| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
The site has a 7 day trial available for $1.00. Unlimited access. But you must access VictoriaPink.com directly and not through PU to get that price.
They redesigned the home page so I hoped that, perhaps, they might have added more material on Victoria Pink.
Nope. Same old crap with no updates in at least 3 years.
However the site has added several additional sites as bonus sites (all titled [something] Next Door - such as Virgins Next Door, Handjob Next Door, etc.) that show dates that suggest they are updated relatively currently. The bad news is that they download at the rate of about 140 Kb and are the usual unimaginative crap.
I downloaded what little I found any good (a decent, but not spectacular Bree Olson video, for example) and cancelled my trial about 2 hours after signing up.
Warning. Cross sells. Warning. $40.00 if you don't cancel before time runs out. Good news, billing by ccbill.
I gave the site a 64 a few years back but now it gets a 50.
|
09-30-09 11:10pm
|
Reply
1002
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Got it. 90 to me is spot on. At least at this point in my membership. Clearly theirs is a different niche than, say, Bang Bros or Brazzers, but they are, IMO quite superior to, say, Danni.com.
|
09-26-09 02:47pm
|
Reply
1003
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Not only a 1TB, but maybe 2 or 3. Or more.
I signed up using the three month network option that was offered in August and I just can't find the time to D/L all of the superb content I've found on this and the other sites.
A HUGE uptick for the quality of the babes and the videos they've made.
It's too early for me to write a review but I'm a notch higher than an 85...but not a lot of notches.
|
09-26-09 11:55am
|
Reply
1004
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
As with any group there are some bad apples, but by and large they are busting their butt and doing good.
The process is that the girls must buy their way into the club and by doing so get an opportunity to make tip money showing off their remarkable assets.
It's a cash cow for both the club owner and the girls so by and large the bad apples are screwing the pooch if they are doing anything they shouldn't be doing.
If the question is a moral/social question rather than an integrity/honesty question, then I'll simply ask if the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders are doing wrong when they wear their "eyepatch sized" shorts and wiggle their assets for a national TV audience?
|
09-26-09 11:52am
|
Reply
1005
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Poll
If I pay a premium for access to HD where a single video can approach 2 Gb (today, who knows what it'll be in the next year or two) I want a much higher limit.
I agree that the idea of limits is reasonable, but the limit must be set high enough to provide the subscriber with the product (s)he has paid for.
My answer is 20Gb for a standard quality offering and 40Gb for HD offerings, but that's not available, so I answered 20Gb.
|
09-19-09 08:53am
|
Reply
1006
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I just went to the site and they still want $14.95. What is the "student discount?" I couldn't find it mentioned anywhere.
|
09-14-09 08:39am
|
Reply
1007
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
The improvements are excellent and the Porn Users adjunct just makes this the best source of good information for us porndogs.
I've said frequently that PU and TBP together are the Consumer Reports of the Porn Biz.
|
09-13-09 11:12am
|
Reply
1008
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Thanks for the tip. I will give it a go. I dropped $74.95 on the deal because there's so damned much GOOD content there's no way I can D/L what I want in just one month, and it is over my budget to spend $34.95 a month on just one of the sites.
I'm guessing (hoping) they get smart at DDF Prod and offer network deals in the future as well.
So far I'm also impressed with the quality of the vids. The older ones are not so good but anything 2007 and later are great.
|
08-30-09 06:59pm
|
Reply
1009
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I agree with Drooler. The screaming in porn is almost as bad as the shrieking that goes on in Women's professional tennis. It's unnecessary and a ridiculous waste of energy.
|
08-30-09 01:24pm
|
Reply
1010
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I read 'em all while waiting for the D/L to complete. Some for entertainment, some for information and some for specific data that I want to include in my summary comments (which I prepare for each down load).
The summary lists the model name, possible/likely aliases, saved file name, source site, my personal rating and why, and other comments and narrative.
|
08-27-09 02:02pm
|
Reply
1011
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
With the popularity of the main site and the marketing efforts they continue to employ, All these guys need to do is to clean up their navigation and naming conventions.
I'm ready to volunteer to do the naming project.
|
08-22-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
1012
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
chancler's Review
That happened to me (expired cc). I called the 800 number of their billing service. They told me to sign up for the $5 trial with the new credit card and immediately sign up from the trial, while I was on the line with her. She said she would set it up at the $9.95 rate. I got the 3 days and am back on the $9.95 rate.
Seems like a silly procedure but it worked fine.
|
08-21-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
1013
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I don't care. There are gorgeous 22 year olds and ugly as sin underdeveloped young girls who can pass for under 20.
|
08-18-09 11:27pm
|
Reply
1014
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dracken's Poll
Ditto...all of the above.
My list in order of frustration (high to low):
-Lousy data in general such as no model names, no scene names, etc.
-Lousy navigation where one cannot find new posts, posts by model name, etc.
-Broken links to content
-Slow downloads
-Video identifications that are meaningless
The only thing in the list that I don't worry about is color themes. I prefer subtle to garish, but I don't really care much so long as the babes are doing what I want them to do.
|
08-16-09 09:26am
|
Reply
1015
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I agree with all the foregoing comments. But I have to add that the aftermarket installations are getting better and better.
I saw one gorgeous babe whose C boobs were just fantastic and were moving beautifully during the reverse cowgirl. There was no way these beauties were fake.
So I went to work on a web search for more of her stuff. I found some that was pre-enhancement that blew me away. Unless she "blossomed" more than any other babe ever did after she turned 18, my kudos to the surgeon who did the installation. No scars and no strange shape at all.
Bottom line, if I can't tell they're fake, then I love 'em. But if they are visibly fake, Big Dick returns to being Little Richard very quickly.
BTW, one babe with aftermarkets who was a turn on for me is Carmella Bing. She claims they're all natural but I have my sincere doubts. Lately, though, she's added some additional poundage around her waist that now makes her look a bit too dumpy.
|
08-14-09 08:08am
|
Reply
1016
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm still in the site, but not by choice. The damned thing renewed me at their ridiculously high rate.
I spent some time last night trying to fight my way through the "garbage dump" structure, as you so aptly called it, to see if I was missing something that would help identify the babes and/or the scene. No luck but I did stumble on one video that was barely average in quality but was a great performance by one of my faves. But I'll be damned if I can find it again today.
My bottom line is that this site needs adult supervision and a user friendly structure.
There are so many site that are cheaper and much better out there I see no reason to remain a member and will keep trying to cancel my mambership.
|
08-14-09 07:56am
|
Reply
1017
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
Now this is one great review. Well written and it held my interest beginning to end.
I've been keeping this site near the top of my round tuit* list of sites and tjhis review may just get me off my ass and signing up for it.
*Round tuit=when I get around to it.
|
08-13-09 09:01am
|
Reply
1018
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's News
Sounds great. But the sites say "one time." Does that mean if I sign up now I will have to sign up again in Sept at the regular rate per site?
|
08-09-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
1019
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
The location is not important to me. What is important is good lighting, a straight horndog kind of guy behind the camera who understands what we porn users really want to see, and a stunt cock who understands that we are more interested in a babe's PTA* than in his body so he finds positions that help us check out all the important body parts.
One good example of the kind of lighting, camera work and unobtrusive stunt cocks is the Busty Adventures website.
BTW, they normally use a living room setting because a couch provides better viewing angles and variety, but also do some good dtuff in kitchens, dining rooms, and occasionally outdoors. I can't say I recall ever seeing a scene shot in a bedroom.
*PTA=Pussy, Tits, Ass.
|
08-08-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
1020
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Occasionally I'll take one for the PU team, but I have yet to find a great (or even a moderately good) site that hasn't been reviewed on TBP or PU.
What I do now when I discover a site that isn't on TBP or PU is send an email to Khan with the site's URL so it can be added to his project list.
|
07-31-09 08:48am
|
Reply
1021
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto that except that well produced softcore videos can really get my motor going as well. Generally, most photos no longer get my interest except when they are of my A list babes and are taken by a true pro.
|
07-29-09 10:19pm
|
Reply
1022
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Now that's a term I can understand. Brazzer tits are, by and large, enhanced with aftermarket adjustments by Dr. Gene and are becoming a total turn-off.
Naturals are best, by far.
When I was a Score member a few years back when the quality was lousy and the DRM was in force, at least the models were mostly (not always) natural.
And as James says, there were some "thick" ones in there with very large naturals bouncing on their very large bellies, but that's just fine. The assortment was good back then but the price and the HD have me interested; very interested.
Great review James. Thanks.
|
07-26-09 08:35pm
|
Reply
1023
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
PU first, then TBP if I need more info or if the scores are significantly different.
|
07-21-09 06:52pm
|
Reply
1024
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Boy is that true!
But better yet, I liked the articulate and fact loaded commentary. Much better than the "your site sucks" crap that is often posted.
|
07-13-09 08:32am
|
Reply
1025
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Reply
Got it. A more subtle form of overpromise. I have visited a few topless beaches in Europe and would have loved to been able to shoot some video without being conspicuous, so this kind of site is right up my alley. Great definition and great bods in the preview site.
This site is what I call a "once and done" site where a short (one month) membership should be timed so that I can drain as much as I can of the good stuff to my hard drive, then sit back and wait a year or so for another grab and run.
Thanks for the review. I was not aware sites like this existed, so they may get $25 of my porn budget shortly.
|
07-13-09 08:27am
|
