| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
So image quality is still maximum of 2400 x 1600? NubliesCaptain said they were upgrading the image resolution a while back.
"We do plan to increase the image size soon."
From December 2014. source: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=87893
Must be working on Valve time.
|
01-09-16 01:36am
|
Reply
2
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I would assume so, I don't believe it would be retroactive because they would need to process all the source images again.
|
02-13-14 11:56am
|
Reply
3
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Thanks for your candor. It's certainly impossible to please everybody, and if the majority appreciate that updating schedule then I can understand why you do it that way.
It is good to hear that image size will be increased, that will help the site immensely from my perspective. Sasha P is beautiful and it would be good to see her return.
|
02-12-14 11:23pm
|
Reply
4
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Are you seeing this latest stuff Drooler? A set just released today.
Pure A - Accept (Majoly) is a prime example of the crap I am a disliking. Her face looks like a plasticine doll and her skin has no definition because somebody has taken out the blur brush and gone crazy.
I mean I've even noticed some other artists doing similar stuff now on Met-Art to varying degrees. RYLSKY has taken the wonderful face of Loreen and decided her smooth skin wasn't smooth enough by itself and applied a very agressive filter over some of the close shots.
Is this fakeness appealing to anybody? I registered to these sites to see some genuine beauty and they insist on photoshopping a lot of models. :(
|
10-01-09 06:07am
|
Reply
5
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Just an update. I've been a member of this site for about a year now and I visit it even less than I was when I posted this review. When I do visit sometimes I open up some sets but am usually pretty disappointed by the content.
In a recent video of the Mexico Shoot Hegre talked about photography and what his aims where. He talked about playboy being so fake and something he hated and wanted to produce something much more real.
I'm not sure how his thoughts align with the sets that feature a bland monotone backgrounds, fetish items and sterile poses. If anything I can't help by think some of the sets are just like a portfolio, surely the audience wants something more engaging?
I haven't changed my mind, I won't be renewing my subscription. I only hope Anna S makes more sets at Met-Art and less at Hegre-Art ;)
Keep in mind I still think his photo quality is very good, clean, crisp. It's just what's in the photos that I find pretty ordinary.
|
09-04-09 03:14am
|
Reply
6
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well that doesn't sound too bad, I'm not planning to rip the site. Downloading more than one zip would have been nice. Sounds like all I would need to do is ensure only one thread is active in my download manager program. Thanks for the info I'll think about it.
|
08-08-09 05:39pm
|
Reply
7
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I don't mind the black, I'm used to it from other sites :P
Does MPL studios still not support download managers? I think I read horror stories about them canceling accounts if people used download managers or something. Are you a current member Drooler? And if so do you recommend the website based on the sets you've seen in the last few months?
Anyway thanks for replying quickly.
|
08-08-09 02:21am
|
Reply
8
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Just came across this site via a model I liked on Met-Art (Natalia on Met-Art) and the no zip policy has pretty much ruled me out of going for this site. I'm a collector and I'd have to manually open each image of the set and then save them using my firefox plugins.
I don't see how this stops piracy? Surely the pirates would just do the same, zip them up and post them, then the pirates get nice zip file collections and paying customers have to do it manually every time?
|
05-31-09 04:25am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
no fears really, but running out of money I guess is a fear associated with spending on anything for so it's the only choice I can make
|
05-31-09 02:40am
|
Reply
10
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Good review, I personally see the lack of explicit content as a pro as it keeps the standard pretty high. But that's just personal preference. Of course I agree that some of the recent vids have been sadly of photoshoots with the camera clicking and people talking in the background which is really unappealing - only Erro pulls this off. Really disappointing, when I look back years at some movies I see some quite good ones, but movies aren't the main thing here anyway. And yes download manager support is very good although others sites I use (hegre, met models and errotica archives) also support dl managers.
|
05-27-09 02:41am
|
Reply
11
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well they seem to have toned the fetish stuff back. Which is good, however I still am finding a lot of sets extremely boring and void of any life or soul compared to other sites like met-art or errotica archives. Recent one "Jane french lingerie" Is 59 images of near enough the same photo, good model standing against a white background with basically two different camera positions.
What might be even worse is they basically censored my comment about it being boring. Previously they were getting quite a few negative comments in that section, I guess they decided to delete many of them and paint a false positive opinion of the sets.
All I know is at the current rate I will not be subscribing again. Anna S is hot but not worth the full price alone.
|
04-16-09 12:50am
|
Reply
12
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Review
I've been looking at recent Femjoy sets and I find the models and photo quality generally very good. Also 2 updates a day is good for the price.
The thing that definitely bothers me, that you touched on in your review is the fact that so many models are nude from the first image which I find greatly lowers the tease factor. The problem is many members are expecting Femjoy to be 100% nude, but it's preventing me from subscribing.
|
03-27-09 04:50am
|
