| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
iPink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I just checked the tutorial on their site (reachable from the Support page) and it looks they have made an effort to optimize the layout for the iPhone. I don't see the point in watching porn over such a small screen either but iPhone has a 480x320 resolution already and I've enjoyed sites that have videos at that maximum resolution; if someone wants to grab some quick porn this site doesn't seem so bad. I like some of the Pink Visual content, anyway.
For completeness, here's the forum thread you mentioned:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=520
|
05-15-09 11:41pm
|
Reply
152
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Follow-up to my previous comment: turns out Savana Ginger is Havana Ginger's real-life sister. No wonder why they look so similar.
|
01-01-09 05:08am
|
Reply
153
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
It's not part of the main Reality Kings network but its new sister network Muffia. I got access to Muffia as a cross-sale from Reality Kings.
Scenes usually involve some prosthetics (double-dicked guy, three-titted woman, four-nipple woman, two-vagina girl, extremely hairy bushes, bifid tongue and so on) but there are a couple scenes which are, in fact, real (big real tits, mainly). Except for a couple, models are probably American but unknown to me.
There's a scene with a model with huge areolae. Funny thing is they name the model "Savana Ginger" and she physically reminds quite a bit of "Havana Ginger", a porn star who does have similar huge areolae.
Currently, there are 17 scenes and the schedule says they update once a month.
|
12-28-08 09:17am
|
Reply
154
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
bjajlt362's Comment
Good catch. Looking at their forum, it looks like they are encouraging non-members to submit reviews since this JABloid is already available to paying members.
In the forum thread where they announce the new JABloid for members, they say:
If you're not currently a member, you have a chance to see the JABloid for free by submitting a good review for us at the following review sites. More details on our home page at: ...
We would appreciate it if existing members submit their reviews and comments as well: ...
On the other hand, JAB (the author of the sites' comics) has been around for a long long time. I remember his cartoon parodies from more than 10 years ago.
|
07-26-10 01:42am
|
Reply
155
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
JFYI, they have recently lowered the price back to $19.95.
|
09-08-08 12:10am
|
Reply
156
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Glad that you found my review useful. It was my second review ever but I feel it's still accurate. Ever since I discovered Jaime Hammer's site, what's offered here is what I expect in other solo sites and most fall short for one reason or another. That's why this site stays at the top of my list of reviews.
If you like her personality, let me suggest that you try to make it to one of her webcam chats. As for her major assets, she is currently working mainly for her site so this is almost the only place where you can find her recent pictures and videos. She recently did, though, some pretty awesome sets for Digital Desire, which were being released here even before they were available at DD.
One more detail that, IMHO, sets this site apart is that there was a message board thread asking site members about their opinion prior to raising the price. They also added multimonth membership options then.
|
08-22-08 03:07pm
|
Reply
157
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Thanks for your interest in my review. I'm a newbie but, the way I see it, the rating of "Excellent - Site is near perfect, best in its class. Highly recommended" is perfectly justifiable in this case.
The key is "best in its class". I've been member to several other American professional Individual Models sites (Porn Stars and published Glamour models alike) and few come close to deliver half as this. You may not like Jaime Hammer's looks or personality (probably not worth joining, then) or expect every adult site to be a gynecology textbook (this site is clearly not one) but the quality of the product and the high degree of involvement of the model with her site is undeniable and way higher than most other similar Individual Models sites.
The cons are not that big. After all, seeing nobody but the website model in an official website is what you join for not to just get "girlfriend" updates of models you are not interested in. Images and videos are currently big enough to fill most screens. HD quality is cool but I don't look for it so I listed them as cons for those who do. Maybe a bit too few images in the galleries but more could become repetitive in a softcore model.
On the other hand, the site is currently clearly misscategorized at PU: it should by no means be in the Porn Stars category but Softcore or Glamour. If you look at it as a Porn Stars site, you will be very disappointed.
Also, the TBP official review is 2 years outdated although I'm in awe that they updated the site facts after my review. For completeness, let me state again that half the galleries (the most recent ones) are available as zip files and that the content is not amateur in any sense.
|
04-20-08 03:46am
|
Reply
158
|
Jesse Capelli
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
There are 50 girl-girl galleries where a dildo or some fingering is usually present. I didn't check the videos but I believe it's usually the same. Most of them are solo, though.
I've created a new comment to highlight that the site hasn't been updated in years and how misleading the tour is.
|
05-04-08 02:54pm
|
Reply
159
|
Jesse Capelli
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the Planet Anita heads up. I believe it should have almost the same content and at the same resolutions that eventually appear at Club Anita. Someone at the Club Anita forums complained, though, that Planet Anita had much more BTS/personal material than Club Anita. It certainly has a real diary updated more often and with more meaningful entries although it is already available in the free section.
Planet Anita, at least, doesn't try to fool you in the website tour: I feel that what you get once you join is what you see in the free section.
Very few of the Glamour Models Gone Bad are alive and kicking and the website tours are specially misleading: they look super cool and promise great content and interaction with the model but, once inside, you get a very old looking design, questionable quality and the promised interaction with the model is a bad joke. Apart from the ones you say, Club Charlie (Charlie Laine) still seems to live up to the promises.
|
05-04-08 01:58pm
|
Reply
160
|
Jesse Capelli
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
That could make things worse and the site might not have received more than a handful of updates in 4 years. That could explain also why most videos are MPEG. I am not familiar with the model and I had never seen any of the galleries so I couldn't really tell what year exactly they were taken.
I assumed most of the content had been uploaded together in 2006 because one of the latest galleries was from her "new movie"; I looked up the title and it had been released in 2006. All the preceding updates had almost the same day and month and that's why I thought they all might be part of the original content.
Anyway, whether they are from 2004 or 2006, anyone joining should not expect any recent content.
|
05-04-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
161
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
After checking the blog and the previews in the free section, I'm pretty sure the site is consistently updating at the same rate and in the same style as always. AFAIK, Jessica Jaymes has been focusing a lot on her site in recent years so, IMHO, the fact that not many scenes of hers for other companies come up shouldn't be an indicator of the quality of this site.
|
10-17-12 03:05pm
|
Reply
162
|
Karlie Montana
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
As I said, I got the feeling not much care was put into this site's design. Regardless, if Karlie Montana made regular use of the features at hand, fans of hers would get their money's worth.
For instance, that exact content engine is used at Jessica Drake but jessica drake seems to be working on her site several times a day (blogs, travel pictures, comments, Wicked Pictures movie stills or whatever). The site is as ugly, cumbersome and download-unfriendly as this one but her fans have good reasons to check in on a daily basis.
In any case, I'd still recommend the trial to Karlie Montana to anyone who's had a thing for the model at some point; I feel her "nutty" personality is one of her main appeals and it shows a lot here.
|
05-12-09 11:26am
|
Reply
163
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Interesting info on 420. Thanks for sharing. I confess I had never come across the term until I tried to find more about the model and the 420 Wikipedia article showed up in a Google search. I'm guessing it's widely used only in English speaking countries. I'm certainly not a weed expert so I mentioned it in my comment in case someone as clueless as me was intrigued by the site name.
Regarding Kayden, I browsed her MySpace blog and I got the impression she had somehow been "expelled" from Suicide Girls a couple years ago for reasons she didn't say or I didn't see.
|
05-08-09 11:31am
|
Reply
164
|
King Dong
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
This is a new Muffia site. You may get a full-access trial to Muffia if you join Reality Kings. I got one when I signed a couple months ago. Unfortunately, King Dong was not up yet then.
|
02-17-09 03:00pm
|
Reply
165
|
Lisa A Daniels
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
As of today, there are 29 videos of varying quality. 6 of the last ones are at 1280x720 (300-700 mb each), some of the old ones are 320x240 but most are at 640x480. Length is 10-15 minutes. The content of the videos is about one third solo, one third lesbian, one third boy-girl and they are quite good.
Very poor update rate, though. Lately, you get one HD video every two weeks and a "photo gallery" consisting of video captures from next week's video the week in between. You also get access to Glamour Models Gone Bad, Amateurs Gone Bad and all related model sites (Shay Laren, Crissy Moran, ...).
|
04-19-08 05:38am
|
Reply
166
|
Live Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks indeed for your reply. I got comfort in knowing I'm not the only one who is confused about that sign up page. Looks like a very interesting site but it's a pity they don't realize what they are doing wrong.
|
03-19-12 03:29pm
|
Reply
167
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I've also checked sometimes a model simultaneously at Live Jasmin and other sites and confess I've never found much of a difference in quality apart from aspect ratios and slightly different video sizes. Maybe the fact that Live Jasmin is a European site and most models that work at both places are European has something to do with your perceived quality.
I'm not 100% sure how models are able to stream simultaneously through different networks, but it's most likely achieved by some software that sends the stream to various sites. For practical reasons, I'd discard them having various cameras.
On the other hand, what Live Jasmin claims to be "HD" is quite lacking compared to some of the "HD"s at Cam Crush (a clone of Streamate.com, btw); but the best qualities I've seen there are usually from US models, who are not available at Live Jasmin.
|
11-20-10 01:15am
|
Reply
168
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
English is not my mother tongue; I try to be very verbose so the meaning doesn't get lost in case I use a weird wording in a particular sentence. The praise means a lot coming from you.
|
11-17-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
169
|
Mariah XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Thanks. This site isn't an exception. Almost no US site takes into account time zones when scheduling shows. I wasn't planning on joining: it's just that 24/7 spy cams are are something I used to enjoy in the past and I was wondering whether they worked here.
|
02-21-09 10:59am
|
Reply
170
|
Mariah XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Thanks for your quick reply. I really don't see what's the point of advertising 24/7 cams when they cannot get them to work properly. I mean, two weekly shows for members is pretty awesome, way over what the majority of solo sites do. Why not advertise that fact alone?
|
02-19-09 02:46pm
|
Reply
171
|
Mariah XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
I'm curious about the cam shows. The free tour says she does 3 weekly cam shows, that she also has 3 cams live 24/7 from her home and that she broadcasts all her shoots and travels.
Is any of these claims for real? What does she do on the regular shows? Does she bring any guests? Are any of these shows archived? Thanks in advance for any further info.
|
02-19-09 11:16am
|
Reply
172
|
Matrix HD
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Good review. They are great content producers but their websites are subpar. This one is better than Matrix Nudes in some things but worse in others.
Just a very minor correction, though. I believe pictures at this site are offered in 4 sizes: maximum axis is 750, 1024, 1600 or 2000 pixels. Most of them are portrait and you have to click four times on the popup window every time to get to the highest resolution. I don't know if they license their photo content at greater than 2000px resolutions.
|
12-23-08 12:26pm
|
Reply
173
|
Matrix Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Try Matrix HD instead. The site has the same look but the join page works. I read somewhere some time ago that they were planning to make Matrix HD their consumer site instead of Matrix Nudes.
|
06-20-09 05:19am
|
Reply
174
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Never been a member of this site but I often use Firefox's DownThemAll and I occasionally get the file mismatch error at other sites. Even for large video files I rarely lose any data: it's nothing but the hassle of having to restart a paused download a couple times. Perhaps a Firefox specific forum or a generic question at the forum here might get you some answers.
|
06-08-09 02:06pm
|
Reply
175
|
Mia McKinley
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Another site powered by the same people, Naughty Natalie XOXO, also got a rave review with little info. I wrote a review for another site by them, Miss Laura Lee, whose picture content info shouldn't be much different from the one here.
The free section from these people usually shows the amount of content available in the members area. Be advised, though, that pictures are probably quite small and cannot be downloaded. Video sizes are probably big but there's no info on resolution or duration. Only a handful of videos. There's a free video sample which is 1280x720 (6000kbps); IMHO, very bad camera work, though.
|
10-12-08 05:35am
|
