| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
The only thing I can say about that is that they never do say the breasts are all natural. Brazzers is about big tits and they couldn't care less how they go there! I like fake breasts, to a point though. But somehow natural does seem to be better. Perhaps you should give Big Naturals a try, there are some pretty damn good looking natural ones there! :)
|
06-18-08 02:46pm
|
Reply
677
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
delta69's Review
Are you speaking of MBit/s or MBytes/s? Big difference and important to know! i hope you are speaking of MegaBytes, because I have seen 4 MegaBytes/sec from them.
|
03-18-08 09:06pm
|
Reply
678
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
I would not call the photos high resolution! They are pretty much all at 600 x 900. This is barely half a mega-pixel! This is something the site truly needs to work on. I just check this for the March 17 2008 update.
I also agree with the covered bellies too. And yes you can tell that some of the women have extremely augmented boobs. Not all look bad and the is a good handful of women with real boobs! :)
Also, they did redo the site around Christmas time, it is a little easier to navigate the network now.
But I do realize that this review is a few moths old by this point. I jut wanted to point out about the picture resolution.
|
03-18-08 08:58pm
|
Reply
679
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Review
Just a warning! Be prepared to be hazed and have very detailed answers for questions based on the rating you gave this site. 100 ratings are not viewed lightly on this forum for damn good reason. I should know this because I have been defending a 100 score on videobox or a few weeks now!
Can you give a detailed reason as to why you give this site a 100? What is not good about this site? Every site has something that could be better (that does not make it unperfect). You are going to have to give a real good reason as to why you feel Brazzers is perfect. No one will trust this review if you do not justify it.
Keep in mind that I have reviewed their site and I am a current member and have been so for nearly a year. I would not call them perfect! They are great though, but could use work on quality. The photos in the sets are rather small and the videos are not HD, when that should be standard for new sites and old ones alike.
Please check out my review of the site, and perhaps my review of videobox (the replies!) just to see what happens when people notice a 100 rating here! It is rather entertaining. :)
|
03-17-08 11:52pm
|
Reply
680
|
Ms Jaylene Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
jaylenefan's Review
High Resolution pictures are not considered a con by the vast majority of people. In fact, many people list it as a con if the pictures are not larger than the size of the screen. Nicer sites can have resolutions as high as 4000 or more.
|
12-13-08 06:07pm
|
Reply
681
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
Dimensions are a tricky thing right now because so many people have different size monitors. 640x480 used to be ideal because everyone had 4:3 monitors and the resolution was not all that high say 800x600. But now many 4:3 monitors feature resolutions of 1600x1200 and some higher.
Also, many people have switched to widescreen, so now the aspect ratio is in question. It is all compromise at this point.
Now the resolution to use. The higher the better, at least for the highest option you would offer. ideally you would offer an HD option and retain something close to you current. 1.5 to 2 MBit video is pretty easy to play and even people with lighter, older machines can enjoy that. But many of us have more modern computers that can easily hand very high bit rates. Of course, it is important that any increase in bit rate is utilized close to its full potential. It is easy to make a video 6 MBit from 1 Mbit, but it will look no better.
A few sites have gone as high as a 1440 resolution. These videos look phenomenal but can be practically impossible to play if the user does not have reasonable video capacity. Ideally i would look into resolutions of 1280x720 for your higher end at this point. Of course you camera must be able to shoot this. Most computers can play this without much issue and those of us with good video ability would still be able skip around the video fairly easily.
Of course, none of this means anything without using decent cameras and video compression. Being able to offer beautiful videos costs money, but that is only a one time payment. Well, there is storage and bandwidth costs. But, if bandwidth becomes and issue it is a blessing at the same time because that means your spectacular videos have attracted more members and more revenue. Besides, sites like TBP have search options for video quality, and it would be great for you if your site where to show up under the HD listing.
I am certainly glad to be helpful to you. If my suggestion prove fruitful for you than it has helped you become successful, and provides us with another good site to enjoy. Sounds like a win-win deal to me.
|
11-11-08 07:31pm
|
Reply
682
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
Have you considered increasing the bit rates on the videos. Many of us would call 1000 KBit the bare minimum for new content, and the 512 and 256 just fluff. It would be much more appealing if you offered good videos in the 3000 KBit range.
A site can not be built under the assumption that people are still using dial up. While it is nice for those with minimal internet connections and storage space, it is a deterrent for those of us with moderate connections and plenty of storage. I would gladly wait 3 times as long for a 3000 KBit video and would enjoy it 100 times more.
For a softcore site I believe video quality is a paramount issue. Those kind of videos are not showing us much, which is fine, but I better be able to everything that is being shown.
|
11-11-08 12:46pm
|
Reply
683
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
A webmaster actually recommending holding off on joining until more videos can be posted. Either it is insane or pure genius! Most people want the revenue to start flowing on smaller sites to help the site grow, where as you taking the honest and concerning approach.
You certainly get point from me for being honest enough, or smart enough, to recommend that a video fan hold off on joining so that he will not be disappointed. Two good things here, Cybertoad does not feel ripped off when he find a limited number of videos, and you do not have to deal with an unhappy customer. Even better for you, you make yourself look wonderful on this site, and at the same time avoided a respected PU telling us of the video shortcomings in the form of disappointment.
We PUs like you already, and please do keep us posted about an influx of videos. Also, can you tell us what the dimensions and bit rates will be for your videos?
|
11-10-08 09:16pm
|
Reply
684
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
In my email to them I did not mention TBP. I pretty much never do mention TBP in correspondences with websites. I mentioned them here because they have the same price displayed as the sign up page did and it was on the same day that TBP posted that site.
You are correct about the length of the trial. I knew it was two days when going into this, and it does not change anything here. I did not check on the duration of the trial before responding since that is not the part in question.
I sent them one email with everything in it, including quotes of the pricing. Also a request for a refund of the difference. I have no issues with paying the $14.95, since that is what I had expected to pay anyway.
Hopefully they are decent about it, I am still sorting out my last credit card issue!
|
06-12-09 04:15pm
|
Reply
685
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I mention TBP because that is where I first seen the price, and it was on their update for that day.
I signed up for a 3 day trial to see if I liked it or if they had anything good. TBP showed that the site would rebill at $14.95 and the site said the same thing on the sign up page. TBP is not to blame because I seen the same thing they did.
The deal here worked just like any other trial. After a few days access it recurs at what ever the recur amount should be. Since the sign up page stated that the 30 membership for $24.95 or the trial for $4.95 would recur at $14.95 I thought it seemed like a decent deal.
TBP got their information from the same place I did, the sign up page. The issue is that is not what they charge. They have another set for rules listed in the customer service page. Of course a person usually only goes to this page AFTER having a problem, not before.
The point is that they advertise one price up front, and they charge based off a price that is displayed somewhere other than the sign up page.
As for me, my trial rebilled at the higher amount. Not the amount shown on the sign up page. So in effect I was billed $10 more than I had expected for the additional 30 days.
|
06-12-09 11:31am
|
Reply
686
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
I never had issues with their site. You seem to have an awful lot of pros in there to give it a 51, or a 20% as you say. Did you try to get a hold of their customer service? Did you try clearing all your cookies, brownies, and other baked goods?
|
03-30-10 05:49pm
|
Reply
687
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Renewing at $25 does not sound nice to me. I think they are counting on us college pervs to be lazy and forget to cancel.
|
09-15-09 01:29pm
|
Reply
688
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
Did they make an mention to how a user would go about getting these discounts? It is too bad that deal is going away. It made them a very good deal, and completely irresistible to anyone on a budget.
|
09-01-09 09:10pm
|
Reply
689
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
I would not call them DVD quality. They quality is not bad but it is not up to DVD. I know they have a "DVD quality" option to download which I always use for anything that offers it. The videos are at 2000k. The DVDs that are produced by them actually do look better. Same goes for other sites that also produce DVDs.
|
05-26-09 09:58am
|
Reply
690
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
As did I. This is a terribly hard deal to pass up.
|
03-19-09 01:48am
|
Reply
691
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I could not have asked for better timing! I have a subscription somewhere else ending tonight and NA was my next place to go. Perfect! I knew there was a reason I hung around this place.
Thanks for the heads up and all the work.
|
03-04-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
692
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Brazzers have been using 1800 KBit. RK was a bit lower, at1500 KBit. Personally I always download the highest quality available. I always want the highest quality no matter the size. I am not beyond downloading 3 GB videos if that is what a site offers.
|
02-20-09 04:46pm
|
Reply
693
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
The physical quality of the video, resolution, bit rate and such. Do they look better than most places or are they not much different.
|
02-20-09 11:30am
|
Reply
694
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Well, I am not going to poop in your sand box too much. You do bring some very valid points. It really is a slight difference in opinion, but only on the scoring. The review and reasoning are solid as my dick was the first time I ever seen a porn. :)
I will have to check this site out by the way. I have never made it around to them yet.
Videobox is at a disadvantage when it comes to making it entertaining, they do not make the content. As for the model names, even i have noticed a few mix ups. If I notice a model name wrong there is a serious problem, I am lucky to remember my friends names!
Since I have your attention. How does the video quality compare at NA to videobox and brazzers. Videobox has better looking videos than Brazzers, but I would not want to go much lower than Brazzer's quality. I am hoping they have a higher quality than Brazzers and especially RK. I do not mind huge file sizes if it gets me good looking videos.
Might I suggest in you BL to but "My Take" paragraph and an "Average Joe" paragraph that is clearly defined. This way you can include both clearly. I kinda like that idea, I may just do that myself!
|
02-19-09 11:47pm
|
Reply
695
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
I just do not understand rating a site you prefer lower than another. Is there something fundamental that Brazzers and NA do better than Videobox? When I look at a score I see the score that the review gives the site based on what they feel it deserves, not what they people others believe it deserves. This is exactly why I am not telling you that one site is more deserving than another, because that is up to you to decide. The way your reply reads you are saying that you score sites not based what you like but rather what others like, a popular vote if you will. I certainly hope that is not the case.
You say that NA and Brazzers post content in a more appealing way, and this is a reason to show favor to them, I tend to agree. Perhaps we just have a difference in our logic. Not that either one is wrong, I am just trying to figure out yours.
What if someone is interested in finding particular models. Obviously you can not list every model on the site, but it would be worth noting if a site has usual models or unique models. You are not the only person interested in collecting this way. Exotics is the same way. But you are also correct in saying that some people have less concern over models, I am one of them to an extent.
What I am after is what, in your opinion, makes NA better than all other sites? Not what other people think.
|
02-19-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
696
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
As a rule we must give you some grief for posting a 100. So here it is.
The last thing you say is "On an overall scale? I prefer VideoBox." Now that is simply wrong right there. A site can not be viewed as perfect, by you, if you actually prefer another site. I also might add that you scored Videobox as a 95.
As I mentioned before, everyone is entitled a 100, in my opinion. The site someone chooses as a 100 does not actually need to be perfect, but it should be the one site that you would stay a member with if you could choose one and only one site. So now if you would choose this site over Videobox than assigning a 100 is fine, but you need to tell us what makes this site better for you. Again, the key question, is this site the best site out there for you? If you can not say yes then the site does not meet the requirements for perfection.
I believe I went into this somewhere else on this site, but my view of perfection for a site is one that is the absolute best. A perfect site is of course unattainable, so we are left with calling the best the current definition of perfection and the close running sites are near current perfection.
I guess I get a little anal about this, but you are certainly free to ignore me. I will just bug you forever then! :) Don't worry though, I am not going to yank my trust vote over it.
Oh yeah, reason number two. You passed me on point...grrrr...(shaking fist in the air) ... :)
|
02-19-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
697
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Everyone is entitled to their 100. But seriously, we do have to find a way to bust his balls about it! :)
|
02-19-09 06:12pm
|
Reply
698
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
So you are saying to keep this on your normal hard drive so when she finds it she does not think much of it. However, we must keep the other 98% of our collection somewhere else! :)
Seriously though, this was a very insightful comment. It is usually not something I consider when reviewing a site.
|
12-27-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
699
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Reply
Gotcha. The ones on the preview page did not look so good, she should put a HD sample out there.
Hey. We were all new at everything we have ever don at one point. So do not think much of it. We all do things that are easy to criticizes after the fact. It is just a matter of being man enough to say "oh, duh that makes sense!"
Anyway, welcome to PU and keep coming back.
|
09-25-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
700
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Comment
You kinda should have put this as a reply to the comment you are reply to. This way people do not wonder what you are talking about, or have to dig for the comment you are replying to.
I do have a question for you though. Is the quality in the site the same as seen in the preview videos?
|
09-25-08 09:04pm
|
