You seem to have at least some experience in porn.
But what you are looking for "women OTHER than your stereotypical Hot teen/early 20s woman" is more of a niche product. Yes, there might be sites catering to that, but they are, as you implied, in the minority.
Glamcore sites are gaining interest, but the content is limited compared to mainstream teen/early 20s women.
As far as Asian, Asian women are some of the most beautiful in the world.
One problem with Japanese porn is the mosaic effect, which is required by Japan.
There are some Japanese porn sites that have some content without the mosaic.
If the mosaic bothers you, you can do google searches of PornUsers.com to see what the members have said about sites that might or might not offer some mosaic-free content.
But most Asian sites focus on the teen/early 20s models.
Do a google search (I'm not expert on Google searches) for PU members who like and have commented on sites that feature mature models. But I don't recall, off-hand, that they have mentioned sites that are combined mature models + glamcore, or non-white models + glamcore.
But like I said, the internet is big, so hopefully you will find sites that you think are worth the money to join.
When you think about it, a large part of enjoying porn is in the hunt.
When you find content that you really like, that is the payoff. But, hopefully, you will appreciate search, as well.
The Porn Users site can be a resource to check on porn sites
And most members are friendly, and willing to share their knowledge and interests.
But porn is a hobby, not a business, for most of us. LOL.
Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and 18 Only Girls are strong in hardcore videos.
Those sites cost about $30, so they are more expensive than Met-Art.
Those site are borderline glamcore.
I think 18 Only Girls is the best value of the three, because it has the most content.
There are different options to join:
You can join any one of the 3 sites by itself, or you can join all 3 sites, but it gets expensive.
Lovely models, professionally shot videos, and the quality of the photo sets has increased in recent years--but not quite to the level of Met-Art or MPL Studios.
There are a bunch of other glamcore sites that were created the last few years.
What is the best value for you is truly personal: what your likes are, what you enjoy.
Do you focus on photos, videos, what type of women do you like (age, body type, race), softcore, hardcore, fetishes, etc.
The Met-Art network, which might have sites that you would find interesting.
Can you be more specific in what you are looking for? And the truth is, I'm not a real expert on porn or glamcore: other PU members might quibble about what glamcore is, or even what softcore midcore or hardcore is. Everyone seems to have their own opinions.
I'm rambling, but you or I could write book-length replies on what "glamcore" sites you might like. :)
There are a number of glamcore sites. Most of them good, but it's a question of how much money do you want to spend.
Unlimited money, a lot to explore.
But for most people, you only join one or two sites, on a limited budget.
First, what are your interests, likes?
Do you want mainly photos, or mainly videos, or a combination of the two?
What type of women are you interested in? All ages, teen, mature, what?
Ethnicity: most sites are mainly white models, but some sites emphasize other races as well.
For teen to early 20s women, photos only, softcore, Met-Art is my favorite site.
The site also has a lot of videos of beautiful naked women, but I find the videos almost all boring, and so do most other members at PU who have commented.
But at $20/month, or $99/year if you really like the site, this is a great value.
MPL Studios is also a good choice. Mostly softcore, but the videos have a slightly harder edge than Met-Art.
$30/month membership.
Excellent review.
I agree with almost everything you wrote.
Also, pleasantly surprised you gave Met-Art a score of 99.
Makes me feel that I am in good company. :)
I agree the old format is much easier and simpler to use.
Plus, it's the once I've been accustomed to.
Separately, the new format can mess up the intro page.
A few days ago, the new format page came up automatically, and everything was in tiny size. The thumbnails were tiny, the text size was tiny, and there were 2 black bars on the sides of the page that took up most of the page.
I sent an email to Met-Art support, asking how to get rid of the page and return to the old format.
Support emails me back, within a few hours, but their reply was not useful. They said they could not duplicate the effect that I was seeing for the Met-Art page.
I increased the size of the page using the VIEW-ZOOM option on my Firefox browser, and that allowed me to find the icon to return to the old format. (I couldn't read the page in the new format since everything was so tiny, except for the 2 black bars which were taking up most of the page.)
Anyway, I will use the old format as long as I can.
I have been dinged a few times by the pre-checked cross sales.
From my experience, what I've learned:
You can not get a refund on a pre-checked cross sale.
Even if you call the billing company within minutes of the pre-checked cross sale going through, and even if you have never used the subscription to the pre-checked cross sale site, you will still not get a refund.
The only thing you can do is cancel the subscription to the pre-checked cross sale site as soon as possible, so you won't be billed the expensive, additional charge for the cross sale site going into the monthly rate.
Because the monthly rate for the cross sale site is almost always very expensive, much more than the normal monthly rate for the site you can find elsewhere.
So it definitely pays to examine any site join page, to make sure any pre-checked cross sells are unchecked.
A fine, professional review.
I'm putting this network on my list of sites to join.
I was put off by the stupid-sounding network name, but your review has sold me.
LOL.
Brings back fond memories of looking at photos on a CRT monitor.
Actually, my LCD monitor recently went out, and I'm now using an old CRT monitor I still have, until I buy a new LCD monitor replacement.
The LCD monitors really have a much better image than the old CRT monitors (or maybe I'm just talking about all the spots on my old CRT monitor that I am currently using).
I'm on a very tight budget myself, or I would be if I had more financial self-discipline.
I'm aware that because of the internet, the prices for wonderful porn are far cheaper than what the prices were 20 or 30 or 40 years ago.
But still, having a limited amount of cash to pay for porn, as is true for most people, the cost for each site has to be considered. Along with, the quality of the site: site content, site ease of use, and other factors you consider when deciding whether to join a site or not.
Basically, it comes down to: is the site membership worth the cost?
So I think that it makes sense to write that $30/month for FTV is expensive, compared to other sites that are $20/month, that offer a large amount of professional photo sets of lovely young models.
I'm not saying that FTV is a waste of money.
FTV is an excellent site.
I am saying that I would rather spend less money for access to other excellent sites: photo sites like Metart, MPL studios, Femjoy.
Or video/photo sites like X-art. Or Teen Mega World (not a photo site, but massive amount of hardcore teen videos with a huge amount of attractive models).
Thanks for the confirmation.
Sometimes, cookies or other problems show a faulty price, so I can never be sure if the price has changed, or if there is a computer error, or some other problem.
One problem with joining FTV.
The PU discount for FTV has disappeared.
Monthly price is now $29.95.
There are a lot of photo sites (I realize FTV also has videos) that are $20/month.
But the extra $9 makes FTV expensive.
PU score is 65, but TBP score is 94.
As you know, FTV only has 2 active reviews.
One review score was 50.
That's why the PU score is so low.
It just goes to show you can't depend on PU scores alone, to help you pick your sites.
You also have to read the reviews, and see what sites might be attractive for you, in spite of their scores.
By the way, I agree that FTV is an excellent site.
Ditto tangub's input.
But also, if I had the site's content before, but I lost it, and want to replace that content.
I've lost a lot of past content from sloppy housekeeping, not making backup files of my content, etc.
You can try sending an email to Zemani, and request an extension of your membership, because of the problems you had with your membership.
I bought a 12-month subscription to Muse.org in 2009.
The main photographer for the site was Richard Murrian, who has contributed to Metart.
There were almost no updates during the time I was a member (for one year).
And many times, when I tried to log in to the site, I could not get in.
Because of the lack of updates, and other problems at the site, the site eventually said they would give 12-month members a 6-month extension of their membership.
I mailed customer support asking for the extension. Never got a reply to any of my emails. Never got an extension.
So sites can, for one reason or another, give you very poor service for your money.
I've read reports by some PU members that mention distortions in photos, and now I better understand what they were talking about. Because I always thought the photo quality was perfectly acceptable.
Using a smaller monitor, and almost never zooming in for fine details, explains the difference.
I agree that MetArt has tons of content and thousands of lovely models.
Maybe there is too much content, and the average viewer starts to get bored. A psychology thing.
Very few of the videos at MetArt are worth watching or saving.
That's my opinion, in spite of how lovely the models can be. The vidoes are boring, not erotic.
As long as I am confident a site will give me good value, I'm willing to support that site with a long-term subscription.
I've had 12-month memberships to MetArt, XArt, TeenMegaWorld, maybe a few others.
I was recently a member of the Diesel network.
I joined 18 Only Girls, and since I remained a member, I gained access to the other two sites over time.
But my experience was different from yours.
It took at least 60 days, maybe more, before I gained access to the other sites. And when I did gain access, it was to both of the other sites at once.
Wow Girls and Wow Porn are treated as separate sites.
If you join one, you do not have access to the other site.
You have to pay separately to join the other site.
However, if you join 19 Only Girls, or Wow Porn, or Wow Girls, and you stay a member for a certain amount of time (I'm not sure of the details), your membership will then include access to all three sites.
Or if you join any one site, and pay an upgrade fee (which is very expensive), you will have access to all three sites.
Or there might be an option to join all three sites at once.
If you haven't been a member of any of these sites, the best value is joining 18 Only Girls, because it has the most content.
As well as the most updates of all three sites.
The content of all three sites is similar. And they use the same models for most of their content.
Having three sites is basically a marketing strategy, to maximize profits.
You would need to be an expert to determine, from watching a video, which site it came from. Because based on content, the same video could be placed in any of the three sites.
Most of the old Diesel sites were merged into 18 Only Girls.
Some of the old material from different sites was dropped (no longer available).
But you wouldn't notice that unless you were following those sites closely.
As a newbie, you can now join 18 Only Girls, which contains most of the material from the older sites, as well as updates.
Wow Girls and Wow Porn are still treated as separate sites, from the old Diesel sites.
Young Legal Porn no longer exists as a separate site. Most of its material is now found in 18 Only Girls.
If you are seeking an erotic site where the models make an art of removing their clothing, you are better off looking elsewhere. Some photo sets or videos might start off with the girl wearing some article of clothing. But the majority of the photos feature fully nude models.
Metart is supposed to be Most Erotic Teens, and it's mainly stayed true to that approach. There is very little stripping. It's mostly an appreciation of the bodies of young females. Most of the models are attractive to lovely. The photographers are professional, among the best in the business.
A few members of PU have expressed a wish for an erotic strip tease site. But that niche seems lost in today's market.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
