| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree. When a lot of biased (even if well-meaning) reviews flood a website profile page here on PU, it does nothing to encourage me to join.
|
05-31-13 09:59am
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely love it! Definitely x a million
|
05-31-13 08:51am
|
Reply
203
|
Karla Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Ooh, I'll have to check Sandy out - thank you for that.
Karla is so stunning - her expressions, her body, her charisma - she literally has it all. The site is great, such a shame she doesn't model any more.
|
05-29-13 11:10am
|
Reply
204
|
Karla Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
tjpacinonetwork's Reply
Oh good, thank you for the clarification - I saw updates had stopped so thought I'd better warn people as it normally goes: reduce update frequency, start rotating content, stop updating, close site... - glad to see you're making improvements. Hope Karla's happy doing whatever she's doing post-Karla Spice :)
|
05-29-13 11:09am
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I voted other. 'Frequent' on a solo site should be 1-2 ties a week, but on a network site or one with lots of models, daily.
|
05-29-13 11:07am
|
Reply
206
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
No problem, and thanks for the thanks :)
It's so strange how they've removed so much stuff. I can think of several blowjob videos that have vanished (her first one, her first facial, the one in the car/car park, the one on the plane, the halloween-themed one etc), a lot of masturbation videos (car wash, rain) and god knows how much else.
I rejoined as I lost a lot of my Peachez collection when my hard drive turned into a brick, so frankly I'm frustrated there's so many gaps on her site.
|
05-27-13 09:40am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Organise as I download.
My filing system is fairly basic with a folder for videos, and a folder for photos, then sub-folders for each model (or network then subfolders for models if applicable).
|
05-27-13 12:52am
|
Reply
208
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I didn't try the trial unfortunately - I'm always a bit cynical towards them so rarely do.
Video quality was not bad. The aspect ratios on a lot of the videos were mucked up and I had to either/both resize manually and set VLC to crop the outside black bars. It's hard to tell sometimes what their actual size is, but they all look fine full screen.
Her blowjobs are excellent they really are. There's about 15 BJ videos on the site, but she's done a lot more that unfortunately aren't on there at the moment :(
|
05-25-13 01:51pm
|
Reply
209
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
You could do a lot worse than joining her site, for sure, but don't expect much more than photos and movies, and bear in mind there's a lot of missing stuff from her back-catalogue. If you want more details on something in particular, let me know.
|
05-25-13 08:22am
|
Reply
210
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I really like them and vote about 90% of the time, and comment about 60% of the time.
|
05-23-13 10:35am
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm really not fussy at all. I love models like Peachez (AA), Katie Banks (G, I think) and anyone in between, but I definitely err towards a more natural size or smaller.
My favourite size is probably around C. For me, models like Nicky Cassidy have perfectly-sized boobs.
|
05-21-13 12:12am
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Odd poll in that there seem to be several options missing - no "love it" option for those who love both Euro/US and Japanese, no option for me where I quite like bukkake but don't love it, and no option for "other"
So I think it's a bit unfair as obviously people like me can't vote, those who have no preference over where it's from can't vote, so the result is overwhelmingly biased towards those who don't like it.
(sorry to moan)
|
05-17-13 12:10pm
|
Reply
213
|
Sexy Pattycake
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Reply
It's strange because I think she's great - she's been doing strip tease ever since I've been into porn and it doesn't get boring, but I always join her site every 6-or-so months and every time it just leaves me feeling unfulfilled - it's a shame.
|
05-15-13 02:32pm
|
Reply
214
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Thanks for the updated review. This was a massively disappointing site for me. Anna's great but the content is pretty poor, and I think there has only been about one hardcore update since I left over a month ago.
|
05-11-13 10:43am
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind a few, so long as they're obviously ads and not trying to trick you into thinking it's additional membership content. If an ad means I discover another porn site, then IMHO that's a good thing.
|
05-11-13 01:02am
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I don't mind glasses on girls, but in porn it's pretty clichéd to be honest and doesn't really add anything.
|
05-07-13 11:13pm
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do if there are no current reviews, the current review(s) are vague, or if the score on the current review seems disproportionately low/high.
|
05-05-13 12:19am
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
High heels for me. I don't really have a foot fetish, but if the heels come off after all the clothes then that's also absolutely fine :)
|
04-29-13 11:19am
|
Reply
219
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Such a great, in-depth review - good job!
|
04-27-13 09:28am
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Voted 'Other' as it varies far too much. Sometimes it's excellent, sometimes it's terrible. Fortunately I don't need to deal with Tech Support too much normally.
|
04-27-13 04:04am
|
Reply
221
|
Indian Love Goddess
(0)
|
Reply of
bbiillyy's Comment
Hope you have time to review it as from a non-member's point of view there doesn't seem to be any arguments as to why it's so disappointing.
|
04-24-13 11:01am
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but probably wouldn't rejoin.
|
04-19-13 08:22am
|
Reply
223
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for this, and I do agree.
I'm not a fan of regional pricing, and although I respect Capn for his passionate stance on the matter, I think 15 points is far too many to consider docking a website for regional pricing.
Like you noticed, I've updated the review, reduced the score by 3, but I'll let PU members draw their own conclusions. The score is illustrative of my thoughts on the site. I've gone into detail in the pros/cons, so if a particular issue (eg, regional pricing) grinds somebody's axe, then they have every right not to join the site - I'm only sorry I missed this in the first review, but like I say, quality of content is more important to me than regional pricing which is why it slipped the net.
I don't know the whole story about regional pricing - for example, I don't know if webmasters have to shoulder extra costs from international members, so it's not really for me to by judge, jury and executioner.
|
04-17-13 12:09am
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't really notice any flaws vs standard definition. Regardless, though, I think 'flaws' add character. Always mystifies me when a website goes through the effort to photoshop out moles etc, but then leave them in the video.
|
04-15-13 12:00pm
|
Reply
225
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
dgerity's Review
Interesting, and if true, not particularly surprising. Her website did seem to have a lot of recycled content, and you've just reminded me of another con which is that their preview section implies (well, basically says...) Anna is NOW LIVE when she actually isn't.
With regards to 10 year-old content, yeah, I think a lot of the content is basically recycled from her old site, and it seems her webcams aren't even live which is unacceptable really.
The H/C content? Pretty sure that is new because her figure is different. She took a year-or-so off (at least) while she had a baby, and her boobs are definitely not as pert as they were.
|
04-14-13 04:47am
|
