| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
If the special were a few dollars lower, I'd actually consider it anyway. Mainly because there not being any download links doesn't mean you can't actually download scenes from the site, if you're resourceful enough.
|
04-01-13 05:52pm
|
Comment
27
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
03-30-13 11:39pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
28
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
I'm looking at it right now (I can still log in from an old membership) and I see two videos every day for the past week.
And to answer your question: I think when reviewing a site you should include all scenes that the site gives you access to.
|
03-24-13 10:13am
|
Reply
29
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Review
I believe that the two videos a day include the solo masturbation videos. If you're only counting boy/girl and girl/girl videos, then it would be 2 a week (one b/g for Twisty's Hard, one g/g for When Girls Play).
|
03-24-13 09:44am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
There are some girls that I just like to hear talk and have their brain picked. For the ones that don't, there's always fast forwarding.
|
03-22-13 08:05pm
|
Reply
31
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I feel like it's just the nature of the people that join sites like these and like them. They want to "please their mistress" so much that they are more than eager to do things like this for them.
|
03-22-13 10:47am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with the people that have said an attractive woman is an attractive woman even when she's pregnant. It doesn't specifically turn me on, though.
|
03-21-13 09:40pm
|
Reply
33
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Is it just me, or does this seem to be more common with dominatrix sites than any other type of site?
|
03-21-13 09:38pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I basically only join large sites, so it becomes nearly impossible to download everything there. So I focus on the good stuff, and then work my way outward/downward.
|
03-19-13 03:16pm
|
Reply
35
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Which is why I would love to find a way to access their video content without joining their site. The idea that this place might have been that, even if I had to pay an extra fee on top of the normal membership, might have been enough to get me to join.
|
03-16-13 09:36pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably around a quarter to a half, varying dependent on whether I have actual work to do on the internet.
|
03-16-13 08:59am
|
Reply
37
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Thank you, that is what I was looking for. I might just join here instead of my next VB subscription, just to take a look at it.
|
03-16-13 08:58am
|
Reply
38
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
The reason I'm asking is because I'm already a member at Videobox, and I wanted to know if VideosZ is worth a subscription in addition to/following that. I'm intrigued by the access to Hustler (which is a studio whose content I want, but whose website I do not want to join), but the idea of it being behind a three month paywall when I only wanted to join for a month is disappointing.
|
03-15-13 08:39pm
|
Reply
39
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Review
How much content would you say is here that isn't on Videobox?
|
03-15-13 03:53pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
French accents get me every single solitary time.
|
03-15-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
41
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think that when they decide to license, they probably don't get to choose whether or not they get HD, whomever they're licensing it from does. For example, it looks like they've just started uploading scenes from Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity, but all those scenes are in standard definition, even though at least some of them are available in high definition on that site.
|
03-09-13 11:19pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, somewhat. A shitty webmaster isn't going to make me not join a website if the customer service is reportedly okay (which, when it comes to bad webmasters, it usually isn't). But it will make me a little more apprehensive.
|
03-08-13 05:57am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I consider it for weeks/months at a time, then jump when I find the right deal and know that I'm going to have the time to go through the site as thoroughly as I want to (which is pretty thorough, so it takes a while).
|
03-07-13 01:41pm
|
Reply
44
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I agree that they'd probably be better off if they focused on 1-3 movies per day and just made them of "better quality" (i.e. HD, more well known actors/studios). That would probably buy them some more time before the content dried up entirely. About the only way I can see them being able to get back ahead of the curve now is if they were to attempt to buy content from websites that have stopped updating relatively recently. It would give them a ton of (probably) lightly seen content at a cheap price.
|
03-07-13 01:40pm
|
Reply
45
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I just don't see how they're going to fix their HD problem without raising the subscription price, to be honest. Because most of the companies that still exist and are shooting their content in HD already have their own websites and aren't going to sell/license that content to Videobox. So they're probably just going to shell out more money to different companies to get their not-new HD content. And as you noted, even the premium channels aren't doing it, since they still want to give you a reason to join their site instead of going through Videobox. This is just the danger of being a site that doesn't produce its own content. They're at the mercy of the market, and the market isn't going to be kind to them.
|
03-05-13 05:40pm
|
Comment
46
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
02-26-13 02:38pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Poll
Not on porn, and very rarely on photographs in general.
|
02-24-13 12:20am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
I would have to own a Roku to do that, and I don't. Most of my streaming is handled by video game consoles.
|
02-18-13 12:47am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Okay, this was entertaining.
|
02-17-13 08:29pm
|
Reply
50
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Just thought I'd let you know that it looks like the Lexi Belle scene is going to go up in the next week (the 21st according to the schedule).
|
02-15-13 11:30pm
|
