The ratio of feet to legs? Heh, don't they come together? Just kidding around! There is a lot of feet content on this site. Most of the b/g sets end with the guy cumming on the girl's feet. Lots of foot/toe sucking, even two girls um "toeing" each other instead of fingering. So, it might be a bit too much feet/toes if you don't like those. I'm not a fan of feet either, but did like the site. I guess you could say I am indifferent to feet, won't take much away, won't add much either for me. The leg focus is very good though and some of the sets are very intense. I take it that some women are very, very turned on by men or women licking their legs and feet. There is one g/g set has a model named Ennie in it. I don't think I've ever seen a woman in a girl/girl set get so turned on. Her fingers and hand looks like a guy cummed in her hand but there is no guy in the set. She ended up that wet in the scene and orgasming that much.
I was a member a few months ago, the recycling isn't as frequent since this one is based around the feet/leg niche, but there was a few sets that I had from 1byday on it. DDF Busty and Hands on Hardcore seem to be the two that are the worst for recycling from 1byday. The biggest change I noticed is that Hot Legs and Feet is still a feet/leg fetish site, but there is more masturbation and more b/g sets than there used to be. The last time I talked to anyone at 1byday, they still are saying the "recycled" sets on their sites are not identical. I had mentioned some of the Aria sets from 1byday showing up on DDF Busty, the explanation they gave was, "Same outfit, same setting, different poses". Kind of like buying a alternate take cd. I haven't taken the time to check this out though.
I have a couple of clips from "wife" sites like the, "Interracial wife bangers". The stories in those are so sad that I just skip them. One, the husband comes in the kitchen, falls, knocks himself out. The ambulance is called. The paramedics run in and take him to the hospital. The wife grabs the one EMS and says, "I will feel sick too, could you take my temperature?"
How sick is that one ha ha? Her husband is dying. Believe it or not though, in my line of work, one of my main objectives is to understand fantasies and why people have them, since some people disturb themselves with their own sexual fantasies. One of the most, I would say top 3 for husbands, is walking in and catching their wife having sex with another man. I've been meaning to check some of those reality sites out, to see how the storylines play out and how believable they are.
I think most porn sites are getting worse these days since they have ran out of scenarios.
Hey Khan, I noticed that as well, but the site facts were updated in 2007, according to the review. It really looks odd, check out the review. Where it says, "videos" it says 320 videos, at the bottom in the "other" section it says picture galleries and over 300 videos. Then Maggie's review says, "No videos" as a con.
I would think that could cause some confusion. Especially when it says the site facts were updated just last month, 4-09-07. The thing is, I would say it is easy to go on the site a few times and miss the videos, I did. I just happened to look up and see the link to "videos".
The videos are of good quality, but they, the site, is saying their videos are exclusive. I don't believe that for one minute. They have an Adrianne Sage masturbation video that I have seen on New Sensations. I don't know if because they are owned by New Sensations, they are saying it is still exclusive if it appears on one of their other sites. They also have a Taylor Ann POV blowjob that I've seen on several of the New Sensations sites in the NS All Access network. Plus the split videos can get annoying. One that I was going to download had 7 parts to it. I just skipped it.
My fascination with Eve Angel was what broke me down to try it out, I had noticed she was on their main page. I did download her one video on the site in 4 parts, it is good quality, and I understand why they split them, but other sites like Club Sandy and Pix and Videos split them, then give you the option to download the whole file as one.
There are videos, but it is a hassle to find what you are looking for. I had noticed that TBP said no videos, but it is right on the first page of the members section, "videos" up at the top of it. I don't know if they just missed it, because I did at first. I kept thinking if I clicked on the model it would bring up videos too. The videos categories are out of whack as well. The one Eve Angel video is a 4 way lesbian movie, it shows up in the blowjob category, the solo category and the Big Movie category. There is no order to the videos either, just 30 or so pages of thumbnails showing each one.
Veronica has no movies, but has 33 picture sets and Olivia de Treville has 14 picture sets, but no videos.
From what I can see a lot of the videos are of New Sensations biggest stars, Adrienne Sage, I even saw Taylor Ann, who I know is not Hungarian. Overall, it looks like if someone spent maybe a week on the site working on it, they could make it a decent join, especially for picture fans. They have around 50 sets of Anetta Keys, no videos though. They have pictures of her that I have never seen, where she had braids when she first started porn. It is kind of like finding an uncle's old magazine stash ha ha.
I wish it had been a lot better. I'll sometimes look over those smaller sites, newer sites that wouldn't rate very good, but one with the Hustler name has to draw a lot of attention just from the name. I sometimes forget we're into a whole new generation of porn users.
I was hoping that you wouldn't take my post as anything more than a continuation to the discussion, and I think you picked up on that. I think, I could be wrong, but the way I take it is similar to Chris Rock's "Negro" skit. He would mimic a rich stereotypical rich stuck-up white guy. He would say, "Oh great thanks to Tiger another negro is on the golf course" and "Oh look at that negro with his white girlfriend, she must be a whore". I really didn't take it that way until I read the the little stories with each preview video and saw, "Gated community". I think one of their other sites is also based on a comedy routine, the "I fucked your stupid face" one. I'm thinking that is an old Will Farrell comedy routine where he is acting like a non-English speaking person and says, "Shut your stupid face or I'll fuck your stupid face".
I guess more than anything, it is another reminder to how unoriginal porn has become.
I don't know if I would call it racism. Racism is a form of hatred. Looking at the preview, it actually looks more like reverse-racism shrouded under an offensive name. The site mentions "watch powerlessly as your wife feasts on black cock" Later it says "The scandalous white wives"
More importantly once you get beyond the main page, you get one video description from one of the husband's that is titled, "Don't tell them about my baby cock" and the white wife is showing the sub-one inch size with her fingers while giving the black guy a blowjob, the husband's response is, "I'm sorry I can't satisfy you and that I'm fat and lazy. I love you. Why did you bring home this scumbag and why are you sucking his dick on my sofa, laughing at me? I'd never hurt you like this, you fucking bitch. I wish I could leave you, but I'm too weak. I guess I'll just endure this humiliation. Fuck."
Each of the other samples has another supposed response from the white husband and here those are, "Look at that smug look on his black face. Why did she bring him here? She had to know you'd come home and catch her with this degenerate. God, look at his giant black balls. Why the fuck is his dick so big? What's the point of that. She won't stop sucking it, and there's nothing I can do about it. Fucking bitch!"
Another, "I did everthing I could. I live in a gated community. I have a top notch security system. How did this hoodlum get in my house? My fucking whore wife let him in. And now she's going to suck his giant smelly cock why I watch in shame. I wonder what we're having for dinner tonight."
Another, "I can't believe she's doing this to me. Where the fuck did she find this guy? I tried to be a good husband, but nothing I do is good enough for her. And now she's humiliating me by letting this black scumbag defile her mouth and rub his black ass juices all over my couch. Marvelous."
So in the big picture you have an offensive site name towards blacks, but inside, the black guys are getting all the women and the white guys are amazed and blown away by how endowed the black men are while they have sex with their wives. If there is hatred, it is towards white men. There also is the assumption that the white man couldn't physically stop the black man, "Watch powerlessly as your wife feasts on black cock".
I don't know whether to laugh at this point or slap myself on the head for even wasting another reply. I can see now that English isn't your first language since most of what you're saying to me doesn't make much sense so I will give you a break there.
Where I won't give you a break is on your reasoning for not listing the technical numbers of the site. What if someone doesn't know there is a The Best Porn review for I Dream of Jo and just reads your review here on Porn Users? Think the numbers might be useful to them? It's not like it's time consuming to add those. Those also add credibility to your review. I can promise you, putting the numbers is more likely to help others want to join the site than saying, "Jo loves animals and when she plays with them, itīs wonderful".
And please spare me on telling me what Porn Users reviews are for. You've been a member here for 1 week and have 1 review. I've been a member here for 6.5 years and have 233 reviews. While it's true that the reviews should show each person's different perspective, it's also true that 90% of your pros could be things that no one else cares about. Which is why putting the numbers would help. Here's an example that should be able to get beyond our language barrier.
You're going to buy a new vehicle. You want cupholders, air conditioning, leather seats, cd player, power windows and automatic transmission.
You read user reviews on the exact car you're wanting. The first one says, "It's a great car!!! I love it!!! It has everything I need!!!" Did that review help you decide if you want the car?
It also should be noted that not all sites have updated facts from The Best Porn and those facts that you linked to will be somewhat out of date in 6 months. If someone writes a review for I Dream of Jo in 6 months should they too leave out the facts, even though they've changed?
Agree completely on all of this. I especially love her scenes with Eve. The only model I've seen with better chemistry with Eve was Sandra Shine. Jo also seems to become a bit more kinky with Eve than the other models.
Hey Pat, I'll probably give it a try since I too like Jo and especially if it has new Eve Angel content. The webmaster seems pretty genuine in what he's saying. The reviewers seem like nearly all other fly by night reviewers, looking for or getting a discount.
I did think that was funny about the November 2013 updates. Someone defended it somewhere on one of these as a "typo". Looking at my keyboard, I don't see how Nov could be a typo from May, maybe on the first letter since those are right beside each other, but the a-o keys are on separate sides. The future date bothered me mainly because Eveangel.com used a similar method when Eve left their site. They just mass removed the sets from 2004 and listed them as 2007 (which was the current year at the time). Maybe Khan at least gets a chuckle out of all this mess!
thaavi, I never said it's a rip off site. I was asking if the content had been used on Viv's other sites, then reused here. It's a common thing for sites to do. Since I have the majority of the content for Eve from Viv's sites, I wanted to know if I was going to sign-up for I Dream of Jo and end up with a bunch of scenes I already had.
Nick, on this reply, you're saying the point I was making. I honestly had never seen this I Dream of Jo site. And if Eve and Jo are only or mostly only shooting on it or Viv's other sites, then it would be hard for most of us not to question if it's new since they're hardly around on sites like 21 Sextury where Eve has roughly 200 scenes and DDF where Eve has nearly 300 scenes. I do apologize if I was wrong.
I do appreciate the offer of a review account, but one of the rules here has always been we aren't supposed to review a site unless we pay for it. I will still join it and review it since I do like both Eve and Jo a great deal and have huge collections of each. I would like to see new content of them.
I don't know if I'm crossing any lines by saying this, but we have a forum here on Porn Users and also an announcement section where you could have maybe talked to our admins here, Khan or Rick and offered a discounted reviewer price to get some fair reviews. I don't guarantee that though since it would be Khan and/or Rick's call.
Most of the negativity you're seeing here right now is based on several sites in the past giving members free memberships if they come here and score their site high. I've always thought our members here are a unique bunch of porn fans who try to help each other by reviewing sites so others will know what to expect.
No offense is meant to the reviewers who have posted over the last few days, but I really think those high 90s reviews will hurt more than they will help. It may be hard to believe, but I'm generally considered one of the more forgiving and optimistic reviewers here, but out of 200+ reviews, I've only had 8 that are rated 95 or higher. While there has been already 4 reviews of 95 or higher on Jo's site in less than a week.
A few examples of why these reviews are getting a lot of negativity.
There's no mention of picture size in any of them which is a key selling point.
There's no mention about whether the photo sets are zipped for download.
There's no mention of the video resolution. We have members here who won't join a site that doesn't have HD resolution.
There's no total picture sets count or no total video count. Or even more specific ones like, "There's X amount of solo videos, X amount of girl/girl videos.
These all can be a huge factor in creating believability since these all show that the member really is a member and not just someone paid to write a high scoring review.
thaavi, if I could offer some friendly advice. You're starting to sound like you work in the porn industry to know who Eve only works with these days. I do know she isn't with DDF though and made note of it in my review of DDF's Network since they are still listing her site as having new updates.
On the date one Nick, I didn't so much think it was meant to mislead as it is that I think it makes the site look poorly put together. I really couldn't even come up with a reason why a site would list an update that far ahead of time outside of sloppiness during the programming.
Glad to hear that about Jo. I hadn't seen new content of her anywhere.
I linked to Viv's video site to show that I wasn't just being negative about the reunited set. I'll put the link here too so you can see why I questioned it as a mid-2000s set. Bottom left hand corner. http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Looks nearly identical to the vidcap of reunited on I Dream of Jo. As I told the other person, I'm one of the biggest collectors of Eve's content and was genuinely interested in knowing if it was just an old set that had been re-released/recycled. Not to get on Viv's regular site too much, but when they went to the new look and started putting more videos on the regular site, the dates did change a great deal. I used the example in the above reply of one scene that shows as released in 2003 on Viv's video site and shows as released in 2010 on his regular site.
It's also worth mentioning, as you all at Viv's sites probably know, Eve is one of the most recycled models in porn. Her first solo site recycled for nearly 3 years. DDF is still recycling her content on the Eve Angel Official site.
First thing to know is I have collected Eve content since 2003. I have an external with over 1 TB of Eve's content including the rarest of rare scenes like the gangbang scene, her interracial boy/girl scene, her Bubblegirls scenes and everything I've found from 21 Sextury to DDF to her first solo site eveangel.com to her last solo site eveangelofficial.com
Second thing to know is I'm a huge supporter and fan of Viv Thomas as can be seen by mid-90s score on his video site. I have no malicious reason to question if these scenes are recycled. If you need a link or proof of the scene I was talking about, see here at Viv's video site. http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Bottom left hand corner with Jo in a lightly colored bed, just like the scene on the front page of I Dream of Jo, in the updates. Eve nor Jo have changed that much and it's based simply on one small vidcap on the new one. I asked on that one based on curiosity since I do collect Eve content and if there's some I don't have, I would like to have it.
Lastly and I mean nothing negative towards Viv's site with this, but his sites and content has become confusing. If you would like to see this, look at this link from his video site, http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Bottom right hand corner is a scene with Eve, Jo and a guy from the DVD Bubblegum Babes 5. It is dated on Viv Thomas Video - July 3rd, 2003. Now look on Viv's regular site, http://www.vivthomas.com/model/eve-angel/, click load more until 2010 scenes open and there is the same scene from Bubblegum Babes 5 listed as February 18, 2010.
I have every reason and right to question if it's new content since his other sites have changed formats and as you can see, Bubblegum Babes 5 has a 7 year gap on when it was released between his video site and his regular site. As for when Eve and Jo did scenes together in the mid 2000s, I have at least 9.
I was suspicious because:
#1 In the new updates there is a scene with Eve Angel. I haven't seen a new solo or girl/girl Eve Angel set in quite a long time. The one's being posted on Eve Angel Official are scenes that are 3-4 years old.
#2 Each and every review I've found of this site rate it between 70-83. Three near perfect reviews pop up over a day or two period for a site that had never had a user review on here before.
#3 Because you just admitted the admin told you about the possibility of writing your opinion here. Now, if you really believe that the sites is a 95+, that's fine, it really is, but why isn't that admin who told you all of this possibility, defending against what I posted in my comment? You've made it clear he/she knows about this site. He/she has replied to one of your "great" reviews. Would seem like instead of replying to a 100 scored review, he/she would be replying and defending his site from recycling old content as new.
The #2 one shows why anyone would have a reason to be skeptical. The site has been listed on here since May 2011, so 0 reviews in roughly 2 years, then 3 (perfect and near perfect scores) reviews come in, in 2 days. That wouldn't make you skeptical?
On the third con, "No option to download". Are you sure about that? I have been a member here multiple times and they have downloads available for their videos. They are known to have a download limit after you've downloaded so much in a day but that would be a major con if they've removed the download feature. When I click on a preview scene there it says, "Login or Join to Download High-Res Versions"
I think, I'm not positive on this, that Porno Dan used to be a very active member here on PU in the forum. My memory recalls the old version of "Blowpass", can't remember the old name, it was something generic sounding, being one of the sites that let PU have a huge discount (under $5) to get more reviews for their site.
Porno Dan makes me want to cheer him on. He reminds me of that guy that gave up his office job to become a porn star and producer.
Hey Denner, was checking out my older folders from Only Cuties. The models have very little overlap with In Focus and the scenes are very similar, softcore-midcore masturbation, strip and some boy/girl. The models are the slimmer, younger style, but I always thought it was really good.
And Denner, don't forget Only Cuties, if you're looking for similar content to In Focus, since it is ran by the same company and uses the same aliases. I always liked all three of their sites, Sapphic Erotica, In Focus Girls and Only Cuties. It's almost hard to believe some of these sites have maintained a high quality and kept churning out quality updates over the years. I always thought it was funny that the parent company Final Whistle changes nearly every model's name and uses those aliases on all 3 of their sites.
What you are seeing is most likely because the sites with photo shoots and videos in the same setting and clothes are exclusive to their site. I'm not positive on how sites go about booking these models, if it is an per hour basis or per shoot basis. I know that the site ATK Premium has a lot of behind of the scenes videos that are actually pretty good about explaining how they do their shoots. The model could have say 5 outfits there, usually brought from their own closets/homes and they in turn will shoot 5 different sets, one for each outfit. I've seen Eve Angel complain several times that her members on her old site were wanting new outfits in every set. A problem for her since she had over 250 sets on that site. She was really joking about it more than anything, even saying she had started making her own clothes and jewelry since the stores didn't have anything different than what she already had.
I might be able to help in one way and that is to say don't necessarily look for sites that have 100% exclusive content. This will get you more photo sets that are in different outfits than the videos. Take a look sometime at Eve Angel's old site. Every outfit and setting had a photo set and video set. Where as on say Twistys, I don't think any of her videos have the same outfits as her picture sets on there. And they have 53 picture sets and 10 videos of her, but none are the same outfit/setting.
There is a downfall to exclusive content and it goes into cost for the site more than anything. I think the reason that Panther and I responded to the exclusive part is because we are probably using the word differently than you are. Generally speaking when you see exclusive in porn it means that the content cannot be seen on any other site. If you are still interested in Twistys, based on wanting different outfits from set to set, it could be your best bet of all sites.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
