| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Comment
from Karup:
Same comment I replied to your review of Karups.com...
Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. That said, as long as you begin a download within that 10 minute window of you accessing a page, you should have no problems completing the download. The 10 minute page expiration does not apply to a file that is already in the process of being downloaded.
If you're using a download manager, perhaps even a multi-part download manager and that download manager tries to launch a download for a new part after 10 minutes, etc... that would of course cause a problem. Or if your download breaks and you click again after 10 minutes to resume it, that will obviously cause an issue because the link will have expired.
If you are having problems I would suggest that you reach out to our support address and they will be able to help determine why you're experiencing problems - support@eentsupport.com .
We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc...
|
12-06-17 11:49pm
|
Reply
27
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Comment
from Karup:
Same comment I replied to your review of Karups.com...
Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. That said, as long as you begin a download within that 10 minute window of you accessing a page, you should have no problems completing the download. The 10 minute page expiration does not apply to a file that is already in the process of being downloaded.
If you're using a download manager, perhaps even a multi-part download manager and that download manager tries to launch a download for a new part after 10 minutes, etc... that would of course cause a problem. Or if your download breaks and you click again after 10 minutes to resume it, that will obviously cause an issue because the link will have expired.
If you are having problems I would suggest that you reach out to our support address and they will be able to help determine why you're experiencing problems - support@eentsupport.com .
We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc...
|
12-06-17 11:49pm
|
Reply
28
|
Karups
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Comment
from Karup:
Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. That said, as long as you begin a download within that 10 minute window of you accessing a page, you should have no problems completing the download. The 10 minute page expiration does not apply to a file that is already in the process of being downloaded.
If you're using a download manager, perhaps even a multi-part download manager and that download manager tries to launch a download for a new part after 10 minutes, etc... that would of course cause a problem. Or if your download breaks and you click again after 10 minutes to resume it, that will obviously cause an issue because the link will have expired.
If you are having problems I would suggest that you reach out to our support address and they will be able to help determine why you're experiencing problems - support@eentsupport.com .
We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc...
|
12-06-17 11:48pm
|
Reply
29
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(standard's Reply)
I suspected it was something like that. As far as I can tell every performer is either retired or in the case of Manuel. The site it actually brings you to has nothing to do with him.
|
11-19-17 05:49pm
|
Reply
30
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from pat362:
I don't have much to say about your review because the score says a lot but I do have one question that I hope you can answer.
Why did you join this site? I mean it took me about 5 minutes to find out that the site is dead and probably has been for a very long time for one simple reason. Bree left the porn industry at least seven years ago and has never been heard since then. I can't even be sure if she was ever involved with the site.
I'm glad you took a bullet for others because maybe some who were curious will save their money for something better.
|
11-19-17 09:43am
|
Reply
31
|
Charmane Star
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from tangub:
I remember having access to Charmane Star when I signed up at Sunny Leone a few months ago but I didn't save a single thing from Charmane's site so your review pretty much sums up what I thought of it too.
|
10-01-17 02:01pm
|
Reply
32
|
Abbey Brooks
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from rearadmiral:
I've been burned by similar sites. My guess is that Open Life tacks these 'solo' sites on so that can call themselves a network. I haven't been a member at Open Life in a while but I recall mostly liking it. (It's odd that I didn't review it though...)
|
09-11-17 02:28pm
|
Reply
33
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(standard's Reply)
I have no insider information obviously, but I read on another forum that they sold the Armory where they used to set all their scenes. That might be a sign of some financial trouble. Their overhead was probably unsupportable given the level of piracy.
I wish them well because they still are the best 'mainstream' BDSM sites on the internet.
|
08-30-17 01:11pm
|
Reply
34
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Amanda:
(standard's Reply)
Hello! That is definitely out of the ordinary. We've not heard of any download limits or restrictions for Kink. I'm going to reach out to them and see if perhaps it was a temporary technical issue.
|
08-30-17 05:40am
|
Reply
35
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from rearadmiral:
I'm not questioning your experience and I haven't been a member there since June of this year, but I've never had any issues downloading. The worst I've had there is that the download speeds are slower than I'm used to seeing but I was able to download and faced nothing like you report.
I hope what you experienced is just temporary. Can you add a comment and update us as your membership is coming to the end? I'd like to know how you make out.
|
08-29-17 02:15pm
|
Reply
36
|
Naughty Alysha
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from mbaya:
Nice as well as very complete review. I thought this and RoxyRaye were the best of the network. However, neither lives up top their potential.
|
07-25-17 05:13am
|
Reply
37
|
Girlsway
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from elephant:
Thanks so much for the review Standard, I've seen the site a while back when it was just launched but kind off forgot about it, I've recently discovered Mindi Mink so really wouldn't mind seeing more of her, she reminds me of Tanya Tate in her acting, they both seem to get turned on by dirty talk and I really love that. Yeah Sapphic Erotica early days were a joy, only today coincidentally I had a look at the site now a days and its just more like ddf type done up girls which really don't do anything for me, I much prefer normal everyday makeup and less glam with my lesbian porn, Some of the old Sapphics had some amazing girls that were shot really well but appeared much more real than some of the robot acting these days on sites. The only lesbian site I keep an eye on these days are fillyfilms and girlsoutwest, both have hit and misses like most sites but the gems are stand out movies in my collection. I also used to love Lezcutes and welivetogether (gone down hill I think of recent times)
I'll go and check out this site and might treat myself.
|
12-04-16 09:00am
|
Reply
38
|
Wankz.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Amanda:
I'll look into it for ya and post back here shorlty.
|
11-22-16 12:29pm
|
Reply
39
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from bibo:
(standard's Reply)
Basically, yes. One could also say that bang is the main site and has all the videosz content as a bonus. At least that's how I look at it. :)
|
11-17-16 10:33am
|
Reply
40
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from bibo:
(standard's Reply)
Let's not confuse things here...
Videosz is a DVD site. They are publishing DVD's from a bunch of companies and yes, tainster is one of them. You will also get material from DDF, lethal hardcore, combat zone, famedigital etc.etc. So the material you are going to find on Videosu is NOT exclusive! It is mainly a huge database of back catalogue DVD's. Perfect if you are a collector who is trying to hunt down the odd scene you've been missing from a certain model or company.
The material on bang.com, on the other hand, IS exclusive. Like I've said above, they are offering two niches, casting and audition. All the scenes under these tags are exclisive scenes. (They even write "BANG" on the girls forehead during the casting scenes to accentuate the exclusiveness ;)).
Since Videosz and Bang have merged, you are now able to find all the Videosz scenes on bang as well (amongst the original scenes). Actually it's pretty simple: if you go to bang.com, you will see preview thumbnails of the latest scenes. The exclusive scenes all have a small "bang" logo in the lower left corner. Alternatively, you will find a "Bang Originals" button on the left side of the screen, which leads directly to their exclusive content.
|
11-15-16 09:40am
|
Reply
41
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from LPee23:
" It's neat how distinctive DDF (and others) methods and styles are, and also neat how you might not have noticed it until you see them lumped together with other studios'."
Pretty cool to see early scenes by Denys Defrancesco on ATK, right?
Also, since pre-2005/2006 content can only be found on the archives, their other sites would be incomplete without it. Definitely glad they keep the archives going.
|
10-16-16 04:31pm
|
Reply
42
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from lk2fireone:
Quote:
"More of the ATK underarm fetish present. I've joined three of their sites now, and it's definitely not coincidence. It's not so bad to be offensive, but it's very noticeable if you're not into underarms."
Since most people have underarms, I am willing to look at women's underarms.
I think it's kind of funny how so many men complain about women's pubic hair and underarm hair.
I realize it's a fashion statement. But still. As long as it's not a hairy forest, I don't mind a bit of hair.
|
10-16-16 01:37pm
|
Reply
43
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Divinx:
If I'm interesed in a pornstar for which 21Sextury does not provide any content, but other "21" sites do, I prefer to have the pornstar listed, and the content indicated, even if under a lock.
But formerly, they just used a logo, instead of this ugly lock.
All in all, 21Sextury changed design, and made a mess of Favorites, for the worse. As almost every site has done. It's the curse of web designers :(
I find the "21"s very good sites to join. What may be questionable is rejoining.
|
09-06-16 07:21am
|
Reply
44
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from tangub:
I'm tempted to join to check out their photo sets as the price is so low but on trying to browse the tour pages every time I click on a model I'm getting "The website cannot display the page" HTTP 500 Internal Server Error....not exactly a good advertisement for the site. I'll hold on to my money for now and see if it gets fixed.
|
08-06-16 03:46am
|
Reply
45
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Amanda:
Hi standard! Thanks for the review! Dog Fart has contacted us saying that their daily download limit is actually 400 GB. :)
|
07-28-16 08:06am
|
Reply
46
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Ace DDF:
Thank you for the Great Feedback. You'll be pleased to know that we started releasing 4K videos and in the months ahead it will be standard. Additionally, we have started shooting in VR and plan to have 1 to 2 updates per Month for our Members. Cheers!
|
05-06-16 05:47am
|
Reply
47
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from pinkerton:
Yeah, George is in a lot of the content on this site but he does good cumshots and in one Mom XXX scene, he cums twice, once after about 10 minutes and again at the end.
|
04-08-16 10:07am
|
Reply
48
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from lk2fireone:
PU member 9900max commented in February 2016 that Dane Jones videos have playback problems (for streaming).
Did you notice any problems with streaming at the Dane Jones site?
Or playing the videos you downloaded from that site?
Nice review, by the way.
|
04-06-16 07:52pm
|
Reply
49
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(standard's Reply)
Yeah this is an awesome tip as I too hate these ones that make it a hassle if almost impossible to cancel, its just so wrong and does them more harm than good as many will never return again.
|
02-20-16 05:26am
|
Reply
50
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(standard's Reply)
Thanks for the tip.
Most of the sites I join use CCBILL or EPOCH, and I've never had any trouble cancelling with them.
A few sites have their own payment processors, and I'm a little leery joining them.
But if CCBILL or EPOCH is listed as a secondary processor for those other sites, I will definitely try your trick.
It's worth the extra trouble to get a processor that you can trust.
MBI-Probiller is not a scam processor, but they do make cancelling a subscription more difficult than CCBILL or EPOCH.
With MBI-Probiller, I opened about 4 chat boxes to talk to an agent to cancel.
2 of the chats put me on hold after a representative told me he was transferring me to an agent that could handle the cancel.
After 15 or 20 minutes, I closed those chat boxes.
On the third chat box, I waited over an hour before I closed that box, because no agent came on line.
On the fourth chat box, I got lucky. And was able to cancel my subscription. The agent tried to sell me a cheaper membership, but I kept saying no.
CCBILL and EPOCH are so much easier to use--and to cancel.
|
02-19-16 10:25pm
|
