| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
trev's Comment
Did this comment change along the way?
Looked at a different version some hours ago..
Anyway: Quite a few PUs have been members here - this PU included - and had no problems with downloads - see former reviews.
BUT: if trev has those serious problems with the download - AND customer service, guess we can look forward to some reaction from the webmaster - who has been known to get back here at PU.....
|
08-16-11 06:45am
|
Reply
627
|
Christina Skye XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
"Short and sweet" review - for a site apparently not that great (never been there).
Guess you do not need more info here than pat362 comes up with. Thumbs up for a short review like this....
And, oh, BTW - thanks for the warning...
|
08-16-11 06:39am
|
Reply
628
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
For fellow PUs I know - NO.
For newer PUs - Sometimes, Yes.
|
08-16-11 04:07am
|
Reply
629
|
Brazzers Reel
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
Let's have an answer from some webmaster on this one.....
BTW:
More and more site are being grabbed/taken over ect. by this Manwin Canada Co...........And more problems seems to occur to the users/customers?
|
08-14-11 10:46am
|
Reply
630
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What is .xxx domains????
|
08-14-11 08:16am
|
Reply
631
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Netscape 9 for porn - OLD habit, but it works fine with passwords managing and downloads....(and the icon hidden a secret place)
Firefox for every thing else
IE - never use it
|
08-12-11 03:10am
|
Reply
632
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I know, I know.....just had to blow off some steam....and I still believe some sites should show more appreciation of all that PR they're getting from us...and honestly, I - as a user and customer - would urge them to consider that fact...and that's not in the way of, yes: disparage those sites...but only to take that fine PR in consideration..
|
08-11-11 09:41am
|
Reply
633
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks for this feed back, Khan.
..."They declined offering it to us"??
Kind of arrogant and not very wise in my opinion - we are close to 12.000 PUs here - so probably a lot of potential members......still, I'm not that surprised.
Really, MetArt and Nubiles - do you not appreciate the business/potential business of that many members of PU???
Well, if you do not care about our (PU) membership, guess I'll pass this mail-offer.
|
08-11-11 07:39am
|
Comment
634
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
|
08-11-11 06:35am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
635
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
Fine review of this old site....
Some really nice models here - but I agree with otoh:
"Possibly too slick"!
Well said.
|
08-11-11 02:47am
|
Reply
636
|
N/A
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
Well spoken - both about the "gradual build-up in intensity" - and for sure: "it needs some skillful editing to sustain the momentum."
|
08-10-11 12:00pm
|
Reply
637
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
What a fine review - and a ditto fine heads up of this network.
Been a member several times in the past - but not lately... have had my downs/doubts for the network for some time - but guess I have to go here again for lots of reasons mentioned in this review (Sasha Rose at Reality Kings - for one).
Well done, elephant!!
|
08-10-11 06:11am
|
Reply
638
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As a "porn veteran" I feel I've almost seen it all.
BUT I like those US massage sites - Massage Girls 18, Soapy Massage and Massage Parlor.
They have that turn on from way back when visiting places like that - it WAS fun.
BTW: Miss a TBP review of Massage Girls 18...
|
08-10-11 06:03am
|
Reply
639
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for this heads-up, Drooler....no pressure, friend - but guess a review from you of this site would be appreciated big time - not only by this user, but...
It's kind of funny/strange that no words(comments or alike) have been up here for years - it's not a minor one, as I see it..
Well.......if you get the time...
|
08-08-11 10:27am
|
Reply
640
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
This is very nostalgic with a question like that:
"I got a ten dollar bill and my gas tank is filled - and it's only three miles to town"
and:
"Would a '49 Mercury still be out of sight
That was the way it was then - You were like Natalie and I was James Dean
Slow walkin soft talkin silently mean
Surely the rebel in me lives again
But without a cause to be caught all up in.."
(Quote: Mickey Newbury)
Bottom line:
Times change all - and of course you get another view of - also - porn along the way.
Don't like tats, don't like too much anal, don't like a guy have to jerk off in facials (that's the girls job, anyway).
But I dig beautiful girls - teens or MILFS - and I dig the way they looked then and the way they generally look now.....and for sure, I still dig some of that retro porn - soft and hard - from way back in the 1980th - when their hairstyle and their high heels knocked you off your feet...
So yes, it kind of "colors" my taste - in some ways: big time...
|
08-08-11 10:09am
|
Comment
641
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
|
08-07-11 09:28am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
642
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Ema, cute, for sure - but like you experienced - nothing new - and the the todays vid preview is in a hopeless low quality... really still have my doubts, but let's see.
|
08-04-11 07:07am
|
Reply
643
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
LOL, rearadmiral..."technical dimwitted" - dig that one /and still laughing) - and that's some of us are. Look forward to some advise from BadMrFrosty on this one... to the benefit of all here
|
08-04-11 06:45am
|
Reply
644
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
"I'm trying very hard to be selective and not hoard stuff I will never see again."
Know about that deal, for sure....But on the other hand: Went back a couple of times to stash saved years ago - and even if most vids then where lower quality, I got surprised about what I found - and had forgotten ....and spend hours enjoying watching that old material, so...
|
08-04-11 06:40am
|
Reply
645
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
First: Not a member..
But it'd be great to get some news about this site and the bonus sites.
Glam Deluxe had it's ups and certainly downs for years..(just ask the Drooler)
But according to previews things seems to happen - so I'll just join lk2's: Any members here (before I want to spend money on this site again)
And if not, well maybe I'll go for it in spite of former warnings. (I've been a member a couple of times in the past)
BTW: Helen's Planet does not seem to update anymore (not totally sure, though)
|
08-04-11 06:33am
|
Reply
646
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Guess I'm an amateur with 5 externals -
But, BMF: Help this hopeless amateur out: How does SERVERS work???
And you say it's much cheaper...sounds interesting.
|
08-04-11 06:18am
|
Reply
647
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just bought a new Freecom 2 TB - so now 5 - AND I enjoy NOT having to delete old/older stash because of space issues...
Besides the new one: an OLD 320 Gb, a 500 Gb and 2 1 TB.
|
08-04-11 06:15am
|
Reply
648
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Good inputs above - and mostly, I agree...bottom line: Reviews got to be subjective even for TBP...it's people making them.
BUT: One thing that - now and then - is a serious slip in TBP reviews are the statement: Exclusive - when not..
|
08-03-11 05:19am
|
Reply
649
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
We're not alone - thanks for that fine reply/input - or rather those fine words, ol' friend....I agree and never doubt your taste....
|
08-01-11 10:09am
|
Reply
650
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
No, gaypornlover - forget it (put on hold)......just take it in consideration in the future, please (had my review up in less than 30 minuttes.....it's easy: Look at the review line - here you get both date and time....it's just some thing about consideration for other reviews - but we've been through that
No problemas!!!
|
08-01-11 09:01am
|
