| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1276
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
Reply of
Pragy's Comment
Scary stuff.
Thanks for the heads-up.
Cap'n. :00
|
03-16-12 09:03am
|
Reply
1277
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Agreed.
Unfortunately, they certainly are not the only site guilty of poor / non-existant editing.
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-23-11 03:20pm
|
Reply
1278
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
bently's Review
Are they updating regularly again now?
Cap;'n. :0/
|
02-18-11 06:34pm
|
Reply
1279
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
Mort's Review
Yes, I was intrigued by this a couple of years back.
I tried it, but whilst I liked the premise & the intent of the site, I found the execution woeful & it came over as being somewhat lazy.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-14-12 01:27pm
|
Reply
1280
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
TBH I'm surprised you didn't mention the huge premium for membership in your negatives, along with the lack of selectiveness in hiring the models.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-27-12 03:39pm
|
Reply
1281
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes, I am not into the artificial glam look either.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-23-11 10:56am
|
Reply
1282
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I fully concur, but I do think they should be a little more selective.
Especially at that kind of ante. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-23-11 10:37am
|
Reply
1283
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
Beautiful as the models are, I like to see progression from fully clothed to full nudity in a set. The journey is as important as the destination for me.
It looks like they are nude from photo one in most sets?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-24-13 03:22am
|
Reply
1284
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Reply
Never fully clothed? ....
OK Thanks.
I'll take that one off the list of possibles then.
|
05-28-10 03:56pm
|
Reply
1285
|
Mega Site Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Now that isn't good! :0/
At least they took the trouble to explain the situation though.
|
11-27-09 10:19am
|
Reply
1286
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Indeed there is a market for it.
Unfortunately few if any cater for it fully clothed to full nude. :0(
|
05-11-15 04:30pm
|
Reply
1287
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think we are coming to the same point from different directions ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-10-13 11:32pm
|
Reply
1288
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I have to say, I certainly prefer the age to be quoted as at the time of the photoshoot.
As it is a snapshot of the moment, I feel that it is only appropriate.
Surely you can roughly work out the models age from the time it was first published?
Cap'n :0/
|
01-10-13 04:16pm
|
Reply
1289
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Be sure to let us know what you think, if you do go for it.
Cap'n. :)
|
11-15-12 01:57pm
|
Reply
1290
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
It really ought to be the age the model was at the time of the shoot IMO
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-28-12 02:42am
|
Reply
1291
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
It would be interesting to know, if & how effectively they deal with this.
Cap'n. ;0)
|
10-22-12 11:32pm
|
Reply
1292
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I think you would be better mentioning that to their Support Dept, TBH
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-22-12 04:58am
|
Reply
1293
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yes, that is the crux of it.
Release or re-release date has no bearing on actually how old the material is. As CP says, it depends on when, where & how much material was shot & the websites' publication policy & schedule.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-10-12 06:31am
|
Reply
1294
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I'm very pleased to see you back, and with a comprehensive review too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-07-12 09:57am
|
Reply
1295
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
Well, that is probably because non european users generally do not seem bothered about the regional pricing scam as it doesn't directly effect them.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-26-12 02:38pm
|
Reply
1296
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
An interesting trip for you out of your comfort zone then, RA.
As regards animals.
Whilst I don't think it adds much to a photoset or video,
I think at times they perhaps might get away with a cat or dog, or pushing it a horse, or two. :)
It really depends on the level of intimacy! :0P
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-10-12 10:00am
|
Reply
1297
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
No, I don't think so.
I share your concerns.
Perhaps that was what gave me an element of unease whilst browsing the site.
With a few sites the personality of the model leaps out at you, which I really like.
With a lot of others it is noticeable, here it appears to be dourly supressed, in the name of 'art'.
Not good!
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-30-11 07:41am
|
Reply
1298
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
I agree with you, otoh.
It is another one of those frustratingly 'nearly' sites.
Rather than striving to crash through the barrier and make a rivetting site, they do more, more & more of the same, which obviously does work for some folk.
This only serves to add more to the frustration for the likes of ourselves wanting a step or two beyond.
What I found most frustrating was that the thumbnails for each set looked identical after a little while searching.
I think it is a problem with sites that have pretentions of 'art'.
Cap'n :0/
|
12-30-11 04:18am
|
Reply
1299
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
A solid review of a classic site.
I'm afraid though what I said in my comment last year still holds true for me.
'I appreciate this purports to be an artsy site, and I can take that at face value.
What really disappoints me about this site is the lack of variety & creativity.
It is all very formulaic & repetetive.
Sure beautiful girls, scantily clad to nude, usually outside.
Most of the thumbnail set 'covers' blend into each other.
There is so much material, I am bound to have missed a few gems in there, but searching through the 'covers' to find one that stands out gets dull.
A shame, but that is the way it strikes me.'
Cap'n :0/
|
09-24-11 12:55am
|
Reply
1300
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fredv's Review
A fine start! Welcome.
I can agree with your point of view on this one.
Formula is fine, but with this quantity it really needs more variation for any model or photographer to stand out.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-10-11 11:19am
|
