| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is one of my absolute fave sites out there. I've got a pretty active imagination, so I like tease sites and sites that show gorgeous women in softer ways than full-spread sites.
This review is accurate that it is not a full-spread site. I don't think this review gives this site credit for the range of models or the range of styles presented. It's that range that guarantees for me that there is one set a day - or at most one set every other day that I find thoroughly captivating.
Why? Gorgeous women, beautifully presented, many waif-like, some more voluptuous, awesome photography, lots of variety in the photography, very high quality.
The vids? This review is SO right. The vids are crushingly boring, for my tastes, though they are also very high quality.
|
07-28-07 04:41am
|
Reply
952
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Reply
I hope you went with Met Art - it's an extraordinary site if you like hot models and high quality photography.
|
07-17-07 08:55pm
|
Reply
953
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
I've been a member of Met Art for approx 1 year now. I really love the site, mainly for the variety of the photography and the quality of the photography and the models.
The vids are an aspect of the site that I pretty much ignore for months at a time. They're just not exciting to me. They are very soft vids of their models cavorting in the surf or on rocks or something like that. They are pretty vids with nice music - the sound is sumptuous.
Having said all of that, I downloaded one of their recent vids in the DIVX version - their highest quality download, according to the site. The file was about 350MB for a 15 minute vid. The video quality, watching it on the newest version Windows Media Player full-screen, is pretty damned fantastic - pretty much DVD quality. The sound is truly outstanding. The content is not terribly exciting to me, though.
I'm there for the pics and, every once in a while, the cam shows.
|
07-16-07 08:22pm
|
Reply
954
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
RobertJason's Review
If you want to get more into the personalities of the girls - and the tease - the Met Art cam shows are a great way to go. Each cam show is 2 hours long, if I remember correctly, so the girls take their time getting naked, spend a lot of time teasing and chatting and playing with the guys in the chat.
The turn-off to me about the chat is it's definitely like little club-house where the guys that are there all know each other and know all of the 'rules' etc. I found it rather off-putting. Others might not.
|
06-12-07 09:47pm
|
Reply
955
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
4nic8's Review
Expensive? That depends on how long you want to join for - at $99/year, it's damned inexpensive - especially when you consider the amount of content that they put up.
|
05-25-07 07:45am
|
Reply
956
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Actually, I think Ninn is partnering with MetArt for the financing. His stuff is a lot more expensive to produce than the standard porn stuff, so he needs a backer with bucks. MetArt seems to have the bucks as well as a related sensibility.
|
01-14-13 09:59pm
|
Reply
957
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
The vids - when you click on them to get a free preview - look very good. Ninn's definitely a stylist, so you either like his style or you don't.
Ninn and Met Art are a great partnership!
|
01-13-13 10:15pm
|
Reply
958
|
Michelle Aston
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Well, she's not a model, to my knowledge, but if you're in San Francisco in the near future, check to see if Trinity is dancing at San Francisco's Crazy Horse. She's about 5'7", blonde, with self-cropped very short hair, a willowy figure, small natural boobs and a really sexy girl-next-door face and demeanor - just an angel - a naughty one at that!
I don't recall tats, though I can't say for 100% certain that she didn't have a small one at the small of her back or something.
I hope she's still dancing there - she hasn't been in for over a week, but might just be busy with school stuff or have taken a Summer vacation trip.
|
07-29-07 06:25am
|
Reply
959
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Great deal - I've joined more than once at that price. The only drag is a) you have to be very careful to be sure not to get snagged on any pre-checked offers - sometimes they have them way off to the right where you can miss them, sometimes they don't have them at all, b) they changed their cancellation system to make it more difficult to cancel.
In my opinion, any site that is harder to cancel than ccbill is just not professional.
|
05-17-13 09:24pm
|
Reply
960
|
Mike in Brazil
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Comment
It's weird. Click on the "Join Now" button and you're told that membership includes access to 6 of the Reality Kings other sites. You would be crazy to join that way when you can join through the main Reality Kings sites at The Best Porn discount, which is a lower price than the one being offered here, and be assured of getting access to the whole network, including this site.
|
08-30-08 07:56am
|
Reply
961
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
That's pretty common with Reality Kings. Ramon is in every vid on Pure 18, I believe.
|
04-06-10 06:55am
|
Reply
962
|
Milton Twins
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Interesting - since Paypal a number of years ago instituted a supposedly strict rule that Paypal could not be used for "adult entertainment-related" transactions. I know people who were using Paypal for their e-bay businesses and had a lot of money frozen.
|
01-15-10 05:33pm
|
Reply
963
|
Misha Online
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Thanks for the detailed review. I was a member of the site when they first opened for over a year, have thought about re-joining, but was held off by the lack of detailed info on updates - that's usually a bad sign. Your review confirmed it.
I doubt if Misha has retired, but I know she has had a few children, might have gotten awfully busy. One would think, though, that she would be smart and build up a stash of updates to keep the site humming. She's one of the most well-thought-of photographers in the glamour game and has access to the most sought-after models out there because of it.
It's just lame for sites to go dead where updates are concerned.
|
03-16-08 08:45am
|
Reply
964
|
Misty Anderson
(0)
|
Reply of
JDuB's Review
The other major "con" to this site for me - and one that has kept me from joining - is the infrequency of her updates to the site - at least if the front page of her site is accurate - she has a most recent update on June 10 - 3 weeks ago. Before that she did an update on May 22 - more than 2 weeks before that. Before that she did an update on May 11.
I'm flat-out never going to join a site that updates that infrequently, despite her statements on the front page that she pours her heart and soul into the site. She ought to pour her heart and soul into updating more frequently if she wants more members.
|
07-03-09 01:54pm
|
Reply
965
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I'm a member - got this as an add-on to my Brazzers.com membership. Perhaps there are different types of memberships. That seems to be a "thing" these days. I have the ability to download every scene except the not-yet-released scenes, though they are encouraging people to buy a VIP membership that would also give members access to those scenes.
|
09-16-16 02:26pm
|
Reply
966
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
You can disagree with Vanessa's rating, but she was pretty clear about the rate of updates - specifically said that there were 3 pic/vid updates in the network in the last week and that they needed more content to get a higher score from her.
I wouldn't agree with her saying that they would be a must-join if they go HD, because there are other networks (Reality Kings & Naughty America) kicking their butts in terms of what they offer
The rate of updates means that you could join once every couple of years and get everything worth having in a month.
|
10-08-09 10:48pm
|
Reply
967
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
chaos93's Comment
Yep - it's that Brazzers Bait-and-Switch Magic
That's why they're the Best Porn Co In The World - except for lots and lots of others
|
08-08-09 11:05am
|
Reply
968
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Damn - stupid thing to do with a network that needs more sites and scenes rather than less - at this rate, Mofos is going to take a year or more to be worthwhile
|
04-12-09 05:54pm
|
Reply
969
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
Yeah, a was a member for a month when they first opened and had a $10/month deal - when they opened, they started with a bunch of good stuff, but then they really didn't add much great stuff - it's the kind of site that would be worth joining once a year for a month.
|
04-09-09 06:06pm
|
Reply
970
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
I joined this site, since it was $10/month at the offer I saw. It's got scenes with such faves of mine as Kacey Jordan, Jenavieve Jolie, Jenna Haze & Veronique Vega. There are over 100 scenes so far. When it went open widely, it already had quite a bit of material. I haven't found the downloading to be slow. I do have a problem with their pic navigation. They have the Brazzers-style thing of having a set of pics with every scene, but you can only navigate through them as BMP files, for some reason, unless you download the zip, which isn't the harshest solution in the world.
They do need to either start updating 3 times a day or stop claiming to be updating 3 times a day.
The scenes are comparable to Brazzers. They have more variety in that they're not all built around every guy saying, "My god, you've got big tits!" while every girl says, "My god, you've got a big dick!"
|
01-29-09 06:02pm
|
Reply
971
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
It looks to me like they wanted a site that they can have a broader focus with than Brazzers' big-tits big-cock focus. It's the right price and has some good material. I wish them well and hope that they develop both of them and flesh them out as to their distinctive-ness
|
12-23-08 05:55pm
|
Reply
972
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Thanks for bringing this to my attention!
|
12-31-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
973
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
MPL STUDIOS's Reply
Any way to get this to impact people like myself that joined yesterday?
|
12-24-11 05:38pm
|
Reply
974
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
Thanks for the heads-up - much appreciated. This is the first sale price that I can remember this site offering - the limit to their generosity is one month, however - after the first month, the price goes to $29.95/month.
|
12-23-11 07:14am
|
Reply
975
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
This is an interesting cam site - gives the girls more options, and gives more opportunities for guys to have fun. I've seen popular cam girls get HUGE tips in the public area, so that's where they tend to stay. Other girls aren't as good at pulling those kind of tips in the public, so they tend to want to go private.
The interface is ugly as a crack ho on a bender and crashes every once in a while. But that might be a result of the huge amount of traffic on this site, which probably makes it difficult to keep up with the servers at time.
|
06-26-11 09:43am
|
