| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Oye Loca
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Hate it too. Honestly don't recall any from Oye Loca (haven't downloaded from them in a while) although I will say that overall the network has loads of content. Innocent High has enough to last a month's membership and I can overlook not including the interviews on the other sites.
|
05-30-08 03:44pm
|
Review
202
|
Oye Loca
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great Network
great price
Lots of girls with updates every week
High Quality Pics
Full, 3-part or 1 minute clip vids for each
Ability to save favorite scenes to easily come back later
NO DRM |
| Cons: |
Site still small (34 episodes though) and less than a year old. Not really many gripes except not all of the girls seem to be Latina. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's a Latina site but a few of the girls seem to be strictly white. But you never know. The site is still fairly new (less than a year old) but has 34 videos as of mid-March with updates each week. This along with access to other sites on the network makes this a great buy. |
|
03-13-07 01:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
203
|
Pimp Element
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
Yeah looks to me like the only difference is Sugarpie Honeys is devoted to black creampies, but other than that not much difference. They could have combined the two sites no problem instead of pumping up the "network" with an additional site.
|
10-05-09 12:54pm
|
Reply
204
|
Pinky Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
peterhd's Review
OK so it's obvious that peterhd/caperuzo is the camera man and wants to hype up the site. Problem is, a fisting site is such an eccentric niche that the tactic won't work at PU. Just looks at the amount of reviews or comments from fisting sites -- it seems like even though some people might like it, they're not joining sites dedicated to it.
I don't think it would be the ideal way to go and the amount of spammers is relatively small here, but to help keep the integrity of the site and its members, maybe down the road the reviews need to be moderated before published. I think PU's moderators have discretion at what constitutes a review, and if something doesn't fit the bill they can reply to the poster to complete a full review or post it as a comment. It looks like a lot of these "100" reviewers never even come back so chances are they wouldn't respond to the request, meaning it wasn't important or legit anyway.
|
06-05-09 04:50am
|
Reply
205
|
Porn Oasis
(0)
|
Reply of
OUMarcus's Comment
Haven't been a member in a year. The video quality wasn't anything you'll find on a big/network site or anything mainly because it really is just Oasis with her husband filming and maybe a sound guy or two. However, there is tons and tons of content - pics and vids. In the event you decide to try, you should also give Cathy's Cravings a shot, although the content type is slightly different. They often feature each other in sets on each other's websites because they're friends outside of the business, but Cathy's I would say is a better value. Both are very affordable though, under $15
|
08-06-07 05:21pm
|
Reply
206
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I almost joined this site once and kept it on my "future subscribes" list. Is there any way for PU staff to give some sort of mention of the types of things that make you make this decision? Obviously not every detailed problem, but maybe something that influenced your decision that may help us out?
|
12-17-09 11:35am
|
Reply
207
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ah thanks. This is one site I was always interested in but don't know about it due to all the negative reviews. I'll stick with VideoBox and BrainPass
|
02-10-10 12:41pm
|
Reply
208
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
How did cancellation go? And was it easy to cancel or do they make it difficult?
|
02-10-10 12:34pm
|
Comment
209
|
Real Drunken Girls
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 08:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
210
|
Real Drunken Girls
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Extremely real and the amount of vomiting in these videos shows that its not acting.
New videos give multiple options-Middle, High and DVD quality
Delivers what the tour and premise promises
Eight bonus sites included (I had to e-mail them and get the password to work though)
More content than you could get through in a one month subscription |
| Cons: |
Not in English
The worst members-site organization ever
A lot of scenes don't have a full video option, and those that do are split into two "full video" parts - drinking and fluffing & the drunk action.
Cost is too high for a site that takes forever to find what you're looking for. |
| Bottom Line: |
Real Drunken Girls delivers what is promised - video of guys getting these girls completely hammered and then taking advantage of them. One word to the wise, the site is not filmed in USA and as a result there is no English so no enjoying the set-up. Obviously 95% of "reality" sites on the internet are staged, but I would honestly put my money that this site is the real deal. They show the massive amounts of alcohol consumed and in every video the girls vomit from the alcohol - and it's not a cut scene where they have time to prep. They blow it out of nowhere and in one or two scenes it actually ended the action b/c of how messy it got.
Organization is where this site loses at least 10 overall points. There's no way to describe it except to say that the videos are organized chronologically, except it's the worst possible structure. There's no way to just click a girl/scene and then go to the videos or pictures of that one. Each scene has about 8 or 9 updates and they are all listed side-by-side on about 30 pages, making it impossible to find a particular season.
Eight bonus sites are included, including Pregnant Wishes. However they all follow the same site design, meaning good luck finding a certain scene you may have liked in the tour/preview.
Video quality for the most part is High Def on the "full scene" videos and middle to high on the minute clips. Overall, a great site if organization gets fixed so you can find whatever scene you want to see. |
|
11-20-07 08:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
211
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Me too, I actually never look at the photos on any site unless I want to quick browse the screencaps to find out which part of a scene I should download. Don't remember why I happened to come across the RK photos the other day.
|
02-15-10 12:13pm
|
Comment
212
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
02-13-10 06:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
213
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Thanks for the info about the extra sites. Real thorough review, as always expected from the TrashMan
|
02-13-09 10:36am
|
Reply
214
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
juanchopancho's Comment
Oddly I didn't have that problem two weeks ago with a trial membership. Maybe it's something that just started in the past 14 days. It would be a shame because I liked it so much I stayed on. Tons of content and I never do full memberships before a fl trial because that's how I know if I like the whole get-up.
|
10-23-08 12:26pm
|
Reply
215
|
Rip Her Up
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I'm interested too. The fifth rotating picture at the top with the girl with getting it doggy with her hand in her mouth...looks like it will be an amazing scene. Hopefully someone knows something about the site.
|
01-29-09 07:20pm
|
Comment
216
|
Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
|
03-26-07 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
217
|
Ruth Blackwell
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Made by same crew as BlacksOnBlondes, spring and glory hole so the production is good
Cameos by most of your favorite stars |
| Cons: |
High price for amount of vids
Downloading problems
Not all of girls featured on preview are in members area |
| Bottom Line: |
The most unacceptable thing for a site is to not have all the girls featured in the preview page. In this case, one of the main reasons I joined was because I was interested in just about every guest featured on the preview page, but a few of my faves that were on there weren't in the members area at all. For some reason, I also had problems downloading on this site, although I haven't had problems on the other sites run by the company (BoB, Spring, GloryHole).
It's only one scene of the close to 20 videos, but Naomi looks completely uninterested or high, which doesn't make for good quality. Other gripes with the scenes include this being a site about how Ruth gets the other girls hooked on black guys, but most of the action is with her while the other looks on...not good in terms of what the premise is. |
|
03-24-07 10:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
218
|
School Girl Lapdance
(0)
|
|
09-25-08 05:26am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
219
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Many thanks but my period would have ended yesterday so I don't think there's anything else that can happen. It was a shame because I actually liked the site, but what happened makes no sense and spoiled their site for me.
|
07-11-10 02:19pm
|
Comment
220
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
|
07-08-10 12:07pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
221
|
Soft Puffy Nipples
(0)
|
Reply of
giggitygiggity's Review
My general rule of thumb - never sign up for a site with no tour. Means they have something to hide (that being no content).
|
04-09-09 08:21am
|
Reply
222
|
Solo Interviews
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Review
I haven't checked solo interviews yet, but their network sites OyeLoca and InnocentHigh do indeed have high quality pics. Or rather, just to be safe, i'll say they are smaller in size (700x1050) but high quality regarding how they look. They don't look anything like vidcaps or amateur-ish. They look like any other sites High-Res pics but smaller in size. Video quality wasn't DVD quality like some great sites but wasn't worse than any other regular site and I never questioned it until reading the review.
I agree that this site is not as good as the other sites in the network, but does it really deserve a 51? Is that based just on the pics (it is mainly a video site)? I'd think, based on the things you pointed out that they did wrong, that the site would be in the 70's, described as: Average, some things done right, some things done wrong or 60's: does more wrong than right, low recommendation.
51 just seems low for a site costing 17.84 a month with 4 other sites included (over 100 vids all together), has a score of 78 by TBP and five 80's out of seven other sites reviews, no DRM or download limit (not anymore). Even a site with vidcaps only would be at least Average with all those added at that price, but this site DOES have actual higher quality pics, just not as high (pixels) as others which you wouldn't notice unless you used a program that showed pixels like photoshop or irfanview.
|
03-13-07 10:35pm
|
Reply
223
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Murr's Comment
Hasn't updated in years
|
06-16-09 10:27am
|
Review
224
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
A lot of content
Great interracial action
Spring - while not early 20's anymore - has a great body |
| Cons: |
No longer updates it seems
Not interested in cuckhold scenes with men licking sperm off her |
| Bottom Line: |
There are plenty of videos to serve you for a month or two but that's it. Doesn't update regularly anymore, no bonus sites. Spring isn't the little 18 year old she was when she started a few years ago but still has a great body for sex. Started doing scenes with other pornstars in later updates, shows she was running out of ways to keep the site fresh.
It seems they passed the torch to KatieThomas.com, her "sister's" website. While Katie is cuter, she isn't as skilled as sex as Spring. |
|
03-01-07 02:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
225
|
Squirt Hunter
(0)
|
|
06-05-07 05:17pm
Replies (2)
|
