| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
801
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Different tastes - I really like this site - I joined when they had their half-price special in January. I don't go there every day, but I find it to be a really unique site and I find the photography to be very erotic.
My favorite thing about it is that their doesn't seem to be any photo-shopping going on. Hegre seems to use light and water and oil and things like that to show the models off to their best. While he leans definitely toward the waif look, there are enough models who don't fit that look to hold my interest.
If you're a fan of Nella, I don't think that anybody has photographed or filmed Nella to look better than Hegre.
|
07-17-07 09:02pm
|
Reply
802
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Check out Holly Randall's Twitter account. I don't know what the issue is, but she posted that the Holly Randall site is not accepting new members currently and is not adding new material currently - she is posting lots of new material to her Only Fans site.
Again - for more info, it's best to go to the source - Holly is very active on Twitter and you can get all the details she cares to share from her there.
|
01-14-18 02:43pm
|
Reply
803
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
Things change quickly - I was wondering if this was a situation like with ALS Scan and ALS Angels where the first became part of the MetArt Network and the 2nd did not. But I just clicked on Forever Vamp and wound up in a completely different non-Holly Randall site.
I think the whole kit-and-kaboodle of her sites are going to MetArt Network.
|
05-12-13 09:28pm
|
Reply
804
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
They seem to be taking their re-design of sites slowly. It's been several months since ALS Scan announced their partnership with MetArt, which was to include a complete re-design. There has been very little change in ALS Scan's site since then.
I'd be very surprised - and disappointed - if MetArt got involved enough in Holly's site to start dictating the posing of the models.
Holly's a pro, she certainly knows what she wants to do with her models. Teaming with MetArt will give Holly the greater financial resources that they can contribute.
The main reason I like it is the nice-sized non-Manwin firewall being built around a group of high-quality sites.
|
01-26-13 11:13pm
|
Reply
805
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
It's an awesome deal - one that I'll probably take advantage of when I'm going to be around to do some serious downloading.
Most such DDF deals are for 1 month only, but I haven't taken that deep a look at this one.
|
08-07-09 07:20am
|
Reply
806
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
Well, when you ask about "good erotic taste", you're definitely getting into subjective territory. One person's good erotic taste is another person's sub-standard crap. But having recently had a brief 8-day membership to the site as a bonus to 1-by-day, I found that this was the "niche" DDF site that kept me coming back to it most often during that period. There's a lot of material - I think they had 3 full sets of pics and vids per week, plus a casting special. The women are hot, there's a variety - if you like nylons or bare legs - younger, more mature, slender, more voluptuous, etc.
The vids are really well-filmed and show off the assets of their models beautifully.
That's my opinion anyway. And the reviews on this site have been good generally.
|
01-05-09 05:31am
|
Reply
807
|
I Love Gauge
(0)
|
Reply of
turismo's Review
This really is Gauge's site. I had some e-mail correspondence with her when I was a member, trying to find out if there were going to be updates and to find out if she were going to attend an upcoming AdultCon. This was 1 1/2 years ago maybe. She was pretty lacksadaisical as to when she might be updating the site, didn't think it was all that important.
The best thing about this site is the cool intro. It's all downhill from there.
I found a similar situation with Stephanie Swift's site. Stephanie's site had a bit more content but wasn't being updated and Stephanie, like Gauge, was busy with other things.
Both these women need to hire a good, professional webmaster/mistress to run things for them.
My current theory - if a site doesn't have dated updates to let you know for sure that stuff is going on that's new and frequent, it probably isn't being updated much.
|
03-17-07 07:28pm
|
Reply
808
|
I Love Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Good review - more than fair to a site that needs to kick it into another gear. The weirdest thing about the current lack of updates is that they actually took down the best vid that was on the site - it was over 30 minutes of hot 3-some sex - even with The Tattoo Guy it was undeniably hot.
When you've stalled your updates to the current snail's pace and you take down your best material, that's not a good combo.
I wouldn't recommend this site to anybody that's not a huge cam show fan - because that's the big deal here. The woman has a stellar little bod and does 2-hour cam shows that usually involve girl/girl, solo masturbation and then some boy/girl - usually her pussy's sore from all the previous activity and she does bj's.
If they start archiving the cam shows or start more regular updates and increase the size of their photos, which are really substandard, that might change my recommendation.
|
07-06-10 05:51pm
|
Reply
809
|
I Love Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Comment
A fairly new site with 46 vids isn't too bad. Your membership must have ended prior to 5/17, since they've added another 3 since then - and the "hard" factor is increasing. I actually think Lupe's a brilliant tease. That "Thirst" video where she pours warm milk over herself and then masturbates is incredibly erotic. But she's also quite a hot sexual performer. The newest vid must be about 40 minutes of g-g-b action and Lupe's a delight to see throughout - a bit too much of her bf, the Illustrated Man, for my tastes, but she's hot enough that I can deal with him being there.
The cam show tonight was awesome. Lupe and Amia are both goof-balls and they were doing some of the funniest shit I've ever seen. At one point, Amia was sitting up in the bed with her feet over the edge. Lupe sat facing front straddling one of Amia's legs so that Amia's foot protruded up between Lupe's legs. Lupe thought that was hysterical, which it was, and started grabbing Amia's foot and acting that it was her (Lupe's) cock, stroking away.
I've often thought that sex was not worth having with a partner without a sense of humor about it, so I thought that shit was priceless. The probably should have aimed for a shorter show. By the 90 minute mark, you could tell they were pretty drained, though they were troopers and the last half hour was the boy/girl/girl action with Amia getting fucked and both Amia & Lupe blowing The Illustrated Man, who decided to cover up his tats by wearing an outfit that made him look like Freddy Krieger - lol
|
06-02-10 11:41pm
|
Reply
810
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I've been a member of this site, jsexnetwork and Actionjav, all of which have significant amounts of Maria O material.
Actionjav.com only has censored (mosaic) material. Both jsexnetwork and this site have uncensored material.
It's very easy to browse Jsexnetwork's site as a non-member to see what they have - and they have a lot. I recommend that site far and away above Idol69 for 3 reasons:
1) Overall, it's a more professional site. When I was a member of Idol69 for 1 month, I didn't have access for multiple days. I got NO help from the C/S at this site, just BS answers like "nobody else is having a problem, must be your fault"
2) The material at Idol69 is ALL clips - no whole DVD's at all on the entire site.
3) Besides the vids at Jsexnetwork's site, they also have some really nice soft-core photo sets - it's like the cherry on top.
|
09-14-10 05:45pm
|
Reply
811
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
This site is inaccessible once again - unless you like paying to look at blank screens and error messages during much of your subscription, I REALLY don't recommend it.
|
06-19-10 10:59am
|
Reply
812
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
AND the site is inaccessible again! Not surprising and it's why I react as I do - because when a site gives no access after I first join, and there is no quick C/S response, I've learned to recognize it as a warning sign that the site has MAJOR problems - as this one clearly does.
Now you may want to appoint yourself as the PU Defender of web-masters - that's fine. Me, I want to warn other PU's of sites that are poorly, incompetently run and are un-stable and are likely to not deliver much of value.
How much entertainment do I get from a site to which I have no access - none! How much entertainment do I expect other PU's to get from a site to which I would expect them to get no access - none!
|
06-19-10 10:58am
|
Reply
813
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
They can charge somebody else money to read their error messages. I have no interest in paying for a few days of nothing.
|
06-17-10 10:04pm
|
Reply
814
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
It's not a reality site, if that's what you mean. I would say that it's pretty performancey, though I personally don't consider that to be a bad thing. My main gripe with this site is that they have gone the shitty-photo-treatment route over time. So where you used to have skin tone and all the things that are exciting about looking at hot nekkid women, now the photos are all laquered crap where you might as well be looking at one of those sites with 3-d cartoon images. The vids are still good, in my opinion, and older photos are better than the new ones.
|
08-01-11 07:07pm
|
Reply
815
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
I wish they would lay off the freaking photoshopping, which you correctly list as a major con - I keep being drawn back to this site - but the photoshopping makes their posted sets boring - so my former excitement about this site is no more. Nice vids, but without photosets that are also enjoyable it's a site that's killed 50% of its updates, far as I'm concerned.
|
02-05-10 10:05pm
|
Reply
816
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
And very little of that in the last year
|
12-10-09 05:33pm
|
Reply
817
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I'm not a member at this point. I got sick of the increasing photo-shopping, though I like their concept and their babes. But fisting - very rare. There might have been 1 fisting scene added in the last year - their usual fare currently is a hot babe showing off her bod, stripping and masturbating, most often outdoors with all natural sounds.
|
12-07-09 06:45am
|
Reply
818
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Yeah - agreed - I got bored when they started having too much photo-shopping in the pics, but it's a really good site - very consistent with hot women posing, stripping and masturbating - sounds good to me!
|
11-23-09 07:55pm
|
Reply
819
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Given that their vids have natural sound and don't have the sound of clicking cameras or directors, I think that "yes, they do the vid and photo shoot separately - same location & outfits - I'm sure they have dupes when there's messiness involved." If there's anyone here that knows more the methodology of doing these kind of photo/vid shoots, they ought to chime in.
|
04-17-09 09:06pm
|
Reply
820
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Screen stills? You think so? I don't. I think that they are photo sets that go along with, but are separate from the vids. They don't give the appearance of screen stills to me.
I would compare them to the photosets that you see at Pix & Video or One By Day - both of those sites have vids that go along with the photo sets, but the photo sets are not screen stills. For comparison, there are bonus sites to Pix & Video where they do have screen still sets - which look quite different - and much lower quality.
|
04-17-09 05:52pm
|
Reply
821
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
He said it only updated 3 or 4 times a week, which wasn't often enough for his tastes. The every day updates might not be often enough for his tastes either - some sites give multiple updates a day, but I was responding to the incorrect info in the review - I should note that the review has now been edited - so if anybody else comes along and says, "Where does he say it only updates 3 or 4 times a week?", well it no longer does.
|
10-31-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
822
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
Actually, this site updates every single day - one day it updates with pics, the next day it updates with the related vid.
|
10-31-08 11:18am
|
Reply
823
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
I rejoined recently after another member (Exotics?) raved about it and while there is less fisting, etc, overall I find the site much more exciting than when I had joined a year or so ago - just the overall quality of the models and the presentation is more my tastes these days - and I can find all the hot intense fisting I want over at ALS Scan - their recent vid of Amy Lee fisting Kacey Jordan is the absolute hottest fisting vid I've ever seen. The prelim to the fisting is Amy having Kacey pour beer into her mouth and spitting it all over Kacey's hot pussy and lapping it up - so freaking hot!
|
06-16-08 07:06pm
|
Reply
824
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I decided to try this site on your suggestion - and I find the quality and excitement factor quite a bit higher than when I tried it before - so thanks.
In return, I've got to tell you that ALS Angels just posted a whole new Eve Angel set - exclusive, too, as all ALS material is.
|
04-25-08 08:22pm
|
Reply
825
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
iporn's Review
I agree about the lack of passion, sensuality, imagination - I felt like I should have been a lot more excited about it than I was.
|
04-23-07 06:33pm
|
