Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
tehlupy1's Review
Pretty good information in a short n' sweet review. The largest point that I'd have to agree with is your statement about advertising HD when they are in no way even close. I'm finding more and more sites are doing this and not even spurting out a high resolution to begin with. Now it's obvious that true hd that are in the realm of blu-ray would be downright ridiculous in size for download, a site should always tell the correct resolution and bitrate for their movies. It's always funny when a site claims HD and they are at 640 X 480 or 720 X 480 and less than 1000 kbps.
But, my question to you is about your definition of quality of videos here. Are you saying that just because the videos are not above 960 resolution means they are bad quality or is it a combo of both the resolution and clarity of the video. I have seen some great looking videos at less than this resolution with a decent bitrate and don't really feel that the resolution needed to be any higher to get a good, clear video. I was just wondering what your thoughts were on this based on your wording in the review.
However, the price alone at $50 is swaying me away from the site in the first place, I just wanted to discuss the HD thing because this seems to be a hot topic recently with a lot of discussion. Take care.
|
06-08-09 07:17pm
|
Reply
302
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
This is great news Shap, I know it is probably an odd question but when I put my porn in to the 'archives' of my collection, I categorize exclusive and non exclusive material of the site. No reason in particular, suppose I'm just OCD :)
Anyways, thanks for the quick response and clear answer about your site. I have no doubt I will be enjoying both types of content soon here...
|
06-08-09 07:05pm
|
Reply
303
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Camera man, hands down!
Nothing would be better to satisfy my porn observing addiction than to be the one directly recording the content I so dearly love and cherish!
Well, I suppose being the porn star involved would be great but unfortunantly (fortunantly?) I'm not a scum bag that feels screwing that many women is as satisfying as keeping one or a few closer and being more intimate. Hmm, who knows though, that is easy money and completely less stressful than my jobs right now (or is it??).
Anyways,
let me capture that action how I like it, hopefully everyone else would like it too!
|
06-08-09 07:01pm
|
Reply
304
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the the highly detailed information to my question. Appreciate it a lot man. With that being said, I can't wait till I can join !
|
06-08-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
305
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I bought a Sony surrond sound in a box for about $200 a few years ago which came with a receiver, subwoofer, 2 right speakers, 1 center, and 2 rear speakers. It's actually very nice for the price and delivers loud and clear. I think it might even be cheaper to go this route plus everything looks nice and matches. I can only use it during the daytime because it get's so loud so I can only use it every once in awhile. But, when I can, it truly adds to the overall experience of the movie. I'd suggest getting one if you are a lover of movies in general!
|
06-05-09 01:06pm
|
Reply
306
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
you stated that 'when this came out, you had to check it out'. So, are you a ex-member/current member? I'd love to see your thoughts in a different review for the site. If not, let me know if you need to know anything else about the site, I can go in to more detail (those bottom lines are not enough words for me and I can go to even more detail sometimes but have to edit them down).
As for your comment on screwing each other with these, they actually have with a few sets! I mean, really, they actually managed to get a few inches inside these girls. Talk to ya later.
|
06-05-09 01:03pm
|
Reply
307
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Yeah it is really eccentric and different than anything I've really seen. As I said in the review, I really thought the girls were gonna be taking the scenes with zero seriousness which would result in garbage. But, they do a good job of mix and mashing the seriousness with fun which creates some interesting and well done scenes. Thanks for the kind words about the review and let me know if you need any more information about it, I am still a current member for a little bit.
|
06-05-09 12:55pm
|
Reply
308
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
No biggie, I actually saw it listen on the 'new full trials' category yesterday and that's what enticed me to try it out. It was only $1 but I just thought I'd let someone know about it. Thanks for the quick response as usual.
|
06-05-09 12:52pm
|
Reply
309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I'd say any kind of writers should get the most recognition. It's funny how actors and directors get the most when the story is usually even created and forged by someone completely different but yet these people get a small text credit at the beginning and ending of a film. If it was not for these creators, the film would never even be created by a director or actor.
I also want to think that great writers of fiction novels should be the most recognized. Honestly, creating an original novel that uses one's imagination and clearly written in text for others to understand takes a lot of talent. Ever tried describing a dream to someone in a clear way that they understand it? While not all stories comes from dreams but it's still the conscience mind and memory that is needed to create these stories and to correctly brainstorm these ideas to create a story for another to understand and enjoy should be recognized the most by society.
Too bad this is only half true, film stars and directors are the most recognized these days. While they are talented and I enjoy almost all the other options in the poll, in my opinion, writers have the most talent and should be the most recognized.
|
06-03-09 01:05pm
|
Reply
310
|
Total Tranny Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jbgild's Reply
It was not canceling my account that I had problems with the Tranny Boss network, but them charging my card with other sites after I canceled. The graphics and set up looks exactly the same and I'm still weary in joining the network due to this. If I were you, I'd check your email and card periodically to make sure nothing happens. While it my just be coincidence, I highly doubt it is due to the fact that the network got basically ousted by TBP and may have moved their scheming to another place with a different name and content. The largest worry I have with the network was I got the Tranny Boss link from a email through being an older member of OnlyTGirls and this site is provided in this network. So, somehow, some way that site was/is involved with the Tranny Boss network which ripped me and a lot of people off.
So basically this is good news if the Total Tranny Pass network is not involved but until I can get clear concise information provided that they are not involved with Tranny Boss, I am going to stay away for now.
|
06-03-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
311
|
Shemale Club
(0)
|
Reply of
jbgild's Reply
This was like the second review I ever wrote and my quality of reviews were not as good at the beginning. Unfortunantly, with this site as well, I wrote the review a few weeks after my membership and I could not remember all the facts. However, I do remember the daily download limit and it being the standard 4 GB's and not 3 GB's. While it is a con and I should have mentioned it, I don't think a limit should sway someone completely away from a site. I've been to quite a few TS sites and I can tell you that this site is one of the better places for exclusive hardcore content of North and South American TS models. The sheer quantity and navigation of this site (from what I remember) is worth a visit from anyone completely interested in shemale content. To each it's own though, if a limit would sway you away completely, then that's up to you and I respect that.
Thanks for mentioning the limit, I was planning on returning to this site eventually to write a better updated review in the future since I feel my newer reviews are far more superior in how I do my facts and outlines than my first few.
|
06-03-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I think Drooler might be referring to something I've actually heard a few of my buddies talking about. It had something to do with that if a woman ate something more sweet, that when she is in arousal and the juices flow, that the actual sweetness from the sugar would make these juices more sweet to the taste. However, I remember being a bit perplexed how this was possible and how much of a myth it was. One of my friends actually said it worked but c'mon, it's a bunch of men talking about stupid sex stories over a few beers and I've heard a lot of bullshit in my short life already during these discussions. So who knows, I guess it's time for some quality scientific research on the subject! How about us PU's pick the subjects and we can be 'taste testers' :)
Maybe I'm wrong about what Drooler was referring to and it is just what pussy should taste like with a nice list of options :) Anyone else hear about this 'rumor' that my friends were talking about?
EDIT: Actually, now that I think of it, I heard this story goes both ways or maybe it was for males who ate sweeter things and that their cum tasted sweeter. Maybe I'm totally off and it was neither :) Can anyone help me out and let me know that I'm not nuts.
|
06-01-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
313
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Well I was using that site and the others as an example of some of the better looking and more professionally looking videos I've seen on a site in my recent stays. However, I think that the demo might have been the wrong choice for which video to promote for their site. Besides, the whole preview page for that site is actually horrendous. However, I did not join this site on a whim and it was several other of the more upstanding PU'ers that guided me towards this site and they were the ones who told me about how well these videos were produced. Plus, I suppose we will just have to agree to disagree about the site and it's videos, they blew me away after watching more than 75% of the content on a large screen LCD TV when I compare to the other sites that used 640 X 480 or 720 X 480 in the range of 1,000 to 1,500 kbps which I thought was the debate to begin with. It was just one site as an example, I'm not saying they have the best videos I've ever seen, it was just a site I remembered off hand and had access to recently using a higher format than what was discussed and had way better looking videos than the majority of the sites I've been to that used lower resolutions and bitrates.
As for the argument of comparing any site's video quality when talking about 'HD' to a blu-ray, I find that a bit overwhelming to even think that these can be compared. A standard blu-ray disc is 25 GB's and a movie is 1 hour and 30 mins to 2 hours long. Let's say there are 30 mins of special features. A site's videos range from 15 to 30 mins. So, lets say an average blu-ray is 1 hour and 45 mins with 30 mins of special features. This uses up a standard blu ray at 25 GB and if you average in a site's average scene which is 20 mins, that's about 8.75 scenes for one blu-ray. However, that means that each scene would roughly be at 2.7 to 3.0 GB's if it was in true blu ray quality. Therefore, these scenes from sites are obviously not that high and therefore could never be the same quality or even in the same class as a true blu ray scene because a 20 min scene at the usual 1280 X 720 format is only 300-800 MB. Yes, a standard blu ray is at 1920 X 1080 and if these videos used that res, they would probably jump up in size but no where near 2.7 to 3.0 GB's. So, what I'm trying to say, is that at the encoding that most sites do at 1280 X 720 and 4002 kbps with the quality I've seen, they are extremely nice and the comparison to blu ray just seems outrageous.
Maybe I'm just crazy and my standards are a bit lower or something, I just think that at that format (1280 X 720, 4002 kbps) and with certain sites, they are remarkable for the size I'm downloading at.
Hope this all makes sense and I'm not trying to be a smartass or anything, hope we can talk about some other things soon!
|
06-01-09 11:58am
|
Reply
314
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm afraid I will get way too bored and this hobby will become nonexistant for me. While I do get a bit worried about my money situation, so far, I've been pretty good at staying within my budget and knowing when and if I can join a site. Sometimes, having to wait a whole month or more to be able to join a site whets my appetite for the content even more. However, if I get disapointed that wait can be a large bummer for sure. But, all-in-all, it has to be my fear of boredom. While I feel I still have a laundry list of sites I want to go to, the list of places new to add to join is becoming less and less each month as I join more sites. Therefore, I'm joining more than I add to join so eventually I think I may be at a limit to what I will join. Hopefully the sites I love the most will keep on providing the content I already love and can keep me there.
|
05-31-09 01:21pm
|
Reply
315
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
highparkman's Reply
Hello,
While I agree that some may not know about the law but I don't think the site should HAVE to mention that Japanese law provides a mosiac for their porn and that this site contains these. They mention that they offer AUTHENTIC Japanese Porn DVD's which is enough information provided to make a firm decision. While maybe it would be nice to add a statement in the FAQ section about the law for people to understand, I don't think knocking a site down an extremely large chunk as you did is warranted. I don't think that the site is misleading potential customers at all, it's not like they added the mosiac themselves for their site. ALL Japanese porn has the mosiac unless it is Japanese porn shot outside of the mainland or is strictly focused for the west but hence becomes banned in Japan. While there are companies that use more professional models for these exports such as Amorz, most of these uncensored videos are Amateurs and do not contain the better camera work and professionalism that the mainline videos provide. While stars such as Maria Ozawa have gone against this and provide uncensored videos, it is quite well known in the japanese porn community that the law provides a mosiac.
I'm not saying that it's completely your fault for not knowing the law, but, personally as well as most other people who join pay porn sites attempt to do a small amount of research before joining a site. Within this research, I'm sure it would be quite clear that authentic Japanese porn provides a mosiac for their content due to law.
As far as the login probs go, yes, that is a problem and I see it worth mentioning in a review or comment for others to know that there was a problem. However, that the fact that support is addressing the problem is more positive than it is negative because some sites are truly automated with responses and provide nothing in terms of true help.
We can agree to disagree about the site and that's what makes Porn Users so great, I just wanted to address that I felt the site's score was not justified through my experiences with it and help others who read this particular review that I have had good personal experiences with it to provide a different outlook and point of view for them.
Good luck with your future reviews and I hope to see you around some more!
|
05-31-09 01:01pm
|
Reply
316
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I have almost every video from InFocusGirls and I watch them on a 42 inch LCD TV. I can account for them being just as good or even better than the hundreds of DVD's I've rented. That's strange that you find the lighting for that site to be bad because I've found the locations to be extremely well lit and the outside scenes are always on a sunny day. In fact, I'd go out on a limb and say these videos are some of the most professional scenes I've seen on a site so far. In these videos, I've even seen the little light blonde hairs that women can get which I've only seen in well lit areas and real life. While I'll agree the earlier videos are not as good but I'd say less than 1/4 are from the site's beginning and used those formats. While this is my opinion, I don't know what else to say besides the fact that if you found videos better than this, I'd like to know which sites so I can check them out.
|
05-31-09 12:44pm
|
Reply
317
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
highparkman's Review
I've had great success at logging in to this site. I agree with PinkPanther 100% about blaming the law on the site, this is something you cannot blame the site for due to it being Japanese law. They do have almost all the harder to find DVD's that I want/wanted and almost all the mainstream ones and they update constantly, I don't agree that this site deserves a 60 at all.
|
05-30-09 09:50am
|
Reply
318
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Yep, I am a current/previous member at shemale.asia, infocus girls, only cuties, ladyboy player, long mint, areeyas world, only tgirls, shemale club, and I can name abut 5-6 more of my favorites that use that format and they are the best I've ever seen. So yes, I have seen plenty that use that and are crystal clear.
|
05-30-09 09:46am
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
You could be right but I have recently joined about 5-6 sites whose videos were at 640 or 720 and at ~1000 kbps. What can I say for these videos? They were unbearable to watch and borderline disgusting that I even paid my hard earned money to look at. Honestly, the best endcoding I've seen on sites is at 1280 res and 4002 kbps. These are all crystal clear, not extremely huge, and I feel like I'm getting what I paid for. I have come across some sites that encode at about what you said and been average, but to be honest, they are far in between most sites. So, I'm not saying your wrong or that videos at that rate can't be good, but for some of the prices I spend for sites and it being mid 2009, these videos are absolutely horrid for the most part on a lot of sites still.
|
05-29-09 12:36pm
|
Reply
320
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I agree with the fact that this review was better posted as a comment to tell us that the site is no longer updating. While this is great info for a review, I do believe tech stuff can easily be thrown in there for 1 line in the pros or cons or in bottom line and the user could describe what is in the scenes more in full to create a more in depth review. My philosophy is bigger is better, I do find users who do short and sweet reviews as trustworthy as others.
But let's get for real, if you are actually planning on joining the site and giving YOUR money to them, everyone would want more details than this. This review just leaves anyone as a potential consumer to ask more questions which RagingBuddhist did and rightfully so in my honest opinion. If you are just looking to read this as never being interested in the first place, it adds a fact that you now know the site is no updating which is a great comment.
|
05-28-09 10:16am
|
Reply
321
|
Pantyhose Lane
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
On the preview page they had nothing with the amount but I found the res and bitrate.
Copy and pasted from site:
1024 kbits/sec at 720 by 480 pixel
|
05-28-09 09:53am
|
Reply
322
|
Shemale Japan
(0)
|
Reply of
zergling's Reply
Honestly, I always knew I'd rejoin this site. While me and the webmaster seanchai have seemed to 'bump heads' in the past, it was by no means that I did not like the site or it's content. Honestly, to be doing a shemale site strictly with true Japanese TS models is very proactive and I commend Grooby for taking on this task. Getting Japanese TS DVD's to the USA are about $30-$50 USD a movie which contain 3-5 scenes and you can pay Grooby about the same to get plenty of the same models that appear on these DVD's. While I still may not like the updating style that this company does, I still understand why they do it and seanchai did make a comment how once a site is up for so long, the masterbation to cumshot videos become quite high in content. I have only joined this one site from grooby (I'm waiting for some extra money to purchase their grooby ticket thing making sites about $19.95 a pop) and when they were fairly new, so the content was so low by the time I got all of it in about 2 weeks, I was waiting for updates and waiting my last two week stay for a nonexistant cumshot video pissed me off at the time.
Thanks for the heads up and let me know your thoughts about the site and it's updates. I remember reading the blog a few months ago and they talked about bringing Marin (YUMMY) back for an update with one of her friends who looked pretty good herself.
|
05-28-09 09:47am
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I put video res and quality. I have just noticed that most sites still see that 640 and 720 res are 'high' quality these days and bitrates under 2000 kbps. Honestly, I'll sacrifice some HD space to have an extra 200-300 mbs a file to get better videos. Honestly, even if a site wants to keep their files at 640 or 720 res, the videos should at least be in the 4000 kbps range if not higher. Plus, I have found way too many sites lately that are still even lower than 640 or 720 and stay in the lower 1000's in kbps and honestly, they are borderline unwatchable. I love both videos and photos equally, but I find myself living with photos in the upper 800's and lower 1000's in res rather than these low res and quality videos a lot of sites are still updating with.
|
05-28-09 09:36am
|
Reply
324
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
When creating these polls, you only get 6 slots for answers to your poll. So, when making polls, you are sometimes limited to which answers you can put in. Usually when I make these, I want to put an 'other' option in or even more responses. However, for this particular poll, I also wanted to address these other options as well, so I did not want to leave any of these responses out :(
|
05-28-09 09:30am
|
Reply
325
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Yeah at first I was ready to rip in to these people after seeing that screenshot. You are right, the concept is actually quite good from a business stand point but it really messed me up because all these review sites were saying they had all these videos and sets and I was at about 6-8 videos each model and 10-15 sets which was like half of what all these extremely old reviews were saying them had. Thinking to myself like, ummm, what's going on. Good thing they responded with that news and the changes are said to actually be during my term as a member so I will be able to get all the content. However, it's all about them actually deliver these promises in that time span now and waiting.
|
05-27-09 01:40pm
|
|