| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Did not know about those rumours - but that guy can really ruin my porn/avoid me downloading a scene with a sweet girl/model - and I just hate that.
If he's really such a jerk in general...why do the girls/models still say ok...well, it could be another thread....
|
03-05-12 07:34am
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Forgot one:
Don't know his name - and do not care much/want to go Google the name - but this in the US porn world well known over/extremely tattoed former "lover" of Tera Patrick - who went to the cute Little Lupe/Zuleidy..
Those scenes with this disgusting character that would make any Hells Angels, Bandidos, Outlaws ect.-biker blush with envy made me feel sorry for that petite Lupe... but like Willie and Waylon sings:
"Ladies love outlaws"....still: Jeeeeez - this/these scenes almost make my avoid the former great Lupe!
|
03-05-12 07:25am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
When I stumbled across some scenes with faeces, I not only lost appetite for food, but also for porn - the rest of that day..
And I've been disgusted with some normally regular site scenes where the male part goes very brutal in anal porn. Think they're called gape-scenes - where this aversion of mine: the Russian male actor, Timo acts like a jerk...
Not into anal in general - but definitely not the brutal kinds - (and not talking about bondage/BDSM ect.)
|
03-05-12 05:29am
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mostly/sometimes - depend: If it's one of the old, well known Top-sites where we all are aware of the price - a price that's been the same for years....then: normally not.
BUT: When encountering a new site, I definitely compare the content and the price - also in the score.
But bottom line: Capn is right - it's Value For Money...
|
03-02-12 08:37am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Put this poll up for one main reason: The - sometimes - totally confused search for certain models...(we've had threads on this item several times).
And - as we've had some inputs from webmasters earlier - stating that some models insists on choosing their alias/"stagename".
Other webmasters have told me in mails, that it's not the question. Some sites choose the "stagename" in order to get some exclusive names...
And if that's really the case....some sites, some webmasters really keep us in a black hole in our ongoing search!!!!!
|
02-28-12 05:55am
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
Surprise, surprise....agree with Droolers input...
AND apart from the fake deals in body surgery - the "fake" deals in production, editing, stupid remarks ect. is taking over - generally to the worse...
A few - too few - sites are avoiding that negative development in porn.
|
02-26-12 08:15am
|
Reply
257
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
Doctor Blues's Comment
You may want to take a looks at this little ol' link:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=45906
|
02-24-12 12:25am
|
Reply
258
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Maybe it's a question of the entire setup at this site - it may seem attractive to some - and it may be attractive when you join and get overwhelmed - by the amount. And then to some: A disapointment of quality in general.
Still it should come as no surprise with the very different scores - this site in particular has been debated over and over again - with all it's "plus and minus"
Will not go into details - the details have been around about Videobox as long as TBP/PU - but guess it still comes down to the gap between "the amount" and "the quality" - it does to this user, anyway.....
|
02-23-12 06:52am
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Nada, no interest. Not even for sapphic erotica...
|
02-23-12 06:44am
|
Reply
260
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
It's a somewhat difficult site - I am and always has been partial to full body vids - and In The Crack have them for sure, great ones - maybe the best - but as the name goes: Crack - alas too, way too many loooooong close-up vids that would make some hospital/doctor happy....
And no - I'm not a gynecologists and not into it - so ten minuttes of insides do not appeal to me..
Still those full body vids... great - and for those I could maybe still go to a top score like this 95, maybe...
But: They also - still - got that damn regional pricing - and if you want to avoid that - you got to make bank payments - no deal, here.
Been a member a couple of times, but fed up with paying more from Europe.
|
02-21-12 07:25am
|
Reply
261
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Bummer, RB - plain Bummer........
BTW, of course: Thanks for the warning.
|
02-21-12 07:16am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ambivalent - really like them when "authentic" on Latina models....
Otherwise don't care much
|
02-21-12 03:15am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
It's a hard one - (oh, yes - I know I submitted the poll) - still:
Looking back over quite some years - and looking at my saved stash, Nubiles has probably supplied some of my most favorite vids. Ok, from way time back.
The same goes for Teendreams - vids from both these sites are those I go back to and watch when fed up hunting for new material.
In spite of the quality (mostly) of DDF and 21Sextury vids, I'm a bit surprised how seldom I turn back to watch those...
|
02-15-12 05:12am
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
Today, I definitely choose to wait - to make a review - at a new/till now an unknown site with low/small content normally needs more focus....
And some of those so called top scores - you got to handle with care when it comes to entirely new sites.
Remember you have an obligation towards your fellow PUs...
So: No, review them later .....OR be patience for at least a couple of weeks to get to know the site before a review.
|
02-12-12 09:17am
|
Reply
265
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
paulmarkham's Reply
Sorry to hear about your health - hope for the best...
And sorry - also for us - to hear about the site.
In many ways the site has supplied me with a lot of fine material in the past - man, you even got vids of great Misty McCain - who has now "banned" all her earlier material...
All the best
Denner
|
02-10-12 08:27am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The "I consider it a few days" - is pretty good...so that's my vote.
And of course, it's the content - but that's what it's all about, is it not?.
So a new site (never joined before) or a well known one, I do not rush into it - anymore. Yes, the term "consider" is the deal...
|
02-10-12 08:21am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, no - and just like RBs conclusion: Boring.
With one exption, at least at first glance: The clips you can find everywhere with the gorgeous Marisa Tomei from The Wrestler.
|
02-09-12 06:57am
|
Reply
268
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Laptopbs's Comment
Is the billing local(Brazzers own)?
Anyway, it's not good for any user (PU) to get that kind of hassle.....and again why has this particular site had so many problems from users for such a long time...?
Just take a look at the comments, where we find words from users like: scam, con artists, crooks...
Bottom line: STRANGE - that a site with so much fine content and so much attention is so BAD at it's handling of paying members. SHAME...
|
02-07-12 08:34am
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
"I live here"
Visit it more than once almost every day - for the reviews, the comments, the polls, the forum ect...
For a porn-addict it would be frustrating if PU wasn't around.
Fine poll, BTW
|
02-06-12 05:54am
|
Reply
270
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Review
Fine review, fine update for this rather special site..
But when that's said - I do not agree with the score (no big deal: the score is personal) - but still: this site is certainly one of a kind.
Some of my favorite stash is from this site - and even the material from way back when the vids-quality was close to lousy - and in the terrible Real Media.
Today the content is simply great - but agree with one very significant item:
The site should definitely UPGRADE/reedit the old vids!!!
|
02-05-12 08:46am
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
My favorite reply/input of the month.....
|
02-05-12 08:23am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Seems like messmer and I are maybe a minority - apart from others here - that like us are retired...
An WOW - I enjoy the retirement ....and ALL that time in the world to surf porn. So with at least 50%-75% I confess: It is now an addiction - but a great one...
The rest of the time at the PC I mostly spend taking care of my pension with 95% in stocks, so a lot of selling and buying.......you loose some, you win some - that's kind of fun,too.
|
02-04-12 09:59am
|
Reply
273
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Thanks for this update from RustyJ...
Another - alas - not so fine recommendation concerning the problems (reediting) at DDF - sorry to say: The ongoing problems with reediting..is still a bummer...
I used to love that site/network - but I'm not so sure anymore.
I'd be great to have some WM coming back here...
|
02-03-12 08:30am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
This will probably soon be the end of this poll...
But guys/fellow PUs:
We've got a lot in common here - no matter what special deal/sites we tend to....
In my mind this was a serious/important poll - and one that could get veteran PUs together - anyway: an everlasting thumbs-up for this great place - and look forward to the next recommendation/warning - that's what it's all about....
|
02-03-12 08:16am
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Hear, hear...!
And yes, had it not been for the TBP/PU, I'd have fallen in many more traps put up by too smart/not-serious sites.
Guess it has saved me some dough.
|
02-02-12 07:03am
|
