same video, unless you play the files, and remember the scene.
-The file size of the photos (200+ Kb) indicates high quality. But the photographic quality is low: Any quality photo site like Met-art has much better photos.
Bottom Line:
The site features Eastern European teen models.
Many are attractive. They are clean, with few tattoos or piercings. The sex action is varied: solo, masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl. Most scenes are indoors. So the lighting is generally good, because indoor lighting is far easier to control than outdoor lighting. Because of good
lighting, the colors are good: good skin tones, good colors for foreground/background. No annoying background music.
The girls are not necessarily the most beautiful you've ever seen, the videos are not the highest quality definition or the most erotic techniques, but you get a large number of attractive models, nicely captured in good quality videos.
Multiple choices for video download:
High Quality (WMV)
Medium Quality (FLV)
Low Quality (MP4) (for Portable Devices)
The high quality WMV files are about 440 MB for a 14 minute clip, to
526 MB for 16 minute clip.
Frame width x height: 1280x720.
Total bitrate: 4224 kbps.
Videos run from about 12 minutes to about 30 minutes.
Update rate: 1 video + matching photoset every 2-6 days. Erratic update rate, but very good overall, considering other sites in the network are updated as well.
Number of videos: 130.
Number of photosets 130.
Number of photos per photoset: about 90-205.
Each photoset is a photo record of a video shoot.
Improved interface/navigation. You can now transfer from one site to the next in the network, simply by clicking on the hotlink for that site, without having to enter your login information.
You can also switch sites by clicking on the hotlink for a model's video.
This is one of the newer sites in the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network. Joining Beauty Angels directly costs $29.95/month, and gives you access to maybe 24 network sites.
Joining through Teen Mega World costs $19.95/month, and should give you access to Beauty Angels, along with 25 other network sites.
So save yourself $10 and join through Teen Mega World instead of through Beauty Angels. Beauty Angels is a fine addition to the Teen Mega World network.
Pat362 has mentioned that the content at Beauty Angels is leased, and is also found at smackmybitch and 18xgirls. So it does not make sense to join either smackmybitch or 18xgirls, when you can join the Teen Mega World network and get a lot of the content that is at the other two sites, along with access to a huge amount of additional content from the other Teen Mega World sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The best site design of this network I've seen so far.
-Nice-sized thumbnail for each model, giving you a good idea of what the model looks like. Many of the network sites have no nice-sized thumbnail of the model, so you have to play the streaming video or download the complete video before you get an idea of what the model looks like.
-Multiple viewing/downloading options:
Steaming: in low, medium, high quality
Screenshots: good sized, blurry to nice quality, to illustrate the video, could be downloaded as individual photos, but mainly useful to see what
the model looks like and to get an idea of the action.
Download options:
WMV, low, medium, high quality
MPEG
MOV
-Advertises daily updates of videos.
-No DRM
-Easy login to site.
-I don't like captcha, but this site has the easiest to read captcha that I've seen.
Search is basic but functional: search by model name returns model's videos and thumbnail of model.
Cons:
Mostly minor:
-There is a site timeout. But login is easy.
-Advertises 500+ teen porn videos. My sense is there are far less videos at the site, but since there is no simple txt listing of videos, I won't take the time and effort to count the videos.
-A high-speed connection is really helpful. A high quality 30 minute video file is about 1.3 GB. To download that file takes 2 hours 30 minutes for a download speed of 150 KB/s. I can't watch the videos in streaming, because they stutter and stop. But I believe most PU members have fast Internet connections so watching a
streaming video would be no problem.
-Search is basic: Can't search by description of model, or by type of sexual activity.
-Need to manually create your own listing for the videos you download. Files are named as 342.wmv, 201.wmv, 199.wmv. Write your own description of model, and whatever else you want to know, with the file name/number.
-Watermark-bottom right corner, larger than needed.
Bottom Line:
Excellent hardcore teen video site.
The videos are crystal clear for hardcore. Great definition, good lighting. There is actually foreplay and cuddling and kissing before the
sex in many scenes. Many of the girls are extremely attractive, and even the male teens are good-looking. Good camera work on the videos. Instead of gonzo sex, you get scenes of guys and girls making out and having sex. And during the sex, instead of just shots of 2 or more bodies banging away, you actually get to look at some lovely girls enjoying a sexual experience.
The lighting is generally ok to good. The skin color and skin tone of the models is generally ok to good.
At most of the Euro teen sites, the models are almost all small breasted, which I like. There are some models here with medium-sized or larger
breasts. But all the breasts appear natural. No fake plastic boobies, almost no tattoos on the female models, very little piercing (some belly
button or ear-rings, but that is minor). It's really nice the girls are so young and clean-looking.
Obviously not all videos are going to have good lighting and good skin tone color and good everything else, but the general level of the videos is very high for a hardcore video site.
Most of the videos are 1 boy-1 girl, which is what I prefer.
There are a few vids with 2 boys-2 girls.
I saw 1 lesbian scene.
I saw 1 female solo masturbation scene.
Models take a less gonzo style approach to sex. There is actually some tenderness and cuddling and stroking before getting down to hardcore sex. No strip tease, but a big improvement over the wham-bam-fuck-the-slut approach.
Female models don't give out with a lot of fake moans and groans. They do make some sounds expressing enjoyment and excitement, but these are more believable, natural sounds instead of the show-boaty expressions of American porn where the females start screaming: "GOD", "FUCK THAT CUNT", "OOOHHHWHEEEE!!!" as soon as the male gets within 25 1/2 inches of their body. (Slight exaggeration, possibly, or maybe not. :))
The male models are young, fresh, mainly good-looking teens. In some cases the boys look as good or better than the females.
The male actors treat the females, in general, with liking and respect.
There is little to no humiliation or abuse of the female models.
Bottom Line: This is a hardcore video site that makes a nice change of pace from gonzo sex.
I am giving the site a score of 90, because it's the one of the better hardcore video sites I've seen (not to be compared to DVD sites like VideoBox or VideosZ) treating the models with respect, affection, gentle sex, whatever.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Advertises exclusive blue ray quality high definition content
-Rocco Siffredi vintage movies are included
-Online store will sell exclusive clothes so you can dress the way Rocco Siffredi dresses (same T-shirts and caps. But this appears to be a product in the planning stage)
-At the Rocco Siffredi online store, you can buy DVDs featuring Rocco, sex toys, herbs for men and women, lingerie for women.
-Movie options:
--Streaming in low and high quality;
--Download in low and high quality.
--Also have screenshots and a trailer to illustrate the clip.
Site stats:
-Movies: 680
-DVDs: 156
-Actors: 788
-Hours: 339
Cons:
PROS (continued):
Site stats (continued):
-Total size: 307 GB
Sample stats from some of the high-definition videos:
length: 8-35 minutes
bit rate: 2147-2212 kbps
dimensions 720x400-720x480
-I would have thought the bit rate and dimensions would be much higher, because of the statement that there was blue ray quality high definition content. However, I did think the visual quality was very good on some videos
CONS:
-Watermark larger than needed, lower right corner
-Large file size of high quality video. A single file can be 500 MB or more, but this is
great video, and if you have to buy another hard drive to store these files, it's worth the money. -Because these are large files, need fast internet connection to watch high-definition streaming or to download.
-Files download as WMV format only.
-Sometimes the videos are slightly out of focus.
Bottom Line:
BOTTOM LINE:
High quality videos of some lovely, yummy models. A real treat. I'm sorry I didn't find this site in the network earlier. This is the best site in the network of 19 sites.
First video I saw at this site, the girl was really cute, the action seemed real, not acted. Video looks high definition, very good lighting, very good colors, model did not speak or understand English that well, especially with Rocco Siffredi's strong accent, but she was a love, not a porn star. It was like looking at a gorgeous high-quality met-art picture come to life, hard-core action, but not dirty, even though what the girl was doing was pure hard-core. This is the best quality hard-core video site I've seen so far, with ok to nice-looking to very attractive models, good acting, few or no fake-sounding moans and groans by the model, often no music soundtrack (which is a real plus, considering the noisy music soundtracks on porno clips).
Quality of videos varies a lot. Some videos are just ok, some are really nice to great (I'm talking about how much I like the videos, which is a subjective reaction, but there are videos here that deserve to be classics).
Some PU members rave about the great quality of the Femjoy photoshoots and videos. That is softcore. This is great quality hardcore video. Rocco could be less intrusive, but you get to watch lovely women having a sexual experience.
Some videos are erotic/artistic. This is hardcore, but with real value that is more than
just crude or dirty sex. There are good-to-very-good looking models, good-to-great quality
video, some interesting storylines/concepts for the sex.
This site deserves a 90 for itself alone, and you get a lot of additional nice material from the other sites on this network. This site is really outstanding, and I don't understand why other PU members haven't been singing its praises. I think Met-art is the best softcore site I've seen for teen glamor photos, and this is the best hardcore site I've seen so far for quality videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
-PART OF THE METART NETWORK. SO YOU CAN ASSUME THE PRODUCTION VALUES AND MODELS AND PHOTOGRAPHY/VIDEOGRAPHY ARE HIGH QUALITY.
-LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE. $7.99/MONTH. $60/YEAR.
-SOMETIMES YOU CAN SIGN UP FOR A FREE 2-DAY FULL TRIAL THROUGH A METART NETWORK SITE. HOWEVER, AFTER THE 2 DAY TRIAL, THE MEMBERSHIP RENEWS AT $19.00/MONTH, UNLESS YOU CANCEL FIRST. SO IF YOU WANT AN EXTENDED MEMBERSHIP, CANCEL THE TRIAL AND JOIN THROUGH THE PU LINK FOR A MUCH LOWER PRICE.
-YOU GET A CONFIRMING EMAIL IF YOU TAKE THE 2-DAY FREE TRIAL. THIS IS NEEDED BECAUSE YOU ARE ASSIGNED A PASSWORD BY THE SYSTEM, INSTEAD OF CHOOSING YOUR OWN. SO TO USE THE TRIAL, YOU NEED THE PASSWORD.
-SUPPORT IS 24/7, AND IS EXCELLENT.
-PHOTOS ARE IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH RESOLUTION.
-ZIP FILES FOR EACH PHOTOSET IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH DEFINITION.
-VIDEOS ARE ALSO IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH RESOLUTION.
Cons:
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-THE CONFIRMING EMAIL GIVES YOU YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD. BUT IT DOES NOT SPELL OUT THE TERMS OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP. THAT WAS SHOWN ON THE INTRO PAGES FOR YOUR JOIN PAGES. ALL THE CONFIRMING EMAIL SHOWS IS YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD AND THE SITE YOU HAVE ACCESS TO: IT DOES NOT STATE HOW LONG THE TRIAL RUNS, THE MEMBERSHIP TRIAL PRICE, OR THAT THE TRIAL TURNS INTO A MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP AT $19.00 WHEN THE TRIAL ENDS UNLESS CANCELLED.
-THE TRIAL MEMBERSHIP USES ROCKETGATE BILLER. THE NORMAL BILLERS ARE CCBILL AND EPOCH, WHICH ARE BETTER KNOWN. I'VE HAD NO PROBLEMS WITH ROCKETGATE IN THE PAST, BUT CCBILL AND EPOCH ARE EASIER TO USE, MORE FAMILIAR.
-MUCH OF THE CONTENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED ON OTHER SITES IN THE METART NETWORK.
I'M GUESSING THAT MANY OF THE PHOTOSETS WERE PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED ON METART.COM, SINCE THAT IS THE LARGEST SITE IN THE NETWORK.
BUT THERE IS ALSO SOME CONTENT FROM OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, SUCH AS THE LIFE EROTIC.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
WHENEVER A MODEL HAS UNSHAVEN PUBIC HAIR, HER CONTENT MIGHT APPEAR ON LOVE HAIRY AFTER FIRST APPEARING ON ONE OF THE METART NETWORK SISTER SITES.
I AM UNSURE IF ANY CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE TO THE LOVE HAIRY SITE.
THE ONLY WAY TO CHECK WOULD BE IF THE SITE ITSELF PUT OUT A NOTICE ON THE SITE'S CONTENT, BREAKING IT DOWN INTO EXCLUSIVE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTENT, WHICH IS PROBABLY A NEGATIVE FACTOR TO ADVERTISE.
AT MANY PORN SITES, YOU CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT THEY ADVERTISE, BECAUSE THE CLAIMS ARE EITHER OUT-OF-DATE OR OUTRIGHT LIES.
THE METART NETWORK ENJOYS A HIGHER STATUS: YOU CAN TRUST WHAT THEY WRITE, WHAT THEY ADVERTISE.
LET ME MODIFY THAT: THE SITE USES HYPERBOLE IN DESCRIBING THEIR MODELS: THE METART MODELS ARE, IN THE WORDS OF THE METART STAFF, THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN THE WORLD. THE LEVEL OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODELS IS EXTREMELY HIGH, BUT TO THINK THEIR MODELS ARE THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN THE WORLD IS JUST OVERKILL.
THE METART STAFF SPEND A LOT OF TIME TRYING TO KEEP THE METART NETWORK RUNNING AS SMOOTHLY AS POSSIBLE.
RECENTLY, THERE HAVE BEEN SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES AT THE METART NETWORK SITES: PROBLEMS LOGGING IN TO THE SITES, PROBLEMS DISPLAYING OR DOWNLOADING THE CONTENTS, ETC. BUT OVER TIME, THE NETWORK HAS BEEN ONE OF THE BETTER NETWORKS TO JOIN.
-I DON'T LIKE THE SOFTWARE MECHANISM FOR VIEWING PHOTOS ONLINE. IT'S CLUNKY, SLOW TO LOAD INDIVIDUAL PHOTOS, SLOW TO MOVE TO THE NEXT PHOTO.
MUCH EASIER TO DOWNLOAD THE ZIP FILE AND VIEW WITH A PROGRAM FROM YOUR COMPUTER.
-IRREGULAR UPDATE RATE: NEW PHOTOSET ONCE A DAY, ONCE IN 2 DAYS, ONCE IN 4 DAYS, ONCE IN 7 DAYS, ONCE IN 14 DAYS. WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
SITE THEME IS GIRLS WHO DON'T SHAVE THEIR VAGINAS COMPLETELY.
SOME PORN ADDICTS BELIEVE IN THE CURRENT STYLE OF CLEAN IS BETTER: HEALTHIER, MORE ATTRACTIVE.
OTHER PORN ADDICTS YEARN FOR THE GOLDEN DAYS, WHEN WOMEN HAD PUBIC HAIR.
IT'S A MATTER OF TASTE.
THIS IS ONE OF THE SMALLER SITES IN THE METART NETWORK.
APPARENTLY, IT STARTED IN 2017.
THE MODELS ARE MAINLY ATTRACTIVE TO VERY ATTRACTIVE.
IF YOU LIKE THE OLD-STYLE WHERE GIRLS SPORTED SOME HAIR DOWN BELOW, THEN THE SITE MIGHT BE WORTH VISITING.
SEVERAL REASONS:
-THE GIRLS ARE ATTRACTIVE TO VERY ATTRACTIVE.
-THE SITE CATERS TO AN APPRECIATION OF PUBIC HAIR.
-THE SITE STRUCTURE IS EASY TO USE. GOOD NAVIGATION, GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS.
-METART CUSTOMER SUPPORT IS ONE OF THE FINEST SUPPORT TEAMS OF ANY PORN SITE:
FAST RESPONSE, WITH AN ATTITUDE OF WANTING TO HELP THEIR CUSTOMERS.
-LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE: $7.99/MONTH, $60/YEAR.
HOWEVER, IF YOU HAVE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE METART.COM SITE, OR SOME OF THE OTHER METART NETWORK SITES,
YOU WILL COME ACROSS CONTENT YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE. WHICH WOULD BE A NEGATIVE FOR SOME PEOPLE--THEY DON'T LIKE PAYING TWICE FOR THE SAME CONTENT.
ACTUALLY, IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT, THE BEST WAY TO USE LOVE HAIRY IS TO HAVE A SEPARATE MEMBERSHIPS TO METART.COM AND LOVEHAIRY.COM.
THEN, IF YOU FIND A MODEL YOU LIKE, YOU CAN PROBABLY FIND MUCH MORE OF HER CONTENT AT METART.COM.
THAT'S BECAUSE SEARCHING THROUGH THE VAST COLLECTION OF MODELS OR PHOTOSETS AT METART.COM CAN BE AN EXHAUSTING EXPERIENCE. I JUST DON'T HAVE THE ENERGY FOR IT ANY MORE.
GIVE ME THE GOOD STUFF, WITHOUT ALL THE FILLERS (CONTENT I DON'T APPRECIATE OR THINK IT'S A WASTE OF TIME).
BUT IF YOU HAVE THE TIME, YOU CAN DO THE SEARCHES AT METART: WHICH HAS A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF CONTENT FROM ABOUT 20 YEARS OF STEADY GROWTH OF PHOTOSETS AND VIDEOS.
THE METART STATISTICS (FOR THE METART.COM SITE): AS OF 2017-09-24
MODELS: 3,404
PHOTOSETS: 17,579
VIDEOS: 1,431
CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS: 277
THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT AT METART.COM, PLUS THE EASY NAVIGATION DESIGN, PLUS THE OUTSTANDING CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPPORT, PLUS THE OUTSTANDING ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODELS, MAKE THIS THE FINEST SOFTCORE NUDE SITE ON THE INTERNET. WHICH IS WHY I PAID FOR A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP TO THE SITE.
HOWEVER, THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT IS OVERWHELMING. METART.COM COULD BE SPLIT INTO 5 OR 6 SEPARATE PORN SITES, AND THEY WOULD ALL BE WORTH JOINING.
GETTING BACK TO LOVE HAIRY: IT HAS A SURPRISING AMOUNT OF CONTENT, CONSIDERING IT'S A NEW SITE THAT STARTED IN 2017. BUT THEY ARE BUILDING THE SITE WITH CONTENT FROM THE OTHER METART NETWORK SITES.
NUMBER OF PHOTOSETS: 355
NUMBER OF VIDEOS: 128
THIS IS MORE OF A PHOTO SITE THAN A VIDEO SITE.
HOWEVER, THE VIDEOS ARE OFTEN MORE EROTIC, MORE HARDCORE, THAN THE STANDARD METART.COM VIDEOS, BECAUSE THEY ARE TAKING THE VIDEOS FROM THE METART NETWORK SISTER SITES, WHICH FEATURE A HARDER APPROACH TO SEX AND EXPLICITNESS: IN MANY OF THESE VIDEOS, YOU MIGHT SEE ACTUAL MASTURBATION, LESBIAN LOVEMAKING, OR -- WHAT IS FORBIDDEN IN THE METART.COM SITE, A MAN APPEARING IN THE VIDEO HAVING SEX WITH A WOMAN. (MEN ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE METART.COM SITE).
BOTTOM LINE CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION:
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted membership of $17.95/month (recurring).
-483 Updates. This is one of the larger sites in the Porn Pros network.
-You get access to the basic Porn Pros network with membership. (Access to the premium sites costs a one-time fee of $69.95).
-A wide variety of niches served by the 22 sites in the basic network.
-Navigation is basic, but easy.
-A large number of mostly attractive, white teen models engaging in hardcore sex.
-Videos are good quality: professionally shot: good lighting, good camera-work, good sound control, sets are not cheap (but not expensive, either).
-Unlimited downloading.
-Unlimited streaming.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor.
-Cross-sale on join page. Note: even if you uncheck the cross-sale box, you might still be charged the cross-sale membership fee. If you are charged, make sure you contact the biller to dispute the fee.
-Nag screen each time you log in to upgrade to premium status for $69.95.
-Have to check a box each time you log in to verify you are not a robot.
-There is a variation of the box-to-check to prove you are not a robot: You may have to check all the boxes in a visual where there is a street sign, to prove you are not a robot. This is the only paysite I can remember where I have to prove I'm not a robot, after I've already paid for my membership, each time I log in.
-Some ads on each page for cross-sales to other paysites. And an ad to upgrade to premium status.
-Slow, irregular update rate for the site. However, the basic network gets 2 or 3 new videos per week.
-Although the models are mainly attractive young teens, I've been spoiled by the glamcore sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Sometimes the videos stop steaming.
-Sometimes the photo sets fail to load.
BOTTOM LINE:
This is the current list of sites listed at the "Sites" page:
THE NUMBER OF NAMES IS 17
Here are the sorted names.
Before the glamcore sites like X-Art, Blacked, and Tushy came out, the Porn Pros network was an excellent site:
It had a large number of attractive teen models who were engaging in hardcore teen sex. The quality of the videos was excellent for the time.
However, since X-Art, Blacked and Tushy started publishing videos and photosets where the same girls (and other attractive teen models) are showcased, the Porn Pros network suffers in comparison:
The glamcore models are presented to showcase their glamor and attractiveness: High quality, professional lighting, expensive costumes, expensive or upgraded sets, use of professional photographers that strive to make the models as attractive and glowing as possible.
So the same models at Porn Pros just don't look as good.
The porn pros network has the advantage of massive content compared to the glamcore sites.
But the glamcore sites present the models like starlets in a movie with sex. (Except that a movie with sex would have a better plot and better acting). The glamcore sites try to add a tiny plot line, to give the sex more meaning. And the glamcore sites try to add different factors: a sensual element, kisses, interaction between the stunt cock and the model beyond gonzo sex, etc.
Porn pros does give value. But it's a question of what you want to pay for:
A glamcore site, where the models look glamourous.
Or a hardcore teen network, where the models are attractive, but it's missing the glamourous approach.
There are some minor negatives to the network. But it's basically easy to navigate-except for the missing sites. There is a huge number of attractive models featured in hardcore scenes. Download speeds are good, 3-4 MB/sec.
Most videos offer a choice of definition for download: 480p, 720p, 1080p.
You can stream the videos in standard or HD definition.
The network has minor glitches:
--Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error.
--Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states:
Forbidden. We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
-The request to verify you are not a robot, before you can log in to the site.
-The ads you have to ignore, when browsing the pages. You paid for a membership, so why can't you enjoy the site without a bunch of ads? Because they want the rest of your money.
In spite of the minor annoyances, the network does give good value. But it's a question of where you want to spend your money: there are plenty of sites that give good value for your money, and it's difficult to find the best sites to join.
Which is not the worst problem in the world.
With a little searching, you can find porn sites that are a worthwhile join.
Porn Pros would have been an amazing site back in the 1970s or 1980s.
In 2016, it's a good site, worth joining, but not the outstanding value it would have been many years ago.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join the site directly, you pay $30/month.
Join through Porn Masterminds, you pay $17.95 (with PU discount), recurring at $29.95/month, and that gives full access to New Girl POV.
-CCBill and Epoch are the billers, both trusted names.
-Site membership gives access to the Porn Mastermind network.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Only 15 models. But the models are cute teens.
-The models are American. So the dialog is in English. This gives a chance to gain a slight flavor of the girl's personality, because there is a small interview at the start of each video.
-You can stream or download each video.
-You can stream or download the full video, or select the clips you want to watch or download.
-Good download speeds. I average about 4 MB/sec at this site. My maximum download speed is 6 MB/sec. So it's not the fastest site for downloading, but a good speed for me.
Cons:
-Small site.
-Only 15 models at the site.
-Navigation is archaic. Even though this is a tiny site, trying to see all the parts of the site is frustrating. Even though there are only a small amount of contents, the layout is confusing.
-This is an archive site. No updating.
-The most recent update appears to be in 2015. Which is the same year the site was started.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The pre-checked cross-sale is interesting. It offers a free, 3-day trial to a pornsite. But the free trial turns into an expensive, $39.89/month subscription if you don't cancel on time.
-The videos offer a distorted view. I don't know if this is because the video is meant to be viewed in a virtual reality viewer. The videos are not labelled as virtual reality. But the walls and furnishings of the set are curved, instead of shown as straight lines that they are in reality. It's similar to viewing a virtual reality video without the virtual reality headgear.
Bottom Line:
-The Best Porn (parent site of Porn Users) has a review of New Girl POV that was submitted on 2015-09-29. The review has not been updated. That review has an error.
The Best Porn review states that there are 13+ galleries, and that the galleries avg. 1024 pics each.
Actually, the galleries are much smaller.
The Best Porn review assumed that the average gallery has 1024 pics because the site names each zip file for the gallery as 1024 in the filename of the zip download--so the TBP reviewer assumed that each gallery had 1024 pics.
The 1024 actually refers to the width of each photograph in pixels.
The photos are: width x height: 1024 pixels x 1536 pixels.
No big thing. But don't expect the site to have large photosets. The photosets are good quality, of cute girls, but it's not a photo site like MetArt or MPL Studios where you get ultra-high professional galleries. What you do get are nice galleries of cute models where the gallery is basically a photoshoot record of the video that was shot.
The galleries I checked range from 15 to 139 pics in a photoset.
I could not find a gallery for the model Nina. All the other models I checked have a photo gallery.
-One confusing element about the site:
For each full-length video, there are two hot links for downloading:
One hot link is labelled "HD streaming".
The other hot link is labelled "HD MP4 1080p".
As I wrote, these are the hot links for downloading the video--not for streaming the video.
The hot link for streaming the video is labelled "HD streaming" (under the 'watch movie' label).
When you use the "HD streaming" hot link to download the movie, you get an MP4 file that is HD 1080p.
When you use the "HD MP4 1080p" hot link to download the movie, you get an identical MP4 file that is HD 1080 p, with the same file name, same file size, same everything.
So why have two hot links that download the same, identical file?
If this was a stand-alone site, because of the small amount of contents (15 videos), and because the site is not updating, I would give a score in the 60s. However, you do get access to the Porn Mastermind network, which has has some nice sites, with very good, professional videos of hot teen models that range from attractive to extremely attractive, with a lot of good sex.
So I am giving the site a score of 89, based on the network access.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice, clean site design that makes the site easy to use.
-A large selection of attractive models.
-Random updates from other sites.
-Large thumbnails of most models.
-You can download a full video, or selected clips from that video.
-Can also watch the video streaming.
-Good download speeds. I got over 4 MB/sec with DownThemAll.
-Professionally shot videos: good definition, good sound control, good focus, good lighting, etc.
-CCBill is the payment processor, a trusted name.
-Easy login. On my first login, I had to enter username, password, and captcha. On second login, I just hit the member login link, and didn't have to enter anything else. I was automatically entered into the site.
-PU discount of $17.95 for first month.
Cons:
-Captcha required for first login.
-Not sure about update frequency. Apparently, the site does not have exclusive regular updates for the site itself, but uses updates from other sites.
-Many videos download with generic filename. Need to rename the download file to know what it is.
-Can uncheck pre-checked sales offer. But this is the first one I've seen that gives three-day access for free. The free trial turns into an expensive subscription after the three days, if not cancelled. But you get three days for free. So it's worth trying.
-Navigation could be improved if they offered an alphabetical thumbnail listing of their models. Some models in their videos don't even have a name.
-No information about the models, except for their site name.
Bottom Line:
The site has a large number of hardcore videos of attractive young models. Many of the videos are from partner sites.
All of the videos I saw were professionally shot, with good lighting, camera-work, etc.
The models are uniformly attractive, from very attractive to lovely to just breathtaking. Some of the models are actual movie stars, with nude clips from their theatrical movies.
Bottom line:
The four main sites you have access to with a membership (listed above) make this a worthwhile membership. Plus you also get access to a random selection of videos from the partner sites, that give you a flavor of what those sites offer.
Because of the wide selection of site offerings, you get some tease, light hardcore, heavy hardcore.
If you like good quality videos of late teen, early twenties models, this site offers good value for the money.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limit.
-Content is dated.
-4 format choices for each video download: WMV, MKV, FLV, MP4.
-The models are Eastern European, but there are English subtitles.
-There are a number of attractive models at this site, which is part of the teen mega world network (also called the royal cash network or the s&s royal limited network).
-The search engine is integrated with the entire network, so if you find a model you like, by entering her name, you will see all the videos she is in(at the entire network), and can transfer to each video through a hot link. The software team has upgraded the search and made it much easier to use.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Choice of downloading or streaming videos.
Cons:
-Small site. Started January 2011. Only 25 videos (and matching photosets).
-Each video follows the same basic plot: stunt cock stimulates the model until she squirts, then he continues stimulation and fucks her semi-roughly. Not full-blown roughness, but the sex is not gentle or loving or affectionate. The stunt cocks are treating the girls like a piece of meat, but the girls all seem to lap it up.
-Navigation is good, but could be improved. Put a hot link at each model's listing, to make it easier to search for content with that model.
Bottom Line:
The basic setup is a guy stimulates a girl, with a vibrator, a dildo, his fingers, his mouth, or some combination, the girl gets so excited she
squirts out her sexual juices, then the guy fucks the girl in different positions before finally coming on her face. The site has a strong bondage
element: the girl is usually tied, and a cloth or rubber piece is stuck in her mouth. Also, by doing the girl on a chair, or on the floor, or in some other uncomfortable position, the stunt cock is demonstrating his mastery of the bitch getting fucked. The girls moan and groan and whimper as their face is pressed against a wood floor and the stunt cock reams their vagina, ass, and mouth. The girls are real love slaves.
Some girls sound so fake with the moans and screams that it's a turnoff. But some girls are better actors and sound like they are sexually excited.
Squirting is not my fetish. To me, it looks like the girls are peeing when they squirt, which I don't find erotic. It would be smelly as hell having sex with a girl who has just peed all over herself.
But if you are able to think of the squirting as a sign the bitch is in heat, and so excited by the masterful stunt cock, then you could enjoy the action even more by the squirting, the whimpers and moans, the bondage and whatnot.
Number of videos at site: 25
Video runtime: 25-30 minutes.
Download options for videos:
High Quality (WMV)
Medium Quality (MKV)
Medium Quality (FLV)
Low Quality (MP4)
The high quality WMV files are about 958 MB for a 28 minute clip.
Frame width x height: 1280x720.
Total bitrate: 4736 kbps
The technical quality of the videos is excellent: very high definition, good lighting (made easy because these are indoor scenes); the camera is
steady, not jerked around; good framing of the model before and during the sex action. The colors are good (because of the good lighting).
The dialog and script are stupid. But the girls are attractive, and there is solid sex action in the videos.
Update rate: when the site started in January 2011, they updated with 1 video each day. By the end of January and continuing through March, they updated 1 video every 5-8 days.
Number of photosets at site: 25 (same number as the videos).
Each photoset is a video capture of a video shoot. The photos are basically screen captures. So the photo quality is not high. The photos don't appear to be photoshopped or airbrushed. They can be slightly out of focus. Each photoset has a zip file.
Number of photos per photoset: 200+
Individual photos are about 100 KB in size, 1280x720 pixels, 300x300 dpi.
Squirting virgin is the newest offering at the teen mega world network. Joining teen mega world gives access to 27 teen sites. A huge number of hardcore videos.
I'm giving the site a score of 89. You are paying for network access. Scoring the site as a stand-
alone would give a much lower score.
The network access is a bargain at $19.95/month.
See Reply #1 for $10 price saving.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-XXX Shades is part of the LetsDoeIt network. The site and network feature attractive European models in glamcore settings.
-As part of the LetsDoeIt network, you get access to over 40 different sites. The sites are mainly glamcore, and the models are not just attractive, but are presented with special care to appear like movie stars.
-You stream and/or download the videos in a variety of definitions: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Login and member pages are https. So the pages are secure from hacking.
-There is a hot link in each video that lets you skip the intro of the video (which is advertising for the site).
-You have a model index, a network site index, and a search function.
The model index has nice-sized thumbnails for each model.
-The videos at the site and network are exclusive. Except that you can find many of them on tube sites, so the idea of exclusive no longer means what it used to mean.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Standard for porn sites, unfortunately.
-Each video comes with a tiny photoset (6 to 15 photos per set). The models deserve a full photoset of at least 50 to 100 photos per set.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
-But since the photosets are so tiny, they are hardly worth collecting. Except as a visual reminder of what the videos are like.
-It's a small site (only 146 videos currently), so you can manually examine the entire site.
Bottom Line:
The videos are a mix of glamcore in a variety of niches: blowjobs, lesbian, boy-girl, etc.
The site title refers to the novels and films in the 50 Shades of Grey series.
So the site videos feature erotic romantic videos.
The production values are high, and the models are uniformly attractive to gorgeous.
The videos feature boy-girl, girl-girl, threesomes. The 50 Shades of Grey series featured a slightly harder BDSM flavor than the videos at XXX Shades site: the models (male and female) wear nice costumes or underwear, but there is very little BDSM in the videos: the action is more heartcore, where the male tries to pleasure the female with sex, instead of inflicting pain to arouse her. So there's lots of kissing, stroking, cunnilingus, blowjob, vaginal fucking.
There is one video titled "50 Shades Of Submission", which is based on the 50 Shades of Grey series, where the model, Arya Fae, plays a submissive who is mouth-fucked, spanked, choked, fucked strongly, which is the closest the site comes to the 50 Shades of Grey movies.
The video titled "Freaky Threeway" is a hoot.
It features a man, a cute girlfriend, and a sex doll.
The man bugs his girlfriend that he wants a threeway sex, but the girlfriend is jealous and doesn't want to share. So then she comes up with the idea of giving her boyfriend three-way sex, but with a blonde sex doll, instead of a live person.
The boyfriend seems overjoyed, and a bit slow, because he's banging away on the sex doll, saying how great it is, until he tries to put his dick in the sex doll's mouth, and the doll's mouth won't open.
That's when he realizes it's a sex doll, not a real person.
The girlfriend has a laugh, and explains that's the only way he will have a three-way with her involved.
The man slowly accepts the sex doll as a real partner, he fucks the live girl and the sex doll, and everyone ends happy.
The girlfriend is really cute, I'm not sure why the guy isn't satisfied just with her, but variety is the spice of life, and if it takes a sex doll to make everyone happy, go for it.
But, personally, I would focus more on the girlfriend, Andreina De Luxe, who is not just fine-looking, and sexy as hell, but smart and sassy as well.
Currently the site has 146 videos.
Videos have a runtime of about 20 to 35 minutes.
There is a matching photoset for each video, but the photosets are tiny: anywhere from 6 to 15 photos per video. The photos are either excellent screencaps (made from an excellent software program that converts a video to a photoset), or actual photos.
Since the models range from attractive to gorgeous, I don't know why the site (and network) posts such tiny photosets: the models deserve a full-featured photoset, because the models are lovely, and compare to the models at any fine photo site such as MetArt, MPL Studios, or Femjoy.
Since the network and site feature glamcore hardcore videos, this would be a chance for the network to satisfy a need for glamcore hardcore photosets. Sites like SexArt and The Life Erotic feature glamcore videos and photosets, but in my opinion, the models at the LetsDoeIt network are presented more attractively, and the hardcore action is hotter.
So I fail to understand why the network only offers such tiny photosets.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
My favorite site on the network is The White Boxxx, because the mix of models ranges from attractive to lovely.
The models at XXX Shades can be very attractive, but some of The White Boxxx videos are some of the best-looking glamcore videos on the internet.
And since you get full access to the LetsDoeIt network with a sub to any of the sites in the network, the real value of the network is in the 90s.
What I'm saying is: the exact value of a score for a site, or a network, is a matter of opinion.
What counts is whether a site or network's contents appeals to your tastes.
And the videos at the LetsDoeIt network are some of the best glamcore videos on the internet.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Let's Doe It network. Network used to be called PornDoePremium.
The network features attractive women from around the world, mainly from Europe.
-Although many of the models are attractive, at this network they are presented with extaordinary care to make them even more attractive, with some of them beyond gorgeous or beautiful. View some of the videos at The White Boxxx to see what I mean: these girls could be entrants in the Miss World or Miss Universe pageants. Sites like Blacked, Tushy and Vixen choose attractive models and make them look good, but if the same model appears at The White Box, she looks even better. If you enjoy gorgeous women in hardcore porn, The White Box is one of the premier sites for glamcore porn.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-Easy login if you have cookies enabled. Don't have to re-enter username and password each time you enter the site.
-Download videos in your choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Can stream videos in your choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Can also stream videos online in different speeds of 1/4 through 2x normal speed.
(Not sure how useful the different streaming speeds are for viewing: but if you want to study the video in slow motion, or fast motion, you can.)
-There is a trailer for each video.
-There is a zip file for each photoset of each video.
CONS(START OF):
-PU does not have a discounted price. Regular price is $29.95/month.
But holiday specials throughout the year can drop the price to $14.95 for the first month.
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Standard for porn sites.
-Search engine is best used for finding the content of a model.
-Zip of the photoshoot downloads with default name of photoshooting_number.zip. So you have to re-name each zip file to know who the model is, date of posting, title of set.
-Bitches Abroad is a small site (100 videos + photosets). So it's best to manually search through the thumbnails of the videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
You can explore further by playing the trailers of the videos that might be of interest.
-The photosets are tiny. Each one is from 10 to 15 photos. I have no idea why the photosets are so tiny, because these are very attractive models, and the quality of each photo is good. I can't tell if the photos are excellent screencaps or actual photos; if screencaps, they are using excellent software to make screencaps from the video. The models are generally attractive to really lovely, and they deserve a normal-sized photoset for collecting.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is young women who are travelling in foreign countries. Since they are young and sexy, there are also looking to enjoy themselves with a handsome stud they encounter. Actually, the stud doesn't have to be that handsome, because these women are in the mood for sex, and if the guy can get it up, the girls are willing. So not a lot of romance here, but the girls are attractive, and the guys are more than happy to fill their sexual desires.
There is a slight element of freshness, because these are European models, and although the plot or story might be slight, the models can be attractive to lovely.
-The White Boxxx is my favorite site in the network, but you have access to about 43 different sites, most of which have mainly European models.
Then entire network has about 2,833 HD videos, which is far more than you can watch in a single month.
The sites cover the normal niches of boy-girl, boy-2 girls, 2 girls, more than 2 girls, whatever.
The network is basically glamcore, and highlight how attractive these models are.
Bitches Abroad currently has 100 videos.
Bitches Abroad is a site with many attractive models. The videos are professionally photographed, with good lighting, camera-work, sound control, etc. The photosets are disappointing, because they are tiny (10 to 15 photos per photoset).
So Bitches Abroad is an OK site, but access to the entire Let'sDoeIt network raises the score to 88.
Except that The White Box is one of the premier glamcore sites on the internet, because of how it presents the models at their best: the models at The White Box could be contestants in any beauty contest, they are that fine-looking.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring).
-Unlimited downloads.
-Membership in any one of the TMW (Teen Mega World) sites gives you access to all the TMW sites.
-There are not premium sites that cost extra to gain access to.
-There are 30+ sites in the network, covering a variety of niches.
-Daily update to the network. But Squirting Virgin has not updated since May 30, 2011.
-User name is your email adress. And you can choose your own password.
Cons:
-The most obvious con is that this is an archive site. The last update was on May 30, 2011.
-Small site. Only 31 scenes (31 vidoes and matching photo sets).
-They recently raised the price of a year-long membership from $89.95/year to $119.40/year.
But most PU members would select the $14.95/month membership, anyway.
-The did a network re-design to make the network more attractive: brighter images for the photos.
But the network re-design made site navigation more difficult and time consuming. Details in the bottom line section.
-Vendo is the primary biller. I prefer CCBill and Epoch. But I've had many memberships paying through Vendo, and I've never had a problem with them. It's just that CCBill and Epoch are so easy to use, and reliable.
-For a short while, they required a captcha to enter the member's area. But they've dropped the captcha requirement lately.
-Sometimes some videos will not stream. You can hear the sound track, but the video visual track does not play.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: girls who are so aroused by their sexual partner that they squirt during orgasm.
Also, many of the scenes have an element of BDSM.
This is not heavy BDSM (real or fake torture), but I can believe that many of the girls are treated harshly during the sex, but at the end, they seem to enjoy it. The BDSM is not as intense as Woodman Casting, but along those lines.
Woodman does not use the same techniques as shown in the Squirting Virgin site: the Squirting Virgin scenes show the girls being tied down with ropes or thongs, gagged, a large vibrator is often used to stimulate the girl, she is slapped on the face and ass, forceful vaginal and anal sex,
I signed up for a year at $89.95/year, recurring. But the price has since been raised to $119.40.
It used to be $89.95 for many years.
This is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, for many reasons:
I like the selection of the models. They are young teens, many of them attractive to almost beautiful.
Mainly, I like the way they are presented: youthful, attractive, with a healthy appetite for sex.
There is a huge amount of hardcore content.
Over time, they upgraded the network: making the network easier to use, upgrading the sites with more expensive sets, better videos and photos, better costumes, offering the newest fads (4K video site, VR site).
The price seemed cheap, at $90/year.
They increased the yearly membership fee to $119.
Also, they did a recent network upgrade on the network structure, which makes the network harder to use.
Each site now has a model page for that specific site.
Since you have over 30 sites in the network that you have access to with a membership to any one of the sites, that means you can not use the member model page to see what her content is at any other site.
There is a partial work-around: the public preview pages have model listings for each model, which shows the sites she has conent at.
Except the public preview pages do not have hot links to her content.
So: to access her content at the network, you first have to check the public preview page model listing for the model, and note the specific sites she has content at.
And then, you have to log in to the member area of the network, and navigate to one of the specific sites the content is located at.
And then you have to bring up the model's page, where you will find hot links to her content at that specific site.
And if you want to see her content at another site, you have to navigate to that site, and again, bring up her model page with the hot links to her content.
This is a step back from the previous structure where a single model page inside the network showed you her content at the network, with hot links to all of her content at the different sites.
The software designer was not thinking of keeping the navigation easy and simple: The designer made a poor choice, and made using the network much harder and more time-consuming to find the models' contents.
Also, to switch between sites, you can't use a simple drop-down menu, but have to navigate to a page listing all the network sites, and select the site you want to enter.
The only good part of this design is that you don't have to re-enter your login details each time you want to switch between sites: your login details (username and password) are the same for each site).
It used to be that you had long time before you were logged out of the site for inactivity.
But now you are sometimes logged out for inactivity in a much shorter time frame.
I'm giving the site/network a score of 88.
This is because of network access to 30+ sites.
If I was scoring on the site itself, because it's a small site (31 videos), and does not update,
the score would be much lower.
But I just like the selection of the young models and how they seem to be enjoying the sex.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The recent update rate is one video per month for the site. However, the network updates daily.
-Beginning in September 2016, the updated videos were offered in Ultra HD (2160p), as well as lower definitions of 405p, 540p, 720p, 1080p) for downloading.
-$14.95/month, recurring with PU discount.
-Can choose your own username and password on joining.
-New files have better file names. Instead of generic file numbers for the name, new files now use the system: SiteName_FileNumber_ModelName_Definition.mp4: TrickyMasseur_241_Lolly_Small_1280x720.mp4.
Cons:
-Non-secure login page.
-I only see one definition for streaming. Many sites offer you a choice to stream videos in different definitions.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-FX Billing EU Ltd seems to be the default biller. I prefer CCBill or Epoch or Segpay, if possible.
-Captcha required to enter the site. Also, sometimes, you need to select proper images of a captcha to enter the site--and this can be a hassle, because the proper images are hard to detect.
Also, transferring between sites, because of the captcha, is not as easy as it used to be: You sometimes have to re-enter your username and password to switch between sites, which was not required until lately--and if the captca images pop up, you can be blocked from entering, because of the difficulty of guessing the right images.
-The yearly membership price was raised from $89.95 to $119.40.
I've been a yearly member at $89.95 for several times. But a jump to $119.40 will make me hesitate to rejoin.
Bottom Line:
Tricky Masseur started in 2010.
The massage theme was a teen girl getting a sensuous massage that leads to sex.
This theme has been done by several sites, and many of them do a good job with the theme: I think it's a concept that makes sense, and is easy to film. Tricky Masseur is one of the better massage-themed sites:
-Most of the models are young, attractive teens.
-The girls seem to be hot, and appear to enjoy the sex.
-I can't think of anything better than a young, attractive teen who is getting a hot fuck.
Most of the videos at Tricky Masseur are also featured at competing porn sites: Rub A Teen (Team Skeet network), All Fine Girls (Diesel Access network), 18X Girls. So if you've been a member at those porn sites, you've probably seen most of the Tricky Masseur videos.
However, the videos were first posted at Tricky Masseur, before being posted at the competing porn sites (as a matter of historical fact; but what counts is that the Tricky Masseur videos are posted at different websites).
So if you are collector, you probably have most of the Tricky Masseur videos already.
Especially since the update rate is about 1 new video per month.
But if you haven't seen most of the Tricky Masseur videos, I highly recommend the site:
Because, as I said:
-Most of the girls are young teens who are physically attractive;
-The sex can be hot-the girls seem to get into the action and enjoy themselves.
-The slight plot (masseur turning a girl on and having sex with her) is simple, but effective, and makes more sense than most porn plots.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
That's because, in addition to the site itself, you get access to the rest of the Teen Mega World network, which has 41 sites in different niches.
The network works on improving itself: In recent years, they are spending money on more expensive sets, improved lighting, more professional shoots, better photosets.
They added a VR site to the network in 2016.
They started offering Ultra HD (2160p) definition videos in 2015.
They have one site dedicated to Ultra HD, Beauty 4K, but the network also produces Ultra HD videos for the other sites in their recent offerings.
I'm giving the site and network a score of 88.
If they got rid of the capcha requirement, and lowered the yearly membership fee back to $90, I would give the site/network a few more points.
But most PU members would opt for the $14.95/month membership anyway.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE.
-PART OF THE TEEN MEGA WORLD (TMW) NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK.
-PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95/MONTH (RECURRING). A VERY LOW PRICE FOR ACCESS TO SUCH A MAJOR NETWORK.
-TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK CURRENTLY HAS 42 SITES.
-THERE ARE ABOUT 1,096 MODELS (MANY OF THEM HAVE RETIRED) AT THE NETWORK.
-MANY OF THE MODELS WERE TEENS WHEN THEIR VIDEOS WERE SHOT. MANY OF THEM WERE VERY ATTRACTIVE.
-YOU HAVE A LINK AT EACH MODEL'S PAGE TO SEND HER A PRIVATE MESSAGE. EVEN THE ONES THAT RETIRED YEARS AGO. WHAT OTHER NETWORK GIVES YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEND A PRIVATE MESSAGE TO THE PORN GIRL OF YOUR WET DREAMS?
HUNDREDS OF THESE GIRLS ARE WAITING FOR ME TO CONTACT THEM WITH MY DIRTY DESIRES. WHEN I GET THEIR RESPONSES, I WILL BE SURE TO OPEN A THREAD AT PU, TELLING MY FELLOW PU MEMBERS ABOUT MY EROTIC TRAVELS IN RUSSIA.
Cons:
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-THE BEST PORN REPORTS THAT ALL CONTENT AT TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK IS 100% EXCLUSIVE.
THAT'S NOT ENTIRELY TRUE.
THE TRICKY MASSEUR SITE (OF TMW) HAS MOST OF ITS VIDEOS POSTED AT DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK, AND ALSO AT TEAM SKEET NETWORK (THE RUB A TEEN SITE), AS WELL AS OTHER PORN SITES.
THERE ARE OTHER VIDEOS AT TMW THAT ARE ALSO POSTED AT COMPETING PORN SITES, SUCH AS 18XGIRLS.COM AND EXCLUSIVE TEEN PORN.
-ONLY ONE DEFINITION FOR STREAMING A VIDEO. THIS WOULD BE IMPORTANT IF YOU HAVE A LARGE-SCREEN MONITOR. HOWEVER, YOU COULD DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO, AND STREAM THE DOWNLOADED FILE.
-FILES DOWNLOAD WITH A NUMBERED FILENAME. SO YOU HAVE TO MANUALLY RE-NAME THE FILES FOR THE MODEL, SITE, DATE POSTED.
-OLDER VIDEOS MIGHT HAVE 405P, 540P, 720P DEFINITIONS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD.
THE NEWER VIDEOS HAVE 1080P, 2160P (UHD).
-MOST OF THE MODELS ARE EAST EUROPEAN, PROBABLY FROM RUSSIA. SO THEY SPEAK IN RUSSIAN.
Bottom Line:
-THIS IS A WELL-ORGANIZED AND WELL-STRUCTURED SITE AND NETWORK.
-THE MODEL LISTING IS COMPLETE: A NICE-SIZED THUMBNAIL GIVES YOU A PICTURE OF THE MODEL, WITH LINKS TO HER VIDEOS AT THE DIFFERENT SITES.
-TMW STARTED OFF AS A LOW-RENT, HARDCORE TEEN NETWORK. THE VIDEOS WERE CHEAPLY MADE: POOR LIGHTING, CHEAP SETTINGS (A ROOM IN AN APARTMENT THAT LOOKED LIKE A DUMP), CHEAP COSTUMES, STRAIGHT HARD-CORE SEX.
OVER TIME, AS THE NETWORK EXPANDED WITH MORE SITES, THEY STARTED UPGRADING THE NETWORK:
BETTER COSTUMES, BETTER SETTINGS, BETTER VIDEOS, BETTER EVERYTHING.
TODAY, THE VIDEOS OFFER THE SAME OR BETTER QUALITY AS MOST HARDCORE PORN SITES: NOT THE GLAMOUR SITES WHICH SPECIALIZE IN HIGH-GRADE PORN (X-ART, BLACKED, TUSHY, VIXEN), BUT CLOSE TO THOSE SITES IN THE QUALITY OF THE TEEN MEGA WORLD VIDEOS.
TMW NOW OFFERS THEIR NEWEST VIDEOS IN DEFINITIONS UP TO UHD(2160p).
IT USED TO BE THAT DIESEL ACCESS AND TEAM SKEET, WHEN THEY OFFERED THE SAME VIDEOS THAT WERE POSTED AT TMW, OFFERED THE VIDEOS AT HIGHER RESOLUTION (AND BETTER COLORS) THAN TMW.
TODAY, TMW OFFERS AS HIGH OR HIGHER RESOLUTION VIDEOS THAN DIESEL ACCESS AND TEAM SKEET.
TMW ALSO UPGRADED THE NETWORK EASE OF USE:
ONE LOGIN TO A SITE IS ALL THAT IS NEEDED: YOU SWITCH BETWEEN SITES BY CLICKING ON A LINK, WITHOUT HAVING TO RE-ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS.
OR-IF YOU ARE SELECTING A PARTICULAR MODEL'S VIDEOS, YOU CLICK ON HER LINKS, WITHOUT WORRYING WHICH SITE HER VIDEOS ARE POSTED AT.
DOWNLOAD DEFINITIONS (FOR NEWER VIDEOS): 405P, 540P, 720P, 1080P, 2160P (UHD).
THE 720P IS FINE FOR ME: THE HIGHER DEFINITIONS INCREASE THE FILE SIZE, AND THE 720P IS AN EXCELLENT VIDEO ON MY 27" MONITOR.
THE LEVEL OF ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE TEEN MODELS IS VERY GOOD. SOME OF THE MODELS ARE LOVELY, AND MOST OF THE REST ARE JUST GOOD-LOOKING TEENAGERS.
MOST MODELS SEEM TO BE ENJOYING THE SEX.
THERE IS SOME ROUGH STUFF, BUT THE SITE/NETWORK IS NOT HEAVILY INTO BONDAGE, HARSH SLAPPING, SPITTING, NAME CALLING, DEGRADING SEX.
IT'S NOT MAINLY GLAMCORE OR HEARTCORE, BUT IT'S MAINLY HEALTHY YOUNG TEENS HAVING SEX AND ENJOYING IT.
YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS.
I ONLY SEE ONE DEFINITION FOR STREAMING. WHICH IS SURPRISING. BECAUSE MANY COMPETING PORN SITES OFFER A CHOICE OF WHICH DEFINITION TO STREAM. I BELIEVE THAT FORMERLY, TMW DID GIVE YOU A CHOICE FOR STREAMING DEFINITIONS. BUT THE CURRENT STREAMING CHOICE IS GOOD, IT STREAMS EASILY WITHOUT BUFFERING, AND THE VIDEO LOOKS GOOD ON THE MONITOR: GOOD CAMERA-WORK, GOOD LIGHTING, NICE COLORS, NICE SETTING, ETC.
ONE NITPICK IS THAT THE VIDEO IMAGE SOMETIMES PIXELATES INTO BLOCKS OF COLORS. BUT THIS IS A VERY SHORT-TERM PROBLEM.
ANOTHER NITPICK IS THAT THE TOP EDGE OF THE STREAMING VIDEO WAVERS, INSTEAD OF PRESENTING A SMOOTH LINE.
I DON'T HAVE EITHER OF THOSE PROBLEMS WHEN PLAYING VIDEOS FROM COMPETING PORN SITES.
THE NETWORK UPDATES WITH ONE VIDEO DAILY.
THE NETWORK OFFERS A VR (VIRTUAL REALITY) SITE. YOU CAN WATCH THE VR VIDEOS WITHOUT VR EQUIPMENT, WHICH IS A BONUS, BECAUSE MANY PU MEMBERS DON'T HAVE VR EQUIPMENT.
OLD-N-YOUNG HAS AN ERRATIC UPDATE SCHEDULE:
THERE WERE UPDATES IN 2008 AND 2009, THEN ONE UPDATE IN 2014, THEN UPDATES IN 2015, THEN UPDATES IN 2017. SO THE SITE IS CURRENTLY UPDATING.
THE SITE HAS 94 VIDEOS (AND MATCHING PHOTOSETS).
THE NEWEST VIDEOS HAVE 405P, 540P, 720P, 1080P, 2160P (UHD).
THE OLDEST VIDEOS HAVE 405P THRU 1080P.
I ASSUME THAT THE SITE ADDED THE 1080P VERSION WHILE UPGRADING THE ENTIRE NETWORK, BECAUSE THE ORGINAL SITE YEARS AGO ONLY HAD THE 405P AND 540P VERSIONS, AND MAYBE THE 720P VERSION.
IF YOU COMPARE THE OLDEST VIDEOS AT OLD-N-YOUNG WITH THE NEWEST VIDEOS, IT WILL GIVE YOU SOME IDEA OF THE UPGRADES AT THE SITE/NETWORK OVER THE YEARS:
THE EARLIEST VIDEOS HAD RANDOM NOISES IN THE SOUNDTRACK.
THE LIGHTING WAS OK, BUT NOT THE BETTER LIGHTING OF CURRENT VIDEOS.
THE SETS WERE CHEAP, COMPARED TO THE RECENT VIDEOS WHERE THE SETS ARE MUCH FINER AND MORE EXPENSIVE-LOOKING.
OVERALL, OLD N YOUNG IS A GOOD ADDITION TO THE TMW NETWORK. IT'S A SMALL SITE (ONLY 94 VIDEOS), BUT YOU ALSO GET ACCESS TO ALL THE TMW SITES, WHICH COVER A VARIETY OF NICHES, WITH ATTRACTIVE TEEN MODELS.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
-HOME OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, THE ITALIAN STALLION.
I'M NOT GAY. BUT LOOKING AT THE MANLY, MASCULINE FACE AND BODY OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, EVEN I AM TEMPTED TO THINK OF HARD, VIOLENT, SATISFYING SEX.
-NO LIMITS FOR STREAMING OR DOWNLOADING.
-ZIP FILES FOR PHOTO SETS.
-PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
-MEMBERSHIP IN ROCCO SIFFREDI GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, A MASSIVE COLLECTION OF HARDCORE GONZO PORN.
Cons:
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-AFTER THE FIRST MONTH PRICE OF $14.95, MEMBERSHIP RENEWS AT $29.95/MONTH (RECURRING).
-FAMEAID IS THE DEFAULT BILLING AGENT. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH, WHICH ARE DEPENDABLE, EASY TO USE AGENTS.
-SOME HOT SCENES. BUT A LOT OF SCENES ARE NOT AS GOOD. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS JUST OK.
THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, BUT IT'S DONE IN A LOOSE, ALMOST-AMATEUR STYLE OF SHOOTING:
THE LIGHTING COULD BE BETTER, THE CAMERA-PLACEMENT COULD BE BETTER, THE SETS COULD BE HIGHER QUALITY,
THE ACTION IS GONZO-STYLE, WITH NOT MUCH ATTENTION PAID TO MAKING THE GIRLS ATTRACTIVE OR STUNNING, EVEN THOUGH MANY OF THE GIRLS ARE NATURALLY ATTRACTIVE. THIS IS A FAR CRY FROM THE GLAMCORE STYLE OF X-ART, BLACKED, OR TUSHY, OR THE ALMOST-GLAMCORE STYLE OF DIESEL ACCESS, WHERE THE MODELS ARE CHOSEN FOR THEIR HIGH LEVEL OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND THE PHOTOGRAPHY, LIGHTING, AND SETS MAKE THE GIRLS SEEM PRETTY TO LOVELY.
THE CAMERA-WORK IS JUST OK.
Bottom Line:
ROCCO SIFFREDI IS A SEX GOD. HE KNOWS HOW TO TREAT WOMEN: ROUGH AND DIRTY AND BEGGING FOR MORE.
IF THE SONG "BAD TO THE BONE" WAS NOT WRITTEN ABOUT ROCCO SIFFREDI, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN.
-SOME OF THE ROCCO SIFFREDI VIDEOS ARE HOT. THE ROCCO SIFFREDI VIDEOS ARE SHOT GONZO STYLE: FORGET GLAMCORE: THIS IS THE EUROPEAN VERSION OF TREATING ATTRACTIVE WOMEN LIKE PIECES OF MEAT AND HEARING THEM SCREAM WITH PLEASURE.
EVEN THOUGH THE SEX IS ROUGH AND DIRTY, THE WOMEN ARE NOT TREATED CRUELLY: THIS IS LIKE A GLAMORIZED VERSION OF A BAD BOY HAVING DIRTY SEX WITH WOMEN WHO ENJOY BEING TREATED LIKE THE WHORES THEY WANT TO BE.
THE SEX IS NOT AS ROUGH OR VIOLENT AS WOODMAN'S EXTREME HARDCORE, WHERE THE GIRLS SEEM TO SCREAM WITH REAL PAIN, BUT SOMEHOW END UP WORSHIPPING WOODMAN FOR HIS MASTERFUL TREATMENT OF THEM.
ALSO, ROCCO IS GETTING OLDER. SO HIS SEX SCENES ARE NOT AS OVER-THE-TOP AS THEY USED TO BE.
BUT THE SITE CONTENTS COVERS OVER 20 YEARS OF ROCCO SIFFREDI MATERIAL.
IT IS NOT A COMPLETE COLLECTION OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, BUT YOU GET A NICE OVERALL VIEW OF MANY OF HIS VIDEOS AND SERIES.
MEMBERSHIP IN ROCCO SIFFREDI GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, WHICH IS OVER 20 SITES COVERING A VARIETY OF NICHES.
THERE ARE ANOTHER 20+ SITES THAT ARE MUCH SMALLER:
(SEE THE COMPLETE SITE LISTING IN THE FIRST REPLY TO THIS REVIEW.)
IF YOU'RE WILLING TO SLOG THROUGH THE LESS-INTERESTING VIDEOS TO FIND THE HOT ONES, THIS SITE DOES FEATURE SOME VIDS THAT ARE REALLY HOT.
AS I WROTE, YOU NOT ONLY GET ACCESS TO ROCCO SIFFREDI, AND 4 OTHER MAJOR HARDCORE GONZO SITES, BUT TO A LARGE COLLECTION OF NICHE SITES, AS WELL.
SO IF YOU ENJOY GONZO SEX, THIS SITE AND NETWORK OFFER A COMPELLING VALUE.
THE SITE IS EASY TO USE. SUPPORT IS SURPRISINGLY AVAILABLE.
AND YOU GET A SECURE LOGIN TO THE SITE, WHICH IS A NICE FEATURE.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
-PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH (RECURS AT $29.95/MONTH).
-MEMBERSHIP IN PETER NORTH GIVES ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK.
-THEY HAVE A NEW INTERFACE FOR FAME DIGITAL. THE INTERFACE SEEMS CLEANER THAN THE OLD ONE.
-YOU AVERAGE ONE NEW SCENE PER WEEK FOR THE SITE. THE NETWORK UPDATES DAILY.
-NO DOWNLOAD OR STREAMING LIMITS.
-NO DRM.
-CHAT IS AVAILABLE AND RESPONSIVE. I HAD A PROBLEM LOGGING IN, AND CHAT WAS AVAILABLE ALMOST IMMEDIATELY. THE CHAT OPERATOR HELPED GIVE ME SITE ACCESS, AND ANSWERED MY QUESTIONS.
-THE PROBLEM I HAD WAS THAT I COULD ENTER THE SITE, BUT THE SITE HAD A NOTICE THAT MY MEMBERSHIP WAS EXPIRED.
THE SITE DOES NOT VISIBLY SHOW YOUR USERNAME AFTER YOU LOG IN, SO I WAS UNSURE IF THE SITE SERVER LISTED MY MEMBERSHIP AS EXPIRED. THE CHAT OPERATOR TOLD ME MY MEMBERSHIP WAS LISTED AS CURRENT. AND ADVISED ME TO DELETE MY CACHE AND COOKIES. THAT SOLVED THE PROBLEM.
Cons:
-CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR. IF YOU ARE AWARE OF WHAT THE SITE AND NETWORK OFFERS.
THE SITE (AND NETWORK) OFFERS HARDCORE GONZO SEX. DO NOT EXPECT HIGH-GRADE GLAMCORE, OR THE HIGH GRADE HARDCORE YOU WOULD FIND AT DIESEL ACCESS. FAME DIGITAL IS BASIC PORN: THE LIGHTING AND CAMERA-WORK AND MODELS ARE LOWER-QUALITY PORN. IT'S PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, BUT WITHOUT THE LEVEL OF SOPHISTICATION OR EXPERTISE OR CARE YOU FIND AT X-ART, TUSHY, BLACKED, OR DIESEL ACCESS. IT'S MORE LIKE THE OLD SHOOT-THE-PORN-STARS-IN-HARDCORE ACTION, WITH ALL THEIR TATS AND PLASTIC BOOBS.
-PETER NORTH USED TO BE A SITE THAT MAINLY FEATURED PETER NORTH PERFORMING IN VIDEOS. THE MORE RECENT VIDEOS DON'T FEATURE NORTH AS MUCH. THAT'S A NEGATIVE IF YOU ARE A PETER NORTH FAN.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALES ON JOIN PAGE.
-FAMEAID IS THE DEFAULT BILLER. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH. BUT I'VE NEVER HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH FAMEAID.
Bottom Line:
-THE PETER NORTH SITE IS A LARGE PORN SITE. IT FEATURES A LOT OF SCENES WITH PETER NORTH.
NORTH STARTED IN PORN IN 1984. HE'S BEEN IN OVER 2,000 SCENES. AND HAS DIRECTED OVER 70 PORN SCENES.
HE'S ONE OF THE BIGGEST NAMES IN PORN. FAMOUS FOR THE SIZE OF HIS COCK, AND THE AMOUNT OF CUM HE PRODUCES (FOR CUMSHOTS, FACIALS, ETC.).
THE SITE STRUCTURE IS EASY TO NAVIGATE.
IT OFFERS A NUMBER OF CHOICES FOR STREAMING OR DOWNLOADING.
THERE IS NO EXTRA CHARGE FOR DOWNLOADING, AS SOME SITES ARE STARTING TO CHARGE EXTRA FOR.
THERE IS A PETER NORTH STORE, WHERE YOU CAN BUY SEX TOYS AND PETER NORTH VIDEOS.
THERE ARE LIVE CAM SHOWS.
THERE IS A MODEL LISTING, BROKEN INTO DIFFERENT CATEGORIES:
18 TO 19
AMATEUR
ANAL
ETC.
I WISH THE MODEL LISTING WAS UPGRADED: BETTER THUMBNAILS OF THE MODELS, A SIMPLE ALPHABETICAL LISTING THAT IS EASY TO VIEW.
MOST VIDEOS HAVE AN ACCOMPANYING PHOTO SHOOT. THE PHOTO SHOOT HAS A ZIP FILE FOR EASY DOWNLOADING.
YOU ALSO GAIN ACCESS TO 23 OTHER PORN SITES THAT CATER TO DIFFERENT NICHES:
CREAMPIE
GANGBANG
GRANNY
HAIRY PUSSIES
INCEST PORN
LESBIAN
SQUIRTING
TEEN
ETC.
I SAID THAT THE PORN STARS CAN HAVE TATTOOS AND PLASTIC BOOBS. SOME DO, SOME DON'T. I PREFER NO TATTOOS OR PLASTIC BOOBS. BUT THAT'S PERSONAL PREFERENCE. AND THE SITE IS NOT EXTRA-HEAVY ON TATS AND FAKE BOOBS, UNLIKE SOME LOW QUALITY HARDCORE NETWORKS.
YOU GET A LOT OF HARDCORE PORN FOR YOUR MEMBERSHIP DOLLARS, IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT NICHES.
SO IF YOU'RE WILLING TO SPEND THE TIME TO FINDING THE VIDEOS THAT APPEAL TO YOU, THE SITE MEMBERSHIP CAN BE WORTHWHILE. THERE ARE HOT VIDEOS AT THE NETWORK.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 88. THAT IS MAINLY BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WERE SCORED ON PETER NORTH ALONE, BECAUSE IT'S ONLY A SMALL PART OF THE NETWORK, THE SCORE WOULD OBVIOUSLY BE LOWER. BUT AS I WROTE, YOU GET ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE NETWORK, WHICH MAKES THE FIRST MONTH'S MEMBERSHIP A LOW-COST WAY TO ACCESS A LOT OF HARDCORE PORN IN DIFFERENT NICHES.
IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW, I LIST THE FAME DIGITAL SITES YOU CURRENTLY GET ACCESS TO, WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN PETER NORTH:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
-YOU GET 2 IMMEDIATE EMAILS ON JOINING, GIVING YOU YOUR LOGIN DETAILS: USERNAME AND PASSWORD.
THEY ALSO SPELL OUT THE TERMS OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP: PRICE PAID, LENGTH OF TERM, CREDIT CARD USED (LAST 4 DIGITS), SUPPORT TEL # AND SUPPORT SITE. WHICH IS EXCELLENT PRACTICE.
-THEY ADVERTISE THAT CUSTOMER SERVICE IS 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK, WITH LIVE CHAT, PHONE, AND EMAIL.
-DEVILS FILM ADVERTISES 4,200+ SCENES.
-DAILY UPDATES.
-FREE ACCESS TO 28 BONUS SITES.
-THE HOTTEST TEENS, MILFS, AND PORNSTARS.
MY PREFERENCE IS ATTRACTIVE TEENS. I DON'T LIKE TATTOOS OR PIERCINGS. SO A LOT OF THE MODELS ARE NOT REALLY MY BAG:
I ENJOY THE METART NETWORK, MPL STUDIOS, TEEN MEGA WORLD, DIESEL ACCESS, FEMJOY, HEGRE, ETC. THOSE ARE THE MODELS I REALLY APPRECIATE.
BUT IT'S GOOD TO GET OUT OF YOUR COMFORT ZONE EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, TO KEEP THINGS FRESH.
AND DEVILS FILM (ALONG WITH BASIC NETWORK ACCESS) GIVES YOU A TON OF PORN.
Cons:
-2 PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALES ON JOIN PAGE.
-SINCE MUCH OF THE CONTENT GOES BACK 15 YEARS OR MORE, THE QUALITY OF THE CONTENT OBVIOUSLY DECLINES AS THE CONTENT GETS OLDER.
-YOU HAVE TO AGREE TO THE LEGAL TERMS OF THE SITE TO GET A MEMBERSHIP. THIS IS STANDARD. BUT I READ THAT IF I ENTER CANADA (I LIVE IN THE US), I CAN NOT USE MY DEVILS FILM MEMBERSHIP WHILE IN CANADA.
DOING SO IS CAUSE FOR TERMINATING MY MEMBERSHIP WITHOUT REFUND OF ANY FEES PREVIOUSLY PAID.
GOOD THING I DON'T GO TO CANADA VERY OFTEN. (ACTUALLY, I'VE NEVER BEEN TO CANADA.)
AND IF YOU LIVE IN CANADA, AND TRY TO USE YOUR DEVILS FILM MEMBERSHIP WHILE OUTSIDE OF CANADA, THAT IS ALSO CAUSE FOR TERMINATION OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP WITHOUT REFUND OF ANY FEES PREVIOUSLY PAID.
-FAMEAID IS THE DEFAULT BILLER. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF DEVILS FILM (AND ITS SISTER SITES) QUITE A FEW TIMES, AND I CAN'T RECALL ANY BILLING PROBLEMS WITH THEM. BUT I JUST FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE WITH CCBILL AND EPOCH, BECAUSE THEY ARE RELIABLE AND EASY TO DEAL WITH.
Bottom Line:
DEVILS FILM IS ONE OF THE MAJOR HARDCORE PORN SITES.
IT'S BEEN AROUND OVER 15 YEARS, WHICH IS PREHISTORIC IN TERMS OF INTERNET HISTORY.
IT SEEMS TO COVER MOST OF THE MAJOR NICHES:
TEEN, MILF, TRANNIES, INTERRACIAL, GANGBANGS, ETC.
YOU GET ACCESS TO OVER 25 BONUS SITES.
1500+ VIDEOS.
MULTIPLE WEEKLY UPDATES.
MANY OF YOUR HARDCORE PORN STARS MAKE AN APPEARANCE HERE.
THESE ARE MAINSTREAM GONZO PORN SITES.
MANY OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK FEATURE LESS POPULAR NICHES. SUCH AS TRANNY, SQUIRTING, GRANNY, INTERRACIAL, TABOO FAMILY PORN, ETC.
WATCHING THE SCENE: "Big Tit Office Chicks #03".
THIS IS A RECENT SCENE POSTED TO DEVILS FILM ON 2017-07-20.
SO YOU WOULD ASSUME THE SCENE WOULD BE HIGH QUALITY: GOOD COLORS, HIGH DEFINITION, ETC.
INSTEAD, THE SCENE LOOKS WASHED OUT: THE STUNT COCK AND THE MODEL HAVE YELLOW SKIN, INSTEAD OF NORMAL SKIN TONES.
THEY MUST HAVE SHOT THE SCENE USING A YELLOW FILTER. I HAVE NO IDEA WHY.
THE MODEL FAVORS SILICONE BOOBS.
SHE TALKS LIKE A PORN STAR. WITH THE SAME OLD "OOOOHHHHH, FUCK, FUCK, FUCK ME HARDER, YEAHHHHH, GOD, SOOOO GOOOOD, YEAHHHHHHH, YES, YES, OOOOOHHHHHHH YEEEEESSSSSSS (FOR CLIMAX)" LINES YOU HEAR FROM GONZO PORN.
IF YOU WANT GONZO PORN, DEVILS FILM AND FAME DIGITAL IS THE PLACE TO GO.
SO WHY DID I JOIN?
FUCK IF I KNOW.
I WAS LOOKING FOR SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN MY USUAL HIGH QUALITY TEEN PORN.
AND I FOUND IT.
(PARDON THE FRENCH. BUT I PICK UP MY HABITS FROM WATCHING PORN FILMS.)
PLEASE UNDERSTAND, THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK HAS A LOT OF SCENES THAT ARE HOT, AND WORTH WATCHING.
BUT YOU HAVE A LOT OF JUNK TO PLOW THROUGH TO FIND THEM.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 88, BECAUSE THE SITE GIVES NETWORK ACCESS TO A TON OF HARDCORE GONZO PORN.
IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW, I LIST THE CURRENT SITES YOU GET ACCESS TO WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PART OF THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE SITE GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE NETWORK.
THE NETWORK DOES NOT HAVE A PREMIUM MEMBER SECTION, THERE ARE NO TEASER ADS TO UPGRADE YOUR MEMBER LEVEL.
-CSHELPCENTER.COM IS THE DEFAULT BILLING AGENT. BUT I WAS ABLE TO SWITCH TO EPOCH ON THE JOIN PAGE.
-ALTHOUGH ADS ARE USUALLY ANNOYING, SOME OF THE DEALS OFFERED ARE VERY LOW PRICES FOR WELL-KNOWN SITES.
FOR EXAMPLE, THEY CURRENTLY OFFER A 30-DAY MEMBERSHIP TO METART FOR $7.95, WHICH IS THE LOWEST PRICE I'VE EVER SEEN FOR METART.
-THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS GOOD TO EXCELLENT. MONEY WAS SPENT TO CREATE HI-GRADE SCENES WITH NICE SETTINGS, GOOD TECHNICAL DETAILS (GOOD SOUND CONTROL, GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD CAMERA-WORK, ETC.), AND A ROMANTIC PLOT TO GIVE MEANING TO THE SEX.
-THE MODELS AT THIS SITE ARE GOOD- TO GREAT-LOOKING YOUNG WOMEN.
ONE SITE IN PARTICULAR, THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE, HAS MODELS AND VIDEOS THAT RIVAL ANYTHING FOUND AT X-ART, BLACKED, OR TUSHY.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-SCENES CAN BE STREAMED OR DOWNLOADED. IN DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS AND FILE TYPES.
-THERE IS A ZIP OFFERED FOR EACH SCENE PHOTOSET.
-YOU CAN RATE AND COMMENT ON THE VIDEOS. HOWEVER, THE COMMENT SECTIONS FOR THE VIDEOS I LOOKED AT WERE ALL EMPTY. WHICH WAS STRANGE.
CONS (START OF):
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON THE JOIN PAGE.
-NO PU/TBP DISCOUNT ON MEMBER PRICE. $29.95/MONTH RECURRING.
-NO RECENT UPDATES. LAST UPDATE WAS 2016-12-05.
-ADS ON EVERY PAGE. BUT THE ADS ONLY TAKE A SMALL PART OF THE PAGE.
-THE VOICE-OVERS AND PLOT-LINES CAN BE ANNOYING.
THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK IS HUGE:
6500+ EXCLUSIVE VIDEOS
2500+ PORN STARS
NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS
MULTIPLE WEEKLY UPDATES
15+ BONUS SITES
HD QUALITY VIDEOS
THE ROMANCE SERIES, ALSO CALLED NS ROMANCE, FEATURES SCENES WITH A RUNTIME OF 25+ MINUTES.
THIS IS THE FIRST GLAMCORE SITE I'VE COME ACROSS THAT FEATURES TRUE LOVE, ALONG WITH THE SEX.
THERE IS ALSO A PLOT, THAT FEATURES THE STUMBLING BLOCKS THAT PREVENT TRUE LOVE FROM FLOWING SMOOTHLY. WHEN THE LOVERS ARE ABLE TO OVERCOME THEIR OBSTACLES, THE VIEWER'S HEART SOARS WITH JOY WATCHING THESE LOVELY COUPLES REACH SEXUAL BLISS.
(IF YOU WATCH THESE VIDEOS, YOU WON'T NEED TO WATCH DISNEY CARTOONS, WHICH ARE RATED PG-13 OR LOWER. BECAUSE THE ROMANCE SERIES ARE THE REAL DEAL: ROMANCE WITH HARDCORE SEX.)
HOWEVER, YOU NEED TO TURN OFF YOUR BRAIN WHILE WATCHING THESE VIDEOS. DISNEY EMPLOYS BETTER ACTORS IN THEIR CARTOONS THAN NEW SENSATIONS DOES, WHICH MAKES THE DISNEY CARTOONS MORE BELIEVABLE. THE MESSAGE OF THE NEW SENSATIONS ROMANCE SERIES IS THE SAME AS DISNEY'S MESSAGE: TRUE LOVE CONQUERS ALL!
THE GLAMCORE SITES LIKE X-ART, BLACKED, TUSHY, ETC. FEATURE MIGHT HAVE AN ELEMENT OF GENTLE SEX, BUT THE DIFFERENCE AT NEW SENSATIONS IS THAT SEX LEADS TO LOVE, AND LOVE OFTEN LEADS TO MARRIAGE.
THE X-ART, BLACKED, TUSHY SITES FOCUS MORE ON THE SEXUAL THRILLS, OFTEN FORBIDDEN, WHICH ADDS TO THE EXCITEMENT OF THE SEX. WHICH IS A DIFFERENT APPROACH.
WATCHING THE ROMANCE SERIES OF VIDEOS: THE GIRLS ARE YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE, THE STUNT COCKS ARE OK, BUT THE STUPID PLOT JUST GETS IN THE WAY: I KEEP THINKING--FORGET THE SOUL-WRENCHING HEARTACHE AND DOUBTS, JUST FUCK THE GIRL ALREADY.
THE PLOTS ARE BASED ON SUPER-SWEET LOVE, THAT IS BETTER SERVED IN A DISNEY CARTOON THAN IN THE NEW SENSATION ROMANCE VIDEOS.
I FOUND ANOTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK, THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE, TO BE MORE ENJOYABLE AND EASIER TO WATCH: THE GIRLS ARE EXCEPTIONALLY ATTRACTIVE, THE SCENES ARE FILMED IN HIGH-CLASS GLAMCORE STYLE, AND THAT SITE IS AS GOOD AS X-ART, BLACK, OR TUSHY.
I THINK THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK OFFERS GOOD VALUE FOR YOUR HARD-EARNED PORN DOLLARS. BUT THE NS ROMANCE VIDEOS ARE SPOILED, FOR ME AT LEAST, BY THE "TRUE CONFESSIONS" APPROACH TO LOVE AND ROMANCE, IN SPITE OF THE ATTRACTIVE MODELS. THESE VIDEOS SHOULD BE WATCHED WHILE DRUNK. THEN, THE VOICE-OVERS OF THE STUNT COCK MIGHT BE LESS ANNOYING, AND YOU CAN FAST-FORWARD TO THE GOOD PARTS.
A DIFFERENT OPTION IS TO MUTE THE SOUND, AND FAST-FORWARD TO THE GOOD PARTS. WHICH SAVES ON LIQUOR BILLS.
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 88, BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS TO A LOT OF HIGH-GRADE CONTENT.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The Tabu Tales is included with a basic membership to New Sensations network.
This network has 24 sites in the basic network.
-6,000+ exclusive videos.
-2,000+ pornstars.
-No download limit.
-Many of the models are attractive. You get a mix of breast sizes: small, medium, and large.
Model age ranges from late teens to twenties.
-Good basic home page for New Senations with links to:
Updates-Models-DVDs-Categories-Network-Daily Deals-Live Cams.
-Each video has a matching gallery.
-Can stream or download each video in multiple definitions.
-Videos start with a legal disclaimer that all performers are 18 or older, are not illegally related by law (so any incest is fantasy, not real), the sex is consensual, the video is fantasy and not real, etc. So you can watch the videos without the fear of possession of illegal porn, as long as you understand the porn laws in your area.
-Videos are professionaly shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control. The sets are not expensive.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED)
-Videos have a plot.
-With cookies enabled, just have to click the log-in link and you enter the site.
-Videos have a trailor, to preview the basic action of the scene.
-Photo sets have a zip file.
-Cancellation of your membership should be easy. The site even has a hot link for cancellation, that explains how to cancel, and tells you:
NOTE: You should cancel at least 24 hours ahead of the schedule billing date (Date/Time will be in EST) so that there is enough time to process your cancellation. You will still have access to the membership you joined until the expiration date.
CONS(START)
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-European members are charged a higher price than US members.
-You can not choose specific clips from the video, but have to download the entire video.
-No PU/TBP discount. Regular price is $29.95/month (recurring).
-cshelpcenter.com is the primary biller. But EPOCH is an alternate biller.
Bottom Line:
With a sub to New Sensations, you get access to 24 sites: Ashlynn Brooke
Busty College Coeds
Butt Divers Four Finger Club
Fresh Outa High School
Fuck For Dollars Heavy Handfuls
HotwifeXXX
I Film Myself
Internal Violations Jizzbomb
Lil' Latinas
Mr Biggz
POV Fantasy
Papa Loads
Parody Press
Sadie West
Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes
Squirting 101
The Lesbian Experience
The Romance Series The Tabu Tales
The Tales From The Edge
The video titled "Time For Kristens Meeting With Dad":
The stepfather (Toni Ribas) accidentally sees his stepdaughter (Kristen Scott) getting dressed. He texts his wife and tells her they need to talk with the daughter. The wife texts back that they can all talk when the wife gets back home.
The step-father can't wait for the mother to return. He explains the daughter needs to speak to him and the mother before she gets a piercing, since they are a family living in one house. The step-father is a wonderful man, who realizes his responsibilities.
Feeling superior and in charge, the step-father calmly tells the daughter she has to obey him and request permission to get a piercing.
The daughter replies that she respects the step-father, but that her mother got tattoos before the daughter's current age, and the daughter feels she has the right to treat her own body as she sees fit.
So the daughter and her step father each respect the other, but disagree on how much control the step father should have.
The step father says the three of them (step father, mother and daughter) need to get together to discuss this.
The daughter says she loves and respects her mother, but the daughter does not want to discuss this issue with her mother.
And the daughter says the stepfather has been looking at her. How could the stepfather have known that the daughter had her nipple pierced?
The daughter raises her T-shirt, exposing the pierced nipple, and says, "Don't you think this looks good on me?"
The stepfather tries to resist, but they are soon kissing, and she is sucking his penis, and they are fucking.
For a hard core porn video, the plot and dialog and acting are actually very good.
The plot shows there is more thought and feelings than the gonzo slam-bam-fuck-you-bitch-action.
If you can accept the fantasy, it's not just 2 bodies slapping together, but 2 bodies slapping together with heat, lust, meaning, and with the added thrill of forbidden sex.
Besides which, the daughter is a luscious young teen, who is eminently fuckable.
I mean, what red-blooded American male, with a daughter like Kristen Scott, wouldn't jump on this young thing, just to show her who's the boss?
To sum up:
--The Tabu Tales scenes have a taboo fantasy element: incest with a step-relation, infidelity, or some other factor to make the sex more forbidden and therefore hotter.
The Tabu Tales site is large. Hundreds of scenes with matching galleries. Professionally shot. A good fantasy plot of forbidden sex (step incest, fuck the babysitter, lesbian, etc.).
The site is large, and the network is huge. So there's plenty of content to examine and enjoy.
The models range from late teens to twenties, many of them attractive.
There are search/browsing tools to help navigate the diverse content.
There are some minor details that I found impressive at the network:
There is a FAQ page that explains in detail how you are charged for your membership and how to contact support.
The FAQ page explains what to do if you are blocked from the site.
How to cancel your membership.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
