| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Girlfriends.xxx
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The models. OMG. Gina Devine, Tracy Lindsay, but most of all the incomparable Eufrat
+Fun, erotic scenes well captured
+Video quality very high
+Lots of download and streaming options, including 1080p HD
+Regular updates, new video every 3 or 4 days
+Some bonus streaming videos from other Dane sites |
| Cons: |
-Still small. 39 videos, 17 photo sets
-No network access
-A core set of models but not that many others; only a few "new" models
-Possible negative for some: camera work not as crisp and precise as other Dane sites (as discussed below, this is due to the shooting style) |
| Bottom Line: |
I'll confess up front: I love this site.
I love the idea behind it: Eufrat (whom I would marry tomorrow if Eufrat and my wife would agree), Gina, and Tracy get together and have fun filming themselves having sex with each other and the occasional visitor. [The illusion is a little tenuous at times, since there always seems to be a second camera around, and for some scenes the models don't do any of the camera work.]
This site appears to be from the Dane network, though it's a separate membership, but it shares much of the same DNA as Lesbea, except the style is different: rather than the elegant if sometimes demure visual style of Lesbea, Girlfriends has a more raw amateur feel with more close up hand held shots - not surprising since often it's the hands of the models themselves doing the holding. Plus the interactions seem more natural and the girls' personalities are more on display. The whole overall effect, for me at least, is to give the videos a playful sexiness that I rarely find.
Note: the three models who are the central core of the site are Eufrat, with 26 vids (yes, she's in two-thirds of the scenes!), Gina with 17 and Tracy with 15, but most other models only have 1 or 2 - if you love the big three as much as I do then you're in girly heaven, but if you want a steady influx of new models you may be disappointed.
The bonuses are minor: access to a rotating set of streaming videos from other Dane sites. (If you join this site you can stream some Lesbea scenes to see if that style is your preference. As a member of Girlfriends you can join Dane sites at 30% off)
My score is probably higher than most would give it since it presses so many of my buttons (did I mention that Eufrat is prominently featured?) but I think most anyone who enjoys fun girl/girl videos would enjoy at least a month's join. |
|
07-30-14 08:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
VIP Area
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the best solo or lesbian erotica you can find anywhere. Quality of the photography is rarely equaled.
Models look stunningly beautiful
Current updates have many download options, including 1920x1080HD
Update frequency has been great for the past several months
Access to a sister site "ikissgirls.com" featuring lesbian erotica of similar quality |
| Cons: |
Streaming and downloads are slo-oh-oh-oh....
Sets may be exclusive to the net, but some may be available on DVD as part of Girlfriends Films Glamour Solo series (not much of a negative considering the series has won AVN awards three years running)
A nitpick: would love it if updates were more frequent.
An odd nitpick: is it possible to be too perfect? |
| Bottom Line: |
In the field of females-only erotica, Tammy Sands may be the best photographer working today. I was familiar with her work from Twistys, where her solo sets were always great, often my favorites. She's quoted as saying "I believe solo movies are the most intimate of any adult genre" and I think this belief in what she's doing is reflected in her work - these scenes are put together with loving care, with sumptuous settings and exquisite lighting. The women all look gorgeous - don't know if it's great lighting or tons of well disguised makeup, but I don't think any of the models have looked any better anywhere than they do on this site.
That said, understand that the style is very much in the glamor category, fully explicit but with a fairly soft sensibility - there's more of a focus on sensuality. For my taste they strike a nice balance - they're more explicit than the "no close-ups, please, let's not be vulgar" style of some of the out-and-out softcore sites, but something short of the gynecological "camera always two inches from her clit" approach of a site like In The Crack. A nice mix of full-body long shots and up-close-and-personal shots. Plus, the women all seem to be having a good time doing something pleasurable and natural - masturbation and cunnilingus have never seemed so healthy.
But this whole glamor approach relates to my odd negative about being "too perfect". The portrayal of sex here is so idealized that it can sometimes seem a bit remote - something reserved for these goddesses but not available to mere mortals like me. It can lack some of the charm of a good amateur scene with a cute but seemingly more attainable model (a la Abby Winters) - if you prefer the girl-next-door type of model you will likely be disappointed [and it almost goes without saying that if you like your sex scenes to be "hard" and "nasty" you should look elsewhere].
In earlier years the update frequency was not the best, with maybe one new scene a week and occasional gaps of two weeks, but for the past several months the frequency of updates has been great, with three and sometimes four a week. (Speculation: this may have to do with the fact that Tammy quit producing for Twistys in the wake of the Twistys Treat controversy - possibly scenes that used to go to Twistys are now going to this site).
So if you like seeing beautiful women pleasuring themselves and occasionally each other in beautiful surroundings then this site would be a great choice. |
|
10-11-14 11:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Lezboland
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-High resolution video
-Great content for those of us who love this kind of thing - young women, mostly East European, usually quite beautiful, having mutually enjoyable sex with each other.
-Is updating, if a bit erratically
-Very reasonably priced (especially if you go with the TBP discount) |
| Cons: |
-Not large collection yet
-Content may seem a bit tame for those who like raunchy stuff
-Most vids are not exclusive (except as to resolution)
-No real browsing features (model search, etc) just display of vids
-No extras
-Herky, jerky playback when streaming the vids - this could be my connection (downloaded vids were fine)
-No boy/girl content (for those of you who want that kind of thing, in which case why are you looking at "Lezboland"?)
-Hard to know when the next update is coming |
| Bottom Line: |
I would certainly recommend this site to those who love girl-girl sex and are ok with or prefer something on the low end of the rauch meter (nobody calls anyone a slut - not in English anyway - and no hair gets pulled. Hell, these girls even seem to enjoy being together). If sapphicerotica.com floats your boat then lezboland.com should give you a nice cruise around the pond.
One caveat: I immediately recognized a number of vids as ones I had seen, albeit with much crummier video resolution, on paulmarkhamteens.com, so if you've stocked up on girl-girl porn from that site a membership to this one may just be duplication. |
|
10-05-07 12:07am
Replies (2)
|
Review
4
|
GF Sex Toys
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of videos
Lots of unknown amateurs, most very appealing
Fun content if you like solo webcam videos
File sizes are small, so lots of downloads for little hard-drive space
Part of AllofGFs network, so other content themes available
One of few sites I've found where non-pornstar webcam shows can be downloaded |
| Cons: |
Video quality ranges from bad to atrocious
Video count is inflated - duplicate videos
Browse tools almost nonexistent |
| Bottom Line: |
My score is a compromise between my subjective reaction (higher) and a more objective view (lower). Whether or not this site is worth your time depends very much on whether or not you enjoy videos captured from webcam shows. There are few things I enjoy more than a well done webcam show, so when another review site warned readers that some of the videos appeared to be webcam captures I jumped with the TBP discount. Sure enough, near as I can tell virtually ALL the videos are pulled from webcam shows from sites like Flirt4Free.
Pornstar solo sites are often including archive versions of their star's weekly camshows, but this is the first site I have found offering downloadable versions of webshows by the kind of everyday unknown amateurs you would find on a cam site (if anyone knows of another I'd love to hear about it). It's a question of taste, of course, but I love the informal feel of these videos, and their often "let's get down to business" directness. I'm probably much in the minority about this.
The downside to this is that webcam video quality is generally terrible, with fuzzy images and herky-jerky movement (I suppose if all webcam models started broadcasting HD then the bandwidth demands would crash the internet). Of course, this means the video files tend to be quite small also - rarely as much as 100Mb and often less than 50Mb. You could download hours of these videos for the space you'd need for one 10minute HD video.
I don't know for sure if these are supposed to be viewer submitted, if so that might explain why the videos have next to no information - no performer name, date etc. - making almost any attempt to sort/search the content futile. The only sort options available are one you would see on a tube site: Most recent, Most viewed, Best rated, Longest, Popularity.
Also, I noticed a sizable number of videos that appear to have been submitted multiple times - title may be different but the videos are identical, two, three and sometimes four entries of the same video. So the thousand+ videos they advertise are clearly overstated, by how much I don't know, though even allowing for this the quantity of material is impressive.
You do have access to other AllofGFs sites, so you can find a fair amount of boy/girl sex and some all too rare girl-girl, but all the same drawbacks are here - video quality is about the same, these also seem to pulled from camshows
So bottom line: worth a join for a month for someone of my taste, a lot less likely for anyone else.
The big head says "This site is really low quality" but the little head says "Show me more!" |
|
04-19-14 02:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
5
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
|
06-12-14 09:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
6
|
Girls Only Party
(0)
|
|
04-21-12 11:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
7
|
Shot At Home
(0)
|
|
09-25-11 12:51pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
8
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I agree with just about everything you say about the right way to do POV. Problem is, I haven't really found a website yet that does it (Dreamstash comes close - it probably violates your rules a bit since the operator uses a second tripod mounted camera for some non-POV angles, but at least he knows enough to stay quiet and anonymous). What website would you recommend?
|
04-24-08 09:21pm
|
|
