Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the excellent and thorough review. Years ago, I had a 2-year subscription, but after it ran out, I never resubscribed. Your review touched upon some of the issues I had with the site.
It seemed he began doing a bunch of shoots with models against a gray cement background with no striptease whatsoever. I found those shoots very boring and dull to the extreme. The site certainly has included many beautiful models. One who has stood the test of time is Keity from Brazil. Her shoots are really striking. I've always thought he missed an opportunity to actually buy film stock when he went to Brazil to work with her, because you don't see many models like her. Video wasn't so great at the time.
Perhaps I'm old fashion, but when a shoot contains a model who is fully clothed but then slowly strips naked, it's the most satisfying way (IMO) to present a erotic model.
I noticed he has been shooting more explicit videos in the past number of years. Does anyone know if they are any good? BTW, what happened to the shoots of his lovely wife? Some of those were excellent.
|
07-02-23 09:02am
|
Reply
2
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I read the summary under one of Clover's most recent videos, and I'm wondering if the description is misleading. Does she really give the guy a blowjob or is it basically a hand-job video? Thanks.
|
10-29-19 07:58am
|
Reply
3
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
You've written a fine review Wittyguy. I was a member for a fairly short time when the holiday subscription offer was available a few yeas back. I agree with your opinion that the site's main drawback is the repetitive nature of the scenes. I'm not enamored with plastic and tattoos, but there is not a lot on this particular website. Hell, it's porn. In fairness, there are a number of very beautiful models without question.
The bright lighting and modern bedroom locations where many of the scenes occur are also quite repetitive and need some variation. I guess they're very successful and don't believe much change is required.
It's interesting that the site is a bit soft for your liking because I actually enjoy even more scenario setup and detail as opposed to the hard sex aspect. For example, the first scene with Lana Rhodes (she was much more beautiful before messing with her looks) could've been way hotter if they milked the scenario and the leadup to the actual sex by taking advantage of the premise of her boyfriend losing her to the guy who won the card game. She gets stripped and manhandled way too fast. I guess it's difficult to pleas everyone given the varying tastes we have in porn.
|
04-03-19 08:06am
|
Reply
4
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Thanks for the terrific review skippy. I was a member years ago and contacted the site to politely suggest they use clothes on the models before they eventually get naked. A good tease is IMO still the best way to take advantage of good looking models. Unfortunately, I received a snarky email sort of blowing me off and decided to not renew when the subscription had expired.
In any event, are they shooting a bunch of sets starting with partially or fully clothed models? Thanks.
|
03-25-19 10:28am
|
Reply
5
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the fine review tangub. Although the high plastic content is a disappointment to me, I do believe the photographer does a terrific job based upon some of the samples I've seen through the years. I have one question for you: does the site contain a bunch of content with the models either fully or partially clothed before getting naked.
I remember being a member of Femjoy a while back and being unhappy with the amount of "fully naked" right from the start of the shoot.
|
03-24-19 09:13am
|
Reply
6
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I felt the desire to reply because of the very high score given to them by TBP. A few weeks ago, I decided to re-check the models to see if they had improved in that regard, and I clicked the tab and went through about 15 pages of 30 "girls" each. I think I found four attractive. This is a very low ratio, and there are quite a few I found to be complete turn offs.
|
05-21-17 04:48am
|
Reply
7
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I had a membership for a short time last year but dropped it partly due to what was mentioned in your comment. They asked me why I cancelled, and I indicated that I wasn't impressed with the models. Naturally, there are some nice models appearing in the network, but there are way too many unattractive or skanky looking ones as well.
In addition, I'm interested in the setup of scenes and the anticipation of what will unfold as opposed to just the hardcore sex. The site kind of pays lip service to this aspect. They also have IMO some dreary and generic looking sets, the kind that affects the way I perceive the scene.
When watching the cuckolding sub-genre, I'm not going to enjoy it unless the model is really attractive and there is a feeling of believability to it. In one of their scenes, a model who has been around for a while but is quite attractive has a "husband" who looks like a retard. He pisses her off because she finds him viewing porn and of course decides to get revenge by inviting over this big black dude with a massive dick. LOL. It just is so silly. In any event, there is no way I'd give the site a score even close to the one included in TBP-not even close!
|
03-31-17 09:56pm
|
Reply
8
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I had a membership for a short time last year but dropped it partly due to what was mentioned in your comment. They asked me why I cancelled, and I indicated that I wasn't impressed with the models. Naturally, there are some nice models appearing in the network, but there are way too many unattractive or skanky looking ones as well.
In addition, I'm interested in the setup of scenes and the anticipation of what will unfold as opposed to just the hardcore sex. The site kind of pays lip service to this aspect. They also have IMO some dreary and generic looking sets, the kind that affects the way I perceive the scene.
When watching the cuckolding sub-genre, I'm not going to enjoy it unless the model is really attractive and there is a feeling of believability to it. In one of their scenes, a model who has been around for a while but is quite attractive has a "husband" who looks like a retard. He pisses her off because she finds him viewing porn and of course decides to get revenge by inviting over this big black dude with a massive dick. LOL. It just is so silly. In any event, there is no way I'd give the site a score even close to the one included in TBP-not even close!
|
03-31-17 09:55pm
|
Reply
9
|
All Gravure
(0)
|
Reply of
Twotails's Review
Have you checked out "Graphis" as yet? They have some great looking nude samples, although I can't say how many would be in a typical set because I haven't joined so far. However, the photography looks amazing.
|
03-01-17 10:25am
|
|
