| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I completely understand preferring girls without implants. I disagree, but my opinion is no more or less valid than yours, so I don't have any issue with your preference. It was just the phrasing of "I hope they are in trouble", like you wanted them to go under because you don't like their content, as opposed to being ambivalent about it because it's a site that you normally wouldn't join, that got me a little upset. Especially since I know some of the people that work there from having been a member so long, and you would have been effectively wishing they were out of a job.
|
10-16-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
202
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
You hope they're in trouble? Really? You hope a web site goes out of business because of your personal preference? That just seems cruel.
Edit: And there are thousands of scenes on the site of girls with natural breasts (at least 1700 by the easiest way to find them), and couple hundred scenes on the site of MILFs with natural breasts. I can't see how it wouldn't be worth $5 just to check out those couple hundred scenes.
|
10-15-12 10:54pm
|
Reply
203
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I would agree with you except that they're making a huge deal out of the 5000th scene (there's a special intro on the scene [which is this week's India Summer scene, if you hadn't noticed] and they recorded and edited a separate video of a bunch of girls congratulating them for it) and they're doing this as a part of that. If this were a deal that just came out of the blue, then I'd be a lot more worried about it. And $10 dollars isn't their normal price. It's what they give to PU and probably a few other places, but if you were to go there off of just typing it in the browser or through Google, which is how most people probably get there, you're going to get charged the normal $24.95 a month.
|
10-13-12 11:15pm
|
Reply
204
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
The method to scroll through their library is on the front page of the site (technically, the second page you see since the first page is an ad). The tab that says "View Our Latest Fantasies" has numbers on it. Those numbers are page numbers, the arrow is one page back, and that's how you navigate the entire library chronologically. You can also do it for each sub-site.
|
10-13-12 10:02pm
|
Reply
205
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It's not 7 out of 10. It's half. I can prove it if need be, but I don't really feel like it right now.
|
09-19-12 12:17pm
|
Reply
206
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
barbapapa's Comment
It's a little hard to find, but all you should have to do open a customer support ticket telling them you want to cancel. There's a Support link at the bottom of every page that should show you how to do that.
And yes, I think you need to cancel a couple days before renewal, but I'm not sure of what the exact number is.
|
09-04-12 09:38pm
|
Reply
207
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Emma Starr is really well liked by most of the sites fans as well, you might want to check her out (she has about 30 scenes on the site, so there's a lot to check out). Charlee Chase, maybe (and make you get the spelling correct, as there's a Charley Chase that is a young latina, as opposed to Charlee being a blonde MILF).
|
08-31-12 04:07pm
|
Reply
208
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Gasperdian's Review
As far as your problem with male talent, the guys you listed, for the most part, aren't the latest and newest male talent. Anthony Rosano and Marco Banderas, for instance, has been around for longer than all of the guys that you listed that are "overused".
|
07-19-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
209
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
They stopped doing their own live shows almost 2 years ago and now they're done by some cam-modeling company. As to their old shows, many, but not all, of them are archived, and they can be either streamed or downloaded.
|
07-18-12 03:26am
|
Reply
210
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
No.
|
06-13-12 05:55pm
|
Reply
211
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
You're right about that, although most of the time if you rename the FLV file to an mp4 it will actually play fine.
|
06-13-12 06:27am
|
Reply
212
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Comment
Right now, the only difference seems to be that the mp4 is a lower bitrate than the FLV was. I don't think it's very noticeable, but some people might.
|
06-12-12 10:12pm
|
Reply
213
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
barbapapa's Comment
You can log into the main site with your mobile login and vice-versa. I've done it before more than a few times. The reason those old scenes aren't listed on the mobile site is because they only list the videos on the mobile site that they have mobile-encoded versions of. For the rest, you'll have to go to the main site to download them.
|
08-29-11 06:49pm
|
Reply
214
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
If you don't start downloading them immediately, the links time out after something around 10-15 minutes. What you're going to want to do is start each one for a little bit after you add it, then pause it. I've heard that works well.
And I don't know if you realize this or not, but I think that $9.95 is only for one month, after which you get rebilled at their normal $24.95 rate.
|
10-22-10 06:21pm
|
Reply
215
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Rob12's Comment
I let them know, and it should be working better (faster) now, if you want to take a look at it.
|
09-24-10 03:07pm
|
Reply
216
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
The offer's been around for a while (over a year, but it's only really been publicized the last few months), and I haven't really heard anything in the way of accidental charge issues about it. But since I've always been a member, I don't really know for sure how it works.
|
09-14-10 08:41am
|
Reply
217
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They actually did the same exact thing last July for a couple weeks. I think there was even a comment about it here. The price drop, I think, is just something they do every couple months to stir up new members.
Added: Yeah, here's the comment, and it's literally a year ago yesterday.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37418
|
07-15-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
218
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
"Anal unit of measure". I like that, and think I may have to use it sometime. And as far as that ratio, the ratio overall right now is about 250 anal scenes to about 3500 scenes, or 1 out of every 14 scenes. The last 19 weeks or so is about 1 out of every 17 to 19. It's a drop, but I don't know how significant that is, and they've never really been much of an anal site anyway.
|
07-13-10 09:00pm
|
Reply
219
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Actually, early to middle of last year is when the content was feeling the effects of the economy. Right now, it just is what it is. And as far as I know, the $10 deal is $10 recurring at $25, which is more expensive than the PU deal if you plan on sticking around for more than one month.
|
07-13-10 04:45pm
|
Reply
220
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think we can pretty much agree on that.
|
02-25-10 09:01pm
|
Reply
221
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
To me, the main difference between the two companies is that one company (Brazzers) seems to only shoot models with large (and usually fake) breasts to the point of excluding popular models with real breasts. The other company (Naughty America) doesn't care about the breast size of the model, and just shoots who they think fits the theme/who the members want. And, from having been around for a long time, I can tell you that generally, the models with fake breasts tend to get requested more than the models with real breasts. I feel like they still make a concerted effort to bring natural women around (usually at least one per day on the Live shows, and at least 3-4 scenes per week). Could the ratio be better? Honestly, I do think so. But, judging by the general reaction on their forums, this seems to be what the members want. And I'm not gonna begrudge them for giving the members what they want.
|
02-24-10 07:45pm
|
Reply
222
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't think it's an inherently bad idea. I think some girls can make it work, and some can't. I think some go overboard, and some don't. I take it all on a case-by-case basis. Some of my favorite girls have boob jobs (Eva Angelina), some don't (Tori Black). And I think that nowadays, the decision by some girls to get implants is as much a business decision as it is an aesthetic one. Because, from most of the things I've noticed, girls with big boobs (whether real or fake) get more shoots than girls with small ones, especially when it comes to porn made in California (Valley Porn, as it's called). And with companies shooting less because of the economy, you have to do what you can to get shoots.
|
02-24-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
223
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They're not going back on anything. It was a bug. They've always allowed negative comments, and unless they are abnormally mean, they pretty much always stay up.
And I completely disagree with your second statement, but that's neither here nor there, and a topic better left to another thread.
|
02-23-10 07:32pm
|
Reply
224
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
http://tour.naughtyamerica.com/scenes/raquel-sieb/7619/?&nats=MTI1NDIzOjQ6OA,0,0,0,0
I have no clue if that is the scene you commented on, but that should answer anyone's questions as to whether they consistently censor negative comments/reviews.
|
02-23-10 02:49am
|
Reply
225
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
That happens sometimes. Really, comments on scenes going missing and coming back isn't a new thing. And it happens with good and bad ones (I only make positive comments, and I've had it happen to me). If there's one definite fly in the ointment there, it's the tech issues that have been popping up over the last few months. None of them are deal-breaking, per se, but you do notice them, and they can get to be annoying.
|
02-22-10 10:28am
|
