| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
851
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, Drooler music and ass do go together and BTW: please check out my Beautiful X-Art model thread - I had my hopes on you here.....
|
01-04-11 08:20am
|
Reply
852
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Anyone ever watch the somewhat famous music movie of ABBA i Australia - the sequence with Agnetha in white dancing with her back to the audience.....can't get it out of my mind...
It's here from utube with a weird soundtrack, alas:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTbwMyAVm8Y
|
01-04-11 08:12am
|
Reply
853
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Viewing quality - be vids or pixsets - is more and more essential to this user - BUT all those phrases - like Drooler states - are useless unless if it's follow up by that sincere quality - BUT that also why PU has a mission...
|
01-03-11 07:57am
|
Comment
854
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
|
01-03-11 07:34am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
855
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
SimonSubAms's Reply
Thank you for this update.....
|
01-03-11 07:30am
|
Reply
856
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
BTW - kind of understand Khans "Sigh" here.....really we've been through the deals of those trusts - how difficult can it be?
|
12-23-10 09:28am
|
Reply
857
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Reply
The/our trust ratings are not a "misnomer" the way I see it. It's a a deal where you can keep away the kind of people who are in some ways related to certain sites - and give them up to a 100 in score...
Over the years we've had quite a few of those reviews from new PUs and just as fast as they entered - they leave again...
The PU trust is not just a hoax, but useful to the more serious users.
|
12-23-10 08:03am
|
Reply
858
|
Fantasy Female Fights
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Another fine/great/nice review from mbaya....
Not my kind of of fetish - still it looks like this site (finally) do some full body vids - and the UK-deal does not make it worse - and if I had all the money in the world, I might join here - will probably prefer to use my money elsewhere...........but it's certainly not uninteresting...
|
12-23-10 07:54am
|
Reply
859
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, that's not my experience.........and why should we.
It's a matter of help/encouragement, too.
When I've seen a new PU doing some fine reviews - including good pros and warnings/cons - well, then I figure that new PU is on the right track.
BTW: It's getting very close to X-mas, so to all the nice people here at PU and TBP:
A VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS...
|
12-23-10 07:16am
|
Reply
860
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
It's certainly hard to disagree about Nubiles - and also now X-art in this deal - erotic, sensual, horny ect. solo vids....
And we could put in a couple of others.
I still find that those (in my stash) MPL-videos are so much better than MetArt - and it's really between those two I'd be great to hear some views from fellow PUs...
Anyway, I'm with you all the way here, lk2..
|
12-21-10 08:49am
|
Comment
861
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
|
12-21-10 07:03am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
862
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Can't find that deal with Reality Kings anywhere at the preview - they still got Vivid and EA (not worth the extra money in my opinion, anyway).
But VideoBox still brags with the old TB:
"Definitely the best video site on the net."
- The Best Porn
That one is from summer 2009 and a lot of things have happened in porn since then...
Guess I'll not go back to VideoBox for primarily two reasons (and a lot others):
In spite of that vast amount the site is worse than ever: Average/bad tech/viewing quality of most vids. And that's definitely the main bummer here!
Bad search system and that extra deal that will cost you money: Vivid and Evil Angel...at least they could have the decency to make it a part of there entire deal..
|
12-11-10 07:54am
|
Reply
863
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
nadiencendia, this has been annoying me too - for a long time...so it's good you bring it up again - and thanks to your comment, I could not resist to make a new thread - see that, if you like....
BTW: agree somewhat about Viv Thomas - except that what I've seen the vid quality lacks a lot - in general...
|
12-10-10 07:55am
|
Reply
864
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the fine/informative reply...I agree about the models - I still find that you could get a better deal at that Teen Mega World (with the same models and better quality) - but then again - I have not been at this one for almost a year now...anyway: maybe we'll see a review from you...?
|
12-10-10 07:53am
|
Reply
865
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
I think nadiencendia here says what a lot of us/PUs feel - and not only for this site/network - but for quite a few others:
Instead of being so fond - photographers/video-ditto - of a vast amout/looooong minutes of close-ups - let's get much more full body views...including the face, the legs, the high heels...
Close-ups are part of the deal and it's ok - BUT not 2/3 or even 3/4 of a set/video...
We have been around this many times, so the producers/Webmasters must have an idea what the paying users are looking for - it's still a mystery, that they obviously do not listen...don't you guys care - not to loose the dough from users?
Anyway - thanks for bringing it up again!
|
12-10-10 07:02am
|
Reply
866
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Very fast reply from WM (8 minutes) - thumbs up!
|
12-10-10 06:39am
|
Reply
867
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Just a BTW, lk2: See slutty's recent review - and the replies...
|
12-10-10 06:00am
|
Reply
868
|
Video Angels.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
hecatomb's Reply
Oh yes, the review is a little old - but I still treasure some of the content in my 'vault'...
The quality is general so-so (nowhere near those crips 5000k/1920x1080), some just ok, some average and some not that good.
No, do not remember Adeles material, but you'll all models/content here:
http://videoangels.tv/index.cfm?page=preview3.cfm
|
12-10-10 05:56am
|
Reply
869
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
FZKK's Reply
Well, bottom line, FZKK - I think it's not so much an opinion on my own account. We've had this up earlier here at PU - and everybody seems to hate it.
At almost all p-sites you got an option to cancel via the billing co. - and/or doing it by mail ect. - but I certainly get your drift about the deal where a phone call could give more business...
Still for the user - that only way to cancel is not ok...
|
12-09-10 07:34am
|
Reply
870
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
FZKK's Reply
8 minutes on the phone to cancel is a long time - even if it's free (800) - strange procedure. Another reason to stay away...in spite of great looking playmates..
|
12-09-10 06:45am
|
Comment
871
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
|
12-09-10 06:41am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
872
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
FZKK's Review
Agree with graymane - short, but quite informative - so, yes - fine review.
One thing though:
How did you get out of it?
Saw somewhere that you have to cancel rebilling via phone?
|
12-09-10 06:21am
|
Reply
873
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Fine review, slutty.
That said - the site must have taken a much better turn lately - I was there in January (this year) - and certainly not happy with it - see my review. Is it still some kind of clone of YoungPorn.net?
Anyway - according to the preview - almost all the archived material is still the same - also at YP - which generally has some low tech quality material....
|
12-09-10 05:42am
|
Reply
874
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Of course lingerie - but voted feet/shoes/legs - maybe should have been divided, because not feet for this user...
But primarily: HIGH HEELS
Watching all those esteuro vids/sets with girls in tennis shoes or socks - nada.
But small high heel shoes (no pumps) like the one and only Silvia Saint use/used.
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/1840/...s-sexy-more-ways-one
|
12-09-10 05:26am
|
Reply
875
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Another great messmer review - but I'll never be a (new) hairy fan: except from those vintage materials - in those times shaved pussies were not much in style - and the "natural" pussy was great - like some of those US models like Barbii, Stephanie Rage, Blondie, Racquel Darrian ect. Love that time...and keep material from then - though not the best quality, for sure - as a precious treasure.
But for newer porn it's 'shaved pussy' for this user - so one difference in taste there, messmer.....
|
12-07-10 08:30am
|
