Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : dracken (0)  

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428)

Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 690 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
76
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

While I can take it or leave it in general I have to say GGG is a good site and I joined it in the past for the unique scenes they have.

So I guess my answer is only high quality bukkake :)


05-28-12  05:51pm

Reply
77
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Why would you not use one? I mean I disable it for sites I want to support, but most of the time the internet ads can get really annoying.

05-28-12  05:48pm

Reply
78
Visit Dancerbating

Dancerbating
(0)
Reply of BabyGetReal's Review

Thanks for this excellent review. I never heard of this site before, but Lola looks incredibly cute. I have just one question, you mentioned the videos are short, are they high quality though?

Thanks,


05-28-12  05:47pm

Comment
79
Visit Club Tug

Club Tug
(0)

Quick impression

The site is a bit of a let down, as mentioned in the review by Standard, the video quality could be better. Their choice of models is also questionable sometimes. I guess they wanted a mix of a mature "mom" teaching a young guy and some younger girls, but overall it feels a bit disjointed.

Also for a site that is focused on handjobs there are several scenes where the guy finishes himself on the woman's chest. I was a bit disappointed not all scenes ended with the girl making him cum.

Even stranger I believe there are a few scenes where the guy doesn't cum at all, somewhat of a strange ending for a hand-job specific site if you ask me.

Not very impressing.

05-28-12  05:22pm

Replies (0)
Review
80
Visit Rookie Babe

Rookie Babe
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Roughly 100 models, 225 photo scenes and 100 videos.
- Most of the images are at 8000x1200, but a handful are as high as 2048x3072 and some go higher (maybe 25 go as high as 5120x).
- Most girls have a video interview, but it's usually only 5 minutes or less with some pretty standard questions that get repeated for each girl (where do you like to shop, what couldn't you live without etc), some girls also have a bonus video where they talk about themselves, put some make-up on or get dressed. There are one or two solo masturbation scenes, but they are less than 5 minutes as well and not terribly exciting.
- Good light and good framing for the photos. Some great shots of good looking models.
- You also get a written interview with the girl with some playboy like questions (describe your personality, what do you love about your body, etc)
- Decent navigation, easy to download content, good model pages. Overall very decent webdesign, functional and pleasant to use.
Cons: - Very basic site, the photos are the highlight of the site and with only around 40 images in each scene not much is going on here, think Playboy level of softcore. The girls get undressed and pose around a bit, but no close-ups and just one outfit per shoot.
- Videos are here only as a way to help you get to know the girl, but with some very basic questions and only 4 minutes of footage per clip it's hard to get excited about the movies available here.
- While some of the more recent updates are in 5120 resolution some are as low as 1200, when the biggest selling point of the site is the high resolution of the images this is not good. All updates should be high resolution.
- Videos are in pretty bad resolutions 640x400 and not really well lit.
- When trying to stream a video I sometimes got an error that the video wasn't found..not sure why. It was rather infrequent, but still
Bottom Line: I joined the site because several of the girls looked incredibly hot and I expected something similar to the cyber playboy club or met art.

I didn't go into the site expecting hardcore action or even seeing the girls masturbate, but even so I ended up being disappointed by the content here. A lot of the scenes have around 30 images and they are all shot in the same location and same outfit.

Several of the galleries are just the girl standing in front of a white wall or a brick wall or on a couch in front of a white wall. In fact I noticed that they don't even like to move the girls around too much. If a scene is shot in a hotel on a bed, don't expect the girl to also maybe pose in a chair or standing up next to the bed, they will have her maybe stand on the bed, but that's it. I understand that you would need to set the lights again and move equipment around, but when your entire site is dedicated to images you have to offer a bit more.

I also mentioned the outfits, the vast majority of girls are dressed in jeans and t-shirts or very plain skirts. There are maybe one or two scenes where the girl is wearing a corset or stockings and high heels. But for the most part there is nothing here that I couldn't see walking down the street.

Now don't get me wrong I don't mind that the girls bring their own clothes to these shoots, but the reason I would pay for a site that has only softcore images and under 100 images per set would be because I get to see the girls in different outfits, in different poses and under different angles, in glamor shots as well as outdoor shots, here the diversity is minimal.

The content just doesn't feel worth it. I could go to Met-art or X-art and get the same gorgeous looking models in a lot better looking images. (mind you not technically speaking, the photos here are great, well lit and professionally taken, but most of the time the photographer could have chosen better ways to present the girls.)

The other attractive aspect of the site for me was the idea that you could get to know the girls, get to know their unique personality, at least that's what the FAQ of the site promised. I guess the videos are meant to help here, but the low resolution, short length makes it hard to enjoy the limited clips available. The interviews are very brief and don't really help. Compared to Littlemutt for example, you don't get any feel for the models here.

The one area the site shines in is the diversity of the models, they have some gorgeous looking black and asian models. This is one area that I really enjoyed and is lacking from many other photo sites.

In the end the site has some great models but just doesn't use them as well as they could. If we had more outfits, more locations, more video interviews and daily updates in high definition this would be a great site. As it stands now I would recommend Met-art, X-art even Nubiles over this site.

P.S. It only gets a 70 because the site design is very well done and the models themselves are incredible looking.

05-28-12  04:39pm

Replies (0)
Review
81
Visit Hot Hairy Honies

Hot Hairy Honies
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 160 scenes with a somewhat erratic update schedule but it looks like generally they get around 2 scenes up per month. The club 69 network gets an update almost daily though.
- As far as I could tell all exclusive content, a lot of interracial sex with a black male model and mostly European models (some French some Russian good mix)
- All scenes have images but no zip and the quality is only medium (around 525px × 700) They do offer a slideshow option on the site that works moderately well.
- The site does deliver on the hairy promise, all models look very natural
- A mix of models, some mature women, some more overweight girls and several skinny young looking girls. Overall the site seems focused on natural looking women, pretty minimal make-up, not the most flattering light, and pretty standard action
- A lot of stockings, high heels and corsets.
- Good download speeds, no log-outs, no issues streaming content.
Cons: - All videos are only 640x400 resolution, with some less than ideal camera angles (they seem to really like to film stuff sideways here) and rather basic light.
- No real search options. While they provide a search bar looking even for basic stuff like mature or BBW doesn't return anything. They really need a better tagging or content filtering system.
- While it's nice to see a mix of natural looking women, the site is too disorganized. There are 18 yo looking girls as well as very mature MILFS on the same page. It's hard to find the kind of model you're in the mood for.
- Almost all scenes have b/g sex, no anal, no group sex, very little solo or lesbian action. Some older scenes have a bit of a story to them while recent ones are pretty much just gonzo sex that can get a bit boring.
Bottom Line: I joined this site not really because of the hairy aspect as much because of the promise of pretty spectacular creampies and extensive use of corsets and stockings on natural almost amateur looking girls.

On both accounts the site delivers pretty well. All scenes I looked at ended with a creampie or the guy cumming oh her vagina, a nice change to the pretty standard facial at the end of most porn clips.

Also the vast majority of scenes start with the girls in some sort of corset/ bodystocking and a lot of them keep it on the entire time, making for some pretty hot, almost clothed sex scenes.

That being said the technical quality of the videos killed the mood for me. You only get one download option as wmv at 640x400 or you can stream the same quality scene as a flash movie. Even worse the scenes are often not lighted well so you get very dark zoom on the woman's vagina, considering all the girls are hairy/ natural looking and the male model is often black good luck seeing what is going on in the dim lights.

Another disappointment was the lack of a good search option. There is no real way to separate the younger looking models from the older ones. There is no way to select only the handful of lesbian scenes and good luck finding all scenes where the girl does deep-throat.

One telling aspect about the site's technical quality is the fact that the copyright at the bottom of the pages say "materials are © 2009" which is probably the last year the websites were updated.

Bad webdesign, bad video quality, but decent looking models (if you like natural/ amateur looking girls) and pretty okay action.

The one reason I say pretty okay action despite the good cumshots and outfits is that oftentimes the camera work is bizzare. They focus too much on close-ups with several scenes not even showing the girls face until 4-5 minutes into the scene. There are also a lot of strange cuts, one moment she is giving the guy head, the next they are having sex, no transition just a rather strange jump. Add to this tons of side angles and you have some rather odd video choices.

To make things a bit more complicated there are several scenes where this doesn't really apply, the lights are better and the angles less extreme, leading me to believe that they get the content from several directors. However there is no way to tell what is what. Better content tags would have really been helpful here.

The bottomline is that I enjoyed about 30% of the content on the site and the rest of the network did offer some nice action with mature women, but overall the experience was rather disappointing. Higher resolutions and a more modern web design are absolutely necessary for this site, until they make these changes I'd only recommend this to hardcore fans of natural looking women.

05-28-12  01:47pm

Replies (0)
Review
82
Visit White Teens Black Cocks

White Teens Black Cocks
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 146 scenes and this, along with Try Teens and Hardcore Youth seems to be one of the few sites the Teencoreclub network still seems to update periodically (about 1 scene a month) For more info on updates look at the Teencoreclub main page.
- Great looking girls and the majority of them do anal and deepthroat (older scenes have more regular, vaginal sex but for the past two years or so almost every scene has some anal action).
- Scenes look good with varied camera angles, good light, good combination of wide shots and close-ups
- The last two or three scenes feature a very brief interview and the girl playing with herself before the actual sex, otherwise the action is a bit formulaic with BJ, vagina sex, some anal, back to BJ and cumshot
- Some very very hot girls, including several that don't show up anywhere else on the network (or even on-line as far as I can tell)
- Ever scene has very good quality images, although no zip (I recommend using neodownloader to get the images)
Cons: - Just like the entire teencoreclub network this site suffers from simplistic webdesign, very strange update schedule and no search features.
- Hot models doing anal but pretty much everything else here is a con starting with the price and going all the way to lack of choices when it comes to downloads.
- This is the only site in the network that for me had strange download speeds. Sometimes it would max my internet connection, sometimes it would go as slow as 20kb or time-out. Not sure why or how.
- Price is pretty restrictive
Bottom Line: I always find it tough to review a site from the Teencore club network. On one hand they have incredible models often well before they show up anywhere else on the internet (I believe Isabella Clark and Aspen Richardsen started on this network) but at the same time everything else about the network is barely worth mentioning.

The web design is basic, reminding me of the first porn sites that were available on-line. Customer support is very basic, there are no extras worth mentioning, no different options when downloading a scene (you get WMV and that's it) The pictures don't have zip archives. There is no model search or even content type search. For example on this site about a third of the scenes are only vaginal sex, but there is no way to filter them out.

The list of complaints can go on and on, but in the end this is a network that has great looking girls and not much else going on for it. Still I find myself coming back for them again and again for brief periods of time. I use image grabbers to get all the images and periodically download the updates but in all honesty I wouldn't stay a member for long periods of times.

Now that being said about the network itself I have a few comments on this site in particular.

The scenes here seem to run a bit longer than the rest of the network, most of them 30 minutes or a bit more. The angles of the action seem more varied here and the guy goes from anal to vaginal, back to anal pretty often in many different positions. In fact I'd say this is the most varied site on the whole network, aside from HardcoreYouth (which is compete different in vibe and more similar to firstanalquest or 21 sextury).

Another interesting aspect for me was that many of the scenes seem more realistic with some the girls struggling to accept the male model into their buts. Maybe they film the girls first on this site or the guy is significantly bigger than they experienced before but there are not many massive gapes here, something I was actually pretty pleased with.

Overall, I'd recommend this network to anyone who hasn't been a member before and enjoys young girls doing real hardcore stuff. Try it for a month or two, get all the DRM free content you can get and wait a few months until they get some new content then pay them another visit if you like their type of content.

05-20-12  05:47pm

Replies (0)
Reply
83
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Comment

In my experience every scene still has around 200+ images, so I wouldn't really say "a few" candid shots. The quantity is still there, but I do agree that the style of photography has changed quite a bit from a few years ago.

I guess they are going for a more "casual" almost "girls of myspace" vibe, if that makes any sense. The images look less staged and more natural with stuff out of focus occasionally and more "natural" light. Also I noticed several images where the models seem to be laughing at someone off camera.

For me it's a somewhat interesting change as it makes the whole set more amateur-ish and more intimate like someone just happened to take the images, but I do see how it could be frustrating if you enjoy the older image sets.

Just my 2 cents...


05-20-12  12:26pm

Reply
84
N/A Reply of OneMan's Poll

While all of the above are frustrating what kills me is the man ass in some close ups, that and the balls slapping the girl. It's just one of the many reasons I often find myself watching lesbian porn.

05-20-12  12:00pm

Reply
85
Visit Try Teens

Try Teens
(0)
Reply of joekramer08's Reply

Yeah porn is definitely a very subjective thing. Hopefully people will read both my and your review and decide on their own if this kind of site works for them or not.

Either way Teencore club has some great looking girls doing anal and that's a positive thing we can all agree on :)


05-20-12  11:57am

Comment
86
Visit Pornstar Network

Pornstar Network
(0)

Quick opinion on the site

First of all I was disappointed that the site has a pop-up show up in the background right after logging-in. It's just some review site, but it was a bit annoying.

On the other hand I was happy to see that the free membership allows for a very good impression of the site. You can browse all scenes and get some limited streaming to get a really good idea of what the site is all about. If you're curious at all about this network I'd recommend getting the free membership and explore the site. Many thumbs up for this kind of transparency.

Finally, they recently started adding a lot of Max Hardcore content (around 13 DVD's so far), as far as I know this is one of the few network to have this content. Add in the large number of Pierre Woodman casting videos and this is a very attractive network for fans of hardcore anal sex.

05-20-12  11:51am

Replies (0)
Reply
87
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I'm really curious about some of the more recent tablets. It would be nice to browse the internet from my bed or watch a movie while using the toilet, but somehow I can't justify the $300+ necessary for a nice tablet just for the purpose of convenience.

Until the price goes down I'll stick with my desktop :)


05-20-12  11:39am

Reply
88
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(0)
Reply of pat362's Comment

I am a member now, and as of 1:24 PM (central US time) on 5/20/2012 you can download full videos for all sites (I just got the most recent update from Hardcoreyouth and I'm downloading the full scene from Whiteteens)

Everything is just the way it has been for years, no DRM, no daily limits, full scenes available.


05-20-12  11:25am

Review
89
Visit Try Teens

Try Teens
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 200 scenes with new ones still being added regularly (it looks like a new scene roughly every month, although you get a more updates on other sites if you join through the teen core club network)
- New scenes are available at 950 x 540, but back a few years in the database stuff is somewhat lower quality and the first handful of scenes are only available as clips.
- All scenes have many large images 853px × 1,280px (no zip archive though)
- A lot of very very hot girls, including several exclusive models. All scenes are exclusive to the site and almost all scenes include deep throat and anal, with some including DP.
- Great light and camerawork, a bit static in the majority of scenes, but more dynamic recently.
- Web design is simple to a fault sometimes, but works well enough. Downloads are fast although most videos are around 700 mb. No log-outs, no time-out and no daily limits that I could find. Overall decent technical specs.
- Very hot recent updates (see bottom line f
Cons: - As I mentioned before the design of the site, as all sites in the Teen core club network, is very basic. No options to search for all scenes by one model or even search on the site itself(Aspen Richardsen is available on several of their sites for example...but which ones? and how many scenes? no way to find out)
- No options when it comes to downloading videos, past clips or full scene. No choices of SD or HD videos or different encoders. You get a download link to a video and that’s all. Not even streaming of the entire scene is available.
- A lot of the older scenes include no interview, no stripping or girls playing with themselves, just straight to the sex, very formulaic. For me that was a bit of a downside of the site.
- Somewhat on the expensive especially since nowadays several of the girls also appear on 21 sextury and other sites (they used to have some great exclusive models a few years back, not so much)
Bottom Line: Lk2fireone's review (should show one or two reviews underneath mine) really hits home for me, especially his bottom line. This is a great network with some great female models, but I always felt like the guys running the site didn't really know what to do with the hot girls. The sex always felt a bit too formulaic to me, almost boring. Girls that on other sites would be incredible become average here because all the sets looked the same, all shots were wide angle and all outfits were discarded within seconds.

That being said I was a member of this network for a very long time because they always managed to get very attractive, young girls and they always had them doing anal, DP and impressive deep throats. The hot models always sold this site for me. In fact I believe this network had several of the girls that now appear on other Russian sites (firstanalquest, 21sextury months before they did and often they do much more intense stuff here than they end up doing for other websites.)

That's the good part, now for the bad part

The updates are very sporadic with some months seeing an update every week and sometimes one scene per month or none at all (to get an idea go to teencoreclub and click to see all updates, they show a date for each new scene and you can easily judge which site is no longer maintained and which receives a lot of love. Looks like Try Teens received almost daily updates in December and since then the number of new scenes has slowed down significantly)

The webdesign is too simple for a modern network and the lack of a model page listing all the girls scenes is a huge downside. An easy way to search for type of content would also be nice. It used to be that all DP scenes went to Double Teamed Teens, Ass to Mouth had the heavy anal stuff and Try Teens got a mix of regular vaginal only/ anal sex. Nowadays it seems like all new updates get posted here and several of the more recent scenes are of the same models one boy-girl scene and one threesome with DP scene. (Stacy and Avery both come to mind, but I’m sure there are more such models.)



This strange update scheme brings me to the several dead sites the network owns. This is traditional TeenCoreClub practices. They launch a new site, update heavily for a while and abandon it in a month or so. In fact out of the older sites Try Teens is the only one still regularly active. The other site heavily updated in the network is HardcoreYouth, which while interesting is very similar to other Russian sites to the point where one can barely distinguish between a scene on Firstanalquest or Hardcoreyouth.



Now, all of that negative stuff being said on my latest subscription I was very pleasantly surprised. The style of the last handful of videos uploaded here has changed quite a bit with the most recent ones including very interesting interviews with the girls. The English is horrible and there is a lot of awkwardness, but for the first time you get a sense of who these girls are. Several of them are surprisingly outgoing and look like they are having fun. They talk about anal sex comfortably and make the whole scene a lot more interesting.

This is only applicable on the latest five or so scenes, but damn it makes the site a lot more interesting, all of a sudden the girls are more than just pretty faces who get fucked in the same standard scene. They now have about 10 minutes of solo girl, stripping and toy play. There is nothing hotter in my opinion than a girl using a dildo on her anus and then asking for a real cock and now this site has that, adding a sense of uniqueness that was seriously lacking.

The camera is also not as static as before, which could be a downside for some, but for me it looks a hell of a lot more interesting to get some close-ups of the girls face, some shots of her ass, a bit of a wide-shot. Overall the last five or so scenes on the site have been more interesting and arousing to me than twenty of the previous ones. If only they could go back in time and get Aspen to do one of those interviews before she gets a serious pounding…



I only hope that they continue with this kind of updates and don’t abandon the site anytime soon. With a few more updates this site would be a great source for young girls in hardcore action. Despite the high price when you consider all the scenes you get by joining I have to recommend Try Teens, especially if you enjoyed Firstanalquest, Teenmegaworld and other similar Russian sites.

05-17-12  07:30pm

Replies (2)
Comment
90
Visit Jurassic Cock

Jurassic Cock
(0)

Site no longer seems to update

Joined Pornpros again this month (May 2012) and the last video on this particular site was uploaded in December last year. It's really a shame since the quality or the girls is high and this is one of the few porn pros sites that has anal scenes.

The network seems to have sporadic updates here and there, but overall they seem to have hit a rough patch, just fyi.

05-14-12  07:49pm

Replies (0)
Review
91
Visit Teeny Pass

Teeny Pass
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - This is the main access page to a pretty large network of young adult sites. (check out my older review on Casting couch teens for more details about my favorite site in the network)
- In total across all sites you get around 2500 exclusive movies and another 1500 or so scenes from other sites and DVD's
- Some very very cute girls, a lot of unknown girls and some pretty realistic sex scenes along with some of the best pre-sex interviews I've seen.
- Mostly regular sex, a handful of threesomes and no anal, DP or any other crazy stuff.
- Scenes have images to go along, but no zip files
- Easy navigation and streaming works well.
- No technical issues over the past 3 years when I've been a member on and off. It's always easy to cancel, no hidden fees, no log-outs or site down issues.
Cons: - No recent updates. The archive is there and I always find some videos I missed before, but as far as I can tell the entire network is dead.
- The big downside of the entire network is the quality of the video and images. The highest video size offered is 480x360 and none of the images have zip archives.
- The web design is stuck in the late 90's with no model search features, no way to navigate all the scenes available on all network sites and generally just a old fashioned feel to it (strange cartoons in the banners of the sites, especially for Horny Spanish fly...)overall the whole network just feels like it had better days.
- They have a daily download limit that doesn't allow you to download more than a handful of videos (I believe this is a recent development, but it's very disheartening)
Bottom Line: I like to join this network every 6 months of so, every time hoping that things have improved since I last visited, sadly that is not the case. This network is old and shows it's age: videos have poor resolution, web design is very basic and the scenes remind one of the lighting and style of the 90's. That being said, I still join every once in a while so there is some reason to give these sites a second look.

The big bonus of the network is that the girls are all very cute (they have Lexi Belle, Sandy Sweet, Proxy Paige along with a bunch of girls I've never heard off but they all look incredible) and the action while pretty standard is interesting enough. Almost all sites follow the formula of either an interview with the girl then a standard sex scene or the guys drive around and find a girl stranded for some reason in a parking lot. They give her a ride, we get to hear some ridiculous story and then we get about 20 minutes of sex.

The formula is pretty standard, and even sites dedicated to blow jobs like the big swallow of big league facials follow this trend with a healthy dose of interview and regular sex thrown in for good measure.

Overall I'd say that despite the names and supposed different focuses of the sites pretty much all scenes in this network could have been on one site. Even the ethnic focused sites like Spanish fly feature several girls that could be at home on any other area of the network. When you join you basically get around 2500 scenes that are very similar and pretty standard.

Now, that being said the guys behind this network got the formula down to an art. The models are all incredibly hot and I have yet to see an awkward or uncomfortable interview. Even if the girl is shy at first within a few minutes she is giggling and seems at ease. Even better at no point do the director or male actor seem disrespectful or insulting. All scenes look and feel like fun, classic porn.

If I'd have to compare the network to anything exploited college girls comes to mind, but I'd say the average model on here is a lot more attractive and experienced, making for some very hot videos.

That's the good part. The models and the directors involved. The downside is pretty much everything else from the poor video quality to the download limits that make it almost impossible to get all the videos you want during one or two membership cycles. Add to that the lack of recent updates and the network looses a lot of points.

What it comes down to is a preference choice, are realistic interviews and hot models that you probably haven't seen on the other big networks worth putting up with the technical downsides? For me the action is often more arousing than an insane DP, but with so many choices out there it's hard to truly recommend this network.

If you're on the fence about joining I'd recommend checking out videobox where they have several (if not all) of the teeny bopper club scenes. That way you can get a feel for the kind of scenes you'd be getting here with basically no risk (videobox will most definitely have something that is worth the 9 bucks subscription fee.)

05-13-12  05:28pm

Replies (0)
Review
92
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent amount of content around 5,606 videos (although most girl-girl and boy-girl scenes have three videos each) around 1,427 models and daily updates.
- Exclusive models
- More recent videos are available in multiple formats up to 1280x720
- All shoots have images available as ziped files, they also have a best of, which highlight the best photos in a nice gallery.
- All models look very natural, little make-up many are not shaved, just trimmed almost all look very next door girl
- The sex looks very natural, there are some awkward pauses, no insane penetration angles, the blowjobs look realistic.
- Overall the site has a fun, softcore feel with some close-ups of vaginas and blowjobs.
- A lot of the scenes have a before and after where they interview the models and the girls seem pretty relaxed (although there are some serious language barriers at times)
-In a lot of scenes the orgasms are or look real.
- Good download speeds
- Decent forum with many members
Cons: - Almost all of the videos have an old school feel to them, with highlights overblown and colors a bit faded. Even the highest resolutions feel a bit grainy.
- A lot of videos are broken up into various parts. Also the before and after interviews could have easily been lumped with the actual scene.
- Scenes tend to have a slow intro (I remember one video where the boy texts the guy for 3 minutes)
- The site's navigation is decent but takes some getting used to. There are videos labeled "intimate moments" which are basically solo masturbation shots, but there are also "solo shots" and "after dark" shots and when I say shot I don't mean a video I mean a collection of videos... trust me it makes sense but it takes some getting used to
- The girls are very natural looking and some could use a bit more make-up. I was expecting the same kind of models Backroomcastingcouch or Exploitedcollegegirls has, but the girls here seemed less attractive (IMO)
Bottom Line: Man, this site is something else. I've been a member of most major porn sites over the years and have seen many styles and combinations of content, but Abbywinters stands out as a unique product. If I had to compare it to anything else I'd say it's close to suicide girls in their focus on fun, softcore stuff and community (at least that's how suicide girls used to be back when I joined it a few year ago)

The great selling point of the site are the exclusive, natural looking models and the realistic settings and action. The site claims that all scenes are shot in the girls homes with their outfits and only (supposedly) with their boyfriends and/or girlfriends. To cement this claim there are before and after sex interviews where the girls explain what felt good and what they were nervous/ excited about, where they met the boyfriend, how often they have sex in private and so on.

Aside from scenes with boy-girl, girl-girl sex the site has "Intimate moments" scenes where supposedly the girls are alone with the camera and can be themselves as well as solo shots where the director interviews them a bit before the action. They also have a handful of "after dark" scenes where the girls are supposed to be dressed in nicer clothes and be more romantic. I hope they get more of these as some of the outfits were very nice, but for right now they only have a dozen or so.

Overall the site has a decent premise, unique content and a strong community of followers (and a great forum btw). If you like their style and the girls this place will be a great find and the 3 month membership a steal. However the scenes are far from perfect and you could easily end up disliking the site for how different it feels.

The navigation is efficient, but somewhat different from other porn sites and can get a bit confusing at first. The homepage shows the updates, but the preview images are not animated. The easiest way to browse is by looking at shoots and then either video shoots or image shoots (this way you get animated previews), but you can't easily view all models that video or only images and there is no way to search for top rated models or Russian models. Not to mention that older videos tend to be split into 10 parts and even more recent ones often have 2 parts.

Speaking of videos, I have to say that the girls look great in photos but in many of the videos they end up looking average, even a bit disappointing. I suspect that in order to maintain the vibe of the site everything is filmed with minimal equipment and it shows. Overexposed shots, some blurry close-ups, the sound of the camera taking photos in the background. It all contributes to make the site feel unprofessional. Don't even ask me how many scenes are shot in an extremely bright room with perfectly clean white walls or how overexposed reds look in half the scenes. Overall for me the technical quality was a huge disappointment.

The content itself is decent with a lot of the girls really into it and believable orgasms

However it's a bit slow paced for my taste. All sex scenes take several minutes before anyone gets naked. I personally don't see the need for a little make believe story (oh I'm a photographer, get naked. Oh we're watching tv, get naked) when there is a before interview where the girls say they are excited to have sex (especially when some scenes are only 25 minutes long).

Speaking of the interviews. Some have captions to translate the interview and those are great, the British accents on some girls are even better, but the broken English most girls have coupled with giggling every two seconds when they don't understand the question can get frustrating and took me out of the mood.

At the end of the day I see the appeal of Abby Winters, but I don't think I saved more than a handful of videos. The image sets are very good, but the technical quality and the poor set-up make this feel like old, old Pierre Woodman casting videos. I don't regret joining the site but it's not my cup of tea, I'll stick with Nubiles, which has a similar feel but much better navigation and quality videos.

05-01-12  07:24pm

Replies (4)
Review
93
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of content and frequent updates (Scenes : 6516, over 1000 DVD's and they seem to update scenes daily, sometimes two scenes in one day)
- Hardcore stuff here, a lot of DP, a lot of anal. Around 2500 anal scenes, Ass to mouth (1513), Around 1000 DP and around 50 double anal... pretty crazy stuff in here. Also a decent amount of tranny stuff and a surprising amount of Asian girls doing anal.
- A lot of good looking girls with a nice a mix of American and Russian cute girls like Chastity Lynn, Proxy Paige, Aspen Richardsen, Isabella Clark, etc. A lot of big name porn stars and several amateurs
- I believe all videos are available in different formats, including mobile video, MP4 and WMV. But only the more recent ones are available in high resolutions (older ones are a most 480p and most new ones are 720p, with some 1080p )
- Almost all scenes have photos, but some have only a handful while others have over 100 images. No zip archives as far as I could tell.
Cons: - Older content is interesting, but a bit disappointing. I almost wish they'd give you the option to filter it out.
- Model navigation is hard with many models listed incorrectly or under different names. Some links to models don't work and they display the male models along with the female ones. There is a sort function but it doesn't work very well.
- Navigation overall was a bit clunky, with a lot of focus on directors of the DVD or the DVD itself. You can easily find all scenes directed by Mike Adriano, but the related scenes aren't really relevant half the time.
- Some content or very similar is already available on other sites (anal acrobats is a great example, but a lot of girls appear with the exact same male actor on 21sextury for example)
- It's a bit hard to preview scenes, as all you get are some tags which are not always accurate and one preview image. Although they tell you the length and size of the scene.
- Scene quality and content is a bit all over the place.
Bottom Line: This is another mega site and it feels like one. You get more content than you could surf in years and with very frequent updates you won't get bored soon. There are a lot of girls, some amateurs but a lot of them well known pornstars. The action is more hardcore then the average big network site (I'd say more hardcore then Porn Pros, Reality Kings and even Hustler, to name a few, but right on par with 21 sextury or Teencoreclub)

There are a lot of niches, including some great deep-throat POV scenes, some very nice lesbian scenes and a lot of anal.

However,like most big networks that have been around for a while searching through the older content is a lot like venturing deep into the jungle armed only with a flimsy weed whacker.

The older links, tags and even the content of the video is a bit confusing. You could easily watch a video halfway through before realizing it's a transvestite blow-job scene. The tags say blowjob and anal play but there are no actors listed and the image is too grainy to tell what is going on. Yes, a lot of the older stuff is shot with bad light, poor camerawork and a general feel that reminds one of 80's VHS porn.

Even worse, some of these older DVD's are mixed in with more recent updates, making it hard to mark a point in time past which you should not venture.

That being said the vast majority of scenes are much better quality and the new updated tend to be HD, and very well labeled. Overall I'd say you get maybe 4000 good scenes out of the 6500 available and their number grows every day, with many, many exclusive scenes (although you can get some of them with the bonus evilangel membership on videobox the site still has a decent number of exclusive DVD's)

While this kind of quantity is a great thing, navigating it can still be a bit tricky. The site follows a DVD system more then a streaming scenes or nice websites model. You can easily identify what DVD each scenes belongs to, who directed it and browse other scenes from the DVD, but it's a bit hard to find related anal scenes or all scenes by a particular model that are also DP scenes.

In fact the best way to find content is to select a DVD title (like Buttman adventures or Slurpy Throatsluts to give you a taste of the content available here :) and then navigate the scenes available on that DVD. That is the only way I found to get an animated preview for each scene as well as some quick categories of what the scene will contain.

It seems a bit backwards in the era of streaming internet scenes, but the authors of the site clearly would prefer to just release everything as DVD's.

This also means that each DVD is different in tone. Some feature only American girls and there are pretty standard interviews and English commentary during sex. Some DVD's feature Russian girls who barely talk or are completely quiet. Some scenes are pretty rough with make-up running down the girls faces, while some are softcore or solo masturbation. You have the Anal acrobats fetish DVD's (ever wanted to see milk shot up a girls ass?) and leather face masks, but on the other hand there are some blow job only DVD's that are pretty mainstream and tame.

There are also several DVD's focused on women with strap-ons or shemales fucking guys, around 500 scenes or so, not much but it's a bit strange that they don't really have a separate page for that. Then again, they don't have a separate page for the vintage videos although there are dozens of them.

It's a bit of mish-mash and sometimes it's hard to know what you're looking at. A more in-depth description of the scenes or the ability to preview them from the scene navigation page instead of having to go to the DVD page would have been nice. An easier way to navigate the female models would also have been helpful. Overall I'd have to say that this site could learn a thing or two from 21Sextury when it comes to organizing the website.

I mentioned 21sextury a few times, because the content here reminds me a lot of their stuff. There are anal lesbians, a lot of DP, several of the male and female actors appear in both, I sear even one or two of the outfits appear on both sites (mind you a different scene, but the same studio, same girl same male model) This is of course true of only some of the Russian videos, but it's still a bit strange.

The one area where evilangel is really different is that a lot of the girls look a bit more mature and they like to dress the girls in interesting outfits (Lexi Belle in a bunny costume anyone?)

Overall I'd have to say that the hardcore content, the cute girls and the exclusive scenes make this a must for anyone who likes anal or deep-throating. If you're really on the fence check out what they offer on the Videobox membership deal (I believe it's only 15 bucks on top of the videobox membership, so it's significantly cheaper).

04-29-12  06:44pm

Replies (3)
Comment
94
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)

Great news!

Bacroomcastingcouch is now available as a bonus if you join exploited college girls.

Not sure if you get ECC as a bonus for joining BCC but either way this is great news. These two sites go together like peanut butter and jelly, and it's awesome to see this package deal.

No reason not to join these two great sites now.

11-20-11  11:38am

Replies (2)
Comment
95
Visit Squirt Disgrace

Squirt Disgrace
(0)

Quick impression

This is one of the new sites that Porn pros really seems to be pushing. They have weekly updates and while they only have around 25 scenes so far the content is pretty awesome.

Each scene seems to be around 30 minutes long and we get to see some gorgeous looking girls tied up and played with until they cum in a squirting explosion.

The male model uses all sorts of toys on the girls as well as fingering and fucking them. (Surprising not a lot of head from the guys in here) It's also interesting that some scenes end with the girl cumming while some end with her getting a facial from the dude. It almost feels like they had a lot of content from another one of their disgraced sites and decided to create a new site, then more recently started making content exclusively focused on squirting.

Anyhow, the scenes are fun and each one starts and ends with a very cute interview. Good, high quality stuff that fits right in with the rest of the porn pros content.

11-14-11  05:13pm

Replies (0)
Comment
96
Visit 40 oz Bounce

40 oz Bounce
(0)

Quick impression

Around 120 scenes with updates twice a month.

Good site design, good download speeds, the standard porn pros treatment (see my review for the network for more details)

The site has some of the funnies set-ups for the porn that I've seen in quite a while. A black priest preaches about ass then gets to business, The Cocktip Thunder Force is called into the deep jungle to save some delicious round ass sistas!. A guy in a superman costume check, scooby-doo hat, check. Overall a very lighthearted, fun atmosphere.

The site focuses on black girls, but there are a few Latina and white girls here and there,especially among the older stuff.

Also this site has the most anal of the entire network, with probably every other scene having at least a bit of ass play.

Bottom line, a nice site if you like big asses and a nice fit with the whole vibe of the network. Sadly not as much anal as you'd expect, but still a decent amount. More ethnic diversity and more frequent updates would make this a great site.

11-14-11  05:02pm

Replies (0)
Review
97
Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 80 scenes with 2 new scenes added each month.
- Videos are available as MP4 and WMV as well as ipod format. 1280x 720 HD
- Images as well as screen-caps available in zipped archives. Photos are 2,000px × 1,333px and screencaps are around 720px × 406px. (around 1000 images per scene, but not all are very good... some blurriness here and there)
- The theme of the site is a gigolo stripper giving a good time to a supposed bachlorette or birthday party . Basically one or two dudes and a bunch of girls who will clap, giggle and cheer each other on. It all ends up being fun and very different, almost an orgy site, but with a unique spin
- The scenes have sex, multiple blowjobs and facials as well as some lesbian sex and various strange stuff (the guy puts his cock on a bun and the girl licks mustard off of it for example)
- Good looking models, a lot of cute girls getting facials.
- Decent navigation, they also offer a preview trailer for each scene.
Cons: - The site is a bit shady when it comes to billing. Don't go for the 2 day trial since it's not really worth it as far as I can tell. Also if you only get this site the category search as well as the suggested videos will lead you to the main Bangbros site which costs extra. This means that I can't really use the category search to navigate only dancing bear.
- The fact that they have a lot of images for each scene means that they show you everything they shoot, without filtering the bad images. So if you download the zipped images expect some blurry shots, and a lot of images that look identical to each other.
- Not all females present get into it and there are several girls who you don't even see naked. Guess it goes with the theme of the site, but it could be a con.
- Some male models wear a bear head the entire time or a luchador mask, a bit silly and can make the scene feel somewhat awkward.
- Some of the older scenes don't have category tags so it's hard to say what you get
Bottom Line: I joined this site as part of the bang bros network back in 2009, and I remember being extremely disappointed back then. They had few scenes, rare updates and the action was mostly BJ. In fact if you go to the first few scenes on the site you can see that most of the videos are about a dude stripping down with occasional BJ's behind a towel. Overall the site didn't really work well.

That has all changed since. Now they have around 75-80 scenes and are updating twice a month with about an hour worth of content each time. Despite the fact that the scenes are longer they feel a lot faster. The guys don't spend a lot of time stripping and they usually get to the first BJ within a couple of minutes.

Another nice change is that now almost all videos feature a sex scene, oftentimes with the girl still dressed. We also get several cum-shots, including cum on food which is then eaten (Icing on the birthday cake seems to be a favorite) They also added a bit of lesbian content and I hope they keep pushing that area as it would be nice to see some of the girls in the background going at it.

Speaking of background girls there are several who will never get naked or perform oral on the dude, so don't expect every girl present to show their boobs. Also on average there are only two facials per scene so no bukkake orgy here. Speaking of orgies, there is no anal, DP or rough deepthroating, everything feels more playful and funny than intense, rough sex.

In fact I'd say that is the most unique feature of the site, it all feels like a joke, a party that got a bit out of hand in a sexy way. They seem to really drive that point home and have several scenes where we see some shocked friends or co-workers who seem to say "oh Mary she is always so crazy, but I never thought she'd eat frosting of a guys balls."

Overall the vibe works well, and is helped by the fact that all the girls look like amateurs. They giggle, gag on the penis and overall act very realistic. Don't expect professional porn starlets here.

That being said most of the models are very cute and the main girl (the birthday girl or the bride to be) is usually very cute and attractive.

Unfortunately the site is really not up to it's potential unless you purchase a bangbros membership. The category search function leads you to videos on the network and you are encouraged to pay. The suggested scenes are extra and encourage you to pay for a bang bros membership. There is an ad next to the streaming video for the full membership and so on.

Also, due to the nature of the videos there are some strange scene cuts. In one scene we go from a blow job to a man doing cartwheels and rotating his cock like a helicopter for 5 minutes. I mean it's funny, but if you were getting into the action these scene breaks can be a bit odd. It's also strange when one girl is getting fucked and 10 sit around, some clapping a few looking bored, etc.
I would have preferred it if every girl got naked and maybe there was some light lesbian kissing in the background instead of fully clothed girls looking around and cheering at random intervals.

Bottom-line: As a bonus site to another network this site is awesome and a great value. As a stand alone, well you should make sure you really like the content. For me the whole amateur/ this could be a real party vibe made it interesting but then again I really enjoy porn that strays from the mainstream.

I'd say if you're uncertain consider a bangbros membership and go for that since it has this site as a bonus along with other nice goodies.

11-14-11  04:41pm

Replies (3)
Review
98
Visit Ass Bangers Ball

Ass Bangers Ball
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 85 scenes each one available as 640x480 WMV or Ipod format, as well as a few images (around 20-30 images per set, not that many but enough to get an idea of the action)
- Zipped archives available and images are up to 3072x2048 although the lighting is not always the best in the photos.
- Most scenes have two girls that get pounded by several guys. There is a ton of anal, deepthroat and DP. Also there are some serious cumshots with multiple guys covering one girl in semen. Pretty intense stuff.
- Access to the rest of the network which has several good sites with multiple updates. A lot of fetish/ extreme action here including BSDM, latex, and fuck machines.
- Some very cute models and fun costumes (there are a few masks, a Indians vs cowboys theme) lost of stockings and high heels.
Cons:

- Last update published 2010/12/02
- Several scenes have strange cuts during the scene. I understand that this is necessary when you are shooting an orgy with multiple people, but it still feels strange when the action suddenly changes.
- Some models are really disappointing (older looking, strange body types) More make-up or better light might have helped the scenes. It's also strange to see a very cute girl paired with a woman that is not the same body type/ look.
- Navigation is okay, but feels a bit outdated, would like more categories/ search functions. Right now the main search tool is a type in yourself deal, which can be a bit hard if you're new to the site.
- Sometimes the focus of the scene is not necessarily on the most interesting action. For example a girl is getting DP'ed but the camera is focused on her giving a BJ.
Bottom Line: For the price this network is very decent, as long as you like pretty extreme content, and enjoy BSDM. They have several sites dedicated to rough sex and orgies with this one being a very interesting one. Almost all scenes feature two girls and several guys (there are one or two video with only one girl and 4 or 5 guys, but for the most part expect dozens of dudes.) The focus is on anal sex and DP, although several times I believe only one of the girls does anal.
I say I believe because the action can get pretty confusing, which is understandable when you have 12 guys and 2 women having sex. However, the scene editing doesn't help the situation. In one scene we cut away from a sex scene to a shot of the other girl crying out in what seems genuine pain, we cut back to the sex and then back to the distressed girl after she presumably got some more anal lube. That is 4 cuts within maybe 2 minutes, completely unnecessarily in my opinion. Unfortunately this happens a lot in the more recent scenes. They cut from one girl to the other almost every few minutes and seem to have a lot of close-ups of either one of the girls face or her genital area then cut and switch around.
I understand the difficulties of filming an orgy and I have to say that all things considered they do a pretty good job, but less editing would have been preferred. It's not like the scenes are incredibly long, most of them come in around 32 minutes which I believe is on the short end considering how much material they could get from two girls having sex with multiple guys.
Aside from the way the videos are edited the site doesn't seem to update anymore, so that's a big downside, but considering they have almost 100 intense scenes I am okay with the amount of content (just don't plan to spend a whole year on this site)
The final issue I had with the site was that the model quality is hugely varied. They have some incredible looking girls that I couldn't believe were ready to do this kind of action, but on the other hand they have some ladies that would be more at home on a big and beautiful site or on a mature page. Combining the two types of models in one scene can make for some awkward moments, especially since they like to cut from one girl to the other pretty fast.
Speaking of the two girls, I was a bit surprise to see that in several scenes the two females don't really interact that much. The focus is mostly on the two girls getting pounded by the males, almost separately from each other. At times you could easily forget that there were two women involved in most videos.
Aside from the points above the site was a very nice experience. Downloads worked fine ans streaming was excellent. I wish they had more images available for each scene, but the few they do have are all pretty hardcore action so no major complaints there.
The navigation and design of the site felt a bit outdated, but still very functional and while they could use a more improved model page or a category search I had no issues previewing and finding content.
The bottom-line: A good site for anyone who likes orgies and hardcore sex. Worth checking out for a month or two, especially if the rest of the network looks appealing to you.

11-14-11  03:42pm

Replies (0)
Reply
99
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
Reply of Nubiles Captain's Reply

Ha ha. This is exactly what I meant when I said that the webmasters are incredible. I post the review and only minutes later there is a reply here addressing everything I posted.

I see what you are saying about seeing the preview of the scenes. It's just that I really like the new slim video page and it would be great if I could pick out what video I want to watch or download just from that page. I know a lot of studios have the feature of hovering over the scene image and then seeing several preview images... not sure how hard it is to program that, but it's very nifty IMO.

I think my issue with the browsing right now is that whenever I browse Nubiles I find myself constantly going back to a main index, then going back into a more detailed page, then back up a level. It's not really a flow, if that makes any sense.

I see a model I think I like, but sometimes it's hard to tell because the preview image is small or just shows her face or a body part. I click the girl, see all her sets and maybe select something for download then go back and browse through the models again. Back and forth...

On many other sites I am able to just go from one page to another because they have categories or suggestions.

I know Nubiles has categories too, since you use them to some extent on the page where you can stream the video, but I think if you also had images to other models or video links that would help. I would also like to see that kind of linking on the models page.

Maybe something like this: I click on Henessy and she is Czech so maybe I could click on a link saying "other Czech girls" or she has a cute kitchen scene, maybe you could suggest other kitchen related scenes, or other girls that do an outdoors shot. That way I could click this link and see other models, or even better show me an image of those other girls underneath Hennessy's updates. That way I am going deeper into the site discovering models that I maybe didn't even know existed.

Does that make sense? Not sure how hard this is to do, but I have seen it on other sites and I think on a site that has as many models as Nubiles it would help highlight some girls that very hot, but don't end up in the tops...


Anyhow, great site, and I look forward to your next updates.


11-13-11  09:49pm

Reply
100
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

Did you actually contact them or did they do it automatically?

In my experience they were responsive, but you had to reach out to them, curious if they have a more pro-active approach...


11-13-11  09:45pm


Shown : 76-100 of 690 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.4 seconds.