| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Peter Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Capn - I'm a member now (and writing a review of this site or the sister hardcore site POVPorn.com). There are still no zips available for the photos.
|
12-18-10 06:39am
|
Reply
477
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from abbywinters:
(Capn's Reply)
capn, in the past, we have had shoots that have had poor lighting and dark shadows, but these are non-existant on the bulk of our shoots, and all our new shoots. I'd encourage you to give us another go, if you like our content.
If you have concerns about technical image quality (as opposed to lighting of a shoot), we'd like to hear more detail, as I responded to the original poster.
|
12-14-10 12:45pm
|
Reply
478
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes!!! Striptease does it for me too.
Attention webmasters - more striptease please!
|
12-09-10 07:06pm
|
Reply
479
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Thedebilman666:
(Capn's Reply)
Thank you, and yes, I've been hiding in the shadows for quite some time.
|
12-09-10 01:35pm
|
Reply
480
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from PnP Media:
(Capn's Reply)
Correct. Full nudity is whatever level the producer wants it to be, there are from tease to torrid out there in that genré...
Vintageflash is for those that want to see women getting off after a nice strip and teasing British dialog, but with some vintage underwear and always the real deal nylons still on. Thats our fetish.
Our site premise is not for you wanting, 'completly naked' women at the end...sorry!
Ditto our pantyhose fetish site and ditto our uniform fetish site.
P.
|
12-08-10 11:00am
|
Reply
481
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(Capn's Reply)
Boy, you sound like me. I grew tired of the sameness. But worse was when the babe was a real turn on but the photographer was not into any eroticism.
The change to a bit more erotic stuff makes me interested in trying again.
|
12-05-10 11:56pm
|
Reply
482
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
And you would be right, Cap'n. At least that's the case with the videos I've looked at so far. There was one that started fully clothed but did not end up in complete nudity. There was another that featured the model in her lingerie already but she, as well, did not take off everything. A couple more videos wait for a detailed inspection on my part.
Mind you, I might come across some sets/videos that would be more to your liking as I go along in my subscription but with the emphasis of this site being on vintage lingerie, I really doubt it.
|
12-05-10 02:43pm
|
Reply
483
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Capn's Reply)
Yeah. Monday. I know how that goes. Won't be the first time I've kicked myself for joining on a weekend.
But wait ... Doesn't it make sense that people would join on weekends? Hey, maybe those folks at ATK ought to know that! Yeah!
|
12-05-10 01:56am
|
Reply
484
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Capn's Reply)
Interesting point.
I was a member about 12 months ago and have been thinking of rejoining just because the TBP price is very attractive. I hesitated only because I gravitate more to video than pix.
As for what galleries to check out, it's interesting that your issue seems to arise more from the HUGE volume of content than on anything else. My only issue is that there's so much content and their naming convention is so clumsy it's really hard to sort through the downloaded stuff.
This discussion has me thinking that it's about time that I plunk down $20.00 and give it another go.
|
12-04-10 10:01pm
|
Reply
485
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Lovechina:
(Capn's Reply)
really?
It is Models the same as the metart?
|
12-03-10 04:16am
|
Reply
486
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
Agreed. And sometimes (maybe a lot of the time) the tease is the best part.
|
12-02-10 02:28pm
|
Reply
487
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from tangub:
Well looking at the company info on TBP site facts would seem to suggest the two are not related. I have a feeling this is just some copycat sight trying to cash in on the MET reputation. If i was the owner of Met Art I think i would be calling my lawyer.
|
12-02-10 12:36am
|
Reply
488
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from slutty:
(Capn's Reply)
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, tease to me doesn't mean striptease, it means tease.
I understand that you want the site to be a striptease site, but it is a tease site, and tease does not have to have a payoff.
|
11-27-10 09:20am
|
Reply
489
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from slutty:
(Capn's Reply)
But Cap'n, tease implies lack of nudity... The name of the site isn't onlysexyoutfitstofullynude.com, eh? I understand that this is what you want, but that's just not what this site is.
While I understand your complaint, it seems similar to complaining that playboy.com doesn't have hardcore material (I assume it doesn't).
|
11-27-10 12:59am
|
Reply
490
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from malikstarks:
(Capn's Reply)
I think the name of the site "Only Tease" is meant to be a hint.
I know I'm stating the obvious, but if so, I'm not quite sure what it is your hoping for.
Maybe you should try the other site "Only Opaques". Not sure but maybe that one has full nudity.
|
11-26-10 02:39am
|
Reply
491
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Denner:
Alas.....they can call it 'tease' as long as they want - but this user, too REALLY miss that full nudity - 'tease' - or not.
Maybe - just maybe - this site has outlived itself - okay, you still got stockings, heels, very good looking models mostly ect. - but it's boring - to say the least - they keep on in the same track...
A pity - because it's not because those models do not want to do full nudity - a lot of the same models are in Babespotting.tv - which have that nudity.....
Try to renew yourselves at Only Tease....
|
11-24-10 05:53am
|
Reply
492
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Keep whingeing Cap'n! I like it. :-)
|
11-23-10 07:27pm
|
Reply
493
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Then don't resubscribe to the site.
No site is able to conform to all people's individual tastes 100% of the time.
|
11-23-10 03:36pm
|
Reply
494
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gregdd:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes I do, but to see it you need to browse through the sets in the archive. The archive organizes everything by the date added in reverse chronological order, so you can see the freshest content first. If your just browsing through the models by name, everything is mixed and you'll see the old mixed with the new.
I have plenty of time and don't mind loading galleries to get a better idea of the contents, especially with the new additions. You may be different. I never thought you could get a clear picture of the gallery contents from looking at those cover shots anyway. I've certainly never felt like clicking on a gallery was a waste of time, even if the model or set didn't push my buttons. The site's fast so I can get through everything quickly.
My only real complaint is that there's not enough ass shots in some sets, but that's on the photographers. I'm a "legs and ass" lover. Hope I was of some assistance.
|
11-23-10 02:49pm
|
Reply
495
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from messmer:
For me the site was a grievous disappointment, not because it lacked full nudity but because the lingerie was generally so ho hum. I didn't even take advantage of their offer that lets one download 10 upcoming sets because I couldn't find a single one that featured anything of interest to me.
I freely confess, my taste is too specialized and outdated while this site caters to youth (under forty) with their pantyhose and stay ups and thongs etc.
From the whole month's subscription I saved about 8 videos (that I haven't even looked at yet) because they come reasonably close to my taste ... but sadly not close enough, and that's about it!
|
11-23-10 01:53pm
|
Reply
496
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from slutty:
Well Cap'n, seems like they keep suckering you back in... I have to admit there is one site that I always find very irritating, but still join like once a year. Don't know why I do it.
Personally I think tease can be pretty hot, even without a full-nude "payoff", provided it is well shot.
|
11-23-10 01:37pm
|
Reply
497
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Ah, thanks! I thought you were talking about changes regarding lingerie! Less rather than more, I mean. Phew!
As to the models themselves I don't see anything wrong in meeting one in this site whom I saw in ATK Hairy before, as long as her set is more erotic than the stuff ATK have been putting out over the past month.
|
11-23-10 01:32pm
|
Reply
498
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Maybe that's part of the tease (when they post a set as nude and it isn't).
More to the point: tease is strongly related to frustration or denial. You want something (nudity, a slow striptease, eroticism, sexuality) and it's slowly revealed or unleashed. Too much too soon and you lose the oomph, the longing, the desire, the slow, languishing buildup.
Tease can be a delight. But I also like to see the whole package (the nudity, or the sex, or whatever the payoff is).
|
11-23-10 01:31pm
|
Reply
499
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
How do you think things are improving, Cap'n? Less lingerie and more nudity? That would be a real shame in my eyes. I'm this close to subscribing again and really would like to know what you mean by your comment. Thanks!
|
11-23-10 12:16pm
|
Reply
500
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from hardog:
(Capn's Reply)
Sorry for crying wolf!
________________________
Just received this...
XZXZ,
"It sounds like a possible case of a false positive. If you would like to send us the zip file in question, we would be happy to scan it and confirm a false positive. You can send the zip file to us at..."
________________________
My apology to Karups! Sorry for impugning your reputation! The zip file in question caused a "false positive" for some reason.
Karups is and has been a safe and reliable source for adult content. Thank you for your understanding in working to clear this up!
|
11-11-10 04:26pm
|
