| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Lys Xtreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from balz:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
No, the site is not "marketed" as a live site as such.
When I first joined the site, I did not even know that Lys did live shows...
I only discovered that when I sent her an email and got back an immediate response !
This is what I am trying to tell you about this site.
The people who make the effort to get to know Lys
will find that this site is unique !
I can't make it happen for you. All I can do is tell you what you don't know.
I'm live with her right now so I will leave this discussion !
|
04-26-11 01:07pm
|
Reply
152
|
Lys Xtreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from balz:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
How can your opinion be "fair" ?
when you have not completed your work ?
If you want me to take you seriously
you should take the time to be "thorough" !
I've given you additional information
upon which to make an "informed" judgement
but you are so arrogant that you cannot accept it.
What more can I say ?
You have already admitted that you have not
gone beyond the superficial, so stop trying to defend
what you know NOTHING about !
I'm not here to advertise the site ...
**If you make the effort, you will be rewarded!**
I only came here to add "balance" to a review from
someone who has not a clue about what this site is all about !
|
04-26-11 12:25pm
|
Reply
153
|
Lys Xtreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from balz:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Yes, I read your review quite carefully , thank you !
Did you really read mine ?
From a technical perspective your review is harsh and reflects your opinions based on a cursory review of the site.
But your review is hardly "fair" !
You do LYS an injustice by not being thorough in evaluating her site's value for ALL prospective members ...
Maybe for you the Live Shows are irrelevant ... and that is YOUR bias !
What you are trying to do is compare Lys' site to all others... and it doesn't work that way with Lys.
Lys' site is unique in ways you cannot even imagine, my friend !
Lys is a special human being ! It does not take long to discover this if you interact with her live.
And once you get to "know" Lys, her content will have greater appeal.
Certainly, there can be site improvements and her members would all love to see her photo gallery updated and to add a forum.
Lys' webmaster has some work to do but the site is still young and evolving.
That will come in time.
Your review missed the very reason why someone would want to join Lys' site ... but only by about a mile !
My comments are intended to give prospective members a glimpse into the "possible" ... and to give your review much needed balance.
It all depends on what you are looking for ...
I found what I was looking for ... Lys !
...and like I said in my comments to your review, the minor site issues don't matter as much.
|
04-26-11 07:30am
|
Reply
154
|
Lys Xtreme
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
from balz:
BadMrFrosty,
you missed LYS !!
yeah! you really did !
refer to my comments !
balz
a member for 6+ months ...
and looking for lifetime membership !
|
04-25-11 10:01pm
|
Reply
155
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
OK, thanks letting me in on this. I was wondering if there was something like that going on. At least it's not "same as it ever was."
|
04-19-11 03:41pm
|
Reply
156
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from endlessporn:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
I've checked my archive of the girls (founf it not as complete as I would like it to be), and indeed I didn't find new girls in my archive, so it looks that you're right and they are not rotating content, but are updating the site. Thanks for pointing it out, I will update my review accordingly and will probably try this site again some day (or maybe I should try AssTeenMouth instead, did you try it yourself?)
|
04-19-11 10:00am
|
Reply
157
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from endlessporn:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
I am glad that you like my review, thanks :).
About updates - I do not have good memory for faces, but I will check what they have now against my several-months old archive, and if there are no matches, I will change review accordingly (and probably will try the site again some time later). Thanks for heads-up BTW, I've had a strong feeling they're just rotating stuff, like too many other sites :(.
|
04-19-11 05:40am
|
Reply
158
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from endlessporn:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
On the point of 960x540 - yes, you're right, it is my mistake (looked at properties of the wrong file), I will correct it. As it is described on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video, Wikipedia defines HD as 1280x720 or better, so 960x540 is still SD, but it is certainly better than 640x480.
On the point of updates, I strongly suspect they're merely rotating content, and trust statement from https://www.thebestporn.com/review/tryteens/ , where TBP says "No updates in at least a couple of months".
|
04-19-11 02:12am
|
Reply
159
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from Drooler:
I have a related question, as it has to do with that network: Am I just imagining things or are they recycling scenes at Massage Creep? I'm really not sure!
|
04-18-11 04:26pm
|
Reply
160
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
My max download speed is 620-630 KB/s, which is far slower than what you have.
So for me, I regularly hit my max download speeds when downloading files from most of the Teen Mega World sites.
But since you have a much faster connection, my results don't have a lot of meaning for you.
But I am able to use DownThemAll, which is a download manager, at these sites.
|
04-12-11 06:20am
|
Reply
161
|
Fuck My Jeans
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from Denner:
Nice, qualified and helpful update/info about FMJ - thanks, BadMrFrosty.
As a vids man I've followed this site closely/from time to time - and I've got a major opinion from my point of view:
Generally the scenes are sexy and teasing - AND at a certain time/period the final scenes were without the jeans - naked - which is more erotic than watching scenes with jeans just down the knees. (again in my own opinion)
A site like this - fetish kind - is great - but when things (the fuck scenes) get too awkward - man, just skip those jeans in the Finals - the tease and a fine ass in jeans in the start is what matters.
|
04-07-11 07:18am
|
Reply
162
|
Fuck My Jeans
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from lk2fireone:
If you run out of attractive Caucasian women, you might look at Oriental, especially Japanese or Chinese. Those are some of the most gorgeous women in the world. But the Oriental porn style is often different and takes a little getting used to. I don't like the mosaic, and I don't like the funny noises the Oriental girls make when having sex: they sound like they are being abused, even if they are supposedly enjoying the experience. Or maybe I don't really understand the mind-set, and the idea is that they are being abused, and that they don't enjoy the sex. You don't see much smiling from the girls during sex, or even from the stunt cocks. Maybe Oriental sex (especially porn) is a serious business that requires too much concentration to smile or laugh?
What I really enjoy are the photosets, where the girls can smile and look lovely.
|
04-07-11 06:32am
|
Reply
163
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elonlybuster:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
It helped quite a bit. Thanks for the quick reply :-D
|
04-07-11 04:48am
|
Reply
164
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
from lk2fireone:
I will agree with Maines Own that it's a good review, even if my opinions are not as firm or bold as his. Might be the bracing Maine weather that creates such strong-minded individuals.
|
04-05-11 06:17am
|
Reply
165
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
from Maines Own:
I do have a firm opinion about this. A paysite that only holds 12 individual scenes, as good as those scenes might be, does not qualify as a paysite.
If it's only bearable as part of a group of sites or network, as nice as that might be, it can't count when doing a review, at least not as long as the individual site is reviewed and not the network as a whole.
So, if you ask me, they were lucky they got away with a 68.
For your review, all the relevant parts (and especially the cons) were covered so nobody can ever feel ripped off when joining *after* reading the review. And that, I think, is the main goal a review should have.
Well done.
|
04-05-11 12:42am
|
Reply
166
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
from lk2fireone:
A very twisty review. Maybe yes, maybe no, maybe yes, maybe no, maybe maybe... My brain feels like a pretzel after reading your review, even if the site contents don't appeal to me in the slightest. Lol.
|
04-03-11 12:43pm
|
Reply
167
|
Subverted Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
from Maines Own:
Nice and straightforward review, I liked it a lot.
I also understand that the use of the rating numbers are rather difficult and I do not necessarily consider a 65 to be a "no way" when I see it.
Honestly, I believe a 4 or 5-star rating system would do the job just as good or even better, at least as long as the overall score is not calculated out of individual section-scores for all reviewers.
|
03-27-11 03:51am
|
Reply
168
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Thanks for this info/update....well, it's local then and NOT the site..
|
03-22-11 08:02am
|
Reply
169
|
Double Teamed Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Jay G:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Thanks for the info!
|
03-21-11 07:43am
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from otoh:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
I'm with BadMrFrosty, agree there's a distinction! :D
I like and enjoy regular (whatever that means) porn, but I'm not sure I'd consider myself a collector of it. But where it falls in my area of interest - pinups, erotica, nylon/latex fetish - then I do keep (and revisit) any good material I find.
|
03-12-11 05:38am
|
Reply
171
|
Subverted Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
from graymane:
Well written review, BF. Held my interest throughout.
The one thing that particularly stands out is your emphasis on "basics" ... as well as the rare non-renewal provision.
Lets hope some of that rubs off on the major sites.
|
03-10-11 09:01pm
|
Reply
172
|
Subverted Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice, basic review. I like the specific reasons you give for building the score. My only quibble would be the total score: since you think the site is probably worth a one-time membership, my guess would be a score of 70 would be more appropriate. Even though PU guidelines state that 60-69 is "low recommendation", and 70-79 is "might recommend", I believe that since 50 is the lowest score a site can be rated, most people would think that a score less than 70 means a site to be avoided.
That's my feeling/belief.
So many people, seeing your site score of 65, would think/conclude the site was a waste of money, and might not even bother to read your review.
Whereas you personally felt that the site was worth a one-time membership, and did not feel cheated.
And I definitely feel your review is worth reading, because it gives a very clear explanation/feeling of the site.
|
03-10-11 11:08am
|
Reply
173
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from lk2fireone:
"When done right, a little intro to the action can be entertaining."
Gosh, are you implying that porn could be appreciated rather than just gobbled? :)
|
03-07-11 02:55pm
|
Reply
174
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Ergo Proxy:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Yeah, I was pondering to give something below 80% since the shortcomings were beginning to mount up a bit. I don't have more justifications than those from my bottomline though. Will consider to go down to 75% or something like that.
|
02-28-11 09:43am
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from otoh:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Well, I have, on a number of PCs, downloaded and burned a Ubuntu/UNR ISO, started from the CD, said yes to everything in the GUI install, and ended up with a good, working computer for browsing and other typical tasks - with no tweaking or configuring. I guess I've just been lucky!
However, I'm not willing to bet any organs, let alone the reproductive ones... so by that measure, you win :)
|
02-25-11 06:36am
|
