| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Cool beans! The idea about letting users post questions for other members to answer is awesome and probably one of the main things I would have asked about first. I see great things on the horizon and when I have one of those question thingys, I'll let you know. ;) Many thanks and rock on!
|
02-02-07 01:11pm
|
Reply
377
|
Celebrity Movie Archive
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
That's true, but as I said in my review, I like it because I don't have to pay for a mega site that has every conceivable clip. Problem is, I'd never watch 90% of the stuff they offer because it's not my thing. For example, I love downloading clips of Alyssa Milano (sorry, had a thing for her since Who's the Boss), but don't want to pay for a site that has tons of Paris Hilton clips I wouldn't even poke with a stick, let alone watch. Both sides definitely have pluses and minuses, but I agree that a third option would be great.
|
02-02-07 01:08pm
|
Reply
378
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Bo M's Reply
Thanks for the additional info man! I know what it's like to be very devoted to a site and for it to be so dead on to your tatses. It's all good. :)
|
02-02-07 12:56pm
|
Reply
379
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Thanks for the compliment and I'm glad to do it. I've always gotten frustrated with review sites because, although they do great things, it's hard to find views that represent different types of users. So, when PU came along and I was already a big fan of TBP, I had to do it! :)
By the way, if we ever have a question or want to make a suggestion where we feel we'll get a real response from an admin, what's the best way to do that? I imagine you are getting a lot of "suggestions" flooding in like adding sites and users demanding their favorite niche be addressed, but as the site settles in I know I'll have questions about how to find different content. Maybe in the end that's not what PU is for and I know you guys already go above and beyond, but it often comes to mind and I'm naturally curious.
If you have any thoughts on that, let me know. Otherwise, I'll assume you are busy finding more good porn!
|
02-02-07 12:53pm
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
No, but I'm pretty careful about such things. TBP and Porn Users make that easier to avoid though!
|
02-02-07 11:41am
|
Reply
381
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
That helps a lot roseman! I very much appreciate your time in providing more details. You rock! :)
|
01-31-07 03:47pm
|
Reply
382
|
Nakkid Nerds
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan! Hopefully it's just a lapse by the webmaster in renewing the site or something along those lines. However, its lack of activity makes me think it may be lost to the black hole of the interweb. I sincerely hope not!
|
01-31-07 03:45pm
|
Reply
383
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
Hey Abby and Co.,
I appreciate you replying to my comments! Although you have had boy/girl vids in the past, you quite rightly point out that such isn't the focus of the site and I had lost sight of that in my comments. Still, you can't blame a guy for wishing! You do very good work and any boy/girl content you may add would merely be icing on an already delicious cake.
|
01-31-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
384
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Actually, I agree. I got the pervert quote from the home page. ;)
|
01-31-07 02:02pm
|
Reply
385
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
That's actually a good idea, although I guess I was hoping to give her a reason to comment here so all the world (well, the pervert world anyway) could benefit. Thanks for the response and, again, if you wanted to elaborate more I'd be most appreciative.
|
01-31-07 01:52pm
|
Reply
386
|
Goddess Heather
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks for the feedback Khan since I, like everyone else here, is learning as we go what's approprite to comment on and what's not. Personally I've tried to limit my replies to sites I've honestly thought of joining and offering comments mostly on sites where I was a member but longer than 6 months ago. Hopefully that's appropriate.
As for the "low priority" comment, it says on TBP that Heather's site is low priority and I made an assumption about what that meant. I had the idea in my head that it had to do with site traffic, but I'll admit right now that I had absolutely no basis for that conclusion. So, I apologize if that's untrue.
|
01-31-07 01:28pm
|
Reply
387
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
I always wondered about the reason for cutting up the segments and since I have a high spead connection I didn't really see the angle about those with dial up. I remember downloads kept timing out years and years ago (before I was downloading this amount of porn mind you), so I can see the issue. I agree with the webmaster though that they are making the right decision and setting a higher priority on getting more content out there.
|
01-31-07 01:01pm
|
Reply
388
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
I wrote basically the same thing for the other review of Carrie's site, but could you elaborate some more on what you sid in your review? It really doesn't give me anough information on whether I should join. Maybe Carrie herself would like to comment? I would love that!!! Anyway, please consider replying with some more info.
|
01-31-07 12:59pm
|
Reply
389
|
Carrie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
volupfan's Review
I'm seriously thinking about joining this site, but this review doesn't really tell me that much. Could you elaborate and tell us more? When you say you can't see her on cam, does that mean there aren't cam shows or that the quality is poor? Please tell us more!
|
01-31-07 12:57pm
|
Reply
390
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
FrankM's Review
Could you possibly elaborate on this review? It's very brief and not incredibly detailed and, if it is as good as you say it is, surely you must have more you could tell us about it. I'd very much appreciate hearing more from you!
|
01-31-07 12:54pm
|
Reply
391
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Bo M's Review
If you had some points on how it could be improved, why did you give it a pefect score? And are you saying that there is no way in the universe that her site can be improved? I'm not saying you should make something up that's bad just for the sake a doing so since you obviously are a very satisfied and adoring member. However, this review doesn't really help me in deciding whether or not to join.
|
01-31-07 12:52pm
|
Reply
392
|
Babe Ink
(0)
|
Reply of
magoonigal's Reply
I don't think removing your review would have been a good idea because you did make it with every good intention and you obviously adore the site and the woman who runs it. I can provide an example of how someone can really like a site but give it less than a perfect score. I recently joined a amateur site and really enjoyed it thoroughly. In the end I gave it an 85 which in my mind was very high praise. I thought there were some things that could improve and I hope if she ever read my review that she'd take that as a compliment. There is always room for improvement in any website and if you can find some things that others might find questionable or even just notable, I think it raises the respect factor for your review and for you as a reviewer. But, as your review stands now, it wouldn't have any real effect on whether or not I'd join. Although, I do agree that if you love a site and can't find anything wrong with it, what else can you do but sing it's praises? All we need here is time and more reviews which will only be a good thing.
|
01-31-07 12:46pm
|
Reply
393
|
Babe Ink
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I agree with the reply of the webmaster, although I suppose you are entitled to your opinion and it wasn't a full review. I find that my like of tatoos has very little effect because other aspects of the site and the girl will outweigh whether or not she has tatoos in the end and whether or not I'd stay a member. I think it would have been better to have just said you didn't like tatoos and left it at that. Also, if all you liked is what her body would have looked like without tatoos, why comment at all?
|
01-31-07 12:37pm
|
Reply
394
|
Goddess Heather
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
As with another site that got a 100 rating, my reply to the review was a bit critical of it getting such a high score. In this case, the site hasn't even been given an express review on TBP which means it's likely a low priority site. That said, the site does look intrguing and I wish she had a limited full access trial which almost always hooks me in to niche sites that interest me. Her price isn't too bad, especially since the tour indicates above average picture quality in her sets. Bottom line? This kind of review has absolutely no effect on my decision about joining because it's written by someone with a huge bias. Perhaps that bias is well earned, but it doesn't really help the rest of us.
|
01-31-07 12:29pm
|
Reply
395
|
Liz Vicious
(0)
|
Reply of
blackmanwhat's Reply
I just commented on this site and am glad to see someone mention the rating it got. For all I know the site is worth the cost and she's totally awesome, but I don't think giving a score of 100 gives a reviewer much credibility. Anyone's site can always be improved whether it's video and picture quality, amount of interaction, or more content. To say that Liz couldn't do anything to improve her site actually does her a diservice as it gives her little incentive to keep things fresh and exciting. She is one hot babe though...there's no denying that!
|
01-31-07 12:23pm
|
Reply
396
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
I have to agree with this comment, although I felt the girls that were first featured on the site did the best job and were the most attractive. Individual video sets can be pretty hot especially when the "third girl" is really into it, but the setup does get very stale:
Girls go out partying/eating/shopping. Spot third girl, act like they have never met her before, and quickly convince her to come back to their apartment. Arrive at apartment, ask third girl if she's been with a girl, and commence lesbian sex. End up in shower together.
I'm not saying it isn't hot because it is, but after awhile I didn't see much reason to stay a member since I'd seen it all before. The site would be much improved with some variation or even being truthful about the setup rather than thinly veiling the repetitive plot. If you do happen to like the reality genre and young lesbians, you really can't do much better.
|
01-29-07 08:42pm
|
Reply
397
|
Fire Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
marquis58401's Comment
I can't speak to how things have been going there in the last 6 months or so since I was a member, but I can offer a view from more recently than 4 years ago. Updates were pretty stagnant about a year ago, so I'd say that the problem goes back at least that long. The content is still pretty decent if you take each video as a stand alone product, but I never felt like it created the story he advertised in the tour pages. Hopefully someone can fill in the story of the last few months to learn more about the site's status since it is very unique.
|
01-29-07 08:27pm
|
Reply
398
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
marquis58401's Reply
Glad you found the review useful Marquis and I hope you enjoy the site! Regardless, make sure you come back with your review, especially if your experience differs from mine. Have fun! :)
|
01-29-07 08:17pm
|
