| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
A Measure of Curiosity
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from tangub:
Is the site even still going? When i click on the link here it goes to something called Strip Game Central.
|
01-02-12 10:23pm
|
Reply
252
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Advent:
(Capn's Reply)
Premium provides a more in depth potrayal of a model than the Galleria.
The model bio is more detailed, the sets are on average of higher quality and the range of sets is larger, from artistic to the hardcore niches. The hardcore video in Premium is organized around skits, as we do for Petites.
I hope that helps.
|
01-02-12 01:36pm
|
Reply
253
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Advent:
(Capn's Reply)
I will try to explain this as best as possible. We do not put Exotics on Archives because our members like to keep them separate. They do not like to see the Exotics models on the others sites that is why we keep them archived to the Exotics site. We get complaints when we have exotic models on hairy and so forth.
As far as Premium the is not as large as the others so we like to keep the material for Premium only on Premium.
We have decided not to do a mature site right now but all of our mature models (those over 30) all go on Hairy. That is why you see gallery trades with All Over 30 on there.
|
01-02-12 01:20pm
|
Reply
254
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Advent:
(Capn's Reply)
Capn' is right as usual. The content has to be at least 4 years old before it is moved to Archives.
However, not all content goes to Archives. If the model is labeled as exotic no matter which site she is on or how old the material is it will be moved to the Exotics site. We do not move Exotic girls to the Archives site.
We also do not move content from Premium to Archives. And of course Petites is too new to have anything moved over.
I hope this helps.
|
01-02-12 12:28pm
|
Reply
255
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Advent:
(Capn's Reply)
The cam shows can be accessed by anyone that has a membership to any of the sites no matter which site the model is from.
The Premium site is for those that like more glam in their photo shoots. The girls have on more make up and they do a scripted skit as well.
|
01-02-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
256
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks, Cap'n. Oddly enough, I really wasn't gone - been watching PU pretty much daily.
As far as WAH goes, I think the problem lies with some of the photographers. You can tell by some of the comments left which ones gather the most complaints.
|
01-02-12 01:24am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Khan:
(Capn's Reply)
Capn, remember, there is a difference between saying:
This is a total waste (for everyone)
and
I feel this is a waste of time/bandwidth/whatever for me ... which is what this phrasing is meaning.
But again, your objection is noted.
|
12-31-11 09:04am
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Khan:
(Capn's Reply)
Your objection is so noted.
I will, however, bring to your attention ...
The phrasing of the question, including the words "you feel", leaves that option as the users' personal feeling.
BTW, though you may not recall it, this is (intentionally) a word-for-word copy of a poll we initially ran 19-April-2007. So you see, this is not the first time that this wording has been used. If you do a search of past polls for the term "waste" then you'll find this type of phrasing has been used for any number of questions.
|
12-31-11 06:28am
|
Reply
259
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from otoh:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks for the reply, Cap'n. I agree about the thumbnails; it's not at all easy to find anything that leaps out from the sea of them while browsing.
After discussing the site with a friend, one other point occurred to me about the 'Met Art' look - that, by somehow desexualising the models, it somehow objectifies them even more; which bothers me slightly, since like I hope most folk here do, I have a huge respect for all the girls we ogle over. Would you agree, or am I just overanalysing? :|
|
12-30-11 07:15am
|
Reply
260
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from anyonebutme:
(Capn's Reply)
I don't know the details of the cam shows.
The forum I believe is open to anyone with any ATK subscription.
The actual content is just glammed up. In Premium she may start with an evening dress, where in Galleria she is starting with a t-shirt and jean shorts.
|
12-29-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
261
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Not sure what you mean by "quite a fe periphery bells, whistles & add-ons."
It's exactly like ATK Galleria, made for a glamour look, instead of the amateur look.
|
12-29-11 11:42am
|
Reply
262
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Capn's Reply)
It helped a lot.
Thanks, Cap'n!!!
|
12-29-11 06:30am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(Capn's Reply)
Agree completely. In fact if I know the site is dormant, that can be a good thing because I know that I can drain the good stuff then close out on my own timetable.
|
12-22-11 09:15am
|
Reply
264
|
Blue Angel Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Porndog:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks for your comment
|
12-21-11 12:27pm
|
Reply
265
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from messmer:
I hope the webmaster is still looking in because I just took the tour and am wondering how many of the models sport "enhanced" breasts? Except for those perfectly round, big orbs everything else looks really good. The site meets my criterion for nudity as well.
|
12-21-11 11:04am
|
Reply
266
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Secretease com:
Thanks for the review Cap'n. Secretease started as a tease site but I decided to raise the levels to make it different soon after going live.
"To keep the sexy, kinky secretary fantasy real the girls are never
completely out of their outfits. Panties and bras come down, shirts are opened and skirts raised - but the Secretease sexy fantasy dress code is stuck to..."
Yes it's a favourite niche but I'm also open to suggestions for content. I've had requests for heels to be removed by stocking and sock fans - this has been be incorporated into some shoots and will be for future ones aswell.
I'm always willing to listen to constructive comments or suggestions - quick replies aren't always possible due to time restrictions of course.
Btw - non-regional billing still applies.
A happy sexmas to all.
|
12-21-11 09:50am
|
Reply
267
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from otoh:
This looks appealing, and from the preview, it seems to cover my definition of nudity (ie all the relevant, er, bits on display) - even if not yours (not a stitch on) :)
Just thought it worth noting since you compared it to the Only sites, which AFAIK don't show much of anything - I see that as far more of a divide.
|
12-21-11 07:08am
|
Reply
268
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from tangub:
(Capn's Reply)
I look forward to your review Cap'n especially knowing if they've zipped all their photo sets now which the webmaster said they would look into in reply to slutty's previous comment about zips :-)
|
12-20-11 11:13pm
|
Reply
269
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from elephant:
I'd be more persuaded for $19.99 but any price decrease is good and like it that the sites navigation has had a new design.
|
12-20-11 04:57am
|
Reply
270
|
Zellys
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from rearadmiral:
100% agree that a decent tour is essential. I wouldn't buy a car from a catalogue and I'd be reluctant to open my wallet on the basis of a brief tour that dumps me into the 'join' page. The way I see it, if you're a webmaster and you're proud of your site then you'd want to show it off.
|
12-19-11 02:29pm
|
Reply
271
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from picdude:
(Capn's Reply)
Reexamining my score after checking out some other solo star websites It feels a little harsh however the technical issues (ie poor video quality and camera persons skills) and download limit still keeps it down.
I would give it an extra 10 points if they only increased the video quality, in this day and age there's no excuse.
The scenario's are all good but you just can't enjoy it as much as you should.
She's now added a free weekly member cam show.
|
12-19-11 11:04am
|
Reply
272
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(Capn's Reply)
for the record, it should be noted that we've found User acct fredv to be associated with the site Petites Parisiennes
|
12-19-11 08:18am
|
Reply
273
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Capn's Reply)
It isn't. There are sites that are far better in all important respects and cost less money to join. It really is skippable, IMHO.
|
12-18-11 05:36pm
|
Reply
274
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from fredv:
(Capn's Reply)
I saw your message on the forum, complaining about the lack of striptease websites. You should maybe consider joining here, their lingeries are almost always top quality ones, not the cheesy cheap one you buy in sex shop, but from famous french and international brands : Chantal Thomass, La Perla, Agent Provocateur, Mise en Cage, Bordelle, Made by Nikki... as a lingerie freak I must admit it really is a plus comparing to other websites, where sometimes girls are fully nude from A to Z (quite boring for me).
lots of nylons and garter belts too...
|
12-18-11 05:20pm
|
Reply
275
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Drooler:
I've been a member twice, once in 2005, and again in 2010. The first time was awful; the second was less than satisfying. Some of the photo content just didn't meet my preferences, and often the galleries were too brief. Add to that the navigation, which was complicated!
At least that was my experience of it. I don't plan to rejoin ... ever.
Oh, to answer your question. Some was clothed to full nude, and some was just clothed mostly.
Good luck.
|
12-18-11 03:27pm
|
