Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Denner (0)

Feedback:   All (2775)  |   Reviews (120)  |   Comments (399)  |   Replies (2256) Other:   Replies Received (1709)  |   Trust Ratings (1) All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user. Shown : 1776-1800 of 2795 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Comment 1776 Twistys (0) Grainy videos?????? Just joined-up again - this time through an offer via a Videobox-deal where you could get access to Twistys 3 days for almost nothing - a dollar or something like that.. Like many other PU's I have the same feeling about Twistys: "The same stuff all over again..." But this time I actually downloaded some videos at Twistys - but man, they got a new thing about them - more grainy - or NOT so sharp/crisp - is that a new style? BTW: Everybody joining Twistys also take a loook at Anettedawn.com - but man are those videos not getting to be a bore after "all these years"...the same style, the same editing, the same everything. A pitty - she used to be a knockout, a doll - now it's all repeating itself - she should do something radical about her performance in the future.. 01-12-09  08:41am Replies (5) Reply 1777 Karup's PC (0) Reply of mbaya's Reply Thanks for that thumb-up... Agree, Karups - no matter which site - has always been very decent/accurate in costumer-service. And, man - that's what counts too for a good pornsite. 01-12-09  07:41am Reply 1778 Amour Babes (0) Reply of longbucks's Reply See reply to your sistersite: 18 Virgin Sex - it covers the same aspect.. 01-12-09  07:37am Reply 1779 18 Virgin Sex (0) Reply of longbucks's Reply Well, thanks HERE! But this member still cannot gain access to the bonus-sites I joined up for. When I get access to amourbabes.com and try to get futher to the bonus-sites, all just come up with a windows stating: "404 Not Found". If I try to access via the a specific bonus-sites, it's just a NO... BTW: Never got answers when using your costumer-service... 01-12-09  07:35am Reply 1780 Karup's PC (0) Reply of TrashMan's Review Fine review here! Agree with TrashMan in pros and cons. The amount of content is amazing and there's a girl/model for every taste. And I certainly agree with the cons: The name-"givning" are a mess. If you find a model, you want to search for any place else: no chance - not even with alias.. Newer vids are getting better, but still the older ones are not good - even the ones from summer/fall 2008. 01-10-09  03:14pm Reply 1781 N/A Reply of surferman's Poll I voted the six months... In this kind of line it just seems impossible, that we (PUs) now and then NOT hit something thats been "kind of" up to debate before. And again it may be a matter of a small diffenrence in a poll - and so what? As long as we keep polls alive and well in a mix of polls suggested by PUs or placed by TBP... And like they say in the newspaper-bussiness: Readers sure have a short memory....and frankly - somtimes I think TBP is a little fast to reject a poll, just because the subject has been up earlier. 01-10-09  08:05am Comment 1782 Danni.com (0) Back to great things Things are certainly - again - improving at this site. If your're into softcore/masturbation (or maybe lez) Danni is still getting better. Video-quality AND photo-ditto has improved - and the navigation/design is making things even more fun to browse. What a tremendous amount of content of newer and older US-girls/models especially. It LOOKS like they even did som re-editing of older videos, not entirely sure, but thanks! They are in a bit better quality anyway. And man, I'm a fan of Shawna Lenee - and she done a lot of videos - some good, some not so good. But the Danni-lapdace with Shawna is the best solo-video of this girl I've ever seen..and there's a ten minuttes live chat/masturbation which is awesome too. BTW: If there's one thing Danni still does good, it's solo big-titted solo stuff... Been a member 7,8 og ten times in the past - and never regretted it - including this time... PS: I'm also still a bit impressed by the variation of models.. 01-10-09  06:36am Replies (0) Comment 1783 18 Virgin Sex (0) Bad costumer-service Joined in a package (34.95) - but last two weeks I've only had access to ONE site - passwork do not work on the others after the site changed all passwords around Christmas. Wrote websmaster - no response. Wrote Epoch two weeks ago - an answer stated: Contact webmaster. Still nothing - so take care with this UK-based company. 01-10-09  03:10am Replies (2) Reply 1784 Teen Dreams (0) Reply of PinkPanther's Reply Yes, agree - the pics situation is better now - thats a fine thing with the click-next - and as far as I can see: the quality also seems a bit better. And so DOES the new videos - just a petty the amount is not quite what they promissed before Christmas..which was as I remember it daily video updates - today (1/9)there is none... 01-09-09  10:40am Reply 1785 David Nudes (0) Reply of Denner's Comment To both Rizzo and Drooler: Took a closer look at those videos again: Scenes seems parted in two clips - each about 50-60 Mb, so rather short. The sound is only muzak - the filming/cutting is terrible and in some you keep getting flash from still-camera. Sincerly hope that still-camera does a better work than the video-ditto. The girls I've not seen before - but no matter - won't even save those videos 01-08-09  01:20pm Comment 1786 David Nudes (0) Sophisticated my.... Well, well, well... Still agree, that the site LOOKS good at preview. But just got hold of five videos from David Nudes (have NOT seen any photos yet, so this just from those videos). But the five videos sucks, frankly spoken. The quality is ok, but the style is not - the videos states from start: David Nudes - The Sophisticated Nude - the scene looks like a lousy apartment and the girls have problems handleling the situation, the clips are short - and finally the videos are of photoshoots. The models? - I've certainly seen much more "sophisticated" models than at that... BTW: Sophisticated? - it's like comparing a garage rockband to Led Zeppelin 01-08-09  12:16pm Replies (6) Reply 1787 N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll Things differs according to nationality, I guess. I'd never consider Playboy as Porn - it's nudity - and nudity is not porn. Porn is interaction - fucking, 69 or whatever - with two persons of different sex or same makes love/fucks in front of a camera (still or video). 01-08-09  08:14am Reply 1788 Watch 4 Beauty (0) Reply of Mr Fountain's Review Great review with a vast amount of info! Been a while since last join-up, but the site seems to have grown quite a lot. Agree with most pros and cons here - but my main "cons" was then - and it looks like it still have to be according to the preview: Way too short videos - average time for a videoclip about three minuttes...! 01-07-09  03:42pm Reply 1789 David Nudes (0) Reply of TheRizzo's Comment Wow, great hint here, thanks to TheRizzo - never seen this. It deserves a closer look... Think I remember some site where the photographers name is David something - but that site had - as I remember it - only outdoor shoots (video og photo) BTW: Bet the Drooler will know... 01-07-09  03:22pm Reply 1790 Teen Dreams (0) Reply of TheRizzo's Reply Exactly, Rizzo .. this site has some of the best stuff - just wish the updates - especially videos - would come more often - and yes, if so, this user also would rebill much longer.... 01-07-09  03:18pm Comment 1791 Teen Dreams (0) Disappointed One of my all time favorites made me a promiss (how about that)! Well, anyway Teendreams webmaster stated - both here and in a mail to this user - that the site would really go for it from January 2009 - especially with a new amount/style of videos - and a lot of new girls. Well, I'm certainly not that exited: 3 new solo videos in this year - and we're now at the 7.th - less than one pr. day. And then some non-exclusive b/g videos. Had my hopes up higher, but there's not much new on that solo-girl-video front - since I last joined, alas... Still I keep up these hopes up for the nearest future - that's why I join - again and again. BTW: A plus: the few new solo-videos are of new and great quality! 01-07-09  10:48am Replies (4) Reply 1792 N/A Reply of messmer's Poll A poll that covers most of the things that keeps this user from getting involved. DRM - well I guess no real PU will ever accept that again. DOWNLOAD LIMITS - never really figured out why some sites tend to this - anyway it's a no-no.. HIGH PRICE - if a site got value for the money, ok - but high price also tends to scare a lot of users away - and why a high price? Probably greed! FILES NOT ZIPPED - No way I'd join a site where they do not even bother to do zip for photo-files. BAD REVIEWS - It all depends - how well founded the review is, details, man details - and finally opinions. OTHER - Lousy feedback, not taking care of the difference in currency and man, what is very importend: Updates...... 01-03-09  11:24am Reply 1793 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll Does anyone notice, like williamj asks? Probably not - Only thing those changes can create is a bit confusion - but bottomline: we all know the names, after all... So: No problems here. (and BTW: those avatars are also kind of fun, aren't they?) 12-31-08  08:34am Reply 1794 Glam Deluxe (0) Reply of Drooler's Comment ANOTHER ONE!!! Close to scam - is this desperation or what? - just checked out the video-updates - not even worth the six bucks... Almost fell for the "trap" myself, but skiped it thanks to Ze Droolah for the update/warning! 12-31-08  08:30am Reply 1795 Killergram (0) Reply of picdude's Reply I agree that Killergram is probably the best tip for a top british pornsite now... This user is a fan and a neverending searcher for brit-porn - and it's slim. Got some soft-sites as favorites, but still looking for the british stuff. And oh, yes, Killergram did a lot - maybe this user just got tired of those "same ol' scenes, don't know - would it not be great if some other kind of british hc-site could grap a hold of those models and make new kind of scenes - well, we can all dream... 12-26-08  09:40am Reply 1796 Killergram (0) Reply of picdude's Comment As the first reviewer of this site at PU just a few words in reply to this: Guess it may be the best british site overall - have not been to all -:) I gave Killergran an 88 in that first review. Still - "after all these years" - or less - it's not over the famous 90. Killergram certainly does some good with a lot of fine/decent porn. And with a lot of great models (yes, like Delta White, for one). But Killergram are not getting much better - except from more videos/even with some new models. The reason seems obvious to this pornuser: The scenes/the editing are too similar - even with new models and with new "stages"...(like more scenes named af "Streetgirls" - just an exampel). But when it comes down to reality, the "fuckscenes/videos" are too much alike....then again that may be the biggest problem at most sites... 12-26-08  09:17am Reply 1797 Amour Babes (0) Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply Squirrel, just great to have you here as a fellow PU - and of course great you're another one from the UK/Europe - look forward to some good discussions - and mutual warnings/recommondations - you got to the right place, if you ask this danish user....and of course you've been wished welcome here from some of the "good ol' boys"... and man, you got a fine attitude... Cheers, mate!!! 12-26-08  09:01am Reply 1798 Amour Babes (0) Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply Exactly, bro.... That's one of the main reasons here (in my book): Good common support and ditto warnings, so none of us - hopefully - do not waste too much money. I've always considered PU as my main place of mutual help/giving help in joining/membership of different sites. And by all means a mutual help when problems come up.......and Squirrel, you got that sence too....(great reply, thanks) 12-26-08  08:11am Comment 1799 Amour Babes (0) STILL PROBLEMS - new warning Lets face it: Some of those sites do not live op to the standard of "fine costumer" service! After problems with new passwords and continously mails to both Epoch and the site, things are not right. Amour Babes -site got me into the mainsite, but the (importend) bonus-sites do not work in any way. Just mailed Epoch again - and they say mail the webmaster and the webmaster do NOT feed back.. SO to PU's generally about this site/network: I cannot recommend it - so take care, folks... 12-26-08  06:56am Replies (6) Comment 1800 1 By Day (0) 5 days Christmas- access to 7 bonus sites If you join 1ByDay you get five days access to 7 of their other sites - could be worth a try - and then again the deal may not be THAT great, since most of the stuff on the others sites comes from the motherload.... 12-24-08  05:01am Replies (0) Shown : 1776-1800 of 2795 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.6 seconds.