| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
brotherlove's Comment
Let's not short change them on the amount of companies they own. Brazzers, Digital Playground, Reality Kings, Babes, and they run Wicked's network and, I believe, Playboy's TV station as well. They're about as far reaching as they come.
|
03-15-14 03:52pm
|
Reply
2
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Search around for tutorials on how to download Youtube videos. Most of those tutorials work for most porn sites.
|
08-20-13 10:24pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Depends on the model and the dye job. Sometimes, it works really well, and sometimes it, well, doesn't.
|
07-24-13 01:06am
|
Reply
4
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
The sad part about all of this is that New Sensations actually does still shoot good content nowadays (if you get the chance, check out their newest DVDs), but they website is just so out of date that it's ridiculous.
|
07-23-13 07:34pm
|
Reply
5
|
College Sugarbabes
(0)
|
Reply of
Carue's Comment
The site also stopped updating like a year ago.
|
06-26-13 01:11am
|
Reply
6
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I agree, actually.
|
05-27-13 02:27pm
|
Reply
7
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I wouldn't go that far (just unsubscribing and not saying anything). I'd find other ways to say what I wanted to that aren't the comments section. Maybe to a general customer service e-mail account, or saying something to them on Twitter. I'd definitely find a way to let them know that I think their content is slipping, but I think you're right that the comment section might not be the best place to do it, specifically when it refers to the talent in the scene.
|
04-20-13 08:11pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with pretty much everyone else. If there's enough content to make it worth joining to access what's already there, then yes I would.
|
04-20-13 12:24am
|
Reply
9
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Comment
Is it still only for people that subscribe for the full year, or are they allowing people who get shorter memberships to get one as well?
|
04-18-13 01:23pm
|
Reply
10
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
From what people are saying, what it's about is that billing companies are getting pressure from credit card companies about what sites can and can't do, and one of the things they're supposedly focusing on is sex that could seem non-consensual. And bound sex is on that list of things.
|
04-18-13 01:19pm
|
Reply
11
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
They create Hardcore Gangbang specifically because they had to get away from the bound aspect of Bound Gangbangs. The sites don't both update because they're moving away from Bound on purpose and Harcore is its replacement.
|
04-16-13 03:38pm
|
Reply
12
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
I'm not really sure what you're saying is not correct? The feedback loop comment? I do agree with much of the other stuff you said here, though (except the HD thing. 720p is still HD by every definition of the phrase. Hell, technically, 721x481 would be HD). Especially the fact that the customer isn't always right. I've worked in retail for way too long to actually believe that. I think as long as it's fairly obvious that you're primarily a video site with photos also, you're not doing anything at all wrong.
Also, if you check my reviews, I'm a video guy. Always have been, always will be. So your sites lack of zip files wouldn't bother me at all. Without really knowing much about your sites/network, I don't' know whether I would join or not (I've never joined a single model site/network yet), but this wouldn't be an issue that persuades me either way.
|
04-16-13 12:34am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like my photos to be real, and my videos to be fantasy. So I don't mind flaws in the model in photos.
|
04-15-13 05:20pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Yeah, that was easily the best fisting scene I've ever seen.
Though in general, I agree that it's done for the spectacle of it, and not because it's something that's particularly arousing to the person getting fisted.
|
04-13-13 12:26pm
|
Reply
15
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
The point of taking photos doesn't really have to be to allow collectors to download them. If nothing else, photos make for much better promotional material than videos. They're much easier to distribute freely (a fact that pirates take advantage of), and you can use them as part of your website design (especially on the front page of the site). Not to mention the ability to use them to make advertisements with (from banner ads to preview pages). The truth is that the majority of video sites that make their own exclusive content (as opposed to licensing it from someone else) shoot at least some photos to go along with it, and there's a reason for that.
|
04-13-13 11:57am
|
Reply
16
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Makes perfect sense once you realize it's a self-fulfilling prophecy/feedback loop. The policy on photos means that people who prefer photos to videos aren't going to join in the first place, so when they survey their members on whether they prefer videos or photos, their members are going to overwhelming say videos.
Basically, it sounds like the photos on the site are more about people who like just looking at them as opposed to people who like collecting them. I don't really see a problem with that as long as you can know that ahead of time.
|
04-13-13 01:30am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, the tech is there at this point, it's just that no one has fully put it all together, and then there's the price factor.
|
04-08-13 04:30pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Don't we all?
|
04-08-13 04:29pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Only if you tell it to.
|
04-08-13 06:42am
|
Reply
20
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
They do have 1080 on every video that's in HD. The bitrate isn't as high as some people would like, but it's there.
Other than that, I do agree with your basic points.
|
04-07-13 11:06pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree with this. It's possible (but pretty expensive) to put, for lack of a better word, moving fuckable parts on a life-sized doll right now. The only thing it's missing is some kind of AI/programming to control the parts (which shouldn't take long). Once someone does that, it's just about the cost coming down.
|
04-07-13 10:27pm
|
Reply
22
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Reply
Yeah, it looks like they've lowered it again to the point of being worthless now. Which sucks.
|
04-07-13 09:34pm
|
Reply
23
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
If the special were a few dollars lower, I'd actually consider it anyway. Mainly because there not being any download links doesn't mean you can't actually download scenes from the site, if you're resourceful enough.
|
04-01-13 05:52pm
|
Reply
24
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
I'm looking at it right now (I can still log in from an old membership) and I see two videos every day for the past week.
And to answer your question: I think when reviewing a site you should include all scenes that the site gives you access to.
|
03-24-13 10:13am
|
Reply
25
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Review
I believe that the two videos a day include the solo masturbation videos. If you're only counting boy/girl and girl/girl videos, then it would be 2 a week (one b/g for Twisty's Hard, one g/g for When Girls Play).
|
03-24-13 09:44am
|
