| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Black 'N Hung
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from all4youguy:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Yes, exactly. I trust Verotel, CCBill or even EPOCH.
They pretend on the homepage to work with Epoch but this is actually another one and I did not pay attention.
I have spent now hours trying to find contacts information, then contacting them, writing emails, etc.
I have never seen something like this.
|
09-25-12 11:55pm
|
Reply
77
|
Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Yes, agreed GPL, this is what the forum is for. Hopefully it highlights the good ones and exposes the bad ones, and at the same earning itelf some money.
|
09-06-12 12:31pm
|
Reply
78
|
Bound In Public
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from mbaya:
Sounds a lot like every site in Kink.com. However, in those other sites you also have the option of downloading scenes, not just whole video. That separates the interviews, which I never watch or download.
|
07-13-11 06:40am
|
Reply
79
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Ambition:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thank you for your hearty welcome! I'm enjoying my stay so far and will defenitely post more reviews!
|
09-19-12 02:07am
|
Reply
80
|
Boynapped
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ambition:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thank you for your kind words! I'm glad you appreciate my review. I was so happy to see they got rid of DRM. Their content was always very hot, but I never understood, why they use DRM. People who pay to see their content receive limitations while those who pirate their porn can view it DRM-free. The site seems to be part of the GayLifeNetwork now, at least the downloads are hosted there. They seem to improve constantly. JizzAddiction just got added to their bonus content, that's the first bonus worth watching so far.
|
01-16-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
81
|
Boynapped
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Jay G:
DRM.....(Downright Rotten Method)....that's really ancient and stupid terchnology. It's hard to understand how with modern technology, someone could still believe this is a useful means of extracting money from customers.
DRM only hurts customers who PAY for your product, making your work almost unusable to them. Hackers and pirates can get around DRM as easily as burglers can pick locks.
DRM....bad idea.
|
11-11-12 11:40pm
|
Reply
82
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Watson:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I would agree. Sounds very dodgy. I would be cancelling my card unless a further proper conversation with Brazzers doesn't result in
a) membership and
b) general goodness.
|
12-08-11 12:35pm
|
Reply
83
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Khan:
Just taking a quick look ...
It appears their "preview" is the scene descriptions (and tumbs) they have on the landing page along with the model bios and scenes one sees when one clicks on any of the head shots on that same page.
Not sure if that helps or not.
|
01-24-14 03:25pm
|
Reply
84
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from manholelover:
Oh, the relief we can finally join this! I too joined it for a month. The uploads don't seem to be as frequent as before, so will rejoin in a month or too (if us humble Brits are allowed!). I don't like the fact they interview the performers afterwards - very much like the kink.com sites, but I suppose this must be a legal requirement. At least you don't have to watch those bits, and can choose not to download them, unlike boundinpublic.com.
|
10-03-12 11:36am
|
Reply
85
|
Brutal Tops
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
I was just looking at some trailers from this site last night actually, and have also tried to access it. i can't really see much difference between this and Straight Hell. But, as we are forbidden from joining both of them, the question remains academic!
|
09-05-11 11:42pm
|
Reply
86
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I find that I generally don't rely on a raw number score that a lot of sites give, including TBP and our own reviews here. With TBP and the detailed reviews here I much prefer an explanation about the site. I figure that I might score a site low just because I don't like a particular niche but another PU member might score it high because they do like that niche. I try to remain objective in assigning a score. I've reviewed sites that I really didn't like but that had high-quality videos and pictures, decent download speeds and were well laid out. I still scored them high because they were good sites regardless of the fact that I didn't personally like the material.
And I agree - PU is a great place to hang out. This is probably among the most civil user-driven sites on the internet!
|
09-17-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
87
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the comments, gaypornlover. This was clearly my own fault given that there weren't many positive comments about the site from anyone. I got burned, but I don't feel too bad since I knew that I was likely to get burned. I had a recent experience where I signed up for a site expecting to be able to download scenes and learned it was streaming only. That site, including the Terms of Service, was pretty vague so I did feel cheated there.
I'd guess that a serious disadvantage that you have, as one of the few gay PU members, is that you're breaking the trail more than the rest of us. For most of the sites I've joined some other PU member has likely been there before. I probably haven't said this loudly enough, but I'm glad you stick around and contribute as much as you do. I may not have any personal interest in the sites you review (but I always read them!), but I am interested in your perspective and you write excellent reviews that will form a great basis for new gay members as they join PU.
|
09-17-12 09:11am
|
Reply
88
|
Cam4.com
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
Great to read your take on this site too. I really don't understand why people would go to other webcam sites and pay a premium as there are some really hot people on here, and it generally has quite a friendly feel.
|
09-20-11 11:00am
|
Reply
89
|
Carmen Cocks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Marcus:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Yes, totally. It's a good example of joining the site for the MODEL, not for the CONTENT. I think Carmen looks incredible, but it's definitely a site to join once and then never again. I would have given another 5 points had it not had claims that it was being updated weekly with HD videos.
|
04-14-12 02:12pm
|
Reply
90
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from spagett:
Great review mate. Could I ask a bit of help and ask how you go about cancelling your membership. They haven't made it very clear how to do this.
thanks
|
02-05-13 12:05pm
|
Reply
91
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Congrats on a great review. Even though this site isn't my thing I can tell you took a lot of time and care to put this together.
|
01-26-13 06:33pm
|
Reply
92
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from manholelover:
Great to back reading your reviews. Excellent review too, as usual. I've seen the odd scene from this site, but prefer CMNM...
I don't understand why they have two sites. What would be the rationale? If they wanted to update or refresh the existing site, then they could do that without creating what amounts to a clone...
|
07-26-12 03:44am
|
Reply
93
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
She just did a spot check so I have no way of knowing if it was a "latest stories".
Perhaps a current member can answer that one for you.
Sorry I wasn't of more help.
|
11-07-11 10:15am
|
Reply
94
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Khan:
I asked one of our editors to take a look and she said they do still have (at least some) videos. She saw in browser and windows media (.wmv) files for download.
Hope that helps.
|
11-07-11 10:08am
|
Reply
95
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
I can't imagine members actually asking them to stop doing videos. They probably can't afford the costs involved. As it's from the same company that makes StraightHell.com, and their weird insistence that the site remain banned in the UK to maintain the anonymity of the performers (still waiting for my reply from their editor), it does all seem a bit fishy. And yes, given that loads of their photos are seen on blogs such as Gay Demon and Queerclick.com, I doubt if it would be worth paying the subscription.
|
08-06-11 11:51am
|
Reply
96
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
"Awful customer service"... sadly that seems to be a very common thread among porn sites...
|
07-28-11 03:21am
|
Reply
97
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I know some people prefer photos over videos, but I highly doubt that there were any 'user requests' to stop shooting videos. That's pretty fishy...
|
07-26-11 04:09pm
|
Reply
98
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from mbaya:
I also like CFNM, but undoubtedly not the sites that you would like. I don't care for male humiliation for example. I am glad that you make the distinction between the two kinds of sites and I agree that DRM is a nonstarter. I like CFNM that shows imagination and is not just sex with clothed females.
|
07-13-11 06:45am
|
Reply
99
|
Christina Skye XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
It's possible that she wanted to do porn to earn a living but may have discovered that it's easier said than done these days. I'm sure that some girls are still making a decent living doing porn but the majority of porn girls aren't making enough to live on. Just look at the number of porn performers turning to prostitution. It's so high that it's less time consumming to write a list of which porn girl isn't escorting than the other way around.
|
08-18-11 06:09pm
|
Reply
100
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ergo Proxy:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
If he didn't pay Clips4Sale directly he has a problem. Once I bought a clip which was extremely crappy and got my money back, but this was a regular clip...
|
11-30-12 03:17pm
|
