| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Really? Think I missed that.
What has been done?
|
03-19-12 07:03am
|
Reply
77
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
True. But she's not as spoiled as many others out there.
Just give it time ;)
|
03-17-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I think it's helpful.
It shows if the site has made any changes since the last review.
Sorta.
|
03-17-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Really depends on the new sites or content I will encounter ;)
|
03-17-12 12:05pm
|
Reply
80
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Spot on review, CT!
Especially the fact it's repetitive.
Great site but it does get boring sometimes.
|
03-17-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
81
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review! :)
However, I did cancel my subscription a while ago when they stopped doing actual public videos.
The uncontrolled environment is what makes public/exhibitionistic videos appealing.
Also, when they added a woman to dominate a the model, I lost interest. As did many others.
Nonetheless, great review!
|
03-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I voted Fetishes as I think there should be more specific fetish sites. It's probably a bit too personal to specify the fetishes I would be interested in that aren't really available in large quantities yet.
Though it was more of a tie between Fetishes and Solo
|
03-13-12 02:50pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Low bandwidth and poor quality are the the top of my list.
But if a network site offers pretty much the same as the other sites which are tied to the network just in a different setting or with different people, I tend to walk away from that.
So, exclusivity and individuality makes for a good site in my opinion. Which doesn't necessarily mean a website can't be tied to a network, of course.
|
03-09-12 04:50am
|
Reply
84
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
I agree, good review!
I like how you appreciate yet dislike the fact they went to midcore.
But is the new photographer better or worse in terms of shooting a model?
Thank you for the heads up on the changes!
|
03-09-12 04:36am
|
Reply
85
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Again, Cybertoad, great review!
Though I was left to wonder if the videos offered are exclusive or not.
Too bad they don't allow download managers, really.
|
03-09-12 04:31am
|
Reply
86
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
The fact that someone else recently did a review on the same site shouldn't keep you from doing your own review, so kudos! :)
If the same problems are addressed is multiple reviews, maybe the site owners will start to notice and perhaps think about changing.
But what is even better is when someone reads multiple reviews and reads that more people noticed something good or bad or had a good or bad experience.
Anyway, I certainly agree with you on the issue of lack of different backgrounds and too many close ups.
Great review!
|
03-09-12 04:27am
|
Reply
87
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
It sure is ;)
And thank you for the nice comment and trust!
|
03-09-12 04:21am
|
Reply
88
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I'm a lover of HD.
Could you specify what formats and dimensions they are using?
For example, 720 is HD as well and that just wouldn't cut it for me.
Call me spoiled ;)
|
03-06-12 06:41am
|
Reply
89
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Thank you for the thumbs up! Really appreciate it :)
If I did a very subjective score, I would have given it a lower score as well.
But I gave it a score that reflects the appeal to the people that are into this kind of thing.
|
03-05-12 04:01pm
|
Reply
90
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Did a review on the site. Just so you know :)
|
03-04-12 10:56am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I also agree with Jay. It is a choice only the individual can make.
If someone is interested enough, they will find it by themselves.
|
03-03-12 04:57pm
|
Reply
92
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
No, I figured as much.
But it couldn't hurt to ask, right? Maybe someone is a member but is just too lazy to write a review.
Guess I'll put off getting a new subscription at Humiliatrix then.
|
03-02-12 06:54am
|
Reply
93
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Can't really make out if the navigation has been improved from the TBP facts.
So, I'm relying on the fellow PU'ers experiences. Which I prefer when it comes to things like navigation.
|
03-02-12 05:57am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's vital to factor this into the score in my opinion. (Quantity/quality)+price=score.
Well, sort of ;)
|
03-01-12 03:21am
|
Reply
95
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Haha! That cracked me up! (pun sort of intended)
|
02-28-12 10:59am
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
A network which offered a website with gay content. Wasn't interested in the site though. But interesting to see what it's all about.
|
02-28-12 10:56am
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, yes. Of course.
Equal rights, right?
|
02-28-12 10:54am
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
It's sort of getting worse because it stays the same.
|
02-28-12 10:53am
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Some sites try to remain a certain audience by giving the models different names so they seem native to the country to which the site mostly caters.
|
02-28-12 10:52am
|
Reply
100
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I also think you're right.
Though it might not be dying as there are plenty of people willing to pay for the current library offered.
But the great days of ZT are probably behind them. It might also mean they are going to venture in a different market or business.
|
02-28-12 10:49am
|
