| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from hodayathink:
As far as I know (and I know a couple people that have paid for videos), they are trustworthy with your info.
As for the prices, this is what videos cost if you want something specific that isn't necessarily "mainstream".
|
11-28-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
102
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
I've never actually heard any horror stories about this site but I would still never use it's services because I find that their prices are offensively expensive.
|
11-28-12 06:23pm
|
Reply
103
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I agree. That's why I sometimes explore here and then go see if there is a full web page. There are also shorter videos like 5-10 minutes. I have bought some of these to get a sense of the performer. So I spend $8 to see if I like someone before getting a membership for $25-$30.
Not a perfect system, just something to consider - it's a possibility out there.
|
08-01-12 04:57am
|
Reply
104
|
Club Regan Reese
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thank you, there are all kinds of pitfalls to watch out for in the porn world. Besides the ones you named off, there's the "lets change this model's name and sell her as a new model" this one is so bad that one of the more respected sites, Nubiles, actually still has one model listed under two names, meaning if a member didn't know her other name, they would miss half of her content they have. In this particular case, the model, now very commonly known as Cindy Hope, was originally known as Klaudia. She had a pretty big transformation in her look, going from an average, girl next door, cute, flat-chested model to a glamorous, very pro looking model with implants. And even though Nubiles is a good site with a very good webmaster, they still haven't put her content under one name despite me posting a comment about it here. One of the other reasons I haven't had a lot of bad sites, I have learned which sites deliver what I'm looking for and join those multiple times per year. Meaning I'm kind of playing it safe, but when I saw this Regan Reese, I was drawn in by her uniqueness and willing to take a risk.
|
09-12-11 11:09pm
|
Reply
105
|
CMNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
When i was a member of First Auditions these videos were included, and I don't think it was a separate site then. Do you get anything else with membership to CMNM?
|
08-18-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
106
|
Dads I'd Like To Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Khan:
I've asked our people to take a look at this one.
Sorry for the inconvenience
This one might work in the mentime ..
http://www.dilfs.com/?t_link=pimp5267:ft:::15:4
|
04-14-13 06:22am
|
Reply
107
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from AlexMercer:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the welcome man, and I am happy to be here. I hope to contribute here, and hopefully provide some useful insight to those looking for it. I am also glad to shed some light onto the Cosplay Deviants situation.
|
10-05-11 03:20am
|
Reply
108
|
Dirty Boy Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ambition:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
It's sad, only 16 of the scenes I wanted had acceptable quality (960x540), but 320p or even 240p isn't watchable anymore, especially at low bitrates. I agree, it's very hard to find sites, that do both well. I used to think it's bad, when companies get bought by bigger companies, but what I recently saw (JizzAddiction, BoyNapped) questions me why they gave us such poor quality, when the content was actually shot at a way higher quality. Now that those sites are rebuild and the videos are re-encoded by the bigger companies, that know how to do it, they actually look stunning and are enjoyable.
Don't worry, I'll be posting more reviews very soon.
|
01-26-13 09:33pm
|
Reply
109
|
Dirty Masseur
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BadMrFrosty:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for that. Likewise on the trust thing, also fixed :)
|
04-15-12 02:08am
|
Reply
110
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I like some scenes that show the woman in power and control. It could be just from years of watching Euro hardcore porn where the woman is rarely if ever in control or it could go into my own personal life where I've always just been too big physically for women to even fool with trying to be dominant with me. Where this site struggles in creating that is some of the women aren't that attractive to me, both in looks and attitude. I would like to see a site do this same niche, but have the woman seduce, then humiliate the man by making him do anything she says...to her. I had been most impressed with Reality King's CFNM Secret in creating the niche I am describing. A big part of these niches that focus on giving women the control, is my wife watching it since she has two things working against sexual control with me. She was raised in a country where all women are taught to be submissive and she loves the CFNM sites. If anything, I think Divine Bitches tries to break too much ground.
And I agree about Kink's sites having problems with being too polished, but I probably wouldn't be comfortable with the content if it was much harder and less planned or more abusive.
|
10-08-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
111
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xexbot:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for that. I agree, it's hard to find male focused BDSM.
|
07-10-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
112
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Marcus:
I agree, I find the name borderline repulsive! It's like it's come from some random word generator where it pairs a type of animal with a bodily function.
|
12-11-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
113
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
I never asked them but I know that it`s not something they came up with recently because they have had this name for many many years.
I`m not sure which came first. The studio shooting content only for the VHS/DVD market or the the one shooting content for internet/dvd.
|
12-09-12 09:58am
|
Reply
114
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Capn:
I really don't think it appears to matter to them. As long as they have a memorable name, pleasant or otherwise, they are happy with that.
ALS Scan was mentioned by RA.
The 'scan' part of the name, for me, harks back to the 1990's when a lot of porn was scanned in. Time to move on from that name IMO as it would infer very old content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-09-12 07:12am
|
Reply
115
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I agree with you. I have no idea why they'd choose such a name. I also think that the guys at Diesel need a better name than Skinny Super Girl because 'skinny' is a derogative word and Gloria deserves nothing deroratory. Likewise with "ALS Scan." Yes, it probably made sense when they named the site "All Ladies Shaved" way back when, but if I ever hear the phrase "ALS Scan" in real life I won't treat it as a good thing.
|
12-08-12 08:29pm
|
Reply
116
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Absolutely agree with you. It's a hideous name for a porn site. A real turn off.
|
12-08-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
117
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from exotics4me:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
A lot of times, you will notice that the members who like photos more than videos are older. I'm not quite into the older group, but am old enough to say the first 5-6 years I saw porn, it was in magazines, Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler. Photos also seem to be favored by those that like using their imagination. I seem to go back and forth. I'll have months where I just join DVD sites, no photos at all, then I will jump to a site that has photos and videos, then find myself on the more artistic very softcore sites. Which most have videos, but they are usually extremely boring. I may be trying to find some kind of balance too. My wife "almost" hates hardcore, she loves softcore, so I find myself trying to balance them out, but I do think the nostalgic, remembering old magazines and the photos, does play a big role in these photo only sites surviving.
|
09-12-11 10:59pm
|
Reply
118
|
Dominated Men.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Khan:
Ok, I've asked them to do a new screenshot. Should be changed out w/in a few days.
As far as the site facts ...
Since we don't currently have a log in to the site, I'm not sure when they'll be able to update those. If you see something significantly wrong you're welcome to submit an error report.
We'll look forward to seeing your review.
|
12-20-12 07:12am
|
Reply
119
|
Erotic 4 U
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I appreciate your comment, GPL.
In answer to your question: I did indeed get hold of the site's billing agency: www.CGBILLING.com
Not surprisingly, they suggested I resolve my issues by communicating with the site webmaster or support team.
They did give me another option wherein I'd get a refund -- which I accepted. But having done that, I was barred from subscribing to any future sites under their billing umbrella.
So hey!...... I ain't gonna lose any sleep over that.
|
07-01-12 07:14pm
|
Reply
120
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Yes it seems the option to join for $20 per month is no longer available. I've joined plenty of sites before that are no longer active or updating so it seems a crazy policy to me to remove the monthly join option.
|
03-18-12 11:55pm
|
Reply
121
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks and a quick correction: They update during weekends too. Must have been half asleep when writing...
|
08-21-11 01:32am
|
Reply
122
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MisterMark:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for your input.
|
02-14-12 05:16pm
|
Reply
123
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Omne35:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Hi, thanks for the kind words.
The cum shots are easy to notice once you look for them. They show the sex up to a certain point, then they cut to the guy's face going through all kinds of contortions, then they cut back to the main event and there's semen all over but nothing actually coming out. Let's be realistic, they're not going to film the guys face and miss an actual cum shot going on. Some of the expressions bring to mind a neurological problem, not intense passion.
Other times they cut directly from the sex to a shot with everything done, same issue, why would they not film it?
They get pretty elaborate sometimes having the girl mouth some stuff then drool it out, at other times it's just saliva. Some of the women are better at it than others. If you look close you can sometimes notice that the guy has something in their hand while they're stroking and it flies around.
Since it looks like they film several videos a day using the same guys I can understand that they aren't normally going to be able to cum 8 times in a day. When you see a lot of the videos in a row, such as when you're downloading in bulk, you can see the sets are the same as far as movable items like flower arrangements and clothing.
However, I'd rather they just skipped the weird facial expressions and ended it.
|
11-21-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
124
|
First Auditions
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
Sounds like an interesting twist to First Auditions. I was a member about a year ago and downloaded most of their stuff, which, although the concept was hot, I did find a bit monotonous. This sounds like a good idea and I await your review eagerly...
|
08-18-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
125
|
First Auditions
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from mbaya:
Very nice first review. Welcome to PU.
|
07-09-11 09:00pm
|
