| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Some site owners lie, but certainly not everyone. But I think you know that already.
|
12-20-09 01:38am
|
Reply
27
|
Asian Pervert
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tom22:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
The site must have reported to "The Best Porn" that it was to be a FULL trial in order for "The Best Porn" to list it as such. And I guess I don't understand what is "disingenuous" about "bashing" a site based on a trial subscription. Especially when they advertised for a Full trial and it appears not to be. Seems to me that in that case, a "bashing" is in order.
|
09-08-10 02:27pm
|
Reply
28
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
You are correct. That is exactly what happened. I believe he's directing for Evil Angel. The money must have been too good to pass up.
|
05-17-10 06:44pm
|
Reply
29
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
from greg909:
Yes, great move for them to FINALLY upgrade the image size and resolution. Some of the new shots look great! (Hopefully, Hairy will do this too.)
Unfortunately, the Galleria site is so slow now that it's almost unusable. It takes about 30 seconds to bring up new pages and often times out completely. They need to fix this problem fast!
|
12-29-10 09:38am
|
Reply
30
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Good catch, justme. Good time to ditch IE and use Chrome and see if that's a bit more stable - I hope the site upgraded their servers when they made this change.
It's great changes like this - and great material - that keep me around even with their annoying lack of stability of the site.
|
12-14-10 10:09pm
|
Reply
31
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Take a look at We Are Hairy.
Drooler's comment alerted me to it.
It looks very promising!
Cap'n. ;0)
|
02-03-10 11:36pm
|
Reply
32
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Ah...There is glam - elegant there?
I was referring to glam - tarty.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-30-11 04:37am
|
Reply
33
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Well, the live cam shows, the forums, hype & razzamatazz etc. ;0)
So you are saying it is a glammed up version of Galleria.
Probably not for me then.
Thanks for the info.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-29-11 12:06pm
|
Reply
34
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
OK, I need to edit my response, because when I tried further navigation in the Babes.tv archive, it crapped out 3/4 of the time - so I would say that that Babes.tv archives are there - but the navigation sucks and you might have to try multiple times to actually look at what you want to look at.
|
03-13-10 04:44pm
|
Reply
35
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Yes, if you go into Babes.tv and click on "Archives", you'll have to enter your log-in info yet again - and then you're in the archives - I believe it's complete - no reason to believe otherwise at this point.
|
03-13-10 04:32pm
|
Reply
36
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
"The recent photos at 1000px, might be that's the only resolution they got from the photographer who sold them the sets. Who knows?"
Check out the photoset posted at SexyBabes.tv yesterday - posted in a larger size 2 days earlier by Twisty's
So the people that SexyBabes.tv had only 1 resolution available to them but they made a higher resolution set available to Twisty's?
I doubt it.
I think that the people that run these sites just don't care to spend the extra money to make sets available in multiple resolutions anymore. I don't think they care about much at all in regard to these sites anymore.
|
12-12-09 05:42pm
|
Reply
37
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I'll try it. Thanks for the tip.
|
09-09-09 05:45pm
|
Reply
38
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Yes. The earliest vids as I remember are from late 2008 - AND now those vids from December 2008 and further on are to download. There are some strange flaws (4-5 vids or about) that they have missed or skipped....
And if you go there: Watch those 6 vids of the French girl/woman "Monica" (can't sit still when she starts to pose - never seen her elsewhere, alas).....
|
05-06-11 08:51am
|
Reply
39
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from babespotting:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hello
Apologies for the late reply.
Thanks for your comments and feedback.. I am looking into the whole aspect ratio issue you have raised and will make sure all videos are formatted and encoded correctly in the future to your satisfaction.. I remember the Euraphat content was shot and captured on HDV and looks like it has been downsized incorrectly..
Thanks
|
01-18-10 04:01am
|
Reply
40
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks again - still I come back (the models are just great):
So just this: what kind of files are the download-videos in now? (wmv or only .mov)
|
01-14-10 10:37am
|
Reply
41
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hello justme
Thanks for this update...are you a member at the moment?
If so, are those videos for download ok/crisp in quality - even if it's quicktime -(is it quicktime, only?)
I liked the content/models - AND if the quality has improved for full screen viewing of downloaded videos, this site could be great....
|
01-14-10 08:27am
|
Reply
42
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from babespotting:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for your feedback.. All the new videos are encoded at 720x576.. I will look into why they look stretched as all our footage is PAL
|
01-14-10 02:03am
|
Reply
43
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Or considering that I can easily download 50 GB a day, that would be roughly 125 GB that I missed out on or the equivalent of 31 DVDs at $20 a piece for $600.
You seem to have a problem with reading and understanding the purpose of a post or comment. The title is asking if anyone else ran into this problem in February. It's not hanging Bang Bros or the pay processor, it is just bringing up the oddity most likely brought on by the leap year month. You're always talking about how you are sick of the negativity, but all I ever read from you is you being negative towards other members. Do as I say not as I do, right? If you have nothing positive or constructive to add, I would appreciate if you didn't reply to me again. I'm not here to own anyone or to be a smartass.
|
03-25-10 11:33am
|
Reply
44
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
from GCode:
I noticed you said the site is softcore posing. Is this as far as the site goes? Meaning, do the models eventually masturbate or anything? Thanks for the review! The tour pretty much describes what you stated but I am just wondering if anything happens outside of posing. These are some tiny bikinis! lol :)
|
09-24-10 07:13pm
|
Reply
45
|
Boobie Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
never meant to hurt anyones feelings, it was just a hint.
|
09-16-10 07:23am
|
Reply
46
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Yeah that will be the part anyonebutme, yeah probably some of them do say it was great just for the paycheck indeed.
|
01-07-12 01:35am
|
Reply
47
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Victorycreed:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Really, even it only cost 9.95 a month?
|
12-27-09 02:32am
|
Reply
48
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from asmith12:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for warning, I need to double-check my credit card bill (they didn't overcharge me for 1100, but a few bucks could have slipped without me noticing it). But if they DID charge for something which didn't happen, I really think it will be THEM who will be in trouble, not ME. My bank is usually pretty customer-friendly when disputing credit card charges (yes, they ask lots of questions, especially "Did you already try to contact the merchant?"), but after all they are doing their job pretty good.
|
10-26-09 01:57am
|
Reply
49
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks, aobm, but I think my interest in this site has waned now that otoh mentions as well that most of the pictures are a bit soft, as well as grainy, at full size. When it comes to clarity I am a fanatic. After all, if the pictures aren't crisp a smaller size would do quite nicely for most and there's no need for 4000px. 4000px is for counting pores. :-) Thanks anyway for the links.
|
04-29-11 09:51am
|
Reply
50
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks, anyonebutme, but they wouldn't let me in!
|
04-28-11 01:13pm
|
