| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
That makes sense. I'm guessing the content is exactly the same but only difference is where the models are from? Cool stuff. Thanks for the quick response and answer. Appreciated :)
|
07-11-10 10:39pm
|
Reply
102
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from GD1966:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Yes it was nearly all exclusive in the past too bad they are going this route.
|
05-05-14 02:26pm
|
Reply
103
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nadiencendia:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Okay, maybe I wrote the comment in the heat of the moment, it might have been better to cool off before writing it; anyway, I do think it's a scam NOT to say it's a limited trial anywhere, and then offer such limited a content that it's plain ridiculous. Even if there are no laws about it, there are some conventions, and offering 10 incomplete, low-definition scenes for 2.95€, for me qualifies as scam...
Anyway, what I think is important is for other users to know that the trial membership is definitely NOT worth it. If they want to go for the complete 30€ membership, it's up to them, I can't say if the site is any good, because the trial membership didn't allow me to really try it.
Thanks for your views on my comment, anyway, I only hope it's useful for someone...
|
07-14-10 02:43pm
|
Reply
104
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nadiencendia:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hi, justme, how are you. Yes, I know, this is not the first time I get a trial suscription, and it's not the first time that I find them to be limited (21sextury also had these kind of trial memberships, if I remember correctly); limited trials are always dissapointing, but this is just plain absurd: I don't get to see the size of their archive; the real quality of the videos, or the real download speed. I don't even get to see the faces of the models that work for the site. I am only given access to ONE page with TEN incomplete scenes.
This is not only frustrating for users: it's also a very bad business tactic: if they allowed me to see the names and faces of all their models, a peek of all their scenes (just thumbnails if you want) and some real, complete samples of the scenes contained in the site, I may be tempted to expand or "upgrade" my membership. As it is, I only want to get away and never look back.
A crappy trial membership like this one gives me the impression that the content really is not that good, so they prefer to screw passers-by and get 2$-3$ from them instead of trying to secure long-term memberships from people who could be really interested...
|
07-14-10 09:42am
|
Reply
105
|
Lez Be Girlfriend
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
from RNJ Communicati:
Hi there,
I am very please that you like our sites. I apologise about the lack off updates over the last couple of weeks. We had a problem while encoding them.
This has now been solved and more top quality content will be coming your way.
Best Regards
|
08-24-09 11:09am
|
Reply
106
|
Lezboland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Sevrin:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Right you are. I never actually subbed, just put it on my list.
I apologize.
|
06-28-10 07:53pm
|
Reply
107
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RagingBuddhist:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Flash and Java are up to date here, but I don't think this is a flash or Java issue. Because Pat mentioned having the same issue, I think it's safe to assume that this is a known issue with the site.
|
08-23-10 06:18pm
|
Reply
108
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Gee... thanks for clarifying that for me.
|
08-26-14 02:13am
|
Reply
109
|
My Fetish
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for this update/info, justme!
|
04-09-10 05:53am
|
Reply
110
|
Naughty Euro Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I'll let you be the "objective" one. You're good at it.
|
09-08-10 02:32am
|
Reply
111
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from dracken:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
This is awesome! Thank you so much for this info. I knew hustler offered some parodies, but this site is awesome, do you know if you get access to new sensations with this site?
|
11-16-10 01:50pm
|
Reply
112
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Justy so you know, that site is now listed. You can leave your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/parodypass/
|
11-12-10 11:42am
|
Reply
113
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks, I knew I could count on you!
|
09-10-11 04:15pm
|
Reply
114
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I don't. I subscribed once.
I whinge every so often in the hope something might change. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 03:59pm
|
Reply
115
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I knew I'd get some negative responses to that one and you haven't let me down, young 'un! :-) I think I made it very clear, except maybe to the very densest, that I was being subjective and that younger folks would find more joy in this site and rated the site accordingly. My outrage (and downgrading) is in connection with totally inadequate videos being published as new updates. And that is NOT subjective, everyone should be outraged no matter how much they enjoy the rest of the material. A quality site just doesn't do that. For me the HD videos (again see review) were the only redeeming factor and now I found out that I can't even count on those on a regular basis.
|
10-20-10 07:19am
|
Reply
116
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
100% perfection as in occasional slow downloads? No problem. If your idea of a slight imperfection is "No pics shows at all on any of the sites in the network", then we'll just have to disagree, because I don't find that tolerable at all.
|
06-12-10 09:56am
|
Reply
117
|
Porn Films 3D
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks - I didn't know it was possible to convert 2D images to 3D....
|
02-17-11 01:49am
|
Reply
118
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
And then once someone has joined the site, they have the right to stop updating?
That's your opinion - and you can have a good time congratulating non-updating sites all you want for their splendid job.
I consider sites that stop updating as screwing their members - always have, always will.
I know how much control the girls have because there are forums internal to the site where the people who do the technical work have said - without contradiction by the porn stars - that they post all of the material that they get to post.
Do the girls have the right to work for different producers? Hell, yeah. But if they're going to have a site and not update - or stop updating - then they are screwing over the members that have paid for a membership.
Apparently you disagree - have fun with all the non-updating sites around - there's lots of them for you to enjoy the hell out of.
|
02-12-11 04:34pm
|
Reply
119
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Private:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hey Justme,
yes, that's actually a new feature on the site. if we have photos available from the scene then they are available.
At the moment I'd say that 99% of the scenes also have the full picture sets available.
|
08-21-10 01:18pm
|
Reply
120
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
This site is very confusing. Sarah announces that she is doing lots of new stuff, but the update schedule on the site doesn't reflect it, and members reporting on other forums report that the material is not there.
The last time that I was a member, there were new vids that were stream-only or looked awful when downloaded, like the person who had encoded them screwed up completely and wasn't doing any quality-control once they had been uploaded to the site.
I like Sarah, think she is a very sexy woman and all, but given my own experiences with her site and what I hear from other current & former members, I'll enjoy her work on other sites for now.
She's been doing lots of great stuff for Twistys, for instance.
|
12-02-12 11:04pm
|
Reply
121
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
You seem to be making a good arguement in favour of webmasters who charge customers $30 for content that can be downloaded in a day.
I'm certainly not interested in ripping the whole site in a day as i'm not even remotely interested in the videos which use the highest bandwidth. All i wanted was a collection of her solo photoshoots and at the end of the day i'm paying a premium price at $4.47 for 3 days access compared to around $15 for the whole month so being restricted to such a limited amount of downloads does feel like i've been ripped off. If they had clearly stated that download limits apply then i would have had the choice to either subscribe for the month or not at all, just seems like a shady business practise to me.
It could also be argued that 4 cents per photoset is expensive when compared to sites like MET or ATK where you can download as many as you want in a day.
|
08-30-10 03:26am
|
Reply
122
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I und3erstand the argument completely, but if the site wants to limit the d/l's to 14, then it should say so BEFORE, not after someone signs up.
It's like going to a restaurant offering a second meal free with the purchase of a meal, and once you order, they give you half portions because they can't stay in business if they actually honor their advertised offer.
The rip off is false advertising.
|
08-29-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
123
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xxenon:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Joined the site using the in-house billing system. Never got my password by email, and credit card has been billed !
Contacted the customer support 3 times, never got any reply. Scam !
|
10-18-11 10:24am
|
Reply
124
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from whynot2:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the response...I guess my biggest fear, aside from out and out fraud, is not being able to find the link(s) that allow you to cancel online, I suppose because I had that happen to me once, albeit quite a few years ago. It's self-evident on this site? Do you do it from the service site, or from the vcsbill site?
|
08-09-11 09:25am
|
Reply
125
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the counseling session, but I'm afraid that you've forgotten that not everyone sees things as you do. And though it pissed me off, the more important thing is that those who do care about pixel dimensions -- and some do, believe it or not -- will know if they read the comment.
And I'm a bit tired of your pointless crusade in which you are effectively telling other people that they are wrong for having priorities different from yours. Go find something else to do. Or as you might say, worth doing.
|
03-13-10 04:50pm
|
