| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Divinx:
If I'm interesed in a pornstar for which 21Sextury does not provide any content, but other "21" sites do, I prefer to have the pornstar listed, and the content indicated, even if under a lock.
But formerly, they just used a logo, instead of this ugly lock.
All in all, 21Sextury changed design, and made a mess of Favorites, for the worse. As almost every site has done. It's the curse of web designers :(
I find the "21"s very good sites to join. What may be questionable is rejoining.
|
09-06-16 07:21am
|
Reply
2
|
Abbey Brooks
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from rearadmiral:
I've been burned by similar sites. My guess is that Open Life tacks these 'solo' sites on so that can call themselves a network. I haven't been a member at Open Life in a while but I recall mostly liking it. (It's odd that I didn't review it though...)
|
09-11-17 02:28pm
|
Reply
3
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from LPee23:
" It's neat how distinctive DDF (and others) methods and styles are, and also neat how you might not have noticed it until you see them lumped together with other studios'."
Pretty cool to see early scenes by Denys Defrancesco on ATK, right?
Also, since pre-2005/2006 content can only be found on the archives, their other sites would be incomplete without it. Definitely glad they keep the archives going.
|
10-16-16 04:31pm
|
Reply
4
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from lk2fireone:
Quote:
"More of the ATK underarm fetish present. I've joined three of their sites now, and it's definitely not coincidence. It's not so bad to be offensive, but it's very noticeable if you're not into underarms."
Since most people have underarms, I am willing to look at women's underarms.
I think it's kind of funny how so many men complain about women's pubic hair and underarm hair.
I realize it's a fashion statement. But still. As long as it's not a hairy forest, I don't mind a bit of hair.
|
10-16-16 01:37pm
|
Reply
5
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Advent:
(standard's Reply)
Wow!!! She is gorgeous. I looked all through I system to see if I could find here because I wanted to see her as well. No luck. I see on the photo is says that is licensed content so my thought would be that once their contract ran out for the photos they removed them from the site.
It also seems the site you found it one is an older affiliate site. I'm sorry I could not be more help.
|
10-05-15 12:57pm
|
Reply
6
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Advent:
I would like to thank you for your review. It seems you really did go through the site with a fine tooth comb. No pun intended.....well may just a little. :) Most of the content you are seeing that focuses on hairy is content pulled from our hairy site. As a bonus, well you may not think it is, to our members we pull from our network of sites when a woman is over 30 she is pulled over to Aunt Judy's. It gives our members content that was not specifically shot for Aunt Judy's but because the model is over 30 we thought it would be nice for the members to enjoy her content as well.
We provide the bonus content in addition to the 21 updates of original exclusive content per week. The bonus content never takes the place of an exclusive update.
When we took over management of the site in 2012 there were some issues with pulling over all of the content. So sometimes you will see models with photos but no video or vice versa. Instead of removing the content all together we decided just to keep what we had.
Again, thank you for taking time to write a review of the site. We do use member comments to make the site better so I do appreciate it.
|
10-02-15 09:04am
|
Reply
7
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Wittyguy:
Great review on a site that probably won't see much of the light of day around here.
|
10-01-15 01:00pm
|
Reply
8
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(standard's Reply)
Yeah this is an awesome tip as I too hate these ones that make it a hassle if almost impossible to cancel, its just so wrong and does them more harm than good as many will never return again.
|
02-20-16 05:26am
|
Reply
9
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(standard's Reply)
Thanks for the tip.
Most of the sites I join use CCBILL or EPOCH, and I've never had any trouble cancelling with them.
A few sites have their own payment processors, and I'm a little leery joining them.
But if CCBILL or EPOCH is listed as a secondary processor for those other sites, I will definitely try your trick.
It's worth the extra trouble to get a processor that you can trust.
MBI-Probiller is not a scam processor, but they do make cancelling a subscription more difficult than CCBILL or EPOCH.
With MBI-Probiller, I opened about 4 chat boxes to talk to an agent to cancel.
2 of the chats put me on hold after a representative told me he was transferring me to an agent that could handle the cancel.
After 15 or 20 minutes, I closed those chat boxes.
On the third chat box, I waited over an hour before I closed that box, because no agent came on line.
On the fourth chat box, I got lucky. And was able to cancel my subscription. The agent tried to sell me a cheaper membership, but I kept saying no.
CCBILL and EPOCH are so much easier to use--and to cancel.
|
02-19-16 10:25pm
|
Reply
10
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Jade1:
Do you have access to everything as a regular member or are there additional tiers? I see some videos are labeled as "prime" for example.
|
03-29-18 12:45pm
|
Reply
11
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Kody:
Holy shit! These guys must have quite the work ethic with such a huge backlog. Thanks for the extensive review!
Judging from the screens on the home screen even the older/lower quality content looks pretty good. This will be a definite join!
|
03-28-18 03:31am
|
Reply
12
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(standard's Reply)
I suspected it was something like that. As far as I can tell every performer is either retired or in the case of Manuel. The site it actually brings you to has nothing to do with him.
|
11-19-17 05:49pm
|
Reply
13
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from pat362:
I don't have much to say about your review because the score says a lot but I do have one question that I hope you can answer.
Why did you join this site? I mean it took me about 5 minutes to find out that the site is dead and probably has been for a very long time for one simple reason. Bree left the porn industry at least seven years ago and has never been heard since then. I can't even be sure if she was ever involved with the site.
I'm glad you took a bullet for others because maybe some who were curious will save their money for something better.
|
11-19-17 09:43am
|
Reply
14
|
Charmane Star
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from tangub:
I remember having access to Charmane Star when I signed up at Sunny Leone a few months ago but I didn't save a single thing from Charmane's site so your review pretty much sums up what I thought of it too.
|
10-01-17 02:01pm
|
Reply
15
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from tangub:
I'm tempted to join to check out their photo sets as the price is so low but on trying to browse the tour pages every time I click on a model I'm getting "The website cannot display the page" HTTP 500 Internal Server Error....not exactly a good advertisement for the site. I'll hold on to my money for now and see if it gets fixed.
|
08-06-16 03:46am
|
Reply
16
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Ace DDF:
Thank you for the Great Feedback. You'll be pleased to know that we started releasing 4K videos and in the months ahead it will be standard. Additionally, we have started shooting in VR and plan to have 1 to 2 updates per Month for our Members. Cheers!
|
05-06-16 05:47am
|
Reply
17
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from Amanda:
Hi standard! Thanks for the review! Dog Fart has contacted us saying that their daily download limit is actually 400 GB. :)
|
07-28-16 08:06am
|
Reply
18
|
Dylan Ryder
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from marcdc1:
That really stinks. I really like Dylan it's a shame that no attention has been paid to such a beautiful woman.
|
03-14-18 05:50pm
|
Reply
19
|
Fake Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from host2626:
"- A few pros, but mostly girl (and some boy) next door types."
Don't get fooled by the settings. All the girls are pro actresses. Granted, some are more attractive or more famous than others, but all are pros. "Civilians" don't happen to wander onto a set and then within minutes start sucking dick with a camera in their face.
Agree about fakehospital, horrible angles, distorting fish eye view, nothing to keep or come back to.
All in all, there is nothing on this network I'd come back to.
PublicAgent may have been good, if I were into face and dick closeups.
FakeTaxi/UK is all about the same bad angles, face, dick and guy ass closeups.
|
04-25-15 12:49am
|
Reply
20
|
Girlsway
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from elephant:
Thanks so much for the review Standard, I've seen the site a while back when it was just launched but kind off forgot about it, I've recently discovered Mindi Mink so really wouldn't mind seeing more of her, she reminds me of Tanya Tate in her acting, they both seem to get turned on by dirty talk and I really love that. Yeah Sapphic Erotica early days were a joy, only today coincidentally I had a look at the site now a days and its just more like ddf type done up girls which really don't do anything for me, I much prefer normal everyday makeup and less glam with my lesbian porn, Some of the old Sapphics had some amazing girls that were shot really well but appeared much more real than some of the robot acting these days on sites. The only lesbian site I keep an eye on these days are fillyfilms and girlsoutwest, both have hit and misses like most sites but the gems are stand out movies in my collection. I also used to love Lezcutes and welivetogether (gone down hill I think of recent times)
I'll go and check out this site and might treat myself.
|
12-04-16 09:00am
|
Reply
21
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Comment
from Karup:
Same comment I replied to your review of Karups.com...
Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. That said, as long as you begin a download within that 10 minute window of you accessing a page, you should have no problems completing the download. The 10 minute page expiration does not apply to a file that is already in the process of being downloaded.
If you're using a download manager, perhaps even a multi-part download manager and that download manager tries to launch a download for a new part after 10 minutes, etc... that would of course cause a problem. Or if your download breaks and you click again after 10 minutes to resume it, that will obviously cause an issue because the link will have expired.
If you are having problems I would suggest that you reach out to our support address and they will be able to help determine why you're experiencing problems - support@eentsupport.com .
We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc...
|
12-06-17 11:49pm
|
Reply
22
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
from tangub:
"Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it."
Surely that is the purpose of having a unique username and password to access the content. Is he suggesting that non members can somehow bypass the log in page and access the content therefore paying members have to put up with these kind of restrictions? Surely if people are sharing passwords then you should have your servers set up to detect and block multiple log ins from different locations or ip addresses and block the access from those passwords.
As someone who would be quite interested in joining these sites I think I will save my money as I don't have the patience to deal with that kind of nonsense.
|
05-22-18 09:01am
|
Reply
23
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Comment
from Karup:
Same comment I replied to your review of Karups.com...
Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. That said, as long as you begin a download within that 10 minute window of you accessing a page, you should have no problems completing the download. The 10 minute page expiration does not apply to a file that is already in the process of being downloaded.
If you're using a download manager, perhaps even a multi-part download manager and that download manager tries to launch a download for a new part after 10 minutes, etc... that would of course cause a problem. Or if your download breaks and you click again after 10 minutes to resume it, that will obviously cause an issue because the link will have expired.
If you are having problems I would suggest that you reach out to our support address and they will be able to help determine why you're experiencing problems - support@eentsupport.com .
We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc...
|
12-06-17 11:49pm
|
Reply
24
|
Karups
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Karup:
(standard's Reply)
Please check your PMs.
|
12-19-17 02:06pm
|
Reply
25
|
Karups
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Karup:
(standard's Reply)
In the example you provided, if any/all of the sets/movies/links that are in the queue have already been generated, then yes, they will indeed fail to even begin because your first download took 12 minutes (2 minutes longer than it takes links to expire).
Does your download manager require that you provide links of all of the sets/movies that you want to download prior to running it? Or can it be set to open URLs on its own after a movie completes downloading? If so, that seems like it would solve the problem.
Another option is that you could download 3 movies at a time and all three would start at the same time so all would work, just slower as the three split your connection. But if one at a time, the 2nd one would fail unless the first one finished in less than 10 minutes, as by the time the 2nd file started, the link would have expired.
|
12-14-17 12:04am
|
