| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Real Tampa Swingers
(0)
|
Reply of
OUMarcus's Review
Does she have short hair in all of the content? And what about any of her shoots or scenes with other girls; do they have short hair? Can you tell I'm looking for content with short hair? ;)
|
04-24-07 07:34pm
|
Reply
252
|
Sexy Cassia
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
What does HC mean?
|
04-24-07 06:15pm
|
Reply
253
|
Porn Multi Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
I agree with marquis 100% There is absolutely no reason they would need that information, even to supposedly varify credit card info. You did absolutely the right thing.
|
04-20-07 06:43pm
|
Reply
254
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
That's a good point about joining to show support for the ban! And I'd really like to think it was the reviews here on the site that had something to do with it. So, we'll just say that it was us and celebrate! Ding, Dong, DRM is Gone! DRM is Gone! DRM is Gone! Ding, Dong, Ding, the Wicked DRM is Gone! ;)
|
04-20-07 07:27am
|
Reply
255
|
FC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Reply
No, not really. ;)
|
04-18-07 06:34am
|
Reply
256
|
FC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
The fact that it includes hardcore is a bad thing?
|
04-17-07 05:53pm
|
Reply
257
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Heck, I've gone through the tour page and would give it a higher rating than this guy based solely on that! If he hadn't mentioned the other site I might have let it go, but that plus the fact that Twistys usually gets a very good rating makes me suspicious of the motive here. If there isn't a rule against promoting other sites in a review, perhaps there should be...at least when it's to this degree.
|
04-17-07 05:51pm
|
Reply
258
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
If you can't think of a "Con" per se, can you think of any ways the site could be improved? I think that's what folks are looking for in reviews.
|
04-17-07 05:44pm
|
Reply
259
|
Wild Rose Network
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Thanks for the heads up! Was it every site or just some of them?
|
04-16-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
260
|
Wild Rose Network
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Hey rose-dude!
I did decide to give it a go and will report back as soon as I've had sufficient contact time. ;)
-SD
|
04-16-07 07:18am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find it hard to land when there's a forest, but a landing strip makes for an easy approach. ;)
|
04-16-07 07:16am
|
Reply
262
|
Kitty Karsen
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Review
Great review fellow dude! And since I see that you joined recently, welcome to the site! I think you'll like it and I look forward to your next reviews. :)
|
04-15-07 06:30pm
|
Reply
263
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
raystar's Comment
I haven't joined this site since I'm not into a 100% goth site, but I've been told there is some non-goth content. Do you know if that is true?
|
04-13-07 04:04pm
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'll take smaller and real over big and fake every time!
|
04-11-07 09:11am
|
Reply
265
|
Lesbo Trick
(0)
|
Reply of
Levchik's Reply
Hey Levchik,
I appreciate the comment and will do my best to uphold the fine standards to which I have been dedicated. :) Seriously, it's nice to hear the compliment.
Thanks,
SD
|
04-08-07 08:45am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I think it's fair to ask that people who would judge others by a trust rating be limited to those who have provided some reviews of their own. If nothing else, this demonstrates that it's not easy to write a review and if you limited it to people with a score of 5 they'd be more aware of that fact. I think my original suggestion was a score of 10, but I agree 5 would be more reasonable and at least 1 as uscue suggested. I don't think it's fair for someone to register and then waltz into the site saying they don't trust anybody by voting no.
I really like the anonymous comment section for no votes because "I just didn't like something they wrote" isn't a valid reason for voting no. There are plenty of valid reasons, but I think the member getting voted down deserves to know what it was.
|
04-07-07 01:23pm
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I'm not sure that comments would necessarily make the trust ratings less anonymous as long as the comments were anonymous as well.
You can say you think people take a no rating too personally, but you haven't had anyone say they didn't trust somethong you wrote on here which does feel personal. I agree I'm probably taking it too hard when I get a negative rating, but when you try to make a review as unbiased as possible it can be personal when someone essentially says you failed, especially when it's so easy and anonymous to do so.
I also agree that in most cases a negative trust rating is because of overly biased reviews like giving a site a 50 or a 100, but I haven't done either and I have had 4 negative trust ratings for reasons I can't explain. It's fine if someone doesn't like your review, but to anonymously indicate you are untrustowrthy basically sucks.
In the end, I think the trust ratings were started for a reason and the alternative of no trust ratings is even less appealing. However, that doesn't mean a person doesn't feel bad if even one person labels them as untrustworthy.
Just my $0.02.
|
04-07-07 11:04am
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I know I'm feeling frustrated with the "No" trust votes I've been getting lately, going up from 2 to 4 just overnight. I don't mind someone having a beef at all....if you don't trust me that's fine, but I'd like to know what it is that makes a particular user not trust me particularly if there's something I can do to address their concern. Am I not discussing a certain feature? Is there a misunderstanding? I work very hard to make my reviews fair and if I have a bias I state it up front.
I guess some kind of comment section would be good, but for now if anyone thinks my reviews are bad PLEASE send me a message or post a reply saying why and what I could do better! I take a lot of pride in my reviews and want them to be helpful.
|
04-07-07 09:56am
|
Reply
269
|
The Boss XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hey Denner,
Glad you liked the review and found it helpful. I'm always glad to oblige! :)
-SD
|
04-06-07 01:18pm
|
Reply
270
|
Asian Flower Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Hey Denner,
Does the site say you can download videos? If not you probably can't, although sometimes if you right click you can "Save Target As...". Just a thought.
-SD
|
04-05-07 06:23pm
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Thanks for the kind words and for letting me know I didn't go over the top...well, at least not too over the top!
The one thing I forgot to mention: I wonder if perhaps you should let users with less than 10 reviews be exempt from the trust ratings. I've seen a few too many never get to their rookie reviewer badge because they get jumped all over by "no" votes on their trust rating because they haven't learned the ropes just yet. I know you wanted to discourage people from coming in, writing a couple terrible or biased reviews, and then splitting. I think that's worked very well, but it could be going to far in the other direction and well intentioned folks making a couple missteps may hightail in out of here.
Anyway, it's just a thought. As I said last time, I'm quite sure I wouldn't have done better than you guys have by a long shot if our positions were reversed and you've done very well with every new feature. I'm glad to be a part of it and my "bully pulpit" is once again closed...for the time being. ;)
Thanks much guys!
-SD
|
04-05-07 12:57pm
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I'll definitely go with the DRM thing the others have mentioned, especially when it isn't noted up front. But for me it's videos and if the quality lags behind what's shown in the tour I get really peeved. The other thing would be no interaction with members but as others have said here (and I agree) that should really be considered a cherry on top when you get it.
|
04-05-07 11:28am
|
Reply
273
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
Thanks for the clarification and if I had taken more time with the site I would have known about the limited videos, but sometimes it's nice to read a review and know that before ever hitting a site in the first place. Thanks for your review and the warning!
-SD
|
04-05-07 11:26am
|
Reply
274
|
Izzy's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
I was mostly just joking and giving you a hard time, but I do appreciate your response and your reviews. :)
-SD
|
04-05-07 11:23am
|
Reply
275
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Review
Hey King,
I'll admit I don't know much about the site you reviewed, but a lot of what you wrote wasn't really clear to me. For example, what is a Dev8 site? Why should I beware of the trial? I really didn't know what you were saying. Could you take a minute and add some more? I'd really appreciate it!
-SD
|
04-04-07 06:44pm
|
