Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Adam And Eve TV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(haagar's Reply)
Thanks! This is why I love Porn Users...... inside information before I have to pay to go inside. :)
|
11-16-14 05:52am
|
Reply
2
|
Adam And Eve TV
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Review
from Jay G:
Watched a preview & looked at the site and am still unsure if it is soft-core or hard.
Concept looks fun, but if it's soft-core it seems hardly worth the trouble since I already have cinemax and other soft core on my cable.
|
11-12-14 10:05am
|
Reply
3
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Review
from dracken:
Good review and a good looking site.
I am amazed every time a webmaster listens to the users but if you give constructive feedback instead of just complaining they often help you out and if they don't they're not worth your money ;)
Thanks,
|
07-08-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
4
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review, glad they listened! We Porn Users will make a difference, improving porno for everybody!
|
07-08-12 05:54am
|
Reply
5
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Review
from lk2fireone:
Welcome to PU.
Nice details in your reviews, but even more details/opinions would make the reviews even better.
|
05-03-11 09:46am
|
Reply
6
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Capn:
(haagar's Reply)
I noticed the Webmaster did not reply to jaqw's query.
You can see a fuller discussion of the topic here:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=1894
|
06-17-11 06:22am
|
Reply
7
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ccoldmilk:
(haagar's Reply)
More information on the two sites:
1) www.clubelegantangel.com
Allows downloads of videos: many up to full 1080p.
Does add new EA videos, but added months after initial release. For example, "It's A Sister Thing! #1" which was first released Oct 2016 is listed here with date 2017-09-15.
They have the older Mason (Sam No) and William H. titles (which is what I was looking for).
2) www.elegantangel.com
Stream only. No downloads. The only place to get new EA videos. I did not have time to look carefully but I have read that not all older videos are available. For example, under Lily Carter elegantangel.com lists 10 titles while clubelegantangel.com lists 12: "Just Tease #4" and the extended "Wasteland" are not listed on elegantangel.com.
Please note the above information is from the free tour of both sites. I have not yet looked inside as a member. I will probably sign up for clubelegantangel.com as they have downloads and I am mostly only interested in completing my collection of older titles.
I hope this helps anyone who is trying to decide between the two.
I really wish EA had not split their catalog. The other major studios all allow full downloads. Downloads are important to get full HD at decent bitrates (streaming is too variable and auto-degrades when the network is busy).
With the popularity of Netflix and other TV/movie streaming, my ISP is heavily congested in the evenings when everyone is watching their shows. I need to be able to download my videos during the quiet time from midnight to 8am. I wake up and viola there's my porn. :-)
|
10-01-17 11:06am
|
Reply
8
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Amanda:
(haagar's Reply)
Thanks for head's up, haagar!
|
06-15-17 06:13am
|
Reply
9
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from careylowell:
(haagar's Reply)
Ah.. your reply is the wording I was searching for to explain why this site raises not my wang but the hair on the back of my neck. Your theory rings true.
Its the Enron of porn.
|
07-29-17 09:01am
|
Reply
10
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Comment
from pat362:
Did you really think anything had changed since I posted my comments last year? They have a system that works for them and that is why they are not changing it. I wished that I had gotten a full refund as I never actually used any of the sites services but I at least have the right to bitch about their bad business practice because of that. You can now do the same. If enough people feel like you and I then maybe one day they will have to change their policy. Mind you by the time they do. The damage will have been to great and it will be too late to fix the problem.
In many ways I'm not sad that I didn't get to join. I like their choice of models and some of the stuff they get these women to do is right up my alley but every time I see a trailer. All I am left with is a sick feeling because it's just not sexually stimulating. You wouldn't think that porn shot in a bright white room on bright white furniture would somehow look dark and dingy and yet that is what I usually feel about what they produce. of course it doesn't help that it feels mysoginistic in nature and filled with circus acts.
|
02-24-15 06:17pm
|
Reply
11
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Review
from graymane:
Well, haager, This might be a very pleasant surprise for you. because You've got the limited attention of an 80 year old seasoned pro, who's been there, done that, whatever and wherever it has to do with the birth, onward to maturity of Porn.
I hardily suggest you pass this on to the webmaster of Vivid, because anybody in his right mind associated with Vivid wouldn't simply pass it off without reciprocating with a valued return, commensurate, of course, to the worthiness effect forthcoming favoring this appraisal.
thus, hereunder, should go to the webmaster.
otherwise I'd use it all as a thread posted in the forum.
I, the reviewer, herewith chooses to comment on this review, not only because of Vivid's extraordinary filming merits, but simply because of it's endurably venerable name.
You might interested to know I'm one of the few here who was around when Adult theaters opened its doors -- hence before the word pervert was introduced to local colloquialism, or even the dictionary for that matter.
Following the onset of ribald film fare (naughty) showing in select theaters of my day, with it's darken multi-seated interiors feathering big screen titillation, albeit cleverly censoring any form, or even a hint of actual coital union.
That is, until censorship began retreating by degrees from the inevitable charging brigade of unstoppable, horny male patrons demanding, and getting more of an eye-full for their hard-earned two-dollar ticket.
Although the pro and con was satisfied with prurient interest working together in their community, the pro-anticensorship's greed slyly edged bolder as theaters maintained the illusion of playing by the rules but were, in effect, subtly expanding porn to new heights.
It was within that interim that Vivid made it's debut into the business of producing Porn.
From Vivid filming locations came progressively improved production value, coupled with prevailing cast of the best performing talent in adult films.
This happily went on for the few short years I was privy to be comfortably seated in darkness, as the projector cranked out scenes depicting tame action of boy/girl cavorting in foreplay leading to simulating the act of having sex.
However, The onset of cassette, and later DVD rentals from adult book stores, became a blow that bought adult theaters to it's knees.
But the local store rental bonanza would later be threatened by the same fate, thereby engulfed in slavery to the powerful electronic entity which we all know now as the Internet.
Vivid, Unlike many pay-sites, which once were entertainment cash cows wallowing in prosperity, have since fallen by the wayside, while others are floundering to keep their collective heads above water.
Vivid, however, got right in step with Internet's premium status quo, and proudly shares the honor of keeping neck-an-neck with the established leaders.
Hello, Vivid. Goodbye to those fallen by the wayside in their pursuit to out-pace thee.
|
01-31-14 03:35am
|
Reply
12
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review.
I like studio sites, though they're often poorly done. Vivid was obviously a powerhouse in the porn business for years but until you posted the review I had pretty much forgotten about them. Thanks for bringing them back to life for me.
What will be a deal-breaker is the streaming only status of the site. While you found a work-around for downloads, the fact that the site doesn't support them means they won't get me as a member. It bugs me that in an attempt to curtail privacy some sites choose to penalize paying customers like us.
|
01-30-14 10:27am
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|