| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
STR8 Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
Whereas I'm straight, and so only go for straight (assume girl-girl counts ;)) and mainly softcore porn, I've felt that gay porn fans are underrepresented here, so it's genuinely interesting to read a balanced take on sites that most of us wouldn't look at.
Anyway, I had no idea that there was a genre of solo straight-guys-for-gay-audiences... learn something new every day! Keep up the good work... oh, and great name :)
|
06-20-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
527
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Possibly from time to time; but more out of obscure fascination than specifically titillation; and probably moreso in my youth, which brings back a memory from the days of downloading from Usenet.
For the uninitiated, this involved having to scan the subject lines for something interesting; then waiting ages to download an image in multiple parts and join them... before finally being able to see what depravity the nascent internet had served up.
Anyway, in this case, a friend and I spied the subject 'Woman pissing into other woman's ass via bag'. That's exactly what we got.
|
06-20-11 01:43am
|
Reply
528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, arguably, most of us could choose 'pull on it regularly'; but as Drooler alluded to, that's really only for temporary enlargement, not permanent.
Anyway, despite being probably fairly average in that department, I've never felt a need/desire for anything to be larger.
|
06-17-11 05:46am
|
Reply
529
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Email for me. On a couple of occasions I've not received a a reply, but only when it wasn't that important... as such, didn't chase it up, and just made a mental note about unresponsiveness.
If I had a billing query that I really couldn't resolve, I guess I'd phone... and probably be quite sheepish about it!
|
06-17-11 12:49am
|
Reply
530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I don't mind the odd cut or fade, but unrealistic oohs and aahs, and music are definitely a turn-off. I've seen just a couple of sites with acceptable BGM; but mostly it's shockingly corny stuff and makes the whole scene farcical rather than arousing...
|
06-13-11 05:14am
|
Reply
531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never appealed to me... I guess I'm content with perusing smut in the comfort and safety zone of my own home. If I'm not here, then I've generally got more pressing things to do than watch porn!
|
06-11-11 03:34pm
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've been singularly unimpressed by 3D films I've seen at the cinema, so I can imagine porn would be even more of a letdown, possibly literally...
|
06-09-11 12:57pm
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Agree with Tangub, I find them boring - one site I really like has a few sets and the yoga ones are some of the very few that I skip over there.
Although perhaps it's not specifically the yoga thing, since the I find the superset of totally-nude-from-start-to-finish art-nude sets rather dull. There's little excitement without the anticipation of seeing what you haven't yet!
I suppose with the right frame of mind, the yoga can inspire thoughts of what acrobatic feats the models may be capable of? But it's a bit too much of a, er, stretch for me.
|
06-05-11 02:15am
|
Reply
534
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Tangub, re the lack of zips, and saving your pics as... have you not tried a download manager? DownThemAll for Firefox is free, and effortlessly downloads a whole page full of images.
Otherwise, thanks - as ever - for the review :)
|
06-04-11 04:40pm
|
Reply
535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As others have said, design and navigation are quite linked, so a bad design often = difficult to navigate = less likely to join.
But on it's own, an ugly site is a turn-off, I'd really have to know what the material is like to get past it.
Good designs have the opposite effect - eg I will visit FigureBaby again sometime, partly because the layout and navigation of it is so exemplary.
|
06-04-11 12:54am
|
Reply
536
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
WWW, great review, thanks - as a panty and nylon enthusiast, this group of sites has been on my list for a while, and has now been bumped up a few places. I also share your disdain for insipid music, so it's good to see a site that avoids it; my main disagreement is that I love anything sheer :)
|
06-04-11 12:37am
|
Reply
537
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only site subscriptions; and some racy books and magazines. However, if I was going to buy any adult goods... online is definitely where I would do it!
|
06-03-11 12:04am
|
Reply
538
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Just you wait until you get your statement and it says 'Wank it later'.
|
05-30-11 12:50pm
|
Reply
539
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Perhaps I'm underestimating the dexterity of ladies' feet - but, never having been the recipient of a foot job, I am concerned with the amount of leverage present at the end of a long pair of legs, and the potential for painful mishaps...
|
05-30-11 12:47pm
|
Reply
540
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
fredv's Comment
Good catch, Fred! Apart from the quality of the material, which I know we agree on :) $15 is great price for any site offering daily updates of 4K pics or 1080 videos.
|
05-28-11 01:31pm
|
Reply
541
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Thanks for the review, messmer - another one for my shortlist too. I've been leaning towards pictures lately, since the insipid BGM on most softcore videos turns me off... but if there is some dirty talk to the camera, that's a different matter!
|
05-27-11 12:22am
|
Reply
542
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I favour neck and ears... I find necks particularly alluring (is that weird?) and like to explore from the nape to the pulse under the jaw - and behind the ear, of course.
|
05-26-11 11:25pm
|
Reply
543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
S A Web's Reply
John, many thanks for the reply. When the time comes, I suspect Hot Panty Fun is the one for me!
|
05-23-11 11:23pm
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
S A Web's News
John - good to see you here, you have some great niches and some sites that are on my list to try.
Can you do me a favour and explain - if any - the difference in focus of your panties sites? Ie Panty Amateur, Panty Maniacs, Hot Panty Fun?
|
05-23-11 05:53am
|
Reply
545
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I've never bought DVDs, downloads only for me. But I like physical printed stuff and have been collecting erotic photo books for a while - which is admittedly increasingly hard to store discreetly!
As to magazines, being into nylons and pinup type stuff, I buy choice issues of Leg Show that feature models or photographers I like.
|
05-22-11 11:23pm
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Exactly, RustyJ - for the same reason I don't watch any reality TV, it's just cheap and easy to produce. Much better to see that all involved - not just the actress - are making an effort!
|
05-22-11 11:16pm
|
Reply
547
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Review
Agree with lk2fireone - although this isn't a site on my (increasingly long) shortlist, your review is hugely readable. And - at the risk of getting a slap for seeming patronising - some female input and perspective here is very welcome and appreciated! Hope to see more of your reviews...
|
05-18-11 01:05pm
|
Reply
548
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
rearadmiral, sorry to steal away that glow... I thought you might chime in here, given your moniker :)
This is very much a personal opinion - and perhaps I'm a bit of a prude - but anal has never really appealed to me, either in porn or in real life. So I do sometimes feel like there's too much around, as if it's become the only way of having sex!
|
05-18-11 04:48am
|
Reply
549
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Agree, Capn - was a member here a few months ago and will likely join again at some point to catch up.
Some of the sets didn't quite work for me, but it's good to see a photographer's site evolve as their technique improves; more recent sets are definitely better. I found the same at Breath Takers, where sets from maybe 2-3 years ago were good, but didn't quite have the atmosphere of the more recent ones.
The site design/layout at FB is exemplary, too.
|
05-18-11 12:04am
|
Reply
550
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Although here we have very diverse tastes, I think in general we're not representative - to start with, as some folk have said, most people here agree on disagreeing with many common porn themes such as fake boobs.
But more than that, the fact we are here itself makes the difference; that we are interested in porn, rather than just - just :) - using it for instant gratification. Discussing it intelligently and rationally (and paying for it) puts us in a different demographic from the majority of consumers, so as such our views are likely to be different.
|
05-17-11 11:58pm
|
