| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I've only been a member for a month or two. The sets that I've saved range from the highest pixel measurements from 1000 to 1200. 1200 are the most recent sets.
I have found no zip options of the sets. I believe they expect you to "collect" them in your favorites. And since the yearly membership is so cheap, I can see why they would feel that way. I'm old fashioned and like to archive them to my hard drive. I've resorted to viewing the sets in the HTML Gallery rather than the Flash Gallery so I can right click and save. The sets can have 60+ pics in them, so this does get monotonous.
The Flash Gallery is slick and it makes the imagines fit your screen. My screen is 1680x1050, so whatever scaling they're doing to fit my screen doesn't show any artifacts but the original images are very close to my resolution.
I really didn't like tattoos or piercings when I came into this site. It was so cheap to subscribe I had to try it. And now I'm a fan. There are a lot of gorgeous models (period) on this site. Technically they are "alt" models, but many of them are just so naturally beautiful that they stand up to whatever mainstream models are out there.
For the money, you really should give it a try. It'll either click with you or it won't. And if it doesn't, it's very little skin off your back.
|
02-12-09 08:59pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
I'm going to agree with Toadsith and pick Option #6: No, I'm a Porn Enthusiast.
There aren't any options that apply to me. I do watch porn. There is no reason worry. I am not addicted to it.
|
01-28-09 01:22am
|
Reply
3
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I guess I just don't view VideoBox as a standard porn site like I do for every other site I have subscribed to. It's not just recreation or entertainment for me, it's a utility as well.
Most of the other sites that I go to expose me to models that I don't recall seeing before but took a liking to and wanted to see more of. A search on VideoBox almost always provides me with a number of scenes I haven't seen of those models. It's like a "Mr.Skin" for hardcore porn for me. On top of that, I can just browse recent additions in general and have access to numerous scenes that I haven't seen before.
The only negative I can think of that I'd add to my original review is that VideoBox can expose you to so many scenes of individual models that it can totally kill any interest you have in that model for some time or forever. It's over-exposure in some cases.
It's not an end-all-be-all of a site, but I cannot think of any porn site that I have gotten more use out of. And I don't have a premium membership - I just don't see the point. To me, that's like buying an HDTV and not subscribing to any HDTV channels.
To put it simply, VideoBox doesn't represent a woman I'd marry or make my girlfriend, it's my address book of booty calls, figuratively speaking.
|
04-03-08 08:59pm
|
Reply
4
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Personally, it's variety, for me, that keeps me subscribed. It also functions like a porn IMDB database for me because sometimes I see a girl on another site that I really liked. I can look her up on VideoBox generally get a full page of scenes for that girl.
|
03-07-08 08:58pm
|
Reply
5
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I was going to subscribe to this site before SnowDude convinced me to subscribe to Ultimate Surrender. I'm sure I'll get around to it sooner or later. There's still a bunch for me to go through in the US back catalog.
Great review, though, I'm tempted yet again. :)
|
02-09-08 01:43am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
I'm indifferent to this and I guess it is because I have some experience with this. I have had girlfriends who wanted me to spit on their genitalia. Their reasoning was that it was a turn on for them. Much like various things that either are or are viewed as "wrong/naughty/taboo" - doing them is exciting. Anal sex, sex in public places are more commonly known by purveyors of porn such as ourselves. Spitting, "water sports", choking/asphyxiation, rough sex, etc are definitely things that are far less accepted or are appreciated by a smaller segment of viewers.
There is mainstream and then there are extremes. We all have different things that float our boat. I definitely think that folks in the industry get over-exposed to things to the point that they are desensitized to how far from the middle they are veering. I do know from talking with people in the industry that everyone is aware of in general what is going to happen and both the male and female talent are able to control the levels of the extremes they're willing to go to. They also seem to have "professional limits" and "personal limits". A lot of women are willing to do something they don't personally find a turn on. Sandra Romain, for example, loves to dominate and finds it personally a turn on. She doesn't find being submissive that much of a turn on, if at all, but she'll do it in scenes that call for it.
I think I've rambled enough. :)
|
02-05-08 10:18pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
I don't have any organization system. I have a download manager that downloads everything into a "video" folder. When I start running out of room, I delete everything.
I've heard from a number of places about Heatseek that might be something you guys might be interested. It seems to be more of a tool for hiding your porn on your computer, but it also has some organizational tools. And, it's free without adware or spyware. It's untested by me, though, I just thought I'd pass what I've heard along.
http://heatseek.com/
|
01-28-08 08:02pm
|
Reply
8
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
The new HD videos are really something, too. Full 1440x1080. Although I've only downloaded one to just get a look. The file sizes are huge. Just to put it in perspective for everyone: a normal update would have, on average 700MB-1500MB in videos. With the new HD resolution, every update has been 3600MB-5900MB in size. I can't even begin to think of what their bandwidth bills are like.
|
01-28-08 07:42pm
|
Reply
9
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I updated the review (with credit). It's interesting, they do a mini-redesign apparently every year. I had to go back to ftvgirls.com to check the FAQ and its (ftvgirls.com) different than when I joined. Same premise, just updated photos from more recent models.
|
01-27-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
10
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Nope, you're right. It is 25GB/day now.
|
01-27-08 03:39pm
|
Reply
11
|
Lia 19
(0)
|
Reply of
bayma's Comment
It is the same girl. They both have one mole above the left breast that appears to be in the same spot. They also don't have any other unique marks like that on the rest of their bodies. They both have a similar navel piercing, but that isn't very unique.
She looks younger on the Ashley Ryan site, I wonder if that is still updated.
Nice catch, Bayma.
|
01-26-08 12:26am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I don't like the deepthroating where she sticks her tongue out and basically gags/chokes/almost vomits on it.
When there's a lack of a gag reflex or actual technique involved, yeah, that's hot.
|
01-22-08 08:49pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
I think I agree with Drooler the most. Seems to match my thoughts closest.
|
01-16-08 08:06pm
|
Reply
14
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
That settles that! Well done, Toadsith! Thanks.
|
01-14-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm currently in a video phase, but not too long ago I was very bourgeois with my image standards. So my past self would have wanted an "all of the above" option in this poll. Currently, I'll settle for unappealing poses as the most common reason these days.
|
01-14-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
16
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thank you. I figured that since I'd been a member of the site for so long that it was about time I said something about it.
|
01-13-08 11:02pm
|
Reply
17
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
They could, but I have yet to hit it and honestly doubt that I will. I don't have a really good broadband connection to have the ability to leech that much content in that amount of time.
If I did, I wouldn't let that stop me from subscribing, though. I'd rather see what I've seen and then get pissed at hitting a bandwidth limit than to miss what I've seen and move on to some cookie-cutter site.
|
01-13-08 10:35pm
|
