| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think the .xxx is overall a good idea, but it should be voluntary.
If it's mandated, then we'd get into all manner of wrangles about what is/isn't explicit/pornographic; most of the sites we discuss here are clear-cut, but some blogs or free sites aren't so much; we'd have folk having their sites blocked or mislabelled just for slipping a naughty word in :|
|
08-14-11 12:09am
|
Reply
477
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Safari on the Mac for my regular and work stuff; Firefox for porn, as it's set on permanent private mode, and DownThemAll can be a lifesaver.
Sometimes Chrome for either - it's good, but I'm inherently suspicious of Google :|
|
08-12-11 06:28am
|
Reply
478
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Good review, Brad - am glad you liked BT, I kind of miss the material since I signed up, so it's likely to be one of my first sites to revisit. Might also check Girlfolio - check my recent comment on it, I'm not sure how different - if at all - the material is?
|
08-10-11 03:17pm
|
Reply
479
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Have almost no interest in massage stuff - but have seen a few clips from Soapy Massage, and they definitely have some appeal; possibly the focus on asian girls gives it more of an angle?
|
08-10-11 03:15pm
|
Reply
480
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review tangub - and you beat me to it, mine is impending too. I'll try to come up with a different angle on it!
|
08-07-11 09:23am
|
Reply
481
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'll echo what most other folk have said - I would do so on a site that offered regular updates, eg a few per week, and a good discount. I've got one annual at the moment, and may spring for another; but I doubt I'd go for anything more than $100.
|
08-06-11 11:33am
|
Reply
482
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I like your definition of softcore and midcore! I think that should be officially adopted to readily tell the difference :)
|
08-05-11 11:04pm
|
Reply
483
|
Girl Folio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I enjoyed Breath Takers more than I thought I would; I'll be going back sometime. Possibly here first, if I figure out what the deal is :| Will update if I discover it!
|
08-05-11 12:32am
|
Reply
484
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
I concur, Brad. Over the last few months, PP has, er, slipped in a few masturbation videos between it's more typical softer - but still erotic - stuff. Perhaps one or two videos and photo sets per model.
It may bother the staunchest of softcore fans, but I find it a welcome addition, and a bit of variety. It looks like Breath Takers, a similar site, may be going that route too.
|
08-05-11 12:31am
|
Reply
485
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Although I run various servers for my day job, keeping one at home purely for smut a la BadMrFrosty is tempting but would be a bit too overt for me :| Hence I use external drives - they are such a mass-market item now I tend to find little difference in price between internal and external.
I've got quite a few knocking around but just use 2 for porn; actually really only 1, but the other is a backup. (Drives can and do fail, sot can't stress enough the need for backup of something that has taken time and money to collect).
I'm mainly pics, but even so my 320gb is getting tight; will have to get a new pair of 1TB soon.
|
08-04-11 01:46am
|
Reply
486
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Good review, Denner, even though we don't agree - especially about the models, nearly all of whom I really like. However, I actually like that this site divides opinion; it makes me feel that there is something different to it, as opposed to a couple of slightly banal high profile sites I've been visiting lately.
BTW the update calendar shows each day's update as you hover over the day, and can get straight to the download by clicking on it. But agree that the navigation, although much improved since I joined, can be a little idiosyncratic.
|
08-02-11 03:49pm
|
Reply
487
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the reply, tangub. I'm still not quite sure about the site, but for the price it's perhaps worth a try, I'm still keen on some of the models... but there are a couple more in the running too (which brings me to another comment). Your review was, as ever, most helpful :)
|
08-02-11 03:37pm
|
Reply
488
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with slutty. TBP reviews are, almost by definition, objective - I suspect they have a quite well defined list of what contributes to the score in terms of updates, picture quality, size of archive etc.
Which is a good thing, and leaves subjective reviews - focusing more on the content - to us at PU. I've subscribed to a couple of sites which would get a bad TBP review because they are, well, disastrous :) but I've still enjoyed them because the material is up my street. The same applies in reverse; some top TBP sites wouldn't appeal to me at all, since I'm not interested in the material.
|
08-02-11 01:28am
|
Reply
489
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Maybe on average, an hour or an hour and a half a day. Documentaries, a few sitcoms and US crime drama mainly.
Share pat362's distaste for reality TV; it's cheap, easy, lowest-common-denominator exploitation; far more so than most folk assume porn to be.
|
07-31-11 11:17pm
|
Reply
490
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've said somewhat important. Of course it's very handy to have zips and luckily most sites do; but tastes are sometimes a little esoteric and as such I can't be quite so choosy as to discount any sites that don't have zips.
However, this is only with the caveat of using a download manager; where no zips are available, it's usually short work to set DTA to grab the whole set. If I did find a site that I truly could not batch download from, then I'd be unlikely to bother grabbing pics one by one.
As with Drooler, I've found one site so far that prevents any downloading - very not impressed, but with a bit of lateral thinking I managed to find a way to grab even those.
|
07-30-11 12:32am
|
Reply
491
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Many thanks, sir messmer, for the direction :) Much appreciated - still undecided but one or other will reach the top of my list soon!
|
07-30-11 12:25am
|
Reply
492
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I share everyone's previous impressed-ness with your score of 100 here, messmer :) Another site which I've been tempted by but not yet joined... although I see you've given the possibly comparable Girls Out West a high score, a while back. It possibly seems a little raunchier? I may be tempted to try it before AW.
|
07-28-11 07:32am
|
Reply
493
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Another great review, tangub - of a site which has been on my possible list for a while. I'd kind of dismissed it as a bit too met-art-y, and perhaps the models a bit too young (I usually prefer girls at least in their mid-20s); but am still a bit tempted by your mention of public pics and racier videos than MA. Download restrictions are a bit of a PITA; I doubt I'd hit them, except for the lack of manager support; I tend to use DTA to queue downloads for overnight.
|
07-28-11 07:27am
|
Reply
494
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I don't think it matters too much as long as it's not too large or intrusive. Some sites vary it per-picture, so as not to intrude on any, er, key parts; but I imagine it's too much of a hassle for most folk to bother with.
|
07-27-11 01:31am
|
Reply
495
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Gosh :) Looks like they may be form the same folk who bring us Mastasia...
|
07-26-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
496
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well well... I knew about the fake gushing, but not about such skulduggery as passing off a dildo as the real thing. Is nothing sacred?
Still, least I'm one step closer to being a man of the world. ;)
|
07-25-11 11:11pm
|
Reply
497
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Have yet to see anything that's of any value or interest at all...
|
07-25-11 12:32am
|
Reply
498
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yep, it seems to work - although because I'm at the desk more often than not, with the 22" screen, I opted for a 13" - I find 17" very unwieldy! (Insert random penis size gag here...)
Oh, and re Cap'n's comment about desktops being more powerful... true, but gladly nowadays, for most folk (serious gamers and the like aside) pretty much any computer you buy is easily enough for whatever you want to do with it.
|
07-25-11 12:28am
|
Reply
499
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
That did actually occur to me straight after posting the comment... but the site seems to feature material with dildos, so I'm guessing that's not it.
I wonder if there are any surgically enhanced male porn performers around? :|
|
07-24-11 06:44am
|
Reply
500
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Used to have both, but couldn't be bothered swapping files and emails etc around when I needed to work elsewhere. But when working from home (most of the time) I use it with a mouse, keyboard and monitor attached, so it's pretty desktop-ish.
|
07-23-11 11:31pm
|
