Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive content of younger looking Euro women doing various things, such as solo stuff with fingers and toys, lesbianism, and hardcore.
- No DRM Protction.
- No Download limit.
- High quality videos available in WMV format (1280 X 720, 4002 kbps and/or 640 X 480, 1500 kbps). Also, there is flash streaming, quicktime format, and MPEG available in parts.
- High quality pictures (1333 X 2000, smaller sized available for viewing if you want) available to download via zip plus in browser slide shows.
- Updates daily with one picture set then one video the next day, except on sundays.
- Great and accurate search feature which can break down scenes to which type, where the scene was shot (location), and model features which include hair color, body type, breast size, and amount of pubic hair.
- Model index available for easy navigation to find the model you want quick.
- Hanna's Honeypot available as a bonus site for free which is a individual model's solo website.
Cons:
- While the girl's are young looking and cute, the solo scenes involve girls that in my opinion, are just a little better looking than the girls involved in the hardcore scenes.
- Picture sets are mostly accompanying photo shoots that contain the same outfits and locations of videos made at a different time (meaning, these photos and videos are basically the same content).
- Names of the model differ than most other sites than contain the same models which can mess with navigation.
- An active forum would be great for input and active communication.
- Older videos are still alright in quality but are definently not the as stellar as the newer ones. While the newer ones are more in quantity than the older ones, converting would be great.
- Some content may give you the feeling of, "didn't I already download this?". Meaning, the content can get repetitive.
Bottom Line:
This site is done by the same company as In Focus Girls. However, the content does differ in the fact they feature models that give off the appearance of being more 'younger' and provide true lesbian and hardcore scenes. While the girls may give off the appearance of being younger, they are mostly attractive and they don't do the complete gimmick shoots that include all pigtails, braces, knee high socks, and so on. However, this type of dress is present, the site does not rely on these outfits completely to sell the fact that these girls are young. The largest perk of the site is while being a mostly solo masterbation site, they do throw in a great mix of hardcore and lesbian stuff which keeps most content interchanging a bit, however, the solo stuff can get old if the same model is brought back over and over again.
The videos are shot in well lit areas and done quite professionally. There is no chitter chatter amongst the models and camera man. While the videos contain mostly models doing masterbation scenes with either their fingers and toys, they do capture hardcore/lesbian stuff. I am not a huge fan of lesbianism footage myself, but with the scenes that I did see, they were quite hot and the girl's seemed to be enjoying themselves. The hardcore scenes are well done but I just found the models to not be in the same 'scale' as the ones involved with the other scenes. However, it's not like they are complete hags or not even cute, but, just seeing the more pretty ones doing the hardcore stuff would complete this site. But, I have heard many Euro models do less hardcore, it is still a shame. The videos contain a lot of settings in the bedroom or in a living area of the house with things a lot of times ending up on either a bed, couch, or floor. It's usually a strip to masterbation to climax scene with the solo stuff, strip to standard lesbian action with the lesbian stuff, and a standard undress, each go down, then multiple position sex scene in the hardcore stuff.
The pictures do contain a watermark but I found it non intrusive to the picture. They are caught in a good res and are proper photo shoots. However, they are almost identical to the video shoots in terms of the content, location, and outfits. I always find doing this a bit cheap and almost producing repetitive content which I don't like, they are well done besides these facts. I found them as crisp and well lit as the videos and are not doctored up too much which degrades the photo.
The bonus site is Hanna's Honeypot. She does have a few photo sets on the main page. While this site is a completely different site than Only Cuties, it is all mostly solo action and lesbian stuff that's identical to structure as the Only Cuties site. But, it is a nice addition as a bonus if you like the model.
I think the site is doing many things right for what it is. They mix up the scenes enough to keep you interested and provide quality content. Overall, a nice addition to a collection.
I'd say any kind of writers should get the most recognition. It's funny how actors and directors get the most when the story is usually even created and forged by someone completely different but yet these people get a small text credit at the beginning and ending of a film. If it was not for these creators, the film would never even be created by a director or actor.
I also want to think that great writers of fiction novels should be the most recognized. Honestly, creating an original novel that uses one's imagination and clearly written in text for others to understand takes a lot of talent. Ever tried describing a dream to someone in a clear way that they understand it? While not all stories comes from dreams but it's still the conscience mind and memory that is needed to create these stories and to correctly brainstorm these ideas to create a story for another to understand and enjoy should be recognized the most by society.
Too bad this is only half true, film stars and directors are the most recognized these days. While they are talented and I enjoy almost all the other options in the poll, in my opinion, writers have the most talent and should be the most recognized.
It was not canceling my account that I had problems with the Tranny Boss network, but them charging my card with other sites after I canceled. The graphics and set up looks exactly the same and I'm still weary in joining the network due to this. If I were you, I'd check your email and card periodically to make sure nothing happens. While it my just be coincidence, I highly doubt it is due to the fact that the network got basically ousted by TBP and may have moved their scheming to another place with a different name and content. The largest worry I have with the network was I got the Tranny Boss link from a email through being an older member of OnlyTGirls and this site is provided in this network. So, somehow, some way that site was/is involved with the Tranny Boss network which ripped me and a lot of people off.
So basically this is good news if the Total Tranny Pass network is not involved but until I can get clear concise information provided that they are not involved with Tranny Boss, I am going to stay away for now.
This was like the second review I ever wrote and my quality of reviews were not as good at the beginning. Unfortunantly, with this site as well, I wrote the review a few weeks after my membership and I could not remember all the facts. However, I do remember the daily download limit and it being the standard 4 GB's and not 3 GB's. While it is a con and I should have mentioned it, I don't think a limit should sway someone completely away from a site. I've been to quite a few TS sites and I can tell you that this site is one of the better places for exclusive hardcore content of North and South American TS models. The sheer quantity and navigation of this site (from what I remember) is worth a visit from anyone completely interested in shemale content. To each it's own though, if a limit would sway you away completely, then that's up to you and I respect that.
Thanks for mentioning the limit, I was planning on returning to this site eventually to write a better updated review in the future since I feel my newer reviews are far more superior in how I do my facts and outlines than my first few.
I think Drooler might be referring to something I've actually heard a few of my buddies talking about. It had something to do with that if a woman ate something more sweet, that when she is in arousal and the juices flow, that the actual sweetness from the sugar would make these juices more sweet to the taste. However, I remember being a bit perplexed how this was possible and how much of a myth it was. One of my friends actually said it worked but c'mon, it's a bunch of men talking about stupid sex stories over a few beers and I've heard a lot of bullshit in my short life already during these discussions. So who knows, I guess it's time for some quality scientific research on the subject! How about us PU's pick the subjects and we can be 'taste testers' :)
Maybe I'm wrong about what Drooler was referring to and it is just what pussy should taste like with a nice list of options :) Anyone else hear about this 'rumor' that my friends were talking about?
EDIT: Actually, now that I think of it, I heard this story goes both ways or maybe it was for males who ate sweeter things and that their cum tasted sweeter. Maybe I'm totally off and it was neither :) Can anyone help me out and let me know that I'm not nuts.
Well I was using that site and the others as an example of some of the better looking and more professionally looking videos I've seen on a site in my recent stays. However, I think that the demo might have been the wrong choice for which video to promote for their site. Besides, the whole preview page for that site is actually horrendous. However, I did not join this site on a whim and it was several other of the more upstanding PU'ers that guided me towards this site and they were the ones who told me about how well these videos were produced. Plus, I suppose we will just have to agree to disagree about the site and it's videos, they blew me away after watching more than 75% of the content on a large screen LCD TV when I compare to the other sites that used 640 X 480 or 720 X 480 in the range of 1,000 to 1,500 kbps which I thought was the debate to begin with. It was just one site as an example, I'm not saying they have the best videos I've ever seen, it was just a site I remembered off hand and had access to recently using a higher format than what was discussed and had way better looking videos than the majority of the sites I've been to that used lower resolutions and bitrates.
As for the argument of comparing any site's video quality when talking about 'HD' to a blu-ray, I find that a bit overwhelming to even think that these can be compared. A standard blu-ray disc is 25 GB's and a movie is 1 hour and 30 mins to 2 hours long. Let's say there are 30 mins of special features. A site's videos range from 15 to 30 mins. So, lets say an average blu-ray is 1 hour and 45 mins with 30 mins of special features. This uses up a standard blu ray at 25 GB and if you average in a site's average scene which is 20 mins, that's about 8.75 scenes for one blu-ray. However, that means that each scene would roughly be at 2.7 to 3.0 GB's if it was in true blu ray quality. Therefore, these scenes from sites are obviously not that high and therefore could never be the same quality or even in the same class as a true blu ray scene because a 20 min scene at the usual 1280 X 720 format is only 300-800 MB. Yes, a standard blu ray is at 1920 X 1080 and if these videos used that res, they would probably jump up in size but no where near 2.7 to 3.0 GB's. So, what I'm trying to say, is that at the encoding that most sites do at 1280 X 720 and 4002 kbps with the quality I've seen, they are extremely nice and the comparison to blu ray just seems outrageous.
Maybe I'm just crazy and my standards are a bit lower or something, I just think that at that format (1280 X 720, 4002 kbps) and with certain sites, they are remarkable for the size I'm downloading at.
Hope this all makes sense and I'm not trying to be a smartass or anything, hope we can talk about some other things soon!
I'm afraid I will get way too bored and this hobby will become nonexistant for me. While I do get a bit worried about my money situation, so far, I've been pretty good at staying within my budget and knowing when and if I can join a site. Sometimes, having to wait a whole month or more to be able to join a site whets my appetite for the content even more. However, if I get disapointed that wait can be a large bummer for sure. But, all-in-all, it has to be my fear of boredom. While I feel I still have a laundry list of sites I want to go to, the list of places new to add to join is becoming less and less each month as I join more sites. Therefore, I'm joining more than I add to join so eventually I think I may be at a limit to what I will join. Hopefully the sites I love the most will keep on providing the content I already love and can keep me there.
Hello,
While I agree that some may not know about the law but I don't think the site should HAVE to mention that Japanese law provides a mosiac for their porn and that this site contains these. They mention that they offer AUTHENTIC Japanese Porn DVD's which is enough information provided to make a firm decision. While maybe it would be nice to add a statement in the FAQ section about the law for people to understand, I don't think knocking a site down an extremely large chunk as you did is warranted. I don't think that the site is misleading potential customers at all, it's not like they added the mosiac themselves for their site. ALL Japanese porn has the mosiac unless it is Japanese porn shot outside of the mainland or is strictly focused for the west but hence becomes banned in Japan. While there are companies that use more professional models for these exports such as Amorz, most of these uncensored videos are Amateurs and do not contain the better camera work and professionalism that the mainline videos provide. While stars such as Maria Ozawa have gone against this and provide uncensored videos, it is quite well known in the japanese porn community that the law provides a mosiac.
I'm not saying that it's completely your fault for not knowing the law, but, personally as well as most other people who join pay porn sites attempt to do a small amount of research before joining a site. Within this research, I'm sure it would be quite clear that authentic Japanese porn provides a mosiac for their content due to law.
As far as the login probs go, yes, that is a problem and I see it worth mentioning in a review or comment for others to know that there was a problem. However, that the fact that support is addressing the problem is more positive than it is negative because some sites are truly automated with responses and provide nothing in terms of true help.
We can agree to disagree about the site and that's what makes Porn Users so great, I just wanted to address that I felt the site's score was not justified through my experiences with it and help others who read this particular review that I have had good personal experiences with it to provide a different outlook and point of view for them.
Good luck with your future reviews and I hope to see you around some more!
I have almost every video from InFocusGirls and I watch them on a 42 inch LCD TV. I can account for them being just as good or even better than the hundreds of DVD's I've rented. That's strange that you find the lighting for that site to be bad because I've found the locations to be extremely well lit and the outside scenes are always on a sunny day. In fact, I'd go out on a limb and say these videos are some of the most professional scenes I've seen on a site so far. In these videos, I've even seen the little light blonde hairs that women can get which I've only seen in well lit areas and real life. While I'll agree the earlier videos are not as good but I'd say less than 1/4 are from the site's beginning and used those formats. While this is my opinion, I don't know what else to say besides the fact that if you found videos better than this, I'd like to know which sites so I can check them out.
I've had great success at logging in to this site. I agree with PinkPanther 100% about blaming the law on the site, this is something you cannot blame the site for due to it being Japanese law. They do have almost all the harder to find DVD's that I want/wanted and almost all the mainstream ones and they update constantly, I don't agree that this site deserves a 60 at all.
Yep, I am a current/previous member at shemale.asia, infocus girls, only cuties, ladyboy player, long mint, areeyas world, only tgirls, shemale club, and I can name abut 5-6 more of my favorites that use that format and they are the best I've ever seen. So yes, I have seen plenty that use that and are crystal clear.
You could be right but I have recently joined about 5-6 sites whose videos were at 640 or 720 and at ~1000 kbps. What can I say for these videos? They were unbearable to watch and borderline disgusting that I even paid my hard earned money to look at. Honestly, the best endcoding I've seen on sites is at 1280 res and 4002 kbps. These are all crystal clear, not extremely huge, and I feel like I'm getting what I paid for. I have come across some sites that encode at about what you said and been average, but to be honest, they are far in between most sites. So, I'm not saying your wrong or that videos at that rate can't be good, but for some of the prices I spend for sites and it being mid 2009, these videos are absolutely horrid for the most part on a lot of sites still.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Ebony North American TS model in her own solo site featuring her doing a variety of things including solo to hardcore.
- No DRM Protection.
- Updates once a week with either a photo set or video.
- Two options available for purchase. These include joining the site by itself at $19.95 or as a network at $35.00 including 6 other popular North American TS stars (details in bottom line).
- Content is both exclusive and non-exclusive (more in bottom line).
- Videos available in .WMV format with three different downloading options (High quality: 1280 X 720, 4002 kbps; Medium quality: 1280 X 720, ~1380 kbps; Low quality: 500 X 280, 447 kbps) on average but I've seen some go as high as ~8000 kbps. There is an 'amateur' section which contains low quality stuff caught on a handheld, these are available in .WMV (320 X 240, ~500 kbps).
- Photo sets available in zip format for all sets and are mostly in one format (1600 X 1074) with a non intrusive watermark. However, older ones are lower.
Cons:
- 4 GB Download limit.
- The so called 'Amateur' content are videos which are almost webcamish and borderline unwatchable. While interesting because they are different from professional scenes, they are grainy and small.
- Price is a bit expensive for joining the site alone because the it's a smaller site. I'd recommend forking over the extra $15 to get the other network sites.
- Update schedule of upcoming scenes and sets are never filled in, however, there is a section. Either take this area away or fill it in. Leaving it blank is just pointless.
Bottom Line:
Sexxxy Jade is a popular ebony North American TS star that launched this site around October of '08. While the site includes exclusive content of both videos and photos, the site belongs to a company (Shemale Club, Private Transsexual, some more) which are larger and the site takes content from there and include them here. So, a lot of content comes from these sites so if you were a member there, you will see some repeat material. However, there is a lot of exclusive stuff in both the videos and photos. The site's content can be accessed by being billed for the site alone or for $15 more, you join a network site including 6 other North American TS models including TS Foxxy, Kelly Shore, Kimber James, Mia Isabella, JesseTS, and Arabic TS Mariam. While still being quite expensive, the second deal is obviously the better choice because you get a lot more content.
The videos are broken up in to 4 categories. The categories include 'Solo', 'Hardcore', 'Fetish', and 'Amateur'. The solo area includes only one video of Jade doing a nude photo shoot for private transsexual. The hardcore section contains 8 videos of mostly 1 on 1 scenes with a male and Jade. There is only one video of her with another TS. These are all exclusive to the site and are quite straight forward scenes with straight sex. The fetish area includes 5 scenes and is Jade being more dominant on males. These are scenes from TS-seduction and shemale-club. The amateur area is where a lot of the videos are and includes 58 different ones. They range in solo masterbation scenes, hardcore, threesomes, and Jade's friends doing various things. They are quite bad in quality and could even be skipped over in my opinion. This means as of this review, there are only about 14 quality scenes with a few being non-exclusive. With these 'quality' scenes, they are all done in a professional manner and include good camera work with little to none chitter chatter between the camera man and the model/s.
The photo section has all the same categories as the videos besides the amateur section but adds two more; the candids and friends area. The solo area contains 32 different photo shoots with some being shoots with similar locations and outfits as the videos but also some that differ all together. So, you get exclusive sets that are not almost identical to what you see in the videos. The camera work is mostly glamour shots and a professional photographer is used. She posted a few that have a lower res at the beginning of her updates and are a bit worse in quality, but all-in-all, this is a great section with good quality stuff. The hardcore photos are basically stills from the videos but are in a good res and includes 8 sets. The fetish area includes 3 video still sets and 3 proper shoots. These are stills of her ts-seduction scenes and sets of her in more leather type outfits. The candids area includes 4 of her friends.
The site is lacking in solo video content but it's a good start. Average site.
I agree with the fact that this review was better posted as a comment to tell us that the site is no longer updating. While this is great info for a review, I do believe tech stuff can easily be thrown in there for 1 line in the pros or cons or in bottom line and the user could describe what is in the scenes more in full to create a more in depth review. My philosophy is bigger is better, I do find users who do short and sweet reviews as trustworthy as others.
But let's get for real, if you are actually planning on joining the site and giving YOUR money to them, everyone would want more details than this. This review just leaves anyone as a potential consumer to ask more questions which RagingBuddhist did and rightfully so in my honest opinion. If you are just looking to read this as never being interested in the first place, it adds a fact that you now know the site is no updating which is a great comment.
Honestly, I always knew I'd rejoin this site. While me and the webmaster seanchai have seemed to 'bump heads' in the past, it was by no means that I did not like the site or it's content. Honestly, to be doing a shemale site strictly with true Japanese TS models is very proactive and I commend Grooby for taking on this task. Getting Japanese TS DVD's to the USA are about $30-$50 USD a movie which contain 3-5 scenes and you can pay Grooby about the same to get plenty of the same models that appear on these DVD's. While I still may not like the updating style that this company does, I still understand why they do it and seanchai did make a comment how once a site is up for so long, the masterbation to cumshot videos become quite high in content. I have only joined this one site from grooby (I'm waiting for some extra money to purchase their grooby ticket thing making sites about $19.95 a pop) and when they were fairly new, so the content was so low by the time I got all of it in about 2 weeks, I was waiting for updates and waiting my last two week stay for a nonexistant cumshot video pissed me off at the time.
Thanks for the heads up and let me know your thoughts about the site and it's updates. I remember reading the blog a few months ago and they talked about bringing Marin (YUMMY) back for an update with one of her friends who looked pretty good herself.
I put video res and quality. I have just noticed that most sites still see that 640 and 720 res are 'high' quality these days and bitrates under 2000 kbps. Honestly, I'll sacrifice some HD space to have an extra 200-300 mbs a file to get better videos. Honestly, even if a site wants to keep their files at 640 or 720 res, the videos should at least be in the 4000 kbps range if not higher. Plus, I have found way too many sites lately that are still even lower than 640 or 720 and stay in the lower 1000's in kbps and honestly, they are borderline unwatchable. I love both videos and photos equally, but I find myself living with photos in the upper 800's and lower 1000's in res rather than these low res and quality videos a lot of sites are still updating with.
When creating these polls, you only get 6 slots for answers to your poll. So, when making polls, you are sometimes limited to which answers you can put in. Usually when I make these, I want to put an 'other' option in or even more responses. However, for this particular poll, I also wanted to address these other options as well, so I did not want to leave any of these responses out :(
Yeah at first I was ready to rip in to these people after seeing that screenshot. You are right, the concept is actually quite good from a business stand point but it really messed me up because all these review sites were saying they had all these videos and sets and I was at about 6-8 videos each model and 10-15 sets which was like half of what all these extremely old reviews were saying them had. Thinking to myself like, ummm, what's going on. Good thing they responded with that news and the changes are said to actually be during my term as a member so I will be able to get all the content. However, it's all about them actually deliver these promises in that time span now and waiting.
The names of these films usually give me a laugh ('Lord of the G-Strings', 'Black Cock Down', etc.) but after that, I won't watch the actual film. While I'm basically a lover of gonzo to begin with, a porn film with a stupid plot is the last thing I want to see anyways. I don't mind some acting in a 'reality' type scene but spoofing is plain lame. While the scenes might be alright, I am not feeling these movies too much. Hence, my answer is as so.
How this site works which sums up my other comments which equals great news
I got an update from support as to how this site works. Support told me that upon joining, each member starts off the same and gets more content as they stay members, so the update schedule rotates and after a few months most of the content should be available. However, they told me that there were too many complaints about how this system is and they are changing.
As for the promises, they are very good. In two weeks from this comment, support explained that the archives will be open to all. Therefore, all the content will be available to download in about two weeks. Plus, they promised 8 new models will begin updating the site, along with the others, equaling the chance of tons of new content in the next few months. So, now with everything explained, the place seems legit and will be 10x better in the next few weeks. They still are keeping the downloading zip files for photos only after 1 months stay which is a drag but this news is still a huge improvement.
Wow moments after posting this and looking even more in to things, I noticed that an image screenshot from a review at PornInspector shows the members area and the UPCOMING UPDATE is the same exact UPCOMING UPDATE they have scheduled this week and it says this review was written in 2007! Great, so they are obviously shady then.
Update schedule content not even in my members area
I am starting to get suspiscions about this site and being a bit on the shady side of things. After being surprised by what seems to be a lack of a lot of content in the video areas after reading not only TBP reviews and other places (which have all varied in their video content amount but all being higher than the 50's that it is in currently), I checked out the preview page which actually has an update schedule. In this update schedule (which is not present in the members area), there are photo shoots in this month's schedule that are not present in the members area. I already emailed support about the videos section and will proceed to ask about these missing shoots in the next email if they return my first request. However, in the mean time I suppose I need to point this out, either this place is showcasing and advertising fake content which is nowhere to be found or they are having site problems but I highly doubt the second option is the case.
So all-in-all, it's a waiting game to see from support about these things or if any current/ex-members have ran in to anything like this with this place and can let me know.
Just wanted to let people know that TBP facts sheet lists there being over 100 videos when in fact there are only 52 at the moment. These are for the models and with the extras there are 5 nonexclusive video clips that can be downloaded. However, there are 75 less than one minute to a bit under 2 min clips of random ladyboys shot candid on the streets available via streaming, but you cannot download them. Anyways, they are almost pointless anyways.
So all in all, only 52 videos are actually and currently available to download which is the 'true' ladyboy gold content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- North American TS model Foxxy in a solo model site that showcases her in several different varieties of content including solo, hardcore, glamour, and lesbian type situations.
- Includes exclusive and non exclusive photos and videos.
- No DRM Protection.
- Updates often, usually once week with one video and one photo set.
- Videos available in .WMV format with three different downloading options (High quality: 1280 X 720, 4002 kbps; Medium quality: 1280 X 720, ~1380 kbps; Low quality: 500 X 280, 447 kbps).
- Photo sets available in zip format for all sets and are only in one format (1600 X 1074) with a non intrusive watermark.
- Two options available for purchase. These include joining the site by itself at $19.95 or as a network at $35.00 including 6 other popular North American TS stars (details in bottom line).
- Design is simple but easy to navigate, the photos and videos are cut in to categories for easy to find content.
Cons:
- 4 GB download limit.
- Upcoming update section appears to be blank all the time so far, while updates do come, it would be nice to fill the section in and not keep it blank.
- More model information would be great, there is a small profile on the 'home' section but it is three sentences.
- Price is a bit expensive for joining the site alone because the it's a smaller site just launched, I'd recommend forking over the extra $15 to get the other network sites.
- Some minor technical things wrong in the actual site, in the solo section, there are photo sets of a model from a different section of the network. I think this is a technical problem that should have been noticed and changed because it's not even in the 'friends' section, but in Foxxy's solo section.
Bottom Line:
TS Foxxy launched this solo model site around the beginning of the new year of '09. While she adds content that is exclusive to the site, some of the content is from the sites other company sites including shemale club, private transsexual, and shemale scenes. So, if you been to these sites before, you will get repeat content plus new stuff. The site's content can be accessed by being billed for the site alone or for $15 more, you join a network site including 6 other North American TS models including Sexxxy Jade, Kelly Shore, Kimber James, Mia Isabella, JesseTS, and Arabic TS Mariam. While still being quite expensive, the second deal is obviously the better choice because you get a lot more content for 3/4 more the price of joining one of these sites by themselves.
The videos range in content from 4 different categories including 'solo', 'hardcore', 'fetish', and 'friends' sections. The solo video section currently has only one video which is a solo masterbation scene from private transsexual. The hardcore section includes 11 videos ranging from hardcore sex to POV blowjobs from Foxxy. The hardcore stuff includes both exclusive and non-exclusive content. The hardcore videos are all one on one with a male and foxxy plus some stuff with other TS models including Kimber James and Kelly Shore. They are done alright but the POV stuff does include a lot of chitter chatter between the camera man and Foxxy. They are done pretty professional but the POV stuff is done a bit less this way because she states in these videos beginnings that she 'found' people to do this, so they may be amateurs but who knows. The Fetish section currently has no videos. The friends area includes 2 scenes with Foxxy in a behind the scenes footage video and her at Mardi Gras doing various things.
The photo areas include the same categories as mentioned above but the content does vary. Meaning, the photos are not just sets accompanying the videos which are the same locations and dress but seperate photo shoots of Foxxy. The solo section currently includes 24 different sets ranging from mostly glamour shoots in outfits such as dresses, bikinis, and everyday wear. While most are exclusive, once again, 3 sets are from the company's other sites. They are done very professional and include up to and over 100 each set with good camera work and a bit of variance between the photos for a worthy amount of photos in each set. Meaning, it's not just the same type photo over and over but change in each one so they sets are not overly large. The hardcore section photos are 11 sets which are only stills and accompanying sets of the videos. The fetish section includes 4 sets in Foxxy doing domination to a male and dressing in more leather type outfits. They include both exclusive and non exclusive sets.
The site is about 5 months old now and is updating regularly. With a good steady schedule the place will get more quick. The content is good and I would recommend the network.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
