Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $17.87/month.
-Epoch is main biller, a trusted name.
-Accepts Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and some European(?) credit cards for join.
-With site membership, you get access to most of the Team Skeet network. That's over 20 sites.
The Team Skeet network "Unlock" sites require additional payment for each "Unlock" site.
-Update rate for site is 2-4 videos per month. But you get 1 new video per day for the network.
-Large site. Currently 207 videos. Plus matching photoset for each video.
-As a non-member, you can see a nice-sized thumbnail of each video at the site, and at the network, showing you the models at the site. Which is an unusual feature.
-The models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white.
-A lot of the models are in the early stage of their porn career. Most porn models only last a few years in the business, before retiring, but you get a nice selection of American and European porn models at the site/network.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
They eliminated the cross-sale a few years back for a short time, but brought it back again.
-The software mechanism for displaying the individual photos of a photoset is slow.
-The photosets have a zip file (one definition only), but the photosets are screencaps, and not worth collecting.
-There is advertising for other sites on each page, but many of the ads link to a full-priced join page that is more expensive than the normal PU discount price.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: Amateurs doing porn.
To believe that, you need to turn your brain off.
Porn is fantasy, but it's easier watching Superman fly and believing he is real (since we've been conditioned from childhood to believe in Superman and other super-heroes), than to believe these girls are amateurs or first time in porn.
Unless you've never joined or viewed any porn sites before. That might help the illusion, because many of the site models are familiar from other porn sites.
The girls are not trying to act like this is the first time for them. There is very little acting involved.
This site is basically hardcore teen sex.
The girls don't act shy or hesitant. They strip and suck cock, then fuck.
The fantasy that these girls are amateurs is hard to believe. They are young, but they are definitely not new to sex. Or maybe I'm not thinking clearly: they could be called amateurs because this is supposed to be the first time they are legally getting paid for sex as porn models. As long as you haven't seen these same girls on a bunch of other porn sites.
The videos start off with a short interview, where a guy asks the model if she is new to porn (she says yes), does she like sex (she says yes), and the girl shows off her body by removing her clothes (which are everyday street wear: not much effort is put into making the girls glamourous or attractive).
Then the girl gives a blowjob, and she fucks.
The interview is nice, because it gives the girl a chance to show some of her personality, to make her more real. She will say she comes from a small town, and is excited to see the big city where TeamSkeet is shooting the video. She gives a bit of her sexual history: What is her favorite sex position; How often does she have sex.
And she's excited to be a Team Skeet girl (porn model/actress).
Site stats:
Videos: 207
Photosets: 207 (1 matching photoset for each video).
The photosets are screen caps of the video. There is a zip file for each photoset, but the girls are not glamorized, and the screencaps have little value. I don't see why most people would want to collect the photosets, even of the models they enjoy.
You might collect the videos of your favorite models, or the videos you think are hot, but the photosets are basically wasted space.
This is in contrast to photosets at X-Art or Diesel (All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn), where the photosets are worth collecting, because the girls are showcased to be attractive, and the photos are close to MetArt or MPL Studios quality.
Even many of the photosets at Teen Mega World are worth collecting. Teen Mega World does not usually make much of an effort to glamorize their models, but some of the models are so attractive, and the photography has improved so much over early screencaps, that I've been collecting some of the Teen Mega World photosets, where the models are attractive and the photosets are really nice.
The site (and network) are basically easy to navigate, and has some nice features:
Videos:
Stream in low, medium or high definition(720p and 1080p).
Download in low, medium, or high definition(720p and 1080p).
You can stream and/or download the entire video, or selected clips from the video.
The videos at She's New are advertised as 100% exclusive. I believe that's basically true.
However, if you are a fan of tube sites, you might have come across some of the She's New videos before, because porn pay sites seem to use tube sites to advertise their wares.
There is a long time before you are timed out of the site for in-activity.
The are no download limits. No DRM. So you "own" the videos you download.
It's easy to switch between sites in the network. No need to re-type your user name or password.
I'm giving the site a score of 88. That's very subjective.
You get access to the site itself, which has 207 videos.
You also get access to over 20 Team Skeet network sites. In many different niches.
These are professionally shot videos.
Not much effort is put into making these models as attractive as possible. They are relying on straight hardcore teen sex as the attraction. Very little plot or story to the sex.
So the site (and network) is worth a join. But there are other sites (and networks) that I enjoy more.
So it's a lukewarm recommendation.
But a nice score for a lukewarm recommendation.
And that explains why I don't pay a lot of attention to the exact score a site receives, on deciding to join a site or not.
My system for joining a site:
-I want a site that has content that I can enjoy.
-is easy to use.
-gives value for the money I pay.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining the network gives you access to most of the sites in the Team Skeet network (the premium "Unlock" sites cost extra).
-One update per day to the network. The Solo Interviews site does not update.
-Choice of definition for the videos: hi, medium, low.
-1,000+ models in the network, many of them attractive teens or early twenties.
-2,000+ videos. Most with matching photo sets.
-The Team Skeet network has over 20 different niches.
-Excellent download speed. I get over 5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6 MB/sec.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
Cons:
-Cross-sale on join page.
-First page you enter the site is an advertisement, that you have to click through to get to regular site inside.
-There are several "Unlock" premium sites in the Team Skeet network. It costs an extra payment to access any "Unlock" site.
-Older videos at the site are of lower quality. And offer fewer choices for video download definition.
-The newer videos have no interview. They are basically a solo masturbation scene.
-The last site update was 2013-08-06. So it's been over a year since they updated the site.
Bottom Line:
Number of Scenes: 144
Site Description:
The name of the site, Solo Interviews, is slightly misleading. It seems to imply the videos will be an interview of the porn model.
In the earliest dated videos, the videos start off with a short interview of the girl.
However, they dropped that format, and in the newer videos, there is no interview. The girl might do a short strip, and then masturbate. The girl does put on a show for the viewer, to add an element of spice to the performance.
I think the old format is better, because it gives the viewer a chance to hear what the girl sounds like, maybe gives a flavor of the girl's character.
The site was launched around 2007. So some of the earliest videos are rather old, and the quality goes down as you view the older videos. And the video download file choices become rather limited.
The newer video updates are offered in a wide variety of definitions:
You can stream in 1080p, 720p, 540p.
You can download the videos in 1080p, 720p, 540p.
The girls are mainly natural teens. Very few fake boobs, very few tattoos. Not a lot of piercings.
Even though the Solo Interviews site no longer updates, it has 144 scenes.
And you also gain access to most of the Team Skeet network of sites.
Which offers you a lot of content: more than 1,000 models, more than 2,000 videos.
The models are late teen/early twenties girls, mostly attractive to very attractive, mostly natural.
With over twenty sites, you get an assortment of different themes that might appeal to your personal tastes:
schoogirl, babysitter, massage, anal, blowjob, etc.
Giving the site a score of 88. That is based on network access: the network has a lot of content, in different niches. The videos are professionally shot. Most of the girls are attractive teens. The network is basically easy to use. With a PU discount, the membership price is inexpensive at $17.87/month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU/TBP shows a discount $14.95/month (recurring) for Rub A Teen. When you hit the site page at PU or TBP, you go to the Rub A Teen site. Then hit the join page link. And the price shown is $17.87/month (recurring).
-CCBILL or Epoch is the payment processor. Both are trusted names, with excellent service for customers.
-You get a confirming email with your site subscription details from the payment processor on signup. This is a nice feature, that some sites no longer follow.
-No download limits. There was some confusion when the site started, because the TOS (Terms of Service) stated a daily 500MB limit. But the webmaster posted at PU that there were no download limits.
-Excellent download speeds. I get over 5+ MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum limit.
-Choice of definitions for video download: 1080p, 720p, and lower definitions.
-The videos are outstanding, in terms of professionally shot videos, lighting, colors, camera-work, framing.
Cons:
-The site (and TBP) states the content is 100% exclusive. This is not correct. Many of the videos at Rub A Teen are also found at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Erratic update schedule. You might get 1 update to the site in a month, or in 2 months. To balance this, you get 7 updates a week to the Team Skeet network.
-Overlarge logo on photos.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: masseur gives a rubdown to attractive girl, who is so turned on by the massage that they end up fucking.
Site stats:
Videos: 95 videos (as of 2016-07-07).
Photosets: 95 (1 matching photoset for each video)
Most of the videos are of a boy massaging a girl and then fucking her. However, there are a few videos where it's two girls, one massaging the other girl and then having lesbian sex. Or where the girl is massaging a boy (and then having sex).
Or where two boys are massaging a girl and then having sex. Or where two girls are massaging a boy and then the three having sex.
I last reviewed this site on 2012-12-02. I gave it a score of 73.
The main reason I gave it a low score was because almost every video at Rub A Teen was a duplicate of a video at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network).
What has changed since then?
The most obvious change is the site is bigger. It has grown from 20 videos to 95 videos.
This is both good and bad. You currently get about 1 new video at the site every two months. Since the videos are excellent quality, I wish the update rate was faster. But the Team Skeet network has about 24 sites, it only makes financial sense to spread the new videos around to the different sites. Especially to the newest sites, which are obviously the smallest in content.
So, instead of viewing the Rub A Teen site as a simple consumer, but with an understanding of the business aspect as well,
what are you getting from a membership in the site?
As a member of Rub A Teen site, you get access to all the sites in the Team Skeet network. Which is a major selling point.
The Rub A Teen Site gives you high quality videos of young teens in massage who are getting fucked.
The video quality is excellent.
You get a choice of video definitions of 1080p and lower.
The lighting is excellent. The focus is excellent. The camera-work is professional. The models are attractive young teens.
Most of the sex scenes are hot and erotic.
I've said that many of the massage videos at Rub A Teen are found at Tricky Masseur.
The streaming quality of the videos at Rub A Teen is slightly better than the streaming quality at Tricky Masseur.
The images are more vivid, with better colors, better lighting. I don't mean the quality at Tricky Masseur is poor: it's good quality. But the quality at Rub A Teen is excellent. You get clear, crisp images with good colors and good lighting.
However, when you compare the video quality of the download file for the videos, the difference narrows.
The download version of the same video at 1080p. Mp4 file format.
The download file version of the video from the two sites is not as noticeably different as the streaming version. The Team Skeet version is only slightly better. If you were not comparing the two videos side by side, you probably would not
be aware of the difference between them.
Both download files, from Teen Mega World and Team Skeet, are good to excellent.
But if you study the two videos, the Team Skeet is slightly better.
But I don't know how much value that has.
If you are a member of Team Skeet, then download all the Rub A Teen videos, keep the ones you select, and dump any duplicate files from Tricky Masseur.
Except you have to check the names of the girls in the videos, because the names change from one site to the other.
I am comparing the video titled "Rub Me Right There", with the model named Gabi, posted 2014-11-17 to Rub A Teen.
I am comparing it to the video with the same model named Izi, posted to Tricky Masseur on 2014-10-26.
The Tricky Masseur video has no title.
The two videos are the same, except Team Skeet has added a short intro advertising Team Skeet (and the logo shown on the video changes from Teen Mega World or Team Skeet).
The Tricky Masseur video:
Video
Frame Width: 1920
Frame Height: 1080
Data Rate: 8030 kbps
Total Bitrate: 8183 kbps
Frame Rate: 25 frames/second
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site has a faq on how Silvia Saint got into the porn business, a little on her history.
It's straight-forward facts, not a lot of bullshit.
-Site also has a bio page, with short facts on her personal history and physical likes.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. One of the main sites in the network, based on quantity of content, quality of content.
-Silvia Saint is a very attractive blonde, blue-eyed model, great shape,
-PU discount $14.95/month (recurring).
-This site tries to be more accurate, or factual, than the normal porn site. In videos, if
the model is interviewed, she gives her actual age, rather than trying to appear as a teenager. In the categories page, they list 5 scenes at Teen: 5 scenes out of 737 total scenes at the site.
-Models mainly appear natural. Not a lot of implants. The girls with big breasts appear to
be natural, not plastic.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-In the interviews, the girls come across as real people, not putting on airs, not using a lot of fake moans and groans and fake excitement when they masturbate.
-Can watch scenes streaming or download.
-Videos have posting date.
-Female models are listed for each scene.
-Includes network access to the netFameSolutions network, which has massive, good quality DVDs covering many categories.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 2.06MB/sec, which is close to my maximum
download speed (My max download speed is about 2.16 MB/sec).
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Lots of attractive models.
-Easy login.
-Same username and password work for all the sites in the network you have access to. Or
you can use the dropdown box to switch among your bonus sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS:
-Pre-checked cross-sell at signup.
-Many blank thumbnails for the model listings.
-No low-cost longer term (3 month or more) membership option.
-No zip files for photo shoots.
-I don't like their software mechanism for viewing the photos online. The viewer seems slow and clunky to switch from one pic to the next.
-Have to use drop-down lists to select model, category, scene. A simple blank search box would be easier to use, more flexible to use (if they paid a site designer to implement a software search system).
BOTTOM LINE:
Silvia Saint is one of the major porn stars. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 in the Czech edition. She has probably appeared in over 300 adult films. The site has a large collection of Silvia Saint videos and photosets, as well as featuring many other attractive porn models. The site gives access to Silvia Saint's personal blog, which is updated at least weekly. So if you are a fan of hers, you can read personal messages from her, and read what she is doing and thinking recently. I honestly don't know how many PU members would be interested in this blog. She writes in a simple, friendly style, calling
her fans "darling", blowing them hugs and kisses. So in a sense, if you read the blog, and
you're in the right frame of mind, that could save you a few visits to a hooker, if you
can accept the substitution. The blog also has lots of small pics of many of the models
Silvia is currently working with.
Site Stats:
Movies: 737
DVDs: 304
Pornstars: 481
Pictures: 6660
HD Movies (283)
Older movies (scenes) might have more limited definitions for stream and download:
Streaming: 240p, 480p.
Download: 240p, 480p.
Newer videos have multiple definitions available for streaming and download.
Steaming: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p.
Download: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
I think that the Silvia Saint site is a fine addition to the netFameSolutions network. The
site has a large amount of hardcore DVD content, but the vibe of the site is different from the Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, or Peter North sites. The site features a nice mix of male-female and lesbian videos, with and without toys.
The interview videos, titled "casting" videos, seem to offer a glimpsle of the models as
real people, not overly glamorized or putting on a fake show, but giving a realistic interview with some nudity thrown in, maybe some masturbation as well.
I enjoyed the site. Silvia Saint is a very attractive model, she seems to enjoy sex, is very open, and the site, although hardcore, just seems like a friendly place to visit.
It's hard to rate this site. A lot of the appeal depends on how much you like Silvia Saint. If you are fan of hers, obviously, the site would get a much higher score. If you don't think she's attractive (people can have widely differing tastes), then your personal score would be lower.
I'm giving the site a score of 88. But if you factor in the access to the tons of hardcore DVD material you get at other sites in the Fame network, you could bump the score to the low 90s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Epoch is the billing agent. Trusted name.
-Some very hot videos.
-Can stream or download videos:
-Can choose streaming quality: low, medium or high.
-Can choose download quality: low, medium or high.
-Choose the high quality, since it's the best visual. The low quality is poor.
-Easy login. Once you login and accept cookies, just hit the login button, your username and password are saved, so just hit the popup of username and password, and you enter the site.
-Download speeds vary. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
Cons:
-Most of the videos are censored (with mosaic). But this is required by Japanese law.
-Pre-checked signup on join page.
-Poor search engine. You enter a model's name to search for, and it returns many names that are similar, as well as names that are not similar.
-The funny moans and sounds the Japanese actresses make take getting used to: they sound like they are in pain, but it's supposed to show they are excited by the sex, or else they are resisting the enjoyment of sex due to the cultural idea of being "good" girls.
Bottom Line:
This is a large network.
Some of the more popular Japanese AV stars are well represented:
Note: the statistics can be inflated: you do a search, and many times, they include similar names in the results:
For example: search term "Rin Aoki" (a popular AV superstar) returns videos (mixed, in random order).
From the first three pages of a seven-page list:
Haru Aoki
Junna Aoki
Karen Aoki
Kiyuri Aoki
Miku Aoki
Nana Aoyama
Rei Aoki
Rin
Rin Aoki
Rin Hitomi
Rin Kitano
Rin Sakuragi
Rin Saotome
Rin Suzuka
Riko Aoki
So there are probably a lot of other mis-matched links you have to look through to find the single model you are looking for.
Maria Ozawa is one of the most famous and beautiful Japanese porn stars.
She has filmed censored and uncensored videos.
She has a large number of videos at this network.
She has either retired from Japanese AV or reduced her participation, and is trying to focus on an acting career.
The network lists the number of videos for:
Maria Ozawa 297
Reina Matsushima 170
Rin Aoki 411
Rin Suzuka 381
Those numbers are inflated by lots of videos by other models that might have similar names or completely different names.
But at least the seach gives you a starting point for your searches: otherwise, who the fuck wants to look through thousands of videos to find the girls you are looking for?
Years ago I joined a different Japanese porn site that had download limits. Since the videos were large, it was easy to exceed the download limits in a single day, and be blocked from the site for 24 hours or more.
Also, the mechanism they used to monitor the usage was faulty: I carefully kept my daily download usage well below the stated limit, but I was blocked several times--for a day or more--because the program they used inflated my actual download usage.
That was not a happy experience. I wrote to customer support, complaining that I had been blocked unfairly. Eventually after several complaints to customer support, they sent me an email extending my subscription by around 10 days.
But by then I was so angry with the site because I couldn't get in, that I stopped using the site. If I had been more realistic, I would have continued to use the site as long as the membership continued. But my frustration won over my common sense.
This network does not have download limits. No DRM. So that is a large plus.
It also has a boatload of hardcore Japanese porn. Much of it censored. I don't like censorship (the mosaic, pixel effect), but if you want to view Japanese porn, you need to learn to accept the censorship. Even though some Japanese porn is not censored.
I wish the network was laid out in a simpler way, so that the contents could be easily searched. Their search engine is buggy beyond belief.
But there is a huge amount of good quality hardcore Japanese porn, a lot of it hot, a lot of it interesting. With some attractive to beautiful models.
Giving the network a score of 87. If the video quality was better, so you could appreciate the loveliness of these models more easily, and the layout was easier to use, I'd give it a higher score. I did not reduce the score for the censorship, even though I would really like to see all the videos without censorship. But that won't happen.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Have choice to view videos streaming or download.
Older videos have only 2 choices for definition:
Steaming choice is 240p or 480p.
Download choice is WMV or MP4 file types, on 240p or 480p.
-Newer videos have more choices for definition:
Streaming: 240p, 480p, 540p.
Downloading: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-No download limit.
-No DRM.
-In the public preview pages, you can watch brief sample clips of the videos the site features. You also have access to the drop-down list of the site porn stars, and the thumbnail listing of the site porn stars. This thumbnail listing is much more complete than the thumbnail listing at most of the other sites in the network.
-The public preview pages also gives you the scenes each model appears in, so you can tell how many scenes your favorite models are in.
-Long time before site timeout.
-PU discount at $14.95/month (recurring).
-Thousands of hardcore videos, many of them featuring Peter North.
Cons:
-Search is basic. Have to use a drop-down list to search for porn model, series, etc. A blank search box would be much easier to use.
-Search is limited to just one site. You can't search across the network for content by a model, but have to search site by site, which is time consuming and takes a lot of effort.
-Navigation is basic.
-Uncheck the pre-checked offer, or you will be signed up for a trial membership in some other site.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Movies: 2770
DVDs: 566
Pornstars: 1767
Pictures: 62568
This is a huge site. And access to any one of the sites in the Fame Digital network gives you access to all the sites in the network, which is about 27 sites.
But there are over 20 specialty sites, which have less content, but cater to different niches: Lesbian, Teen, Creampie, Hairy, Indian, Granny, etc.
If you've never been a member before, it's definitely worth visiting, because of the huge amount of hardcore videos, and the wide range of content. And there are sometimes special offers where you can join for as low as $5 for the first month.
Giving the site a score of 87 because of the huge amount of hardcore videos at this site and the access to tons of hardcore videos at the other sites in the network, as well as offering a wide range of material.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DRM: none
-Site timeout: none
-Download limits: none
-Easy login: requires username and password, no captcha
-Download: low or high resolution WMV files
-Streaming: low or high resolution
-Large number of attractive models
-Models have very little piercings, tattoos
-Models are clearly identified in each clip by name and thumbnail
(that is a really nice feature; I wish more pornsites would include the
model name and a clear thumbnail of the model to show who she is and what she looks like)
-Videos are 10-30 minutes, a nice runtime
-Videos have 20-30+ screenshots to show model and action
-Large amount of hardcore videos with nice variety
-Updates 1 new video every 5 days
Cons:
-Check carefully for the pre-checked cross-sells when you sign up. I got stung the last time I signed up, even though I knew they were supposed to be there. I just didn't see it on signup, so I lost a few dollars down the drain.
-Video quality is acceptable but not great.
-It would be really nice if they could upgrade/increase the visual clarity of their updates. The updates are mainly older scenes from DVDs shot years ago. But if they could remaster the scenes to increase the clarity of the video, that would be a really nice feature.
-Screenshot photos do not have a zip file. But few people would want to save these photos anyway. The photos are low quality: they are useful to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and the video action, which is great. But the photos have little erotic value.
Bottom Line:
The video quality is acceptable, but a site like Nubiles or X-art or Mplstudios can give you crystal clear videos, and you don't get that here.
This is a DVD site, and even for the "high quality" streaming or downloaded files, it's like you are watching an older movie: the quality is OK, but not excellent: the colors are not vibrant, the clarity is not great. All the technical factors are good: professional lighting, professional focus, background music is better than most porn videos, the action is good, everything is good, but not the high quality video clarity you can get at some sites. But at the sites where you get the high video clarity, the quantity is small compared to the amount of content you get at this site.
This site is one of the main values of the netFameSolutions network.
The network currently has about 32 sites. About 5 of those sites are general hardcore sites that make up 90% of the value in the network. The
other sites are niche, that might have a limited number of videos for fans of that niche/fetish, but that most PU members will probably skip over.
With a single membership to almost any site in the network, you gain access to about 22 of the network sites.
The sites that I believe have the most value are:
This is a video network. It has a large amount of photos, but I consider the photos low to medium quality. The photos compare poorly to Metart, Mplstudios, Femjoy, or other photosite pictures.
The network (and this site) has a number of attractive models. There is some ethnic variation of models: You have not just the standard East
European models, which make up the bulk of the models, but also a significant number of Latina models. Also a small number of Asian models. A very small number of black models at the network. The Curry Creampie site features models that are supposed to be Indian-looking (from India).
At this site, the videos have a tiny plot setup, where the boy and girl meet, then almost immediately have sex. But the setup tries to give a little more meaning and flavor to the sex instead of just two or more people banging away on each other. The sex is pretty straightforward: for 1 boy 1 girl: start with a blowjob, guy eats girl, they fuck vaginally, maybe fuck anally, then cumshot to girl's face. The action is not rough or harsh or abusive. This is definitely a hardcore site, but not the harsh, gonzo action found at some sites. Not a lot of tenderness in most of the sex, or affection, but not the harshness or abuse found at many sites.
The monthly price of $9.95 (through PU/TBP link) makes this site a real bargain, based on the good quality of the content, the large amount of
content, the large variation in content, and the low price.
Giving the site a score of 87 because the site is good, plus you get access to a solid network of sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some very attractive models
-OK to nice quality video clips
-Nice sized thumbnail screenshots that clearly show the action for each video clip
-Thumbnails also clearly show the model(s) in each video clip
-No DRM
-No download limits
-large number of video clips
-no automatic timer cutoff from site
Cons:
-watermark: slightly bigger than needed, in bottom right corner of vids
-search engine is pretty basic:
--can only search by 1 of 4 factors: DVD title;category(eg, anal, blowjob);series(from the studio);model name
--there are much more selective search engines at other sites that will search on a combination of factors, and by much more specific factors than the search engine here
-many of the clips have an "intro" section where it sets up the sex action to follow. They are trying to make the clips more than just a straight sex clip, but these are basically
straight sex clips with a tiny story and acting that is really amateurish.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the netFameSolutions network.
Membership in any one site includes access to 19 different sites:
-over 1500 movies
-over 500 full DVDs
-some exclusive content
-daily updates
video specs (approximate, can vary from clip to clip)
bit rate: 2148
dimensions: 720x480
That is ok to good video quality, but not hi-definition quality some PU members want
But the videos are professionally shot: mainly ok to good focus, good editing, ok to good colors for skin of models and sets (except where they get fancy and try for special effects thru color); acting is porno standard amateur acting, but fewer fake moans and groans of passion than many porn clips but still overdone, soundtrack music less jarring than many porn clips but does not add to the clip value PeterNorth.com and PeterNorthDVD.com are both sites in the same netFameSolutions network.
It appears that the main reason for 2 peter north sites instead of 1 is a marketing decision, because both sites appear to be essentially the same.
Most of the the DVD material of both sites appears to be the same clips.
Both sites have the same site design: same search engine, same way of presenting the different DVD clips, same Guestbook, same Ask A Question, same other features as well. PeterNorth.com number of movies 2010;number of DVDs 325 PeterNorthDVD.com number of movies 1858;number of DVDs 313
A nice addition to each of the Peter North sites would be a complete model listing where they show a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with the video clips that feature her, with the basic clip data for each: size(MB) and length of time.
For the network as a whole (all 19 sites), I am giving the network a score of 87. There is a wide variety of niches to see at the different sites, with a large number of attractive models in nicely-shot video clips.
For the PeterNorthDVD.com site by itself, I can't really assign a specific value, because most of the value comes from the network of 19 sites, and not this specific site by itself.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-no DRM
-no download limits
-search engine: can search by movie title, category, series, or model
-visual quality of the videos is ok to good
-advertises exclusive content
-updates each day with one video scene/clip
-White Ghetto niches:
--squirting
--curry (models are supposed to be Indians from India)
--transsex
The site also has videos of older men with young women, lesbians, heavy MILFs, heavy models, older women (I think of MILFs as women in their 30s or 40s, but this site has videos of women in their 50s+), etc.
Cons:
-Files download as WMV files only, no other format available
-Personal taste varies, but the models that are supposed to be from India, are not attractive. I've seen gorgeous Indian models, but these models are not good-looking.
-The same for the transsex models: they are mainly on the plain-to-less-than-plain side of looks.
-Actually, I looked at vid caps of every single model at the site, and I did not find a single model that I thought really attractive. The best that could be said for any of them is that some of them are OK looking.
-I did not download a single video clip from this site.
-That is my personal taste. Maybe other PU members might find some of the models attractive, or the action interesting or exciting or whatever.
Bottom Line:
White Ghetto is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Access to any one site gives you access to all 19 sites. The PU/TBP special price is $14.95/month recurring, which is a nice discount from the $29.95/month recurring regular price. The network has some very nice sites, some sites that have less value, and some sites that have very little value.
"White Ghetto Films was built on one principle; give the fans what they want!" That is a nice idea, but what this site serves is not my cup of tea.
This site is built on non-glamor models, non-glamor sex. If you like a little kink in your sex (like squirting or transsexual) or favor plain-looking models or heavy models or older models, you might enjoy some of the videos at this site.
I'm giving this site a score of 87 for its network value. As a stand-alone site, this site personally has zero value for me. But tastes vary. Some PU members might find it worthwhile to visit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This site focuses entirely on facials: girl gives blowjob, guy finishes off shooting onto her face.
-There are a large number of video clips of this content. Currently 822 clips.
-easy logon to site
-no timer cutoff from site
-no DRM
-no download limits
-video clips are short, most from 4-10 minutes
-video clips are ok to nice quality
-sample specs for video clips:
--bit rate: 2115
--dimensions: 720x480
Cons:
-Very basic navigation
-What information do they give in the clip listing?:
--sometimes model in clip is listed, sometimes not
--size of clip (MB) is listed
--number of vid caps illustrating clip is listed
That's all the information you get. To search thru these clips, you have to look at the vid caps, or play clip itself
-Do not give title of clip (what porno DVD title clip came from or the scene #)
-Do not give length of clip (playtime for the clip)
-Many times, do not give name of model in the clip
-No date for when clip was made
-Some PU members want high-quality video. Don't get that here.
-No search engine to navigate site
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-can not search by name of model, or any other factor. Have to visually look thru the clips, which have 6 sample screen caps each. If you want to examine clip more closely to see if it's worthwhile, then can click thru to examine the additional screen caps, or click thru to see the clip streaming. But to see the click streaming, takes 2 mouse clicks; need 2 mouse clicks to see the additional screen caps. A lot of work and time and effort to try to examine the site contents of short-length video clips.
-It is difficult to organize downloaded clips on your PC because of lack of DVD title and scene #, and for many clips, lack of model name. Most of these clips are short, many about 4-10 minutes, so they are only partial scenes, unlike most DVD clips from other sites which are entire scenes usually lasting approximately 16 minutes.
BOTTOM LINE:
-A lot of attractive female models, late teens or early 20s, very little tatoos, very little piercings
-the male models that appear with the females are usually nice-looking guys in their late teens or 20s, usually clean-cut.
This is part of the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price.
There are some member sites that might be worth joining as a stand-alone site: Devilsfilm SilverstoneDVD PeterNorth
You get the really nice sites, and the other sites can be considered bonus material, when you join the network.
This site focuses almost entirely on the blowjob that ends in a facial. Even though there are plenty of young, attractive models in the video clips, the action gets repetitious after a while. Personally, I would really enjoy a little variety in the action. Add a nice search engine, add a listing for each clip that includes the name of the model, the DVD title and scene # the clip came from, the time length of the video clip, the date the clip was made, and the site would be much easier to use.
Giving the site a score of 87 for the value of the network. As a solo site, in spite of a large number of short clips that are ok-to-nice quality, with nice-looking models, there's too much work involved in trying to organize or view the clips in a non-random way. As a solo site this would score in the 50s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
advertises
-tons of DVDs
-some exclusive content
-unlimited downloads
-no DRM
-male porn star who was born for porn. Although a lot of his ability to cum so much is due to genetics, Peter North has worked with doctors to develop a new male enhancement product called Virilix. This is the first porn paysite that I've found that will allow me to increase my ejaculation volume. By studying the cum shots on the peternorth.com site, and taking his Virilix product religiously, fellow PU members will be able to shoot across the room (and hit the opposite wall?) to impress their foxy chicks. Peter North writes in the style of the old-time barkers in a carnival sideshow. :)
-Peter North also has a FAQ sheet that gives tips on getting girls: "Just be yourself and don't try too hard and don't talk about yourself too much. Also, try to have a sense of humor and don't be intimidated. A girl likes a guy with confidence, but not too much confidence, that he comes across cocky."
Cons:
PROS (continued):
-Site has a journal section of the life of this legendary porn star. Shows exciting pictures of Peter North with lots of beautiful women at different sites and events. The heads of many of the women (and some men) are blurred out. But the journal shows that Peter North lives a life of glamor and excitement and meets many beautiful women.
-There are pictures of Peter North's F430 Ferrari, that will thrill any PU member who gets
to see this expensive automobile. "One of the cars I own is the F430 Ferrari which just happens to be my favorite car so of course I had to have it. You probably noticed that I definitely have a passion for cars."
-There are also pics of Peter's Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG that he had modified into a 750+ horsepower beast with high performance brakes.
-You can submit email questions to Peter North. Supposedly, he personally will answer questions every week.
-There is a "guestbook", where adoring fans can leave messages stating their love
Bottom Line:
PROS (continued):
and admiration for the fabulous porn star Peter North. Some of the love messages from female fans are quite explicit.
-A membership to PeterNorth.com means you can skip your Playboy fees, and concentrate on adoring this real cocksman who has glamor, style, and an incredible body with the parts and endurance of a superman and the mind-set of a Hollywood hooker.
-Whitney Houston sings, "The greatest love of all is self-love". Peter North discovered this for himself long before he heard Whitney sing about it.
CONS:
-This is a site for Peter North fans. If you aren't a Peter North fan, some of the written material about this guy's self-promotion might make you gag a little.
-The TBP girls seem to be true Peter North fans. Both TBP female reviewers, Vanessa and Maggie, mention as a negative factor in their reviews that some videos don't feature Peter North. Given the large number of video clips on this site, I personally don't need to see every video featuring this porn star. I am far more interested in the female models than in Peter North.
-TBP reviewer Vanessa wrote in her 10-15-2008 review that Peter's live chat is coming soon. The site itself has a popup baloon that Peter's live chat is coming soon. But it's now July 5, 2009, and the live chat is still "coming soon". So don't hold your breath.
-Search and navigation are basic. Could be easier. This is true for all sites of this network. A simple model index, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, alongside a listing of her video clips, would make navigation/search a lot easier.
-Navigation is basic. Would be nice if you could search the DVD clips more easily.
video quality is ok, not high definition:
sample video specs:
bit rate: 2212 kbps
dimensions: 720x480
BOTTOM LINE:
This is part of the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price.
The special monthly price of $14.95 offered thru PU/TBP is very attractive for someone who does not have an extensive porn DVD background. The clips at the different sites are mainly good quality, professionally shot DVD porn clips. These are not high quality videos that some PU members want, but ok-to-good quality video clips. There is a very limited amount of photosets available thru this network. The relatively few photosets are ok quality, not high-quality. Most of the photos available are video caps that serve to give you an idea of the action of each video clip.
The video clips at PeterNorth.com and the other sites are straight sex clips, with little to no plot.
There is a large amount of content at the network: over 500 DVDs. Network offers different
niches: teen, lesbian, MILF, Indian, hairy models, granny, individual models (Silvia Saint, Tera Patrick), etc. Peter North does get a lot of attractive models in his video clips.
I'm giving this site an 87 rating because of the network value. Most of the value is due to the network, and not this single site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is one of the few sites in the network that has photosets worth looking at.
-Quality of the photosets not up to hi-quality standards of sites like met-art or femjoy, but these are decent photosets that a fan of silvia saint would probably enjoy.
-Has solo photosets of Silvia Saint, also girl-girl photosets with Silvia Saint, a few sets where there is a guy in the set, but the guy is an afterthought, almost like a dildo
-Uses toys (dildo) in the girl-girl photosets (depending on personal taste, that might be a pro or a con)
-updates: a new video scene every 3 days
-silvia saint is very attractive: great face, great body
-video clips try to add a little story to the sex, but plot is minimal, this is a straight sex clip. The acting is amateur
-video quality is, for newer DVD clips, just ok. Some PU members want high-quality video clips, which you won't get here
-specs for newer DVDs:
-bitrate 2115 kbps
-dimensions 720x480
Cons:
PROS (continued):
-easy login. Username and password required. Don't usually require secret word. If a secret word is required, it is easily read, not heavily distorted like some sites that make a real guessing game what the secret word is supposed to be
-no inactivity timeout from site
-updates: every 1-4 days. Very irregular update schedule, but this is part of a nice network, and for a single site as part of a large network, this site is updated with a video scene or photoshoot once every 1-4 days, which is nice.
-clips download as choice of small or big size in one format, WMV
-Network access allows access to 19 sites (this is for network, of which this site is part of):
-1500 movies
-more than 500 full DVDs
-exclusive content
-unlimited download
-updated every day
-DRM: no
CONS:
-no zips for the photosets
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-clips download as WMV files, no other format
-1 size for the photosets, don't have a choice of low, medium and high resolution photos
-watermark. yes. size of watermark: larger than necessary. Placed in bottom right corner
-date video clip made not posted. Many of the video clips were made years ago, but there
is no date posted for when the video clip was made
-older clips can be lower quality, somewhat blurry, out of focus (Sorry, Denner, I see why you are complaining about the video quality of some clips)
-viewing can be a problem even for some of the newly posted video clips, This is the first site of the network where I had a real problem watching some clips. The clip might be slightly out of focus, or worse, and I could feel real eye-strain, almost like my eyes wanted to get cross-eyed, or like I was slightly drunk. I'm not making a joke.
One clip like this is:
2678_03_big.wmv
titled: "Private Penthouse Greatest Moments #01 Scene: #3"
Posted to site: 2009-06-23
BOTTOM LINE:
-The main attraction of this site is Silvia Saint, a porn star with a lovely face and lovely body. Not a great actress. Born on February 12, 1976, in Czechoslovakia. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 (Czech edition).
-I don't know if she is making any new porn films. She announced her retirement from porn on March 19, 2001, but continued to make girl-girl scenes after 2001.
-For her fans, this is a solid site, with a lot of Silvia Saint material: DVDs and photosets. DVD clips are not high quality, but mainly watchable. Photos are not high quality, but OK to look at, with Silvia in solo and girl-girl sets. I wish the DVD quality was better visually. Wish the photos were higher quality. Wish the DVDs and photos were dated as to when they were actually made. Would really be nice if you could look at the DVDs and photos and sort them by date made
-Navigation is ok, could be improved. Should be easier to scan/glance thru the DVDs and photosets on offer here
-My understanding is that the updates of Silvia Saint video clips are from old DVD material, that there is no new Silvia Saint DVD material being made
-As part of a nice network, I regard this site as bonus material. Give the site 87 for value of the network, not the site itself. I liked Devilsfilm and SilverstoneDVD sites of this network much better
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-For those looking for variety from European teens, this network offers a number of Brazilian models at SilverstoneDVD, as well as Indian models at Curry Creampie, plus other ethnic types.
-Updates: 1 scene/clip every 5 days
-Watermark. Fairly small, bottom right corner (could be smaller, but somewhat unobtrusive)
-Choice of 2 file sizes for download, small and big
-Can download clip or watch it streaming
-Screen caps give good idea of video clip, but useless as picture to enjoy
-DRM: none
-Download limits: none
-Easy log-on. Usually no secret word to guess, when there is a secret word, it is easily visible
-No automatic timer cutoff from site, even when you are inactive
Cons:
-Search engine at silverstonedvd could be a lot better.
-Clips download as WMV files, no other download choices
-There is a page where they show a number of nice-sized thumbnails of some of the models. This is the "models" page in the preview. It would be great if they could show all the models at the site, and not just a few (20 models shown on that page). There is no "models page" inside in the members area to show you what the models look like.
-Stats: people like to know how many models are featured at the site, how many DVDs or DVD clips. I see no listing at the silverstoneDVD site.
From the TBP site: 121+ DVDs (approx. 100 min. each)
-Billing by famebill. No billing by CCBill or Epoch.(But I found the signup process to be quick and easy, with no problems.)
Bottom Line:
The netFameSolutions network offers Devilsfilm and SilverstoneDVD, along with 17 other sites,
for a low monthly membership fee ($14.95 thru PU). All the sites I saw have the same basic layout: nice quality DVDs, basic navigation.
You are not getting super high quality clips, but you are getting good quality clips, that are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting, good colors of the models and the sets. The clips are straight sex, no plot or story. Soundtrack ok, usually not as much fake moaning and groaning, background music ok: both moaning/groaning and background music could be improved, but still better than some of the terrible clips I have seen from other sources. Moaning/groaning is supposed to add to the excitement of the clip, but when it's so obviously fake, it doesn't add, it seems stupid. And the background music just gets in the way, so you wonder if it's better to watch the clip with with no sound, or to try to ignore the music.
There are a number of other sites in the network, offering niche products: granny; big-sized models; hairy models; lesbian; milf; etc.
My main complaint about the site (and the other sites in the network) is that a lot of clips don't identify the model(s) in the clips. So how can you search for other clips that particular model might be in if you don't know her name?
In porn, it's easier to find quality photos of beautiful young women, than it is to find quality videos of beautiful young women. There are just too many elements in a video that can detract from the pleasure of looking at a lovely woman.
Do the clips feature attractive girls, is the sex exciting, boring, disgusting, how much distraction is there from fake groans, noisy background music, lousy lighting, etc.
SilverstoneDVD has a number of very good-looking young models, with a number of nice-quality clips.
As a solo site, it would not be worth joining. But as part of a nice network, it's definitely worth a 1-month membership to see all this network has to offer.
I am giving this site a score of 87, based on the network, not as an individual site. I find it difficult/meaningless to grade the site as a solo site, when so much of the value comes from the network's other sites that are included in the membership price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PROS:
-Advertise 1000+ movies
-Advertise exclusive content
-Advertise 2400 Gigs
-Advertise daily updates
-No timeout from site
-Vid caps available for video clips-not good as a picture to enjoy, but good for illustrating the
video content of the clip
-the videos are good quality: they are not the very high quality super softcore like you will find at Femjoy, but these are well shot porn videos: good focus, good lighting, good skin colors, a lot of the vids have attractive female models. No story to the video clips, just straight hardcore sex.
These are professionally shot videos (not amateurish videos where they often cut off the model's head from the shot, use a jerky, hand-held camera, etc.)
-videos are clean: no annoying remarks by cameraman/director; no annoying flashes and clicks of a photographer separately photographing the video shoot
-no download limits
-no DRM
-large number of different categories/niches
-easy to use streaming option to watch the video clips
Cons:
PROS(cont):
-Can download movies as .wmv files in choice of 2 file sizes: small and large
-personal taste-most of the clips I saw had models with "natural"-appearing breasts. I like
natural, not the huge fake breasts many porn stars have. So this was positive for me. Also, there are a large number of good-looking young models in the vid clips
-search by movie title, category/niche, name of model, devils film series
-easy logon. Don't have to play "Enter the secret letters" game, just username and password
CONS:
-no simple listing of date video was posted
-no simple listing of model name in video segment(many clips, don't know who the model is)
-most video sites have multiple formats for download, devils film only has .wmv format
-minor quibble-There is some duplication of video clips. Not a lot. Where the same video clip is given a different file name. 2689_07_big.wmv and 0658_03_big.wmv are the same video clip, with different file names.
Bottom Line:
CONS(cont):
The title name for the first one is: "18 year Olds Love Cum #02 - Scene 7"
The title name for the second one is: "Eight Teen Tryouts #09 - Scene 3"
Maybe the distribution company put the same video clip on two separate DVD video titles, and that is why the same clip has two different file names and two different titles, but I don't want
duplicate clips on my hard drive with different titles/file names that I don't realize are the same video clip unless I happen to watch them and remember they are the same.
-Quibble-When I find a model I like, then do a search for the rest of her videos, it usually turns out she has very few videos at devils film. Strictly speaking, that's not their fault, because they have a large number of videos, but it is still disappointing
-navigation could be improved. It's not terrible, but it could be a lot easier to find and get to
the video clips/photos you are looking for. In many clips the models are not identified, so that
makes searching for a specific model difficult, when you don't know her name.
-the site layout should have model's name clearly connected to each video clip/photoset, so it's
easy to see name of the model you are looking at
BOTTOM LINE:
-This is a video site. The useful pix are vid caps, that serve to show you what the vid clip is
about
-There are photosets of models at devils film. I enjoy the lovely, erotic, enticing photos at met-art, femjoy, mplstudios, domai, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc. These are quality picture
sites. I look at the photosets at devils film, and I think, "garbage". I admit I am spoiled, but I see no value or attractiveness in the photos. This site has hardcore photosets, which many of the picture sites I listed do not, so maybe some people will enjoy the hardcore photos, but they are not "good-looking", erotic, or exciting, as far as I am concerned
I don't have a lot of experience with video sites. So I can't give a good comparison of the value of this site. What I can say is that pornaccess is a video site that I thought had poor quality videos, terrible navigation, terrible search. Devils film has good quality videos, much easier navigation, much better search. There are a lot of good-looking female models in the videos.
Considering that you get 17 different sites in the network along with devils film, I think the site is worth a 1-month membership of $14.95 you get thru PU. It's not the same as a mega-site like VideosZ or VideoBox, but I think the site/network has a lot of value.
edit 1: I logged on today, and was required to enter a "secret word", along with username and password. This was first time I had to enter a secret word, and it was easy to see the letters.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PROS:
-Over 200.000 poster size photos
-All photo series come in up to 4000 pixels resolution.
-Photo sets available in 3 different sizes: hi res, med res, lo res
-Zips for photo sets, for each res: hi, med, lo
-over 700 models, many are extremely attractive
-over 100 contributing photographers
-830 additions per year
-10 new HDV movies per month
-Tiny watermark
-No download limit
-No DRM
-choice of multiple formats and definitions for downloading videos
-special new low price $29.95(USD) for 60 days/recurring
-billing from CCBill, a reliable outside billing company
Cons:
PROS: (continued)
-content 100% exclusive to this site
-updates are dated
-no automatic time-out from site
CONS:
-Basic navigation, could be a little easier to use. To download a photoset or video, select the model, look at the photosets or videos available, select the photoset or video you want, then (if it's a photoset) select the res you want, and download the zip file. At met-art, it just seems
simpler to download the zip files than at femjoy.
-Searching is easier at met-art than at femjoy.
-Site is strictly soft softcore. No hardcore at all. Girls only. Boys not allowed. If a girl
touches herself, or one girl touches another, it is the lightest brush, not erotic at all.
-Don't always prominently list who the photographer is for each photo set or video. So if you want to know the photographer (to keep a personal, manually created list of the photosets, date of posting, title, photographer, etc.), you have to hunt around to see who the photographer was.
Bottom Line:
CONS: (continued)
-Limited to slender white European teen. Site advertises that models are from all over the world, but everything I saw looked to be indistinguishable from teen European. "Our girls come from all over the world - even from Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the US, Scandinavia and not only from Eastern Europe."
Well, from the geography I learned in the Dark Ages (1960s), Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Scandinavia were in Europe. The US might not be in Europe, but how can you tell a US model from a model who is European? Simple answer: Look at her passport. Duh. Everything I saw at Femjoy was European teen, as far as I could tell.
-Most photo sets are solo models
-A small percentage of photo sets and videos are two female models. But there is no erotic contact
between the models, unless you can sense the Vulcan mind-meld auras within the models.
-Model bios: none
BOTTOM LINE:
This is one of the better/best softcore European teen glamour photo mega-sites.
The site ranks up there with met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc.
The main value is in the photosets. Huge number of models, a large number should appeal to almost
anyone's taste (but almost all models are slender white European teen).
There are a number of short videos, 2-6 minutes long, super softcore, high quality, great focus,
good to very-good color, good lighting, nice soundtrack.
The videos are more interesting than met-art videos, but that is not saying much. You are watching a lovely girl doing very little: she stands up, sits, lies down, smiles, walks. There is no plot to the videos. Another nice factor in the Femjoy videos is how clean they are, in the sense you don't hear a distracting photographer giving directions, you don't have annoying photoflashes going off in the video shoot.
There are a large number of Femjoy member comments inside the site about how great the models look, how wonderful the photography is, how artistic and erotic the photos and videos are, how this is a wonderfully clean site with no dirty, vulgar elements. If you are into super softcore, with models wearing minimal makeup, no tease at all (unless you supply it yourself in your own mind), this is the site for you.
Even though Met-art is very simllar to this site in the softcore approach, I find Met-art photos
much more satisfying: the models at Met-art are better looking because of greater use of make-up,
greater use of costumes, with more effort put into making the photoshoots more individualistic with varied sets and backgrounds.
I think Met-art navigation is simpler and easier to use to search the models available. It is also
easier to download the files at Met-art.
If Femjoy deserves an 87 for its fine photography, then Met-art deserves a 97 for its fine, more erotic photography, plus easier navigation, plus free video cams. There are no free video cams at Femjoy.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites.
-The New Sensations network is having a holiday sale: $60/year, which is a great price for a quality network.
-The network has over 20 sites, covering a wide variety of niches.
-This is a quality network. The sites are well laid out, easy to navigate, easy to switch between sites. The content quality is good to excellent.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Network has 7,000+ videos.
-Network has 2,000+ porn stars, many of them attractive to beautiful.
-Network features videos with
-Network has multiple weekly updates.
-Most of the videos have streaming options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates.
-Most of the videos have download options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates.
-Login and member pages are https.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Search function could be better. If you are just looking for a model, the search is fine. But if you want specific types of porn, the search is poor.
-The videos adds plot to make the meaningful, but the porn can be too vanilla for some tastes.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is teens just fresh out of high school. So the models are supposed to be around 18 or 19, though they are often in their 20s.
The female models are mainly cute or attractive.
The behind the scenes videos at the site can provide a glimpse into the personality of the models. Although the models are putting on their showbiz/porn actor face, they can come across as real people instead of plastic porn actors.
So there's a freshness to their appearance, versus the often-times stupid scripted parts they play in most porn scenes.
Chloe Cherry, a popular porn model has appeared at many porn sites, under different names
: Chloe, Chloecherry, Chloe Cherry, Chloe Couture, Robin.
She appears at the New Sensations network under the name of Chloe Cherry.
The video, "Chloe Sends An Urgent Text To Big Brother", posted 03/21/2018, features Chloe and James Deen. James Deen plays her step brother, who, like all loving brothers throughout the world, takes care of his cute sister by letting her give him a blow job and
You can choose to stream in 720p or 1080p, with bit rates ranging from 1500 kbps to 12000 kbps.
The choice I make is based on my personal situation:
Since I'm watching on an older PC laptop, the Lenovo Thinkpad E420:
14" monitor
Streaming at higher definition than 720p does not improve the clarity of the visuals.
Streaming at higher bit rates does not improve the clarity of the visuals.
Although I have a 200 Mbps connection with Specrum, I watch on a WiFi connection, so my speeds average about 13 to 20 Mbps.
This means I select the lowest definition and lowest bitrate available when streaming, and also for downloading. The low streaming choices are to prevent the video from stuttering during play.
On a downloaded file, I could chose a higher definition, and a higher bitrate, which should not affect stuttering playback, but higher definition and higher bitrate would increase file size significantly, and my hard drive space is limited, and I don't want to keep buying newer hard drives to store these files.
Also, watching the files on my older laptop, does not increase the clarity of the visuals or improve the sound, so larger files with increased definition and bitrate are wasted on my computer setup.
The same holds true when selecting file size for photosets: I can't tell the difference, visually, from a low, medium or high definition photoset at MetArt or other fine photo sites, on my older laptop computer, so saving a high definition photoset of a favorite models is basically wasted space on my hard drive.
Even when I switch to a desktop computer with a 27" monitor, I still can't tell a visual difference between a high definition photoset and a low definition photoset from MetArt.
I assume that is because of the program I am using to display each photo.
If I blew up the photo (expanded the view), then the differences between low and high definition would be noticeable. But I almost never view or study each photo in such detail: I either look at a photo by itself, on in a slide show, where the definition (low, medium, high) does not seem to matter on a monitor that is 27" or smaller.
I assume the lack of difference is partly due to my PC equipment, and partly due to poor eyesight on my part: You need very large monitors and good eyesight to appreciate the value of higher definition displays, and faster bitrate videos.
And high (or at least medium-) grade speakers on the audio side.
I also believe that a lot of the supposed value in higher grade equipment is salesmanship.
An inexpensive laptop or desktop can deliver a good experience in watching porn (videos and photosets).
But if you have the money, then, it can be worthwhile to spend some of that extra cash to invest in higher grade equipment, to enjoy a better experience watching the videos and photosets.
It just depends on your personal situation.
Actually, I just read an article on the internet that stated speed requirements for different tasks:
-1 Mbps if you use the internet for general web browsing, social media connection, and streaming compressed music such as MP3 audio and emailing.
-2 Mbps is good for streaming SD quality video and lossless music,
-3 Mbps is good for standard quality videos
-5 Mbps is good for streaming high-definition videos.
-10 Mbps internet connection is good for full HD video and audio streaming
If those statements are true, when I get a WiFi connection that is 10 to 20 Mbps, that should be plenty fast for streaming videos.
However, my Wifi connection can sometimes drop to less than 1 Mbps, even though my Spectrum connection is supposed to be rated at 200 Mbps (that would be the hardwired connection, with everything operating at peak efficiency).
And there are many other factors involved.
For example, I often have to restart my PC laptop, because the browser pages fail to load new pages. I get the message: Unable to connect.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site that stopped updating in February 2017. So most of the review will focus on the New Sensations network, which does update weekly.
-Heavily discounted membership price during holidays. Can get a 12 month membership for as low as $60.
-Network advertises access to 12+ exclusive bonus sites. But actually you get access to over 20+ sites with network access.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloading.
-Clean site design. Not cluttered with lots of ads.
-A lot of attractive models. Not a lot of tattoos. Not overly made up to look like porn stars, but look like really attractive girl-next-door types.
-Secure pages: https login and member pages.
-Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview.
-They upgraded the photosets at the network. A couple of years ago, all the photosets were poor-quality screen caps of each video. They invested in a better software program to make better-quality screencaps of each video.
Cons:
-Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site. It hasn't updated since February 2017.
-I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network.
-The default billing agent is FXBilling / CSHelpCenter. I'm more familiar with CCBill and Epoch, but I've been a member of New Sensations for years, off and on, and never had a billing problem with them.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Some PU members might think the videos are too plain vanilla. Although the videos have cute models and are professionally shot in nice settings, the videos often lack the sizzle that some great sites can have.
-Sometimes the download options are strange: a video might have only 4K choices in different kbps choices.
A lot of the videos have a setup storyline to make the sex more meaningful. This is a personal issue, but some viewers might want to skip the setup and move to the sex, while others might enjoy the setup. Depends on personal taste.
The sites cover a wide variety of niches. The search function is just OK, it depends on the criteria you're searching for. I mainly focus on the model, so, since the search examines the entire network, not just the site you're currently logged into, the search is fine for me.
I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network. Navigation is easy, the videos are professionally shot. There are a huge number of attractive models.
The models don't have lots of tattoos, and are not overly made-up, so they look like the good-looking girl who could be your next door neighbor, not like the porn star that lives on the streets of New York City.
Although the site and network are fine, there are so many porn sites competing for your porn dollars, that the New Sensations network kind of gets lost in the shuffle.
That is the main knock against the network.
There are some sites and networks that offer great value for your porn dollars:
The White Boxxx (part of LetsDoeIt), Pure Taboo (part of Adult Time), Teen Fidelity (part of the Teen Fidelity-Teen Porn-Kelly Madison group) have outstanding videos that are erotic and impressive as hell.
Watching some of the videos at those sites is an introduction to how great porn can be.
The New Sensations network is a fine network. But none of the sites in the network blew me away: some PU members might feels the network is too plain vanilla for their tastes.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. This is because site membership gives you access to the complete network. Actually, membership in any of the network sites gives you access to the entire network. If I were scoring the site by itself, the site would deserve a much lower score. But the network gives you complete access to all the sites, without any extra charge for 4K, downloading, or premium site charges.
It's a good network, but there are other networks that you might find give a better bang for your buck.
In spite of the fact that the network offers a $60 annual membership at times.
However, I did sign up for the $60 annual membership, because I do find the network is worth joining.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The Tabu Tales is part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network, without having to pay premium fees for access, or downloading privileges.
-Secure pages: https login and member pages.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Many of the videos are exclusive to the network.
Cons:
-This is not really a con. But there are so many porn sites, many with similar names, it can get confusing. This site is named "The Tabu Tales". There is a newer site, named "Pure Taboo", that is an excellent site with far better stories than The Tabu Tales site.
Pure Taboo is part of the Adult Time network, so if you get a free Adult Time network with your Pure Taboo membership (which should happen, but the slipups happen, and one PU member complained he recently joined an Adult Time site and did not get Adult Time access, and that customer service ignored his requests for help).
-A lot of the models give out fake excitement over the sex which makes the sex less realistic.
"Oh My God, he touched my PUSSY!!!!"
"Just one look, and I'm creaming in my panties!!!!"
Yes, my darling, lover, my god-man, take me and make me yours!!!!"
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-European members are charged higher prices.
Bottom Line:
The New Sensations network has 26 separate sites (27 if you count the New Sensations Network Home site separately.
So the network covers a number of niches.
However, the navigation is sloppy.
If you click on a video, you don't know what site the video belongs to.
Which makes searching the videos at any one site difficult:
-does the video you pick belong to the site you are exploring?
-how do you get a chronological or alphabetical listing of the videos at that site?
Videos play with the logo: "New Sensations", instead of being identified with the site they belong to.
I belive they did a network update 1 or 2 years ago, and made the network a jumbled mess.
Before the update, it was much easier to tell what videos belonged to what sites.
So you could explore each site more easily.
Currently, you have little idea what video a site belongs to (since all videos feature the "New Sensations" logo.
Basically, this means:
It's hard as hell to explore the contents of any one site, since you don't know what site the video you are looking at belongs to.
There is no alphabetical or chronological listing for the contents of a site.
So it's hard as hell to find the site's contents:
However, one trick to make searching easier:
Go to the New Sensations Network Home.
Enter a model's name.
This should return her contents at the entire network.
Otherwise, if you are logged in to one of the member sites, the search is site-specific:
The only contents of a model returned are her contents at that site:
Which is a stupid navigational set-up, because to find her contents at the network, you either have to do a search for each satellite site (26 satellite sites), or do a search at the home page (New Sensations Network Home).
The strengths of the network:
-A number of attractive to very attractive models. Over 2,500.
-The good to excellent quality of the videos:
-They try to add a story element to give more meaning and importance to the sex, instead of just two bodies slapping together. Love, revenge, taboo, whatever.
-The technical setup of the sites is excellent: they have previews for the videos, the complete video is available in different choices for streaming and/or downloading.
There are over 7,000 videos at the network.
Newer videos are offered in premium 4K UHD quality.
The main negative is the poor navigation, which came with a network update maybe 1 or 2 years ago.
Although there are a large number of attractive models, not all are going to be attractive: in looks, with tattoos, whatever.
Because of the jumbled layout, it's harder to find the videos that will appeal to you.
However, the model seach from the home page is good, returning the model's content at the entire network.
Some videos are hot. But many lack heat. This is a personal experience.
Since you have access to over 7,000 good to excellent quality videos, if you are willing to spend the time searching for what turns you on, the site/network is a worthwhile join.
But improved navigation would make the network far easier to use.
Giving the site/network a score of 85.
Some good videos.
Some very good-looking models.
But a lot of videos to search through to find the ones that interest you.
The number of sites currently in the New Sensations Network is listed in the Reply section below:
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Membership in the New Sensations network gives you access to all sites in the network.
None of the sites requires an extra premium payment to access.
-Login and member pages are secure: https. Which means the government has less of a record of your visits. And your account details are better protected against hacking.
-The videos have a strong plot element: a good part of the video is the backstory, with no sex, just actors explaining the plot: this adds meaning to the sex, it's not just two or more bodies slapping against each other.
-Videos have a trailer, if you want to get a quick idea of the action.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. You don't have to pay a premium fee for downloading, as some porn sites are trying to do.
-You have multiple choices for the definition of your streaming and downloading:
Streaming: MP4 3840x2160-4K-25000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-3000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-6000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-9000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-12000kbps, MP4 3840X2160-4K-16000kbps.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Downloading: MP4 3840x2160-4K-25000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-3000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-6000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-9000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-12000kbps, MP4 3840X2160-4K-16000kbps.
-The photoset accompanying each video is made of screenshots from a software program: the screenshot quality has improved: but given how attractive some of these models are, you wish the quality was even better, because some these models are attractive to gorgeous, and they really deserve MetArt or MPL Studio quality photos. So it's a toss-up whether the photosets are worth collecting: the models can be very attractive physically, but the quality of the screencaps, although much improved, deserves better if you want to collect them.
CONS(START OF):
-The network navigation is sloppy. The sites are not clearly separated from each other.
When you enter a particular site, it's difficult to tell what site you are in: the site contents are not clearly separated from other sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
So searching for all content of each site is a problem. Finding how many sites belong to the network is a problem.
I was a member of the network in July 2017, and they seem to have done a network update since then.
I certainly don't remember the navigation problems I see today: a year ago, navigation was easy, it was easy to find the content of each site. Today, the content seems to be jumbled together.
A simple example: in July 2017, I stated in a review that the New Sensations network had 25 sites.
marcdc1, in his 11-06-18 review of New Sensations stated the network has 26 sites.
The Best Porn review, dated 11-12-18, says the network gives access to 12 sites.
As I said, membership in the network gives access to all the sites in the network.
Sometimes The Best Porn reviews are not entirely accurate. But to go from 12 sites access to 26 sites access seems like a big jump.
The search is site-specific. When you search for the content of a model, the search results are limited to the site you are currently logged in to.
-To search the entire network for a model's content, log in to the New Sensations Network Home, and that should give you her content at the network.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
When you score a particular site, the site factors include:
-Amount of content.
-Quality of the content.
-Site structure. Is the site easy or difficult to use? To find the content. To stream or download the content.
The New Sensations network has a large amount of high quality content.
The models can be attractive to very attractive.
The stories can add flavor to the sex.
You have multiple choices for download and streaming the videos.
The videos are professionally shot.
I wish the photosets were higher quality, because some of the models are very attractive.
But finding the content can be difficult.
Even knowing what site you are in can be difficult, because the videos and photosets are all marked "New Sensations", not marked by the site name.
I'm giving the NS Romance site a score of 85.
Because the good quality content is there: but finding it can be a hassle.
There might be a chronological listing of the site contents for each site,
or an alphabetical listing: but I haven't found those yet.
So a lot of the content seems buried in a jumbled mess.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price: $9.95/month with PU discount. Or $7.45/month with a 1-year membership.
-Secure login. Secure membership pages (https). So no ISP record of which specific pages you visit.
-Get 2 confirming emails on joining: give you complete details of your membership: login details, price and type of membership (monthly, or longer), credit card used (last 4 digits of card).
-Excellent customer service: available 24/7. Live chat support is also 24/7, fast to answer, with knowledgeable staff to answer question. Maybe the best support staff I've ever dealt with.
-A large amount of gonzo porn at the Devils Film site.
-You also get access to over 25 sites in the Devils Film network, which means you have access to a ton of hardcore gonzo porn.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading of all content.
-The physical beauty of the models has improved in recent years.
-The search returns hits from the entire network, instead of only from the site you are logged into.
Cons:
-The Devils Film network is part of the Fame Digital network. It specializes in hardcore gonzo porn.
If your tastes run to heartcore porn, or softer-edged porn, then this site (and network) would be less appealing to you.
-Not a lot of effort is put into making the models appear attractive: if the same model appears at a heartcore site (X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, Vixen), she can be attractive to lovely to gorgeous. If she appears at Devils Film, she is not made up (with makeup or costume or setting) to appear stunning.
The natural look is what Devils Film uses.
-A few years ago, they changed the site and network structure. They removed the simple dropdown menu that made switching between sites easy and simple. The current dropdown menu is harder to use.
-The site/network update also made exploring the contents of each site more difficult. The site contents are presented in a numerical listing of site pages, that is less easy to browse than if you were able to enter each site completely.
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-you seem to be positioned in a gateway site, that allows you to view the site contents, without actually allowing you to fully enter the site you want to examine.
My guess is that this allows the sites to be maintained more easily, since the individual sites are now virtual sites, instead of the original sites that existed on a server. So the individual sites are now maintained as a listing of videos and photosets, instead of the videos and photosets that used to form the sites.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page. But this is standard for most porn sites.
-Far too many tats and fake breasts, but this is standard for hardcore gonzo porn.
Actually, the attractiveness of the models seems to have improved recently.
-The photoset accompanying each video is made of screenshots. Competing sites have much better-quality photosets than this site/network. Which is disappointing, because even though the models are not presented at their most attractive, some of the scenes are worth saving, if the photos were better quality.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Devils Film and the Fame Digital network is hardcore gonzo porn.
For a very low price, you gain access to a ton of porn.
Any one of the sites listed above, by itself, would be worth the membership price.
So if you are a fan of hardcore gonzo porn, this site and network is a bargain.
You also get complete access to over 20 other sites that cover a variety of niches:
tranny, squirting, granny, interracial, taboo family porn, etc.
I wish they would they go back the old site/network structure, but this is doubtful, because they've used the updated structure for years now.
And it's not just this site/network that uses the gateway structure: Teen Mega World uses it also, with the same or worse problems of navigation.
Bottom line:
The site and network is a bargain for fans of hardcore gonzo porn.
As long as you don't require high-quality videos.
These network is basically a collection of DVD rips.
It emphasizes quantity over quality.
If you want heartcore, then go elsewhere.
Actually, I prefer Teen Mega World over Devils Film, because the models at Teen Mega World are younger teens who are more attractive, with less tats and implants.
And Teen Mega World also has a ton of hardcore content, with access to around 30 sites covering different niches.
I also prefer the Diesel Access network, which is another fine teen hardcore network, that has quality models and excellent video and photoset quality: the models at Diesel Access are top tier.
But like I said, Devils Film is definitely worth a join, for fans of hardcore gonzo porn.
And the price ($9.95/month) is a steal.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$14.95 for first month, with PU discount.
-Secure login-https. Keeps your login details safe from hacking.
-Secure member pages-https. Keeps your internet activity shielded slightly from your ISP.
-Same login details (username and password) works for each site you have access to.
-Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites.
(This is the Devils Film network, which is separate from the Evil Angel network-although they are both part of Fame Digital or Gamma Entertainment).
-Live chat support is 24\7. Fast to respond, with knowledgeable staff. When I first joined, I could not log in. Live chat quickly solved the problem: The login details from a previous membership were interferring with my current login details, and the login page did not show this clearly. Support suggested clearing cache and cookies, and that solved the problem.
-Each video has a trailer, to give you quick-view of the video.
PROS CONTINUE IN THE NEXT SECTION:
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-The site and network have choices for streaming and/or downloading.
The streaming choices are: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The download choices are the same: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
When I watch a video on a 27" monitor, at 540p, the quality of the video is surprisingly good: the video has excellent lighting, professional focus, good sound control.
There is no need to go to a higher definition for streaming or downloading.
Maybe on a larger monitor there might be a difference: but 540p is a fine choice for downloading or streaming on a 27" monitor (or smaller).
CONS(START OF):
-A site/network update in 2014 made navigation harder. They changed the drop-down menu for switching between sites.
-The site/network update also changed the structure of the network: You now enter a gateway site, which gives you partial access to the different sites. But instead of entering any one site completely, you are held at the gateway site.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
The logic for the gateway system, I believe, it that it makes it easier to manage and update the gateway, instead of having to update each of the 20 plus sites separately.
But the gateway system makes exploring each separate site harder.
-The search function could be improved: If you search for a model's name, it returns any matches that contain either the first part of the model's name, or the last part of the model's name. So you have to filter the search results.
However, the search covers the entire network, instead of a single, specific site you are logged in to: which makes it easier to use, instead of having to do a search for each individual site.
Also, a useful feature on the search results: when you click on the thumbnail of the model's video, you open the video: you don't have to manually transfer to the the specific site the content is listed under: for example, the video, Deep Throat This #13, starring Hannah Harper, a Peter North video, opens in the gateway site: You don't have to transfer to the Peter North pseudo-site, to open or play the video.
--The models are girls in their late teens or early twenties, that are OK to good-looking, with not a lot of tattoos
The main negative is that the models are not actors: the plots are silly or stupid, and the dialogue is worthless: this is just show the girl, have her give a blow job, then fuck the girl. Not a lot of thought or lead-up to the sex, which is plain-vanilla fucking.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is the popular fake incest, where step family members have sex. Since they are not related by blood, but by marriage or adoption, it's not really incest, but fake incest. This is supposed to add an extra thrill of the forbidden to the sex. But the forbidden element seems tame, to me, since it's not incest, but fake incest. I guess that fake incest has fewer legal issues than a real incest porno (except that in a "real incest porno", the actors would not be related by blood, but only playing they were related by blood).
-This site (Out of the Family) is listed as a clone of the Devils Film site.
I believe this is wrong, and does not represent the site and network structure that is current.
The site (Out of the Family) and Devils Film are part of 20 plus sites that are members of a gateway site, that gives access to the videos and photo sets of what used to be 20 plus sites.
But the sites no longer exist as separate sites: instead, you have a gateway site, that you log in to.
And that gateway, gives you access to the videos and photo sets at each of what used to be 20+ separate sites.
But you can't enter any of the separate sites completely: you remain in the gateway site, which, when you select one of the sites, gives you content pages of the videos and photo sets that are categorized as being in that site.
So Out of the Family is not a clone site: it is, instead, one of the sites you access through the gateway site, where each individual site no longer exists as a separate site on a server, but instead is a software program that allows you access to the videos and photo sets that are categorized as different sites.
That's my interpretation: The videos and photo sets are not linked by the Devils Film site into a clone site, where you have the same videos and photo sets.
Instead, you have a completely different listing of videos and photo sets that fall under the Out of my Family site, which is separate from the listing of videos and photo sets that fall under the Devils Film site.
Access to any one of the top sites would justify the membership price of $14.95 for the first month.
If you are new to porn, or haven't joined this site in years, then, assuming you are a fan of hardcore porn, the membership is more than worth the price.
However, if your tastes are more sophisticated, then you might enjoy the heartcore style of porn offered at competing sites like X-Art, Blacked, Tushy or Vixen: Those sites offer models in their late teens and early twenties who are chosen for their physical beauty: The models are presented to be very attractive, with make-up, costumes, lighting, sets done professionally, and with a small storyline and better acting that makes the video like a well-done love scene, with sex.
The membership price is higher, the content is less, but it is comparing highest quality to middle-grade porn.
I would not consider Out of the Family to be low-grade porn, since the videos and photo sets are quite good in production values, even if the plot is stupid.
Giving the site a score of 85, because the site is a worthwhile join, and the network access makes the value even better.
I just wish they returned to the old network structure, since the navigation was faster and easier, but since it's been several years now, that seems unlikely to happen.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Dyked is part of the basic Team Skeet network. You get access to the the basic Team Skeet network of over 20 sites with a membership in any one of the basic sites. But the premium sites in the network each require a separate additional membership fee.
Note: when you go to the Dyked site, there is a banner stating that Dyked is a Team Skeet premium site. This is misleading. Dyked is included in the basic Team Skeet network.
They used to call the premium sites in the network "Unlock" sites. Now they call the premium sites "Upgrade Now" sites.
-PU offers a discounted price of $17.87/month (recurring).
-Unlimited downloading and streaming.
-Streaming is offered in low, medium and high definition. There are 3 choices of high definition.
-Download is offered in low, medium and high definition. There are 3 choices of high definition.
-Each video has an accompanying photo set.
-Zip file for each photo set.
-Content appears exclusive to this site.
Cons:
-The main con is that some PU members have experienced a very slow connection speed to the site/network, which makes viewing or downloading the contents difficult. The problem seems hit and miss, because other PU members have a good experience with the network speeds.
-Pre-checked cross-sale for $1.10 for 3-day trial to bang.com converts to $39.97/month. Which is a very expensive membership price.
If you want to join bang.com, you can do so through a PU discount of $17.95/month recurring.
-SegPay is the default payment processor. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use processors. But I've used SegPay many times, and never had a problem with them.
-Dyked is a small site. Only 46 videos.
-Dyked updates slowly with 1 or 2 new videos per month.
-They mix the basic and premium sites in the network in a listing.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
You have to open each site, to tell if the site is basic or premium--requiring extra payment to see the content.
They used to list the premium sites at the bottom of the listing, which made it easier to tell what is basic and what is premium.
BOTTOM LINE:
Dyked is a lesbian site.
The site has a sub-theme, where powerful women show submissive teens what a real lesbian experience is.
The site started around 2016.
There are currently 46 videos at the site. That's a small number, with 1 or 2 new videos added per month.
So the site is small, and growing very slowly.
However, the basic network adds 1 new video per day, spreading the videos out over the 20+ sites in the basic network.
Even though you will quickly go through the entire Dyked contents, you have the basic Team Skeet network sites to explore.
The basic network has 2913 videos.
The basic network features 2014 models.
The network covers most teen niches: massage, cream pie, masturbation, lesbian, high school, redheads, step siblings, anal, latina, black models, etc.
Most of the videos are good quality: they don't put a lot of effort into making the models glamourous, but the models are mainly young teens and naturally attractive. The videos are professionally shot, with good lighting, sound control, focus, etc.
The network is easy to navigate. You can switch between sites via a site listing, without having to re-enter your login details.
You have a model listing, which could be improved with a larger thumbnail of the model.
However, when you click on a specific model, that brings up the model's page, which is excellent: You have nice thumbnails that show you what the model looks like, as well as thumbnail hot-links to all her contents at the network--which is an improvement over sites which only show the model's contents at the specific site you happen to be at.
I'm giving the site and network a score of 85.
This is a small site with a slow update rate: if it was a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. However, you get access to the basic Team Skeet network, which has 1,000s of hardcore teen videos in different niches. So if you are into teen porn, the site and network is a worthwhile join.
The exception would be if you experience slow connection speeds, which would destroy the value of your membership price.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A very low membership price with PU discount: $17.87/month.
-Content is exclusive for this site. But some content at the team skeet network is posted at other sites. For example, almost all of the Rub A Teen site content is posted at Teen Mega World, and much of it is also posted at Diesel Access network.
-With a membership to this site, you get access to the basic Team Skeet network of 30 sites.
This includes a variety of teen niches: massage, babysitter, lesbian, anal, school girl, etc.
The premium sites in the network each require a separate membership fee to access.
Cons:
-The major con is that some PU members have complained about a poor connection speed, that would not allow them to view the pages, stream the videos, or download any content without hours of effort.
If you encounter such a poor connection speed, I recommend asking for a refund, either through the Team Skeet support, or through the billing agent.
Some PU members asked for and got a refund, due to poor connection speed.
However, I've been a member of Team Skeet for over a year, and have rarely had a poor connection to the network. And other PU members have seemed satisfied with their membership: so the poor connection speed issue seems hit or miss, and I have no idea why it happens.
-Sometimes, to enter the site, you have to pass through a gateway ad page that is completely filled with ads.
To get to the member site, you have to find the one small square that says something like: "Continue here to Team Skeet". The square/hot link is mixed in with all the ads, so be sure to look for it.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Ads on every member page. Distracting.
-There are a number of premium sites in the network that each require a separate membership to access.
Sometimes you find videos you want to see, and only after clicking on the hot link do you find that the video is part of a premium site. I wish they would do a better job separating the basic content you have paid for from the premium content you have to pay extra for.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
There are currently 30 sites in the basic Team Skeet network.
There are currently 9 premium sites, each of which requires a separate membership to access.
The network updates daily with a new video.
The basic sites are listed in the first reply to this review, along with the number of movies in each site, as of 2018-05-28.
The premium sites are listed in the fourth reply to this review, along with the number of movies in each site, as of 2018-05-28.
(I'm using the reply section, because of the review limits of characters and lines.)
The entire basic network has over 2,907 movies.
Almost all the movies have an accompanying photo set of the movie.
If you encounter a terribly slow connection speed, you should get a refund on your membership.
Because you won't be able to view or download the videos or photo sets.
But a lot of PU members seem to have a good experience with the network, and have given the network and its sites a high score.
The network covers a lot of teen niches.
Some of the best sites that I personally have enjoyed are the Rub A Teen site, which is a massage-themed site, and the My BabySitters Club site, which features a dad boffing the cute babysitter. Oye Loca is also one of the better sites in the network, featuring Latina models.
Most of the videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus and camera-work, good sound control.
The network is not glamcore. They don't put a lot of effort into making the models attractive.
In fact, some models that are really cute on other networks, just appear to be almost plain in their team skeet videos.
Which, for me, makes the vidoes worth much less: I want to see pretty or lovely models.
And the photography and makeup and other factors can have a massive effect on how attractive a model will look.
Because the site and network does have some problems beyond the poor connection speed.
They have far too many ads on every page.
They could put more effort into making the models more attractive.
They used to list the premium sites at the bottom of the site listing, so you could separate the basic from the premium sites.
Now they just list the premium sites willy-nilly in with the basic sites, so you don't know if a site is basic or premium, until you click on the hot link.
Which is annoying.
I don't want to pay extra, beyond my basic membership fee.
And I want the basic sites, that I paid for, to be easily apparent to me.
Which is no longer the case.
You get the basic and premium sites mixed together in a listing, and you don't know whether the site is available to you, until you click on the hot link, and see whether it's open, or needs an upgraded membership to access.
The network has some nice features:
You can stream many of the videos in different definitions: 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080p.
You can download the videos in different definitions: 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080p.
They used to have a feature where you could choose to download or stream the entire scene, or pick the clips from the scene that you want. But they seem to have dropped that option for the site and network.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-First month is $14.95 with PU discount. Recurs at $29.95 for future months.
-Join page is secure.
-Login page is secure.
-Member pages are secure.
-Can choose your own login details: username and password.
-Daily scene and photo set updates to the network.
-Access to the Devils Film network of around 28 sites included with membership. I call it the Devils Film network, since that is the site I use the most. But it's also called Fame Digital network, which is part of Gamma Entertainment.
-The same login details work to enter each site in the network.
-But once you are inside the member's area of any site, you can switch to another site in the network without re-entering your login details.
-Files download with the video title, model name, file definition, file type.
-Unlimited downloads.
Cons:
-FAMEHELP.COM is the billing agent. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use.
But I've been a member of this network several times, and never had a billing problem.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The last network update they did in 2017 provided a brighter, fresher look.
At the same time, it made navigating the sites and network harder and more time-consuming.
Instead of a simple drop-down menu to switch between sites, you now have a clunkier version of a drop-down menu that makes you search for some of the sites you have access to, because those sites are hidden on a second level of q drop-down menu.
Also, searching the content of each site is more difficult after the network update.
-The search is site-specific: you do a search on a model's name, it only returns her content at the site you are currently logged in to, instead of the whole network. This makes finding the network content of a model difficult and time-consuming.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: girls who squirt when they reach orgasm.
Squirting is a niche that is not well served.
There is a squirting site at Teen Mega World (Squirting Virgin), that hasn't updated in almost 7 years.
And there is this squirting site at Fame Digital (Squirtalicious), whose last update was 08/25/2017,
and this site had an irregular update schedule before then: posting 3 or 4 videos in a single month, then going for months without an update, then posting a few videos in a month, then another dry spell for months.
The videos are unusual: they put a back story in the video, to make the scene more meaningful and intense, the videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting, good sound control.
Some of the plots are amazing.
The last video, posted 08/25/2017, is about a woman who squirted so much the first time, that her husband freaked out, and fell through a glass door; the husband then required 250 stiches to sew him back up.
The wife feels remorse: the sex was so great, so intense, that she started gushing all over her husband, which led to the accident, and now the wife feels like a mutant in the X-Men series.
A male friend tells the wife this is amazing, and she has to harness the power of the squirt.
(Maybe they could make a comic book and movie adaptation from the video.)
The wife is full of grief, that she almost killed her husband because of her powerful squirting.
(I know this is amazing, but no less amazing than the comic books-movies that are being made.)
The male friend says her squirting should be a joyful moment, that she should embrace this powerful gift;
the male friend says he had a girlfriend that was a powerful squirter: the first time the ex-girlfriend squirted during sex, her fluids ran out until they covered the entire second floor of their dormitory.
(You see why this scene could be part of the X-Men series: the power of a woman-squirter, combined with the power of the Me-Too Movement, could boost the X-Men series into the heights of Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War.)
Not only does this scene have a powerful woman, exploring her sexuality, but it also has sex, which the Marvel Comic movies lack: maybe you get a kiss or two, but those movies are basically sex-less heroes who have not yet discovered the joys of raw sex.
The site offers multiple choices in video definition downloads:
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The same video definitions are offered for streaming.
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good sound control.
The videos are clear and crisp: even the 540p definition looks good on a 14" laptop monitor.
The site will appeal to fans of squirting and peeing.
Squirting, because this is what the videos are classified as.
Peeing, because the distinction between squirting and peeing is blurred: some people consider squirting as separate from peeing, other people think squirting is a form of peeing.
The site is a worthwhile addition to the Devils Film network.
But what gives it even more value is the access to the entire Devils Film network of about 28 sites, covering a variety of hardcore niches.
Giving the site (and network) a score of 85. The 85 is more for network access, than a reflection of the site-only value.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Gamma Entertainment family (the Devils Film/Fame Dollars network).
Membership gives you access to about 26 different sites in the Devils Film network.
-Site login is secure (https).
-Site pages are secure (https).
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-You get access to early videos of Tera Patrick and Sasha Grey.
-You get to choose your own username and password.
Cons:
-The site hasn't updated since September 2017.
-PU discount of $14.95 for the first month recurs at $29.95/month thereafter.
Unless you can find a special, with a lower price, often offered on holidays.
-They did a network update last year, replacing the site preview pages with brighter images. However, the site and network is now harder to navigate: harder to find content within a site, harder to switch between sites.
-Pre-checked cross sale on the join page.
Bottom Line:
-Tera Patrick is a porn star.
The site hasn't updated since September 2017.
Other porn stars appear in some of the videos.
Sasha Grey has 16 videos at this site, so if you're a fan of hers, those videos alone are worth the membership price. Note: Sasha Grey has a lovely face, a great body. But when she opens her mouth, she often talks really dirty, likes to spit and slap her partner, instead of making heartcore love. I wish she would make love, instead of the antagonistic sex she displays: it would be much easier to watch. Just my humble opinion: Making love to her seems like a visit to the dentist's office, with lots of pain.
The early videos of Tera Patrick show she was a gorgeous model at the start of her career.
She was born in 1976, was a Penthouse Pet in February 2000.
Note: I haven't been reporting on download speeds for my latest reviews, because I used to use DownThemAll, which showed the download speeds you get.
But DownThemAll stopped working with the current version of Firefox.
Bottom line: The main value of Tera Patrick is that it's part of the Devil's Film network, so you get access to over 20 sites.
The main sites of value are: Devils Film Rocco Siffredi Peter North
Silverstone.
You also get access to the rest of the 20+ sites, which cover a variety of hardcore niches.
If you haven't been a member of this network before, and enjoy hardcore gonzo, this network is definitely worth joining, at least once.
Some of the scenes are definitely hot.
Giving the site a score of 85, for the network access.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
