| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Well, Furry loving and plushophilia is a certain niche.
And combining attractive women and "furries" just makes for a lower threshold I presume. And it's just a bit weird, which is what the WTF Network likes.
Other than that, I don't quite understand either. :P
|
02-28-12 10:47am
|
Reply
102
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
Darrow's Review
If you hover over the 'Sign Up' buttons on the joining page you can see the exactly what you are getting with each subscription.
|
07-15-10 08:54am
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do enjoy reading other people's thoughts and comments on various items on the forum. But I don't feel like I have anything useful to add to the usually already lengthy conversations most of the time.
So, I do read but don't write (yet).
|
06-18-10 04:14pm
|
Reply
104
|
iFriends
(0)
|
Reply of
Robbi81's Review
Could you please elaborate on the $10 being charged to your credit card?
In some cases they only do that to verify your card and give the money back almost instantly. Could this be the case here as well?
|
06-07-10 07:30pm
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Swallowing. But only if they actually show her swallowing and can see her throat. It's just makes it more entertaining and arousing in my opinion.
|
06-07-10 07:26pm
|
Reply
106
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the little history lesson! ;)
I heard half of her story but that's quite a sad one if you think about it. Hope she's doing all right now.
As for the Nicole Graves website, I did not know that.
So thank you fro the heads up! Weird that they don't list that...
Think I'll be off to her site now for a bit.
|
06-07-10 07:23pm
|
Reply
107
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Comment
Been a member a couple of years ago for about 2 months. I liked the videos and galleries but the webcam shows really weren't my thing at that time.
The monitoring was way too restrictive. Even a little teasing double entendre could get one kicked out. That's all I remember from the webcam shows.
Since it was so restrictive I just kept quiet at the couple of shows I watched. Have things changed in any way the last couple of years? Have the moderators start to mellow out a bit?
Anyway, thank you for keeping us up to date on this. Very informative!
|
06-07-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Local cuisine is way more interesting and safer I presume. Though I can't compare the casualty numbers obviously.
So I think I'll go with sight-seeing for now. Bonding is also an option in some cases.
|
06-07-10 07:07pm
|
Reply
109
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Wow, thank you for the compliment!
The site is indeed a little off. It's just that it's all the same and after 5 years one would expect a little variety. And it's just not very user friendly even after 5 years.
As for the hair, she went brunette about 4 years ago I think and went back to being a blond about half a year ago. So now she's a blond but not blond like she used to be, platinum. No she's more a "regular blond".
Hope it gave you some insight and it will help you with your decision.
Thanks again for the thumbs up, really appreciate it!
|
05-31-10 10:09am
|
Reply
110
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
To be honest, $30 is a bit steep in my opinion as well. But as you state yourself, it's the only site out there.
The content is also pretty good for a site without any competition.
It's the slow updates that make it not worth the $30.
The recurring $17 is good. But then you have to be a member for at least a month. They should just cut the first month by 5-10 bucks.
|
05-31-10 03:20am
|
Reply
111
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Wow, that's great! Hope you like what they offer and enjoy your stay.
Curious about your thoughts on improving the site as well. Could you let us PU-ers know what your ideas are?
|
05-30-10 08:34am
|
Reply
112
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
Thanks for the heads up!
But when you are prompted with the question which package you'd like, the monthly recurring package still says it has pay-per-minute, pay-as-you-go and pay-per-view plan in the package.
Not quite sure what they mean by that... Does it mean you still have to pay per view for some movies even if you have a full membership?
Anyway, thanks again!
|
05-29-10 10:39am
|
Reply
113
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Thank you, I really appreciate that.
Especially coming from a good reviewer like yourself.
|
05-27-10 12:15pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think it will be outlawed but it will be heavily restricted at some point. Just look at Australia and China for example.
Censorship is gaining ground in these countries as well as others.
Internet-totalitarianism is just around the corner. If we don't speak up now it might be the end of freedom as we know it.
/rant
|
05-27-10 03:33am
|
Reply
115
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Reply
They could certainly benefit from a search engine or some kind of search mechanism.
As for the video I recommended. It's mostly the angles that did it for me. Still nothing really special but I just thought I'd share my findings.
Too bad you didn't like it very much but not really a surprise as it's hard to find a really good video there ;)
|
05-27-10 02:55am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
+1 for "watch more porn"
|
05-25-10 08:53am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't care whether or not she moans. As long the guy in the video doesn't make a sound it's fine.
|
05-25-10 08:46am
|
Reply
118
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Reply
Great review. You certainly make some very good points.
The fake cumshots is what bothers me the most about the site. Sure the acting is terrible but I've seen worse... The communication between the actors and director is obviously what's killing this site.
A while ago I finally found a video that I kept. Well, I kept many but this one I actually like so I recommend it ;)
Working Girl is what the video is called. I still have some issues with some of the angles in this clip and the acting and actor. But it's worth a watch in my opinion.
Anyway, great review!
|
05-25-10 07:52am
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I would've said I would only read it thoroughly if I had already subscribed to the site before.
But websites tend to change the rules quite often these days to scam you into all sort of things. It's happened before and I don't want it to happen again.
Thoroughly it is.
|
05-25-10 07:43am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
Sometimes you just want to complete the collection and you download the last video as well. Even though it's not really interesting to you.
So, yes. I do collect more than I actually watch. But barely.
|
05-19-10 10:01am
|
Reply
121
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Great! Sorry for not using the contact form.
Wanted to but wasn't sure if it was meant for that. I'll be sure to use it next time!
I'll be posting my review shortly. Thank you for adding the site!
|
05-18-10 01:55pm
|
Reply
122
|
The Minion
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Glad you liked my review.
And it really isn't a pretty sight... (no pun intended, lol)
Still, I got a good laugh out of 1 or 2 videos.
|
05-18-10 08:16am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I doubt that a Sarah Palin lookalike would be worse than jail bait material in any scenario.
|
05-18-10 02:21am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
You mean there's an "after the porn"?
|
05-18-10 02:12am
|
Reply
125
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Review
"Bonus sites suck goat" Very well put! Couldn't have said it better myself!
Fine review, really all you need to know. Especially the fact that all scenes look a like. But indeed, there are some memorable girls in there.
|
05-18-10 12:49am
|
