| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Likewise! I can (very) arguably see the appeal to some folk given that perhaps it's even more of an intimate/private activity than sex.
But not for me :) I'll tolerate the odd episode in sites I like, but where it's featured prominently it would be a turnoff.
Not even going to where Denner mentioned...
|
09-05-11 05:13am
|
Reply
452
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
Any reason you didn't add a review with a score? Anyway, thanks for your views, this site is on my to-join list. What do you feel is better here over Abby Winters?
|
09-04-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
453
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
tomjones's Reply
I did read your review pros, which is why it's more of a shame that you give such a poor score to this popular site for doing what pretty much every site does. Any sites you've joined that don't work this way are in the very small minority; and again, by this logic you will score almost every site listed on TBP at 50.
I am neither condoning nor condemning the practice of automatic rebilling; just stating that it's almost universal in the industry; I think every site I've joined rebills until cancelled. It's easily dealt with as Cap'n mentioned; and most sites make it very easy to cancel (difficulty in cancelling WOULD justify a poor score).
It's unfortunate that you perhaps weren't familiar with this when singing up to AW - although I see on their join page, each option has 'rebilling' stated very clearly next to it.
End of story for me, at least :)
|
09-04-11 10:23am
|
Reply
454
|
Action JAV
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Thanks for pointing this site out - I'm planning to join one of the Japanese sites at some point and this looks to be the best I've seen so far. Not really into the extreme stuff, but it seems they have so much material, and good filtering, to make it easy to find something appealing.
|
09-04-11 06:01am
|
Reply
455
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
tomjones's Review
As tangub said, that's a little harsh - suspect this may be your first pay site join, since it's pretty much standard practice with porn sites to do recurring billing and leave it up to the customer to cancel.
Whether or not you agree with it, you'll end up giving all sites 50 because of it :|
|
09-04-11 02:12am
|
Reply
456
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not for me at all :| I can understand that it works for some people, and perhaps even some girls may like it (?) But although I don't idolise or put on pedestals, I do respect the models we see and like to see them treated with the same respect.
|
09-03-11 05:30am
|
Reply
457
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some sites like Petites Parisiennes are very open to input and ideas for the sets, so I communicate regularly with the webmaster there. And similarly, eg FigureBaby and Holly Randall accept comments on sets, which I also see as feedback - and if the webmaster is engaged, I'm more likely to be.
But a couple of times I've emailed and got nothing back; in which case I just give up, got better things to do than flog a dead horse.
But as tangub said, being able to vet sites here cuts down on any really bad sites that specifically need complaining about.
|
09-02-11 03:50am
|
Reply
458
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Worth noting that there is a level attributed to each model - nude, topless or non-nude - so be prepared for not seeing everything from all models!
But still, as you say, looks promising; am-glam perhaps?
|
08-31-11 02:42pm
|
Reply
459
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
'You take a good or great looking model, splash her with gobs of makeup and weird costumes to make her look like a freak, and you have photographs that could hang in a museum. But not one that I would want to visit.'
Actually, for me, this has some appeal. Much as I like natural looking girls, I also like a bit of an angle to porn, and the above suggests one where other East European sites seem to lack it. And from what I can see, it's relatively tame compared to eg Juliland - which tempted me but ultimately terrified me a bit too much!
Denner, do sets here tend to have any undressing? I'm not quite such a strip fiend as Cap'n, but straight nude from start to finish does little for me. And the videos, do they all have typically daft music?
|
08-31-11 12:01am
|
Reply
460
|
Pretty 4ever
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
tangub, another good review, of a site that's caught my eye, thanks! Although there are a few featured at PP, I've yet to subscribe to one of the sites that focuses on East European models, and may try one sometime. Based on your recent reviews, though, it's more likely to be MPL Studios - but have yet to find one that strikes me as genuinely erotic. I note from Denner's recent comment that you are planning to join Watch4Beauty; I will look forward to that review!
|
08-30-11 11:51pm
|
Reply
461
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
As with most others, I like a mix. I do indeed prefer a smile, but it has to be loaded with a suggestiveness; what I'm looking for is the allure, the devilish smile, the 'smoulder' that Capn suggests... this is probably why I don't, largely, go for the younger models because, beautiful as they are, they rarely have it.
So it's very specific to the model. Eg I don't generally like the pout, since it tends to be fake; but having said that it's common from my favourite model, Mosh, who does glamour/fetish/pinup stuff.
|
08-30-11 11:46pm
|
Reply
462
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nbaby8's Review
Good review, thanks. I will likely subscribe to one Japanese site at some time, so this looks like a potential; although it seems a bit disorganised. I'd like to see some mature content too and not sure if there is much here; have you tried any others? I am tempted by All Japanese Pass...
|
08-29-11 02:46am
|
Reply
463
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hmm... well, I know there are some sites geared towards girls with gymnastic abilities, maybe I should try them. ;)
|
08-28-11 01:01am
|
Reply
464
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't use the same password on every site, but there is a pattern of sorts; if I choose my own I can generally remember it!
|
08-28-11 12:31am
|
Reply
465
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I may watch stuff like gymnastics, athletics etc when the Olympics runs... but other than that have pretty much zero interest. Eg I wouldn't watch the World Cup final if England were playing.
|
08-26-11 01:31am
|
Reply
466
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Assume this means PPV - in which case no; seems pointless when for the price of maybe 2 or 3 PPVs you could buy a monthly subscription.
|
08-26-11 01:29am
|
Reply
467
|
Nena Blue
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Reply
Aha, yes, it is billed by CCBill, so at least it's easy to cancel. Can't explain the pricing model though; cheaper to just cancel and resubscribe than to stay subscribed.
This is one of those sites that I put up with the shortcomings of for the quality of the material, it's fairly unique; but one subscription is enough for a while! Might visit again in a year.
|
08-25-11 12:34am
|
Reply
468
|
Fried Rice Fuckers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Echo the eyebrow-raising at the name; I like asian models and I guess they need some hook to the site, but that seems a little offensive to me!
|
08-22-11 01:20am
|
Reply
469
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
I like to weigh up pros and cons and keep a balanced view on things (and play devil's advocate more often than other folk like) so OTOH seemed appropriate.
OTOH, it could, of course, just indicate a preoccupation with what's in my hands...
|
08-22-11 12:20am
|
Reply
470
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Brad, thanks for the extensive and helpful review!
'why does it feel like I'm subscribing to a new car ?'
I kind of got that impression whenever I visited the site, thinking of joining - I know it's big with a lot of material, but the options thing is a bit over the top and if you want a variety of stuff, the full package is quite expensive.
I've seen some material from here and liked it - and as you say, others have rated it highly, so I may try it at some point - but like you, I'm slightly more drawn to Girls Out West so will probably try that first.
|
08-22-11 12:16am
|
Reply
471
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely - members' areas are often the poor cousin of the shopfront anyway, so if the tour is broken, it doesn't bode well for the standard of what you see when signed up.
|
08-20-11 12:13am
|
Reply
472
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well, I wouldn't say that, actually; there are a few site issues, but overall it works well. For me it is the material itself that doesn't quite work; the quality and production values are great, but I found it a bit too slick, and a bit formulaic.
The previews you see are representative; the majority of sets and videos start with underwear or something flimsy. The ones I kept tend to be those starting with a little more, but they still don't fulfil the ideals of a full strip with plenty of tease.
There is a lot of material, though, and the TBP price is good, so if you see anything in the previews that grabs you, it may be worth a try.
|
08-18-11 01:03am
|
Reply
473
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per RustyJ - I've never been in a relationship, or know of anyone, with that kind of creative passion/vitriol! Maybe I should have been...
|
08-18-11 12:53am
|
Reply
474
|
Nikki Park
(0)
|
Reply of
grimmaronw's Review
Like Tangub, I just strolled right into the members' area. But similarly, it's not really worth bothering, in terms of content or design.
However, thanks for pointing out such an appealing model; definitely worth investigating in other avenues, as you suggest.
|
08-17-11 01:26am
|
Reply
475
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per Denner - doesn't usually occur to me, but if it's a reviewer I'm not yet familiar with, it helps to put it context.
|
08-16-11 12:53pm
|
