| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1326
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
crazy8's Reply
One thing I was wondering about this site is the exclusivity of the content - The look of the site and the content is very similar to Babelicious.com.
Xisty is a very good looking site, so I was wondering.
Thanks for your feedback.
|
07-15-07 11:13pm
|
Reply
1327
|
Trista Stevens
(0)
|
Reply of
Pious's Comment
Taking a look at the site, it's pretty clear right on the main page that the last pic update was 5/23/07 and the last vid update was on 5/05/07. Given that webmasters tend to shoot stuff that can be released over time, that's usually an indication that the model has moved on. Oh, well.
|
07-09-07 06:48am
|
Reply
1328
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Good to hear - I have found most studio websites - such as Vivid and Digital Playground to be fairly disappointing.
Please give more details when you get a chance - do they have pics? If so, are they downloadable and a good size and quality?
Can you download the vids or just stream them?
How good is the resolution on the vids?
Inquiring minds want to know!
|
07-08-07 09:59pm
|
Reply
1329
|
Dudes In Uniform
(0)
|
Reply of
pornaddict7's Comment
My advice, for what it's worth - unless you would be too embarassed to do so, follow the procedure with your credit card company to challenge the charges. Let them know that you had signed up for a 3-day trial, had cancelled within that period (any e-mails that you can produce would be helpful) and ask them to reverse the incorrect charges. Most credit card companies are willing to charge back in these types of circumstances.
And a site that operates unethically and has a high number or percentage of such chargebacks is in great danger of being cut off by their credit card processor(s), so don't let them get away with it.
|
07-08-07 09:54pm
|
Reply
1330
|
Ariel Rebel
(0)
|
Reply of
Play Toes's Comment
Ariel's a cool girl. She also posts sometimes at nnboards.com and other forums around.
|
07-08-07 09:49pm
|
Reply
1331
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
AmyLusts4u's Reply
Just makes this great site even greater - when I had an e-mail discussion with Alex a few weeks ago, he said that this was a change that they were thinking about - great to know that they made their decision.
|
07-08-07 09:48pm
|
Reply
1332
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
Wow! The site looks awesome! And they have 2 pic updates a day now too! Coolio!
|
07-08-07 09:42pm
|
Reply
1333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with the prevailing sentiment here - girl/girl where the receiving girl seems to really be enjoying it - that's hot! ALS Scan and ALS Angels are the best for people that like this kind of action, in my opinion.
|
07-08-07 09:35pm
|
Reply
1334
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
OK, my fellow porn fans, I'm thinking of joining one of the following sites:
ATK Galleria
Paul Markham Teens
Karups PC
All three to have frequent updates. Which one is likely to have the absolute hottest babes, best quality vids and pics?
|
07-06-07 07:20pm
|
Reply
1335
|
Galactic Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Review
I agree - with a trial, the awkward navigation can be a bit of an advantage, taking you in directions that you wouldn't have otherwise gone. It's definitely a turn-off in considering whether to join for full, though.
I think that the trial sub here is a real winner.
|
07-03-07 09:14pm
|
Reply
1336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
For me, it's overall body shape. If a woman with an average face has a luscious bod, I'll take the time to develop an affection for her face. If a woman with a pretty face has an unattractive bod, I'm moving on quickly.
|
07-03-07 09:10pm
|
Reply
1337
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
FYI - Alex put a note in his blog this week that they were having a limited time sale on their DVD's. To tell the truth, I've never bought the DVD's so I didn't check out the details on the sale, but I remembered that there was someone here that mentioned liking the DVD purchase option, so I thought I'd add this note.
|
06-30-07 10:11am
|
Reply
1338
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
For me, this is a dividing line - I want to see pics of hot babes that look like living women. Too many sites paint their pics to a point where, to me, they lose all eroticism. Find hot models, light them well, take the pics and I have no problem with doing some reasonable touch-up to make the pics look as good as they can, but I'm turned off by the lacquered or painted look that some sites go to.
Sites that put themselves on my Love List for avoiding unneccessary photo-painting:
ALS Scan
Met Art
DDGirls
and others with a similar style
Sites that keep me away with their insistence on painting pics to a degree that does away with the eroticism:
Pier 999
Ron Howard (though I like his close-up vids, despite his annoying talk)
A site that I wish got away from photo-shopping as much as they do: Twisty's - it's a great site and they have great models, but they're photo-sets would be hotter, from my perspective, if they messed with the pics less than they do, for the most part - I've got to say, though, that their stuff has been going in the right direction over time.
|
06-30-07 10:00am
|
Reply
1339
|
Alison Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Rattlesnake's Review
OK, Rattlesnake - now this is a pretty provocative comment in the bottom section of the review - please give us details on this situation - isn't the webmaster of this site the same guy that does FTV Girls?
|
06-28-07 09:04pm
|
Reply
1340
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
This is another one of those sites, like Pier999, where the painting in the pics is so extreme as to completely do away with the eroticism for me. I found the vids to be the aspect of the site that I liked the most because vids don't offer the same opportunity for messing with a woman's appearance and cause he gets in nice and close. But Ron H doesn't have nearly the skill that Alex of ALS Scan/ALS Angels does at bringing out a models' personality - watch vids of the same girls shot by both guys and 9 out of 10 times, the model is much more vibrant and sexy and FUN when she is being shot for the ALS sites.
I'm tempted to re-subsribe to this site for just a month for the vids, but then I think "Naaaaaaaa" and don't regret it.
|
06-28-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
1341
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
My mistake - I said 12/06 when I meant 12/05. According to TBP, the site opened in 9/05 and up until very recently they had all of the material available from their opening. It's definitely a negative development that they have now cut off the availability of that opening material and are recycling at least some of it as being new material. That could mean that they only plan on ever having 15 months of material and recycle from there - At least 3 recently posted sets - Red Magic, Pearls and Freeones - are recycled from the early days of the site - recognized by me or other members posting at the site's forum.
There could well be more. This definitely lowers this site in my estimation.
|
06-23-07 02:16pm
|
Reply
1342
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Here's my question, Drooler. I've seen awesome photos of Jesse Jane by Earl Miller and had considered joining the site. However all of the pics presented in the sample area have this weird blurriness in the face - like the photo shopping went bad for some reason.
Is that just an issue with the samples or are a lot of the pics on the site that way?
|
06-20-07 07:37pm
|
Reply
1343
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey, Exotics, have you noticed Mya's site recycling photo sets? I was really drawn to the Red Magic site posted on 6/10/07 - I hadn't been to the site for over a week - and when I went to download it, I found that I had the exact same set downloaded from Mya's site back at the end of July 2006.
This seems like a serious "con" to this site - calls into question how much new material they are creating. I understand the challenges of creating material for a new photo-set or video every day for the low price (with discount) of this site - but still.
I also noticed that the archive has been curtailed more than it has in the past - I'm sure that it went back past 12/01/06 previously - no?
|
06-19-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
1344
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I joined recently when they posted the first photo-set of Sandy W, who I love from her site Naughty Girl Sandy. I found that I wasn't spending that much time looking at Sandy because of all the other great stuff they have here. I don't know how long I'll keep my membership to this site, but it's a pretty nice site if you like your babes shaved with juicy natural sizeable boobs
|
06-18-07 09:40pm
|
Reply
1345
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I'm a fan of a lot of the models on this site, but what keeps me from joining is the amount of painting that they do to their photos. I've looked at their site samples and seen their stuff posted online at various forums and for my tastes, they layer it on to the point that, even if the model is on her back, with a sexy expression, in a great pose and her legs spread and panties pulled aside, I feel like I'm looking at one of those 3D Art pics rather than feeling like I'm looking at a hot photo of a gorgeous woman.
I have the same problem with Earl Miller's stuff.
When it comes to photo-shopping/painting, for my tastes less is more and, unfortunately, Pier 999 goes for the "more"
|
06-17-07 11:28am
|
Reply
1346
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
One other note - I e-mailed Alex and let him know the feedback here about how much higher value people think his sites would have if the entire library of vids were available.
He said that they were thinking about doing that - no promises about time frame - but that the vids that they currently offer as bonuses, such as the special collection of Caribbean trip vids or DVD's, would continue to be available for a limited period of time.
The great thing about ALS Scan, in addition to the high quality, is that for the past year especially, they have gone into a mode of continuous improvement.
|
06-17-07 11:20am
|
Reply
1347
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
For people like me that look at membership status when reading reviews, it would definitely be helpful if you noted - returning member here - or something that let people know that your entire experience was not less than 1 month. I have seen notes like that in reviews, possibly in yours, and it was note-worthy to me.
In any forum that has a good amount of people posting, we're going to have people capable of, or interested in, writing solid in-depth reviews, and others who write reviews that are more "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down". The good thing about the comments is that we can always try to draw people out some more if we care to.
Thanks for your comments.
|
06-16-07 01:40pm
|
Reply
1348
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
AmyLusts4u's Reply
ALS Scan currently has a full 2 1/2 months of vids available - this is at the upper end of the scale for them leaving vids out there, so this may change any day. While it is unpredictable how long vids will be available beyond the 4 weeks guaranteed, they do seem to be trying to increase the time of availability in practice.
I agree that the site would tremendously increase the value to their members if they had their full library of vids available.
I'll suggest it to Alex - he's always available for suggestions - and will be pretty direct in saying so if it ain't ever gonna happen.
|
06-16-07 01:30am
|
Reply
1349
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Both ALS Angels and ALS Scan post DVD material - ALS Angels typically has material available from 2 or 3 of their DVD's as part of the current vids
Right now, for instance, included in the current vids on the ALS Angels site are DVD #87 with Sandra Shine, DVD #90 with Eve Angel and DVD #92 with Breanne.
On the ALS Scan site, you can get the complete DVD #91, ALS in St John, with Nella, Brea, Amy Lee, Sandy, Paris & Adele (this is a temporary bonus that may be pulled any day) plus individual scenes from about 7 other DVD's as part of the current vids available.
I've got to say that the vids of their most recent Caribbean trip with Jana Foxy/Jana Jordan are truly wonderful - some of the best stuff that I've ever seen them post.
|
06-16-07 01:22am
|
Reply
1350
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
The more important factor to me is info on whether the reviewer is a current member and how long a reviewer has been a member.
People who are reviewing sites where they haven't been a member for months aren't helping much, since good sites make significant changes - I remember one reviewer complaining about the DRM's at Danni.com weeks after that site had done away with DRM's.
Similarly, I personally don't find reviews all that helpful if the reviewer has been a member less than a month - they can give feedback on how much stuff a site has and the quality, but you don't really have the basis to comment on the consistency of updates or possibilities of technical problems if the reviewer just joined yesterday. To me that's the difference between this forum and the reviews by TBP's reviewers - I know that they're just dipping their toes in and giving their reviews from there.
Where this site can be more helpful is by having the feedback of people who have spent a good deal more time with a site.
|
06-16-07 12:31am
|
