| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never given it any thought. Now I do... the answer is no.
OTOH if the right lady came along, and happened to be bald, I certainly wouldn't hold it against her :)
|
07-22-11 02:44am
|
Reply
502
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I just hope that SD himself isn't included in 'the guys'... although shaggy definitely would be :)
|
07-20-11 01:37am
|
Reply
503
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
WWW, gosh, I see what you mean - shopping for unmentionables just got a bit more interesting :) And glad to see more full-cut panties around - I'm not quite such a fiend for the full briefs as you - although I do like them and I prefer pretty much anything over a thong!
|
07-19-11 12:56am
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like regular, non-porn animation - and if, as anime often has - it features the odd panty shot, then all the better :) But hentai or other porn animation has never really appealed to me - shan't say never, though!
|
07-19-11 12:49am
|
Reply
505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only by default, by virtue of having a PS3. I do now buy (non-porn) Blu Rays when they are not too expensive, and rent Blu Rays when available. But to be honest, I don't find it a big deal; you notice the difference if you specifically look for it, but it has little or no impact on my enjoyment of a film.
|
07-17-11 12:27am
|
Reply
506
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm with pat362 on this - most sites I've joined use CCbill, but there have been a few others and I've yet to have any trouble cancelling. So I guess rarely; although with a different biller I'll check cancellation procedures beforehand and skip it if anything seems fishy.
|
07-17-11 12:24am
|
Reply
507
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely; granted there are some sites out to rip you off, but for $30 or less, there's no comparison in the, er, entertainment available from the good ones.
|
07-13-11 11:02am
|
Reply
508
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have mixed feelings about Japanese porn; I like the girls, but the content is often harder (bukkake, multiple guys, etc) than I'd prefer - so my views on the censorship follow that. Ie the stuff that suffers most from being censored isn't my main area of interest.
But I do like more explicit softcore content, and the censorship can detract from that a bit; I've seen a few Japanese sites lately that I quite like, but when the teasing finishes and the panties come off, it is a bit annoying. For some reason I find this less of an issue with video content than with pictures.
In some ways it's a moot point; a lot of the material I'd like to see is on Japanese only sites that aren't friendly even to foreign cards. But there are some sites - Tokyo Hot, Pacific Girls, Gachinco and more, probably technically based outside Japan - that produce uncensored content, but it leans a bit towards the gynaecological for me.
I have actually seen a few Chinese sites cropping up; they are very softcore, and those with any nudity often hide the face of the model, but with so many cute girls there, it's encouraging to know they are trying ;)
|
07-13-11 11:01am
|
Reply
509
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
A shame that didn't fit the bill, Cap'n... granted not all the sets are fully dressed to fully nude, but I figured about half were? Strangely, this site has grown on me since my membership expired, it's probably the one I'm most likely to join again relatively soon.
|
07-09-11 11:37pm
|
Reply
510
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
tangub, re the .mov files from Petites Parisiennes - I think they are h264s, but the .mov container probably means that you need QT player as opposed to WM player on Windows.
However, if you download VLC, I find that it plays pretty much everything, including these, so you may want to try that. (The only exception is that this month's PP videos lose their sound in VLC, but the webmaster is rectifying this.)
|
07-09-11 05:02am
|
Reply
511
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually watch videos with VLC, which seems to show anything I throw at it, so I'm not too worried about formats. MPG is probably the most open standard though, so given a choice, I guess I'd choose that.
|
07-09-11 12:09am
|
Reply
512
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually find something to edit after posting it; just a typo or a grammatical issue - so I guess I'm anal enough to do so :)
|
07-07-11 11:30pm
|
Reply
513
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Again, widescreen - you'd pay over the odds now to get anything else, you can get eg a 22" widescreen for very little.
Agree with Cap'n - a shame we don't see more landscape orientation pics - when looking at a set in full screen, they are twice as large as portrait!
|
07-05-11 11:44pm
|
Reply
514
|
Nakedby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Aha, Cap'n, you are right... the focus here isn't really on full strips. There are some, and most sets do involve undressing, but generally start with lingerie or something flimsy (that often gets wet).
I suspect you'd prefer Petites Parisiennes, which has more (and actually quite a few getting dressed sets). But even more so Breath Takers, which does have a lot of strips from fully dressed, usually in casual wear.
|
07-05-11 11:42pm
|
Reply
515
|
Nakedby
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the comments, tangub & Drooler. I still prefer PP, but it's more a personal choice, I think - if you liked it, there is a lot of material here from some of the prettiest girls there - notably for me, Eva, Hatsumo, Amandine, Laetitia. It's a little expensive, but worth a one-month join.
|
07-04-11 02:24pm
|
Reply
516
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As with manholelover, I don't think a discount would put a site on my radar; but a discount on one that is would definitely bump it up my list - and has done a couple of times.
And whereas I tend to join via the TBP/PU link where possible, I also sign up for site newsletters; sometimes you'll get an email from the site itself with a discounted link, which again makes it more likely to join.
|
07-03-11 05:05am
|
Reply
517
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've always liked dogs, had dogs when I was growing up, and will probably get one sometime. Never so keen on cats... although I was persuaded to get one and he's actually quite grown on me. Not quite as low-maintenance, since he lives indoors - I live near a main road and cats aren't that good at roads - but still fairly easy to keep.
|
07-02-11 11:07pm
|
Reply
518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely not enough options to choose from :)
I'd go for anything full-back; ideally lacy and sophisticated. Granny panties work if they are sheer... although actually, anything works if it's sheer. I don't mind cotton either; even a pair of white cotton briefs are sexy if a hand is slipped under them. My favourite is probably the boyshort - either plain cotton or fancier in lace; I think the hip-hugging shape is very flattering.
But I'm with messmer on the thong. I can perhaps understand (although still not share) the appeal in real life, eg girls on the beach etc; getting to see parts that you wouldn't see otherwise. But a thong basically isn't there; so in porn, I don't see the point - might as well start naked anyway.
|
06-30-11 01:02am
|
Reply
519
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Toned and muscular up to a point works for me - like Toadsith, I don't even mind a 6-pack, as long as a girl still has boobs and curves. Actual hardcore bodybuilders, though, with big veiny muscles, isn't appealing at all. Unlike turboshaft, it doesn't bother me that a girl could kick my ass; it's arguably even a turn-on, although not so much that I'd call myself submissive...
|
06-28-11 11:21pm
|
Reply
520
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I make the same assumption as tangub, ie that it refers to public wifi as opposed to at home - I guess most folk would be using a wireless connection at home.
Either way, the answer for me is no; I'm not brazen enough to look at smut in public :) And at home, wifi never works well for me - too many neighbouring networks, I guess - so the half dozen computers, consoles etc I have are all wired.
|
06-25-11 06:31am
|
Reply
521
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the definition; to me, search means able to type in something, or perhaps list based on multiple criteria.
As others have said, the model index is the most useful. But I do like some facility to browse by some other criteria; eg photographer, setting (indoor/outdoor), body type etc. I find that going through the site again from a different angle often reveals stuff I wouldn't have found just from the model list.
But I haven't really joined any sites that are so big to make anything other than a model index strictly necessary.
|
06-23-11 11:45pm
|
Reply
522
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
mashy's Reply
Hmm... considering that 720p HD video is perhaps 3gb/hour, this site's limit allows downloading 12 hours of video a day, so approx 1TB over a month. If there's that much content that one person actually wants... definitely VFM that can't be argued with.
But mashy, you are right - no matter how profitable certain customers may or may not be, if their activity is within the allowed limits, then it's unprofessional to complain - a customer is a customer, and hopefully valued as such!
|
06-22-11 03:48pm
|
Reply
523
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I have to agree with pat362... whereas it's annoying when sites limit you to eg 2gb per day - stopping you even downloading just a few scenes in one go - bandwidth does cost the sites and 41GB is pretty generous.
Unless you were trying to download an entire site with eg a 3-day trial membership - which, to be fair, isn't really in the spirit of things - I can't imagine that being much of a restriction.
And if you can download >1TB of content for around $30, there's really not much of anything - porn or otherwise - that can compare in value :)
|
06-22-11 01:39am
|
Reply
524
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with Capn - a win is appreciated, and perhaps raffle tickets are an extra motivation to get involved more; but certainly not the main reason. I'm not checking at raffle time; but when I have won (twice so far!) it's been a pleasant surprise via email.
|
06-21-11 09:46pm
|
Reply
525
|
Torrid Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Looking at the previews, I can see why you like this - looks to be lots of full strips, which lately I find very appealing. And whereas I'm not averse to girl-girl content, it's good to see they are sticking to their niche. One to add quite high up my list; maybe before a revisit to Breath Takers.
|
06-20-11 02:57pm
|
