| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Izzy's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
If you are only looking for so-called "young" girls, you are definitely missing out. Older women (which many classify as anyone over 22 for reasons I can't explain) are the spice of life! ;)
-SD
|
04-04-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
277
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
rogertheduck's Review
I see from your signup date that you just recently joined, so I'd suggest looking around the site a little while first before posting many reviews. To give such a high score people really want to see why you liked it that much, so a little more detail would have been ideal. However, I don't like to scare new folks off either so I do hope you hang around.
|
04-04-07 06:23pm
|
Reply
278
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
MikeAndJen's Reply
Hey Mike,
I appreciate the nice words on the review and it definitely sounds like I came in during a major changeover! And I certainly know what you mean about addressing lighting and other things while the art is underway! I'll drop you a line since I'd love to see how things turned out to get the full effect you both intended.
It's great to see Webmasters interacting with users on here!
-SD
|
04-04-07 05:05pm
|
Reply
279
|
She Muscle
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Hey Joe,
I would say that SheMuscles had the most erotic and explicit sex themes of any similar sites, but there are muscle girl sites like Land of Venus, Sexy Muscular Women, and The Female Physique that I would say are related. All of them are in the database here and at TBP, so check 'em out and if you join any please do a review!
-SD
|
04-04-07 04:51pm
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Hey Rick,
I appreciate all the thought that went into the raffle and the reasons for eliminating the point bonuses which makes perfect sense. So, I am not complaining since you had a very good reason for changing things as you did. However, I would point out that there are legitimate ways of contributing to the site that don't include reviews that now seem to go much less rewarded. I think I'm a prime example of someone who has a limited budget and can't join that many sites to review but still put a lot (at least as much as I could) into the site. My concern as a result of the changes would be that those with lots of money to spend on sites or who join large networks so they can review a large number of sites at once would benefit the most. My point totals dropped by half since I haven't done as many reviews as some others although I think I have been one of the top contributors.
All that said, I know changes needed to be made and I know why you made the changes you did. It's not like I could have done better in your place, but I did think it worthwhile to offer my view on the changes. Regardless, the site is growing and changing which can only be to the good. Thanks for listening to my ramblings! ;)
-SD
|
04-04-07 04:39pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Hey Rick,
Regardless of the outcome, I think it's great how hard you guys are trying to make this a vibrant site. And even though I expressed some skepticism, I'm definitely rooting for it to succeed.
One thing I did want to ask about was taking away points folks had earned from the previous system, especially taking away bonuses that users used to get for earning badges. I can't say I was happy to log in yesterday to see my point total dropped (as well as my ranking) but I know that you must have felt it was the right thing to do.
Thanks for all the efforts and for keeping us informed.
-SD
|
04-04-07 10:55am
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I'll certainly give it some time to grow on me, but my initial reaction isn't really positive. I think it might encourage participation although the lure of money might cause certain people to assign random user trust ratings for example just to get more tickets. I'm quite sure the site will be more active though so we'll have to see.
|
04-04-07 07:11am
|
Reply
283
|
Only Blowjob
(0)
|
Reply of
djwolf's Review
What's wrong with large cocks? I guess everyone has their pet peeves, but for someone who likes blowjobs wouldn't large cocks be ideal?
|
04-03-07 10:05pm
|
Reply
284
|
Round Mound Of Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Levchik's Review
Nice review! Is it possible that there is a technical issue with the videos? Since there's no DRM it made me wonder, but I've certainly been on sites that only allow streaming and I don't know why they do it. I suppose it's to protect your product and hopefully it'll change as the site grows.
|
04-03-07 08:27pm
|
Reply
285
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Thanks roseman! I think you had more points than me, but I guess they don't award the same badge twice! ;) Regardless, it is pretty cool. By the way, how did you manage to impress the 2 users who didn't used to trust your reviews? I gained a few of those in just the last few days which didn't really surprise me, but I'd love to know how you won them over. Do tell! ;)
And thanks again...nice to be in such good company my man!
|
04-02-07 08:33pm
|
Reply
286
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
Understood Marianna! Thanks for keeping me on my toes! ;)
|
04-02-07 07:11am
|
Reply
287
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
Hey Marianna,
I had meant to write that others call her a BBW and I didn't, but I can see why you got that impression from what I wrote. Fortunately, I can edit the review since it's a recent one and I'm quite thankful you replied!
-SD
|
04-01-07 06:02pm
|
Reply
288
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Thanks little joe! I have always thought I'd enjoy it, but it's getting more likely I'll join. I just have to be careful about which sites I join since my budget is smaller than I'd like! ;)
|
03-31-07 09:56am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Poll
None of the categories really fit since I belong to a couple sites that aren't listed here, but that's because they are pretty new. I've thought of submitting their addresses, but I find myself concerned that folks will jump on them being new sites that are just getting their barings. Maybe I'm silly to keep them to myself for now, but I feel that way.
|
03-27-07 06:01pm
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I was surprised as well with so many choosing the daily option and my concern would be keeping them fresh, but if that's what the people want that's what they get, eh? :) I'll put my thinking cap on and see if I can come up with anything!
|
03-24-07 11:14am
|
Reply
291
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
Hey roseman! I'm glad you mentioned the lower prices and I did end up joining at the monthly price. I'll do a review soon and am glad you encouraged me to join!
|
03-23-07 08:51pm
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I think it was great to have a daily poll in the beginning, but couldn't someone come in and vote on each poll, getting a badge immediately? I think it should be weekly and I'd take every other day, but I think daily is too often.
|
03-23-07 08:49pm
|
Reply
293
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Reply
That's actually a good point and I would have liked that too. I like these "alt" sites, but why do all the girls have to be so skinny? :)
|
03-22-07 08:58pm
|
Reply
294
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
volupfan's Reply
Thanks for the info volupfan! It's completely understandable why they wouldn't do sex scenes, but a guy can dream! ;)
|
03-21-07 09:35am
|
Reply
295
|
Mom's A Cheater
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Well, that makes it clear how the deal works and I'm sure that's the signup I used. So far I haven't had a problem, but I will certainly do so if ones comes up. You can count on it! :)
|
03-19-07 03:40pm
|
Reply
296
|
Mom's A Cheater
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Hey man! Again, my apologies for not replying sooner! I don't want to lose my rep for being uber-responsive, but was away from the computer and am glad to be back in porn review heaven. Any other questions, just ask away! ;)
|
03-19-07 12:20pm
|
Reply
297
|
Mom's A Cheater
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Hey roseman! Sorry for the late reply, but I've been on the road for a little while. Yes, the site seems to be $9.95 with total netowrk access. I don't know if it's a new promotion, a glitch, or what, but I followed the total access link off of this site and joined for that price. All the TBP reviews say the network access is an extra $10, but not from what I could tell.
|
03-19-07 12:18pm
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I think he meant to write TBP, but thinks it's all about him. So, it's My Best Porn. ;)
|
03-16-07 08:35pm
|
Reply
299
|
Sexy Samantha 38G
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
I've thought of joining her site, but I had the same feeling about the price. Seems a little high not to have some bonus stuff.
|
03-14-07 07:11pm
|
Reply
300
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
I agree with what everybody said, especially the part about it not seeming like a real review. The pros part is ok if he loves it that much, but the rest seems like an advertisement. It is definitely not helpful to the site to have him give it a 100 because no site is perfect. The only way I'd probably give a site a 100 is if they hand delivered everything to my house and I got to meet with the performers! But, as roseman pointed out, I would like to hear what he has to say because many have rated this site only a couple points lower than 100 and maybe it has fufilled all his needs, which would be awesome if I could find that for myself.
|
03-14-07 07:07pm
|
