There are a few models at the site who appear on many other sites (for example: Eve Angel, Little Caprice, and Lolita), who are more attractively presented elsewhere. Some of the DDF sites are glamor-oriented, but this site is not one of them.
The 10-site mega-pass membership is definitely worth considering.
The membership price to join a single site is $26.95.
The membership price to join the 10-site network is $29.95.
For $3/month more, you get access to 10 sites in the network, instead of access to a single site.
After cancelling my 3-day pre-checked unwanted membership to Porn Access, I got a confirmation email that my subscription had been cancelled. They also included a coupon code that entitles me to rejoin Porn Access within the next 3 months for the reduced price of $14.95 for 30 days membership.
I was a member of Porn Access over a year ago. I thought the site was a waste of time because of the horrible navigation and massive amount of duplication and low-quality vids.
I am more than willing to give my coupon code away free to some deserving PU member. But any PU member (and non-members), can use the PU/TBP link to join Porn Access at a lower price than the coupon code allows.
So what do you call a coupon code that has a negative value, to a site that I believe is basically a waste of time?
Note: the site is not a scam. It has a massive amount of videos, many of poor quality. And the navigation is terrible, and there is massive duplication of their videos. If someone wants to spend the time, there is probably good material to be found. I just don't have the patience or time to wade through all the garbage videos at the site.
I just signed up for Devils Film today. I know I am supposed to look for the pre-checked offer, but I did not see it anywhere. But after signing up for Devils Film, I got an email telling me I was now a member of Pornaccess. This is a separate charge and a separate membership from Devils Film. I used the computer to check the billing company, to see the details, and could not find the membership (or fee) listed for my Pornaccess account. (I did find the Devils Film account information at the billing company). I tried contacting support by computer chat, but gave up after 10 minutes, and called on the telephone to support. I was able to cancel my subscription to Pornaccess, but was not able to cancel the $1.95 charge for 3 days membership.
But at least the Pornaccess will not renew at $30/month.
I know that Devils Film (and related sites) have a pre-checked problem, but I honestly did not see the &*(^ pre-checked line. And I was looking for it when I signed up.
For $1.95, it's not worth arguing about. And I'm not going to involve the credit card company over a $1.95 charge.
But I think I was a patsy.
I usually like to use CCBill as payment processor for a paysite. But Epoch, the payment processor for Teen Mega World, seems to be an easy to use, reliable payment processor as well. Cancelling my subscription to Teen Mega World was simple and easy.
Joining nubilegirlshd (thru the PU/TBP link, or just directly from the site itself, costs $29.95 for 30 days recurring.
But if you join the Royal Cash network thru TeenMegaWorld, you will probably get nubilegirlshd included as a bonus site in your membership for $19.95 for 30 days recurring.
To be certain, you can email the webmaster to check which sites you will get specifically when you join any one of the sites in the Royal Cash network. When you join any one site, you get access to most, but not all, of the sites in the network.
Going to the Porn Access site, I see the $5.00 for 30 day membership offer. I don't know how long this offer will last.
But I also don't know if the site is even worth it. There's a ton of vids, most low quality, and the search and navigation of the network sites is very poor, with massive duplication of the videos at different sites. I prefer paying a little more, for sites with easier navigation and good material that I can more easily find.
But if you use the PU/TBP link to go to the site to sign up, you see the regular PU/TBP discount of $14.95 for 30 day membership (once you go to the signup page and start the signup process).
So maybe PU/TBP can contact the pornaccess site and make the $5.00 offer available through the PU/TBP link.
First time I've noticed the met-art updates page being really messed up. The thumbnails for the most recent updates are out of order, with wrong listing dates for when the photosets/videos were posted. I assume the mix-up will be fixed soon.
Edit01: For what it's worth, the met-art updates page has now been fixed. I didn't have to clear my browser cache to get the corrected page of updates, so the problem was definitely on the met-art site, and not from my PC. :)
Give access to all sites in this network instead of slice and dice.
Please simplify access to the network of sites when you become a member.
Insead of giving access to 15 to 20 sites thru membership at one specific site, why not give access to all 30 sites (I believe 30 is the current number of sites in the network, or in the sites run by Royal Cash)? That would be far less confusing to people who want to join the network, but are currently unsure which specific sites are included when joining this network through a single site or through the TeenMegaWorld membership.
There are maybe 4 to 6 sites that have most of the value in this network. There are many other sites that don't appear to update at all, and that have very limited value.
The sites you get, when you join, are usually not clearly spelled out from the individual site previews. And if you don't get access to the best of the sites in the network, you might feel cheated, or at least frustrated, once you realize that you are not getting total access to all the sites in this network.
But the bottom line is:
1. A simple text listing of all the sites you get by joining any one specific site would be helpful.
2. Access to all the sites in the network would simplify the choices.
The current style of showing a thumbnail of the sites you get access to, where you can't read the names of the different sites, is frustrating.
Advertises "over 40,000 high quality sexy photos."
The site preview is extremely limited: I see some thumbnails, but nothing larger to see what the actual photos look like. So even though there are some cute models here, I'd look elsewhere.
The Hot Futanari Girls site of this network uses fake photos (photoshopped or similar process) of female models to create she-males. Some of the models are from Met-art. The altered photos are probably illegal, because I doubt Met-art gave permission for this site to use and alter the photos that appear on Met-art.
So if you are looking for a real she-male site, avoid this one.
For $1.23 you get a 1-month subscription. Don't know what the renewal rate is, but $1.23 is less than the price of a cup of coffee, or a soft drink at McDonald's. Even if the videos are non-exclusive, it's worth checking this site out. The only negative I can see is that some PU members might feel it's not worth the time to wade through the large amount of videos that are not high-quality to find the ones worth watching. But $1.23 for a 30-day trial seems like a great deal to me.
Most of the past Met-art videos were boring. Very pretty girls for subjects, but videos were boring and a waste of time to watch. This last video I saw, "FIRST MOVIE" BY RYLSKY, with the model Guerlain A., release date 04.25.2010, was slightly more interesting. The model is pretty, which is nothing new for Met-art, but I kept expecting the model to turn into a monster or creature, or for someone to jump on her and start slashing away with a knife or axe or something. Partly it was the lighting and the slow way the camera focused on the model, partly the music. Still a boring video, but maybe in part 2 they will add the monster/creature/slasher part for greater excitement.
When I use the site link at PU and then click thru to the join page, the prices I see are:
-$24.95/30 days recurring for access to younglegalporn
-$34.95/30 days recurring for access to younglegalporn plus their 14 site network
-$99.95 for 150 days membership to the 14 site network, then $24.95/30 days recurring
----------------------------
PU/TBP lists membership at $29.96 recurring (but does not specify if that is single-site access to younglegalporn or to the 14 sites including younglegalporn).
The membership price structure back in early 2009 was different, then they changed the prices in 2009, and now it looks like they have changed the prices again.
Also, younglegalporn advertises the network access option is for 14 sites, but I only see 13 sites listed, including the younglegalporn site. Not a big deal, but if there are 14 sites in the network, that you get access to, why not list the 14 sites where you can see the list?
mc-nudes now offers 3-D photos. You need 3-D glasses to get the 3-D effect, and I don't have 3-D glasses. But even the porn sites are now starting to jump on the 3-D wagon.
I haven't seen a 3-D movie since the 1950s, but I guess I will try to see one of the 3-D movies that are coming out now.
It's time for us to move into the space age, with 3-D vision and supercomputers and whatnot.
Met-art has a photoset that posts tomorrow of a new model named Sophie D. She is better known as Sophie Moone. Back from retirement, she is still a great-looking woman.
More than most softcore teen glamor sites, Hegre seems to make people respond in different ways, from loving the site to finding the site a bore. The PU score for the site is 77, while the TBP score is 92. That is quite a range.
VideosZ has a PU score of 75 and a TBP score of 92. VideosZ is a hardcore video site, instead of a softcore glamor photo site.
But I think it's interesting how some sites seem to polarize the members at PU.
Not a mega-site, but a smaller site that started in 2006. Softcore teen glamor. Some very attractive models, nice high-quality photography. If you've never joined the major mega-sites for softcore teen glamor, then join those first, because there are many quality sites out there. But this is a nice addition to the category.
Any PU members that have been recent members of this site care to comment on site value/score? It seems that a few of the updates are older material (shot a while ago) that is just now being posted.
This site has some absolutely yummy models. But as Drooler noted in a comment on July 29, 2009, in spite of the high-quality photos, the quantity of pix seems small. Any recent members have an opinion on whether the site is worth joining for a month? Like I said, some of the models are fucking gorgeous.
This site gives multiple models the same name. There are currently 4 Masha models, 3 Linda models, etc. The site should give each model a unique name, to simplify the search. Even if it's just Linda_01, Linda_02, Linda_03, or Linda_A, Linda_B, Linda_C.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
