| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from cjd2004:
Looks like they are going down the FEMJOY/joymii route and doing it on a new site (sexart.com).
|
02-13-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
227
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Well, I know that they have me confused, Cap'n! To me it looks as if (with your bonus points) they store it on their site and you can look at it in perpetuity without charge, But when it comes to downloading it to your HD, forget it. I might be wrong though and misunderstand something about this bonus system,
|
02-05-12 08:11pm
|
Reply
228
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
So far, I have no complaints. Questions are answered almost immediately on the forum at the site.
Regarding the focus issue with some image sets, after having looked around more, I found the issue does appear more often in older sets. Newer sets only have this issue sporadically. When these issues do appear, however, they are only usually a major distraction when viewing the image at full resolution. I think it is definitley a gear-related issue and not technique. Sometimes, the focus will be on the wall behind the model or its locking onto the models jewelry or some high contrast object in the scene. This is almost always due to the camera body being a limited point autofocus DSLR or a subpar lense with a squirelly focus drive, or the point bias not set correctly. The lenses also seem to not always be the sharpest. Something like a Canon L series lens will fix that up in a hurry. They are expensive but produce superb results. I have a 300 2.8 L series lens I use for wildlife and the lens is so sharp that you can pick out a fly on the back of a moose at 50 yards. They are that good.
|
02-05-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
229
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes. I do like it. It is definately an excellant site. If there was more diversity in ethnic and model variety, I would categorize it as a truly exceptional site that would score a 100 in my eyes. I think that's the only thing it is lacking.
Obviously, this all depends on whether or not the content is for you. If someone isn't into this niche, they may rate it a 50.
I think the biggest problem is finding models. With the shift away from any hair in the 80's, not too many models are going to be willing to get into this niche and let things 'grow.'
Unfortunately, sometime in the 80's, the US Porn Industry decided it would define for everyone what represents attractive on the female body. At first, my thought as to why the shave craze took hold was that people suddenly decided that any hair on a female was just too masucline. However,this doesn't explain why even the guys in porn started shaving too--their crotch, their legs, even their pits. Somehow, for some reason, hair became contraband in the North American porn industry. After about 1990, Those of us who feel public hair(or, god forbid, an unshaved armpit) on a female can be erotic, were pushed out onto a fringe into the 'odd fetish niche ' category. Look at some porn review sites and see how something like Hairy Bush would be filed in the bizarre fetish category.
|
02-05-12 01:38pm
|
Reply
230
|
Steve Bones
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
That site is pretty different, too, Cap'n.
I wonder how they deal with the 'money shot' on the skeleton. Maybe they shoot dried-up mayonaise flakes out of the dildo onto the models face.
|
02-01-12 11:36am
|
Reply
231
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
A lot of directors today skip any striptease and proceed directly to go. One moment, the model is wearing clothes and heels. The next instant you see her, she is butt naked and the guy is already laying pipe. :( That's why I prefer old-school and don't like a lot of today's high-volume churn-it and burn-it erotica. Impatient boys miss dessert.
|
01-29-12 02:14pm
|
Reply
232
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
For me, it depends on the model and atmosphere of the scene. In general, however, I usually find it most erotic when some element of clothing remains present--especially a skirt. One thing that's a pet peeve of mine is when the model has a sexy par of stilettos or heels on and not only strips off all the clothes at once, but then removes the heels. :(
|
01-29-12 02:02pm
|
Reply
233
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
Yeah, I understand that it could be frustrating for a lot of people. I like the tease elements, however. I also like it when models have some clothing that complimenets the anatomy and it stays on. I like skirts hiked up and tops folded down to the waist, etc..--those types of things do it for me. Also, for me, nothing like seeing nipples sticking through lace bras or drooping out of a corset :)
|
01-29-12 01:54pm
|
Reply
234
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
Hi. Yes. If consistent full nudty is a requirement, this site won't be for you. I would put thise site more in a softcore tease category. There are some full nudes but they are not common and when they exist, they are very conservative. For example, you won't find any images of legs spread eagle or close-in shots of genitals, etc. When it is shown, it's more like full nudity with a flash of bush. This site is R rated and would be something that would pass the censors on HBO.The most hardcore image I saw was a model holding a dildo off to the side. No blowbangs and ATM here.
|
01-29-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
235
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
For porn, and for many other things, that's an apt description...
|
01-28-12 02:54pm
|
Reply
236
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jutti24:
(Capn's Reply)
Afaik it's more softcore without seeing genitals or "pink" spread shots...
Nice posing though of the girls...
|
01-27-12 11:54am
|
Reply
237
|
Busty Madison Blush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jutti24:
(Capn's Reply)
I agree, I'm a big fan but for the amount of content the price is too high...
|
01-27-12 11:53am
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from slutty:
(Capn's Reply)
I figured you'd say 'other', as I don't know that the beer is necessarily all in Europe ;) I've got plenty here...
|
01-19-12 10:26pm
|
Reply
239
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from BubbaGump:
It looks like something I would enjoy viewing. I have bookmarked it for future reference.
How would you rate the overall quality of photos? Are the images clear and crisp or somewhat lacking? I looked at a few of the sample images and they looked a little bit like scans of 35mm film. Or perhaps that is simply due to the lower quality of the samples and them not giving away the best.
Thanks
|
01-18-12 06:15pm
|
Reply
240
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from BubbaGump:
Nice review.
What is the percentage of different model figures? Is it mostly models on the thin side and a few voluptuous women or distributed all around?
|
01-18-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
241
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from tangub:
Great review Cap'n. Is that a full access trial without any download restrictions? I'm not implying that i'd want to download the whole site for the $7 trial as like you i have absolutely no interest in the vids so think the 7 day trial might be a good deal just to grab the photosets that interest me.
|
01-18-12 10:13am
|
Reply
242
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(Capn's Reply)
Lol I wish you luck on your crusade, it's a shame when you have a perfect vision of a great niche you'd love and there is hardly anything catering for your needs. I love girls in skirts with no panties on and flashing but can't seem to find many vids, most movies the skirt is removed before the panties.
|
01-13-12 04:10am
|
Reply
243
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Capn's Reply)
If there's a PU listing page then there's a TBP listing page. Just click the words "TBP Review" where you normally see the TBP review score. That'll take you to the TBP listing page.
Hope that helps.
|
01-11-12 02:43pm
|
Reply
244
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Khan:
You might consider using the "Submit Nomination" for a site review. Just look for the "Nominate" block to the right and about half-way down the page (just above the green, PU "User Feedback section) of the TBP listing page.
|
01-11-12 02:14pm
|
Reply
245
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
I was surprised that I like Met Art as much as I did. I probably should join Bound Gangbangs or something in case I start going into hardcore withdrawl. The strange thing is that I'm only moving mildly to hardcore after that with a membership at Nubiles. I haven't been a member for years and I'm looking forward to seeing what's new.
As for animals, I find their use in erotic photography to be distracting and even disturbing. That might say more about me than it does the photographer...
|
01-10-12 04:22pm
|
Reply
246
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(Capn's Reply)
Posing with is ok.
Posing in, on top, or
with massage oil, would be a whole other site :-)
|
01-10-12 10:15am
|
Reply
247
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BradlyH:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks Capn !
The site needs work that's for sure. The only reason i gave this a 60 and not lower is because i found i downloaded a lot of the sets, not all is lost with this site only because of the models. Other then that I'm just glad it was under 20 dollars !
|
01-08-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
248
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from BradlyH:
Good review Capn, i can defiantly relate my experience at Morey with yours, especially the Navigation and shortage of pictures in a set subject.
|
01-08-12 03:32pm
|
Reply
249
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from otoh:
I've chanced upon this site before and am tempted... I like smut with a bit of an angle to it, so both this and Cosplay Erotica are on my list.
And although I can't find a model list there, I think Bare Maidens features Mosh, who is absolutely my favourite model. Definitely one to consider!
|
01-08-12 01:49am
|
Reply
250
|
Ten.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Capn's Reply)
That was explained in the announcement made when we launched (after public beta testing) You can see it at:
https://www.pornusers.com/announcements.html#255
|
01-07-12 06:52am
|
